Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:25:52.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Agricultural Production and the Ecological Question

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Geoffrey Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Lynda Cheshire
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Carol Ackroyd Richards
Affiliation:
University of Queensland
Robert White
Affiliation:
University of Tasmania
Get access

Summary

Environmental degradation is a worldwide phenomenon. It is manifested in the clearing of forests, polluted waterways, soil erosion, the loss of biodiversity, the presence of chemicals in the ecosystem and a host of other concerns. Modern agricultural practices have been implicated in much of this degradation. This chapter explores the connections between the form of agricultural production undertaken in advanced nations – so-called ‘productivist’ or ‘high-tech’ farming – and environmental degradation. It is argued that the entrenchment of productivist agriculture has placed considerable, and continuing, pressures on the environment and, second, that while no new options for a more sustainable agriculture and new policies are being proposed to tackle the existing problem, the underlying basis of productivist agriculture remains largely unchallenged. The prediction is that environmental degradation will continue unabated until more dramatic (and possibly less palatable) measures are taken to alter the behaviour of producers and the trajectory of farming and grazing industries throughout the world.

The ‘ecological question’ we pose is straightforward: is it possible for modern agriculture – one currently wedded to a regime of petrochemicals, pesticides, weedicides, insecticides, artificial fertilisers, crop monocultures and intensive animal production – to become sustainable?

BACKGROUND TO THE ISSUES

Environmental issues have been recognised throughout recent history. Soil fertility depletion was a major concern, for example, in Europe and North America during the forty years of the mid-1800s, prompting social thinkers like Karl Marx to theorise the role of capitalism in environmental decline (Foster & Magdoff 1998).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, P., and Kovach, M. 2000, ‘The capitalist composition of organic: the potential of markets in fulfilling the promise of organic agriculture’, Agriculture and Human Values 17: 221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almas, R., and G. Lawrence (eds) 2003, Globalisation, Localisation and Sustainable Livelihoods, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 189–203
Altieri, M. 1998, ‘Ecological impacts of industrial agriculture and the possibilities for truly sustainable farming’, Monthly Review 50(3): 60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argent, N. 2002, ‘From pillar to post? in search of the post-productivist countryside in Australia’, Australian Geographer 33(1): 97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, D. 1995, Saving the Planet with Pesticides and Plastic: The environmental triumph of high-yield farming, Indianapolis IN: Hudson Institute
Bonanno, A., L. Busch, W. Friedland, L. Gouveia and E. Mingione (eds) 1994, From Columbus to ConAgra: The globalisation of agriculture and food, University Press of Kansas
Burch, D., and R. Rickson 2001, ‘Industrialised agriculture: agribusiness, input dependency and vertical integration’. In Lockie and Bourke, Rurality Bites, pp. 165–77
Buttel, F. 2001, ‘Environmental sociology and the sociology of natural resources: strategies for synthesis and cross-fertilisation’. In Lawrence et al., Environment, Society and Natural Resources, pp. 19–37
Campbell, H., and Coombes, B. 1999, ‘Green protectionism and organic food exporting from New Zealand: crisis experiments in the breakdown of Fordist trade and agricultural policies’, Rural Sociology 64(2): 302–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cary, J., T. Webb and N. Barr 2002, Understanding Landholders' Capacity to Change to Sustainable Practices, Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences, Agriculture, Fisheries, Forestry – Australia
Clark, J., and Murdoch, J. 1997, ‘Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: a reflection on three case studies’, Sociologia Ruralis 37(1): 38–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. 1980, ‘Capitalist agricultural development and the exploitation of the propertied laborer’. In F. Buttel and H. Newby (eds) The Rural Sociology of the Advanced Societies, Montclair NJ: Allenheld, Osmun
Dore, J., and J. Woodhill 1999, Sustainable Regional Development: Executive summary of the final report, Canberra: Greening Australia
Foster, J., and Magdoff, F. 1998, ‘Liebig, Marx, and the depletion of soil fertility: relevance for today's agriculture’, Monthly Review 50(3): 32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, I., and G. Lawrence 2001, A Future for Regional Australia: Escaping global misfortune, Cambridge University Press
Heaton, S. 2001, Organic Farming, Food Quality and Human Health: A review of the evidence, Bristol, UK: UK Soil Association
Heffernan, W. 1998, ‘Agriculture and monopoly capital’, Monthly Review 50(3): 46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert-Cheshire, L. 2000, ‘Contemporary strategies for rural community development in Australia. A governmentality perspective’, Journal of Rural Studies 16(2): 203–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert-Cheshire, L. 2001, ‘“Changing people to change things”: building capacity for self-help in natural resource management. A governmentality perspective’. In Lawrence et al., Environment, Society and Natural Resources, pp. 270–82
Higgins, V. 2002, ‘Self-reliant citizens and targeted populations: the case of Australian agriculture in the 1990s’, Arena 19: 161–77Google Scholar
Hindmarsh, R., and G. Lawrence (eds) 2004, Recoding Nature: Critical perspectives on genetic engineering, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press
Holmes, J. 2002, ‘Diversity and change in Australia's rangelands: a post-productivist transition with a difference?’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27: 362–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilbery, B., and I. Bowler 1998, ‘From Agricultural Productivism to Post-productivism’. In B. Ilbery (ed.) The Geography of Rural Change, Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley-Longman, pp. 57–84
Industry Commission 1998, A Full Repairing Lease: Inquiry into ecologically sustainable land management. Report No. 60, 27 January, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
Landmark Project, The 2002, ‘How to encourage sustainable land use in dryland regions of the Murray-Darling Basin’. Policy Discussion Paper. http://www.landmark.mdbc.gov.au/policy/policy1.htm
Lawrence, G. 1987, Capitalism and the Countryside: The rural crisis in Australia, Sydney: Pluto Press
Lawrence, G. 1998, ‘The Institute for Sustainable Regional Development’. In J. Grimes, G. Lawrence and D. Stehlik (eds) Sustainable Futures: Towards a catchment management strategy for the Central Queensland Region, Rockhampton, Qld: Institute for Sustainable Regional Development, Central Queensland University, pp. 6–8
Lawrence, G. 2003, ‘Sustainable regional development: recovering lost ground’. In Pritchard et al., Social Dimensions of the Triple Bottom Line, pp. 157–70
Lawrence, G., V. Higgins and S. Lockie (eds) 2001, Environment, Society and Natural Resources: Theoretical perspectives from Australia and the Americas, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
Lockie, S. 1998, ‘Environmental and social risks, and the construction of “best practice” in Australian agriculture’, Agriculture and Human Values 15(3): 243–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockie, S. 2000, ‘Environmental governance and legitimation: state–community interactions and agricultural land degradation in Australia’, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 11(2): 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockie, S. 2001, ‘Agriculture and environment’. In Lockie and Bourke, Rurality Bites, pp. 229–42
Lockie, S., and L. Bourke (eds) 2001, Rurality Bites: The social and environmental transformation of rural Australia, Sydney: Pluto Press
Lockie, S., G. Lawrence and L. Cheshire 2004 forthcoming, ‘Nature, culture and globalisation: reconfiguring rural resource governance’. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden and P. Mooney (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage
Lockie, S., and F. Vanclay (eds) 1997, Critical Landcare, Wagga Wagga, NSW: Centre for Rural Social Research, Charles Sturt University
Lyons, K., S. Lockie and G. Lawrence 2004a forthcoming, ‘Organics, biotechnology and food: Australian consumer views’. In R. Hindmarsh and G. Lawrence (eds) Recoding Nature: Critical perspectives on genetic engineering, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press
Lyons, K., D. Burch, G. Lawrence and S. Lockie 2004b forthcoming, ‘Contrasting paths of corporate greening in antipodean agriculture: organic and green production’. In K. Jansen and S. Vellema (eds) Agribusiness and Society: Corporate responses to environmentalism, market opportunities and public regulation, London: Zed Books
McMichael, P. 2003, ‘The power of food’. In Almas and Lawrence, Globalisation, Localisation and Sustainable Livelihoods, pp. 69–85
Magdoff, H., F. Buttel and J. Foster (eds) 1998, Hungry for Profit: Agriculture, Food and Ecology, Special Edition, Monthly Review 50(3)
Marsden, T. 2003, The Condition of Rural Sustainability, Assen, Netherlands: Royal Van Gorcum
Martin, P. 1997, ‘The constitution of power in landcare: a post-structuralist perspective with modernist undertones’. In Lockie and Vanclay, Critical Landcare, pp. 45–56
Martinez-Alier, J. 1999, ‘The socio-ecological embeddedness of economic activity: the emergence of a transdisciplinary field’. In E. Becker and T. Jahn (eds) Sustainability and the Social Sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, pp. 112–39
Mooney, P. 1988, My Own Boss? Boulder CO: Westview
National Farmers' Federation and Australian Conservation Foundation 2000, A National Scenario for Strategic Investment. http://www.nff.org.au/rtc/5point.htm
Norton, J. 2001, ‘Biotechnology to the rescue? Can genetic engineering secure a sustainable future for Australian agriculture?’ In Lockie and Bourke, Rurality Bites, pp. 270–83
O'Connor, J. 1994, ‘Is sustainable capitalism possible?’ In O'Connor, Is Capitalism Sustainable? pp. 152–75
O'Connor, M. 1994a, ‘Introduction: Liberate, accumulate – and bust?’. In O'Connor, Is Capitalism Sustainable? pp. 1–21
O'Connor, M. (ed.) 1994b, Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political economy and the politics of ecology, New York: Guilford Press
Pritchard, B., A. Curtis, J. Spriggs and R. Le Heron (eds) 2003, Social Dimensions of the Triple Bottom Line in Rural Australia, Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences
Richards, C., G. Lawrence and N. Kelly 2003, ‘You can't be green when you are in the red’. ‘New Times, New Worlds, New Ideas: Sociology Today and Tomorrow’ Conference, Australian Sociological Association. Armidale, NSW, 4–6 December
Rogers, E. M. 1962, Diffusion of Innovation, New York: Free Press
Schnaiberg, A. 1980, The Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Segger, P. 1997, ‘World trade in organic foods: a growing reality’. Paper presented at the Future Agenda for Organic Trade, Fifth IFOAM Conference on Trade in Organic Products, Oxford
Stoneham, G., Eigenraam, M., Ridley, A. and Barr, N. 2003, ‘The application of sustainability concepts to Australian agriculture’, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanclay, F. 1997, ‘The social basis of environmental management in agriculture: a background for understanding landcare’. In Lockie and Vanclay, Critical Landcare, pp. 9–27
Vanclay, F., and G. Lawrence 1995, The Environmental Imperative: Eco-social concerns for Australian agriculture, Rockhampton, Qld: Central Queensland University Press
Wilson, G. A. 2001, ‘From productivism to post-productivism … and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26: 77–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. 1990, ‘Development theory and community development practice’. In H. Buller and S. Wright (eds) Rural Development: Problems and practices, Aldershot, UK: Avebury, pp. 41–63

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×