Assessing the Social Consequences of Planned Interventions

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511804434.016

15 - Assessing the Social Consequences of Planned Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Frank Vanclay

Edited by

Robert White

Show author details

Frank Vanclay: Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Robert White: Affiliation:
University of Tasmania

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Communities experience continual change. Much of that change is deliberate, the result of planned interventions (policies, plans, programs or projects) that have been initiated and/or implemented by government, at local, state and national levels, by the private sector, or by community groups. While planned interventions are undertaken to achieve desired objectives, there are always unplanned adverse impacts on the environment and on people. In order to consider the appropriateness of a specific intervention, such as whether regulatory approval should be given for a project, and/or what conditions should be imposed, assessment of the likely consequences, both positive and negative, is required.

Projects have many obvious negative consequences on people who live near the site. They also have less obvious impacts that only emerge over time or with careful analysis. Policies, plans and programs also have adverse impacts. Consideration of impacts in the design phase can lead to a reduction in the adverse consequences and to an increase in the benefits of the planned intervention. Planning should be a dynamic process that uses adaptive management principles to iteratively consider the outcomes (positive and negative) of the intervention.

Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is the process of ‘analysing, monitoring and managing the social consequences of development’ (IAIA 2003: 1). SIA, in its ideal form at least, is a powerful approach that can lead to many benefits. Communities benefit by having more say in decisions; they become revitalised through participation; social capital is built; harmful impacts are avoided; and benefits for communities are maximised.

Type: Chapter
Information: Controversies in Environmental Sociology , pp. 257 - 274

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804434.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnstein, S. R. 1969, ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, American Institute of Planning Journal 35(4): 216–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Australia 1999, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (No. 91, 1999)

Australia 2000a, Gene Technology Act 2000 (No. 169, 2000)

Australia 2000b, Gene Technology Bill 2000 Explanatory Memorandum

Becker, H. 1997, Social Impact Assessment: Method and Experience in Europe, North America and the Developing World, London: University College London Press

Becker, H., and F. Vanclay (eds) 2003, The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar

Boothroyd, P. 1995, ‘Policy assessment’. In Vanclay and Bronstein, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, pp. 83–126

Boothroyd, P. 1998, Social Policy Assessment Research: The establishment, the underground, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre Working Series Paper #5. http://www.idrc.ca/socdev/pub/documents/spar.html (accessed 20 January 2004)

Burdge, R. J., and F. Vanclay 1995, ‘Social Impact Assessment’. In Vanclay and Bronstein, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, pp. 31–66

Council of Australian Governments (Council of Australian Governments) 1997, Principles and Guidelines for National Standard Setting and Regulatory Action by Ministerial Councils and Standard-Setting Bodies, Canberra: Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. http://www.dpmc.gov.au/pdfs/coagpg.pdf (accessed 20 January 2004)

Dale, A., C. N. Taylor and M. Lane (eds) 2001, Social Assessment in Natural Resource Management Institutions, Melbourne: CSIRO

Egre, D., and Senecal, P. 2003, ‘Social impact assessments of large dams throughout the world’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(3): 215–24CrossRef Google Scholar

Fisher, M. 2001, ‘Hastening the evolution of Australian rural industry policy’. In Dale et al., Social Assessment in Natural Resource Management Institutions, pp. 231–41

Harvey, N. 1998, Environmental Impact Assessment: Procedures, practice and prospects in Australia, Melbourne: Oxford University Press

International Association for Impact Assessment (International Association for Impact Assessment) 2003, International Principles for Social Impact Assessment, Fargo ND: International Association for Impact Assessment. www.iaia.org/Publications/SP2.pdf (accessed 20 January 2004). Also published as F. Vanclay 2003, ‘International Principles for Social Impact Assessment’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(1): 5–11

Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment 1994, ‘Guidelines and principles for Social Impact Assessment’, Impact Assessment 12(2): 107–52CrossRef

Interorganizational Committee on Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment 2003, ‘Principles and Guidelines for Social Impact Assessment in the USA’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 21(3): 231–50CrossRef

Lane, M., A. Dale and N. Taylor 2001, ‘Social assessment in natural resource management’. In Dale et al. Social Assessment in Natural Resource Management Institutions, pp. 3–12

Lockie, S. 2001, ‘Social Impact Assessment in Review’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19(4): 277–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Partidário, M. 1999, ‘Strategic environmental assessment: principles and potential’. In J. Petts (ed.) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, London: Blackwell, pp. 12–32

Partidário, M. 2000, ‘Elements of an strategic environmental assessment framework’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20(6): 647–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Queensland 1990, Local Government (Planning and Environment) Act 1990

Roberts, R. 2003, ‘Involving the public’. In Becker and Vanclay, International Handbook, pp. 258–77

Slootweg, R., Vanclay, F. and Schooten, M. 2001, ‘Function evaluation as a framework for the integration of social and environmental impact assessment’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19(1): 19–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Srinivasan, B., and L. Mehta 2003, ‘Assessing gender impacts’. In Becker and Vanclay, International Handbook, pp. 161–78

Taylor, C. N., C. H. Bryan and C. G. Goodrich 1995, Social Assessment: Theory, process and techniques, 2nd edn, Christchurch, NZ: Taylor Baines & Associates

United States Agency for International Development (United States Agency for International Development) n.d., Social Soundness Analysis (ADS Supplementary Reference 202). http://www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/200/2026s7.pdf (accessed 20 January 2004)

United States Agency for International Development 2004, About United States Agency for International Development. http://www.usaid.gov/about_usaid/index.html (accessed 20 January 2004)

Vanclay, F. 1999, ‘Social Impact Assessment’. In J. Petts (ed.) Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol. 1, Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 301–26

Vanclay, F. 2002a, ‘Social Impact Assessment’. In M. Tolba (ed.) Responding to Global Environmental Change, Chichester, UK: Wiley, pp. 387–93

Vanclay, F. 2002b, ‘Conceptualising social impacts’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22(3): 183–211CrossRef Google Scholar

Vanclay, F. 2003a, ‘Conceptual and methodological advances in Social Impact Assessment’. In Becker and Vanclay, International Handbook, pp. 1–10

Vanclay, F. 2003b, ‘Experiences from the field of Social Impact Assessment: where do TBL, Environmental Impact Assessment and Social Impact Assessment fit in relation to each other?’. In B. Pritchard, A. Curtis, J. Spriggs and R. Le Heron (eds) Social Dimensions of the Triple Bottom Line in Rural Australia, Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences, pp. 61–80

Vanclay, F., and D. Bronstein (eds) 1995, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Chichester, UK: Wiley

Verheem, R., and Tonk, J. 2000, ‘Strategic environmental assessment: one concept, multiple forms’, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18(3): 177–82CrossRef Google Scholar