Book contents
- Critical Race Judgments
- Critical Race Judgments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Advisory Committee
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 347 U.S. 483 (1954)BROWN et al.
- Part I Membership and Inclusion
- Part II Participation and Access
- Part III Property and Space
- Part IV Intimate Choice and Autonomy
- Part V Justice
- 92 U.S. 542Supreme Court of the United States
- 481 U.S. 279Supreme Court of the United States
- 92 U.S. 542Supreme Court of the United States
- 418 U.S. 24Supreme Court of the United States
- 782 F.2d 1038 Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- __ U.S. __ (1971)Supreme Court of the United States
- 28 S. Ct. 324Supreme Court of the United States
- United States Court of AppealsFor the District of Columbia Circuit
- Stopping the Conversation about Isolation by Race and Poverty Before It Really Began: The Case of San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)
92 U.S. 542Supreme Court of the United States
WHREN et al.v.UNITED STATESNo. 95–5841Argued April 17, 1996.Decided June 10, 1996.
from Part V - Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2022
- Critical Race Judgments
- Critical Race Judgments
- Copyright page
- Contents
- About the Contributors
- Advisory Committee
- Foreword
- Introduction
- 347 U.S. 483 (1954)BROWN et al.
- Part I Membership and Inclusion
- Part II Participation and Access
- Part III Property and Space
- Part IV Intimate Choice and Autonomy
- Part V Justice
- 92 U.S. 542Supreme Court of the United States
- 481 U.S. 279Supreme Court of the United States
- 92 U.S. 542Supreme Court of the United States
- 418 U.S. 24Supreme Court of the United States
- 782 F.2d 1038 Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
- __ U.S. __ (1971)Supreme Court of the United States
- 28 S. Ct. 324Supreme Court of the United States
- United States Court of AppealsFor the District of Columbia Circuit
- Stopping the Conversation about Isolation by Race and Poverty Before It Really Began: The Case of San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973)
Summary
Justice Marshall* delivered the opinion of the Court.
In this case, we decide whether it is consistent with the Fourth Amendment for a police officer who observed a traffic violation to use that violation as the justification to perform a racially-selective traffic stop, or as the pretext to investigate a crime for which the officer does not have probable cause. We answer that question in the negative.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Critical Race JudgmentsRewritten U.S. Court Opinions on Race and the Law, pp. 582 - 601Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022