Protecting State Sovereignty from the “Dangers” of Human Rights

Christopher N. J. Roberts

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139035675.005

Chapter 3 - Protecting State Sovereignty from the “Dangers” of Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2014

Christopher N. J. Roberts

Show author details

Christopher N. J. Roberts: Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Law School

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The United States government pursues a strong human rights agenda in international matters. But in national politics the term is rarely, if ever, uttered with respect to US citizens. This practice of strong international support for human rights amidst domestic silence is often considered under the broad banner of American exceptionalism – a concept, a practice, a civic creed that appears at once in opposing normative lights. On one side of the issue, there are those who argue that the United States boasts an illustrious history of rights – a shining city on the hill that has fought for, honored, and set the standard for the modern world. Others, however, are much less forgiving of the United States’ exceptional stance on human rights. The reluctance to ratify basic human rights treaties such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) relegates it to an outlier status among developed nations, making it more of an isolated citadel than a shining city. In recent years the question of whether the nation’s bifurcated approach to human rights is a good thing or not has made for lively debate among small circles of scholars, activists, lawmakers, and jurists. In truth, however, there is relative quiet on the issue. For most Americans the nation’s domestic silence on human rights amidst its strong international support is an accepted fact – no more a subject to debate than the ground upon which one walks.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Contentious History of the International Bill of Human Rights , pp. 72 - 121

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139035675.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Henkin, Louis (1995), “U.S. Ratification of Human Rights Conventions: The Ghost of Senator Bricker,” The American Journal of International Law 89(2):341–50Google Scholar

Tananbaum, Duane, The Bricker Amendment Controversy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988)

Kaufman, Natalie, Human Rights Treaties and the Senate (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990)

Held, David, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Oxford: Polity Press, 1995)

Henkin, Louis (1999), “That ‘S’ Word: Sovereignty, and Globalization, and Human Rights, et cetera,” Fordham Law Review 68(1):1–14Google Scholar

Reisman, W. Michael (1990), “Sovereignty and Human Rights in Contemporary International Law,” American Journal of International Law 84(4):866–76Google Scholar

Held, David, “Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty,” Legal Theory 8(1):1–44

Hinsley, Francis Harry, Sovereignty, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)

Dean, Arthur H. (1953), “Amending the Treaty Power.” Stanford Law Review 6(4):589–612Google Scholar

Sutherland, Arthur E., Jr. (1954), “The Flag, the Constitution, and International Agreements,” Harvard Law Review 68(8):1374–81Google Scholar

Sutherland, Arthur E., Jr. (1951), “Restricting the Treaty Power,” Harvard Law Review 65(8):1305–38Google Scholar

Moore, John Robert (1967), “The Conservative Coalition in the United States Senate, 1942–1945,” The Journal of Southern History 33(3):368–76Google Scholar

Vandenberg, Arthur, “Address to the Senate, January 10, 1945,” Congressional Record 91 (1945): 164–169Google Scholar

Samnøy, Åshild, Human Rights as International Consensus: The Making of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1945–1948 (Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute, 1993)

“Statement by Henri Laugier, Assistant Secretary-General for the United Nations Department of Social Affairs on the Covenant of Human Rights,” April 13, 1950, International Organization 4(3):554

Kelsen, Hans (1946), “ Limitations on the Functions of the United Nations,” Yale Law Journal 55(5):997–1015Google Scholar

Goodrich, Leland M. (1946), “The United Nations and Domestic Jurisdiction,” International Organization 3(1):14–28Google Scholar

Davies, David James Llewelfryn, Domestic Jurisdiction: A Limitation on International Law (London: Grotius Society, 1947)

Henkin, Louis, “Introduction,” in The International Bill of Rights, ed. Henkin, Louis (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981), 4–5

Morsink, Johannes, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999), 3

Korey, William, NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Curious Grapevine (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998), 30

Meyer, Cord, Facing Reality (New York: Harper & Row, 1980), 43

Baratta, Joseph Preston, The Politics of World Federation (Westport: Praeger, 2004), 151

Streit, Clarence K., Union Now: A Proposal for a Federal Union of the Democracies of the North Atlantic (London: Harper & Brothers, 1939), 2

Cousins, Norman, Modern Man is Obsolete (New York: Viking Press, 1945)

Reves, Emery, The Anatomy of Peace (New York: Harper, 1945)

Gilbert, Martin ed., Winston Churchill and Emery Reves: Correspondence, 1937–1964 (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997), 15

Rabinowitch, Eugene (1956), “Ten Years That Changed the World,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 12(1): 2–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyer, Paul (1995), “Exotic Resonances: Hiroshima in American Memory,” Diplomatic History 9(2):297–318CrossRef Google Scholar

Meyer, Cord, Facing Reality (New York: Harper & Row, 1980)

Smith, Reginald H. (1947), “Regional Group Conferences of the American and Canadian Bar Associations on International Law,” American Journal of International Law 41(4):905–8Google Scholar

Holman, Frank E. (1946), “‘World Government’ No Answer to America’s Desire for Peace.” American Bar Association Journal 32:642–45, 718–21Google Scholar

Logan, Rayford W., “The Charter of the United Nations and Its Provisions for Human Rights and the Rights of Minorities and Decisions Already Taken Under This Charter,” in Appeal to the World, ed. Dubois, W. E. B. (New York: NAACP, 1947), 85

Meyer, Cord, Jr. (1949), “A Progress Report on World Federation,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(10):281–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Hutchins, Robert M.. 1947

“The Constitutional Foundation for World Order,” in Principles and Problems of International Politics, eds. Morgenthau, Hans and Thompson, Kenneth (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1950),143–47

Burns, Jennifer, Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Heller, Anne Conover, Ayn Rand and the World She Made (New York: Doubleday, 2009)Google Scholar

Meyer, Cord, Peace or Anarchy (Boston: Little, Brown, 1948)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch (1948), “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” British Year Book of International Law 25: 367Google Scholar

Jessup, Philip C., A Modern Law of Nations (New York: Macmillan, 1948), 41

Hendrick, James Pomeroy (1948), “Progress Report on Human Rights,” Department of State Bulletin 19(475):163Google Scholar

Holman, Frank E. (1948), “President’s Page,” American Bar Association Journal 34(11):1025Google Scholar

Holman, Frank E. (1948), “An ‘International Bill of Rights’: Proposals Have Dangerous Implications for U.S.” American Bar Association Journal 34(11):984–86, 1078–81Google Scholar

Mowrer, Edgar Ansel, The Nightmare of American Foreign Policy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948)

Farmer, Fyke (1946), “Now – Is the Accepted Time” American Bar Association Journal 32(5):267–71Google Scholar

Andrews, Burton (1950), “Amending the Constitution to Provide for Participation in a World Government,” Albany Law Review 14:125–48Google Scholar

Andrews, Burton, (1950) “Constitutional Amendment for Participation in World Government,” New York State Bar Association Bulletin, 22:391Google Scholar

“Survey of Statutory Changes in North Carolina,” North Carolina Law Review (1949), 27(4):497

Suzuki, Masao (2004), “Important or Impotent? Taking Another Look at the 1920 California Alien Land Law,” Journal of Economic History 64(1):125–43. For a broader historical analysis of the Japanese exclusion movement see Daniels, Roger, The Politics of Prejudice, 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O. (1950), “Editorial Comments: Charter Provisions on Human Rights in American Law,” American Journal of International Law 44(3):543Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O. (1948), “Editorial Comments: Integrity of International Instruments,” American Journal of International Law 42(1):108Google Scholar

Press, Lawrence (1952), “Some Aspects of the Human Rights Provisions of the Charter and Their Execution in the United States,” American Journal of International Law 46(2):292Google Scholar

Green, L. C. (1950), “Human Rights and Colour Discrimination,” International Law Quarterly 3(3):422–26Google Scholar

Fleming, William (1951), “Danger to America: The Draft Covenant on Human Rights,” American Bar Association Journal 37(10):739–42Google Scholar

Lockwood, Bert (1984), “The United Nations Charter and United States Civil Rights Litigation: 1946–1955,” Iowa Law Review 69(4):901–56Google Scholar

Holman, Frank E. (1950), “Treaty Law-Making: A Blank Check for Writing a New Constitution,” American Bar Association Journal 36(9):787Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy (1951), “National Courts and Human Rights – The Fujii Case,” American Journal of International Law 45(1)62–82, 70Google Scholar

, E. H. C. (1950), “The Declaration of Human Rights, the United Nations Charter and Their Effect on the Domestic Law of Human Rights,” Virginia Law Review 36(8):1059–84Google Scholar

Schachter, Oscar (1951), “The Charter and the Constitution: The Human Rights Provisions in American Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 4(3):643–59Google Scholar