Nonjudicial Constitutional Interpretation: The Netherlands

doi:10.1017/9781108699068.011

10 - Nonjudicial Constitutional Interpretation: The Netherlands

from IV - Constitutional Adjudication and Interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 February 2022

Maartje De Visser

Edited by

David S. Law

Show author details

David S. Law: Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Book contents

Get access

Summary

This chapter will focus on the manner in which non-judicial actors engage in constitutional guardianship, using the Netherlands as a case study. Article 120 of the Dutch Constitution explicitly prohibits courts from examining the constitutionality of Acts of Parliament. Accordingly, it has fallen to other institutions to ensure that constitutional rules and values are duly taken into account, especially when new legislation is under consideration. The chapter will focus in particular on the role that governments and civil servants play in verifying a bill’s constitutional conformity during the drafting stage; on the Council of State, which is tasked with providing non-partisan advice to the government on new bills; and on how Parliament itself goes about confronting constitutional issues during legislative debates. The Dutch experience shows that it is possible to successfully ensure constitutional supremacy even when judges are not available to act as ultimate protectors of the national constitution.

Keywords

Constitutional dialogue Non-judicial constitutional interpretation Ban on judicial review Executive constitutional interpretation Ex ante constitutional scrutiny Legislative supremacy Council of State Article 120 Netherlands Netherlands Institute for Human Rights

Type: Chapter
Information: Constitutionalism in Context , pp. 216 - 235

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108699068.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

De Visser, Maartje, Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (Hart, 2014), ch. 1.Google Scholar

Feldman, David, ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation and Human Rights’ (2002) Public Law 323.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Janet, ‘Legislative Rights Review: Addressing the Gap Between Ideals and Constraints,’ in Hunt, Murray, Hooper, Hayley and Yowell, Paul (eds.), Parliaments and Human Rights: Redressing the Democratic Deficit (Hart, 2015) 39.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, ‘Constitutional Engagement “Outside the Courts” (and “Inside the Legislature”),’ in Bauman, Richard and Kahana, Tsvi (eds.), The Least Examined Branch: The Role of Legislatures in the Constitutional State (Cambridge University Press, 2006) 378.CrossRef Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Besselink, Leonard, et al. (eds.), Constitutional Law of the EU Member States (Kluwer, 2014) 1203–1239.Google Scholar

Kraan, Karel, ‘The Kingdom of the Netherlands,’ in Prakke, Lucas and Kortmann, Constantijn (eds.), Constitutional Law of 15 EU Member States (Kluwer Law International, 2005) 591.Google Scholar

Voermans, Wim, ‘Constitutional Law,’ in Chorus, Jeroen, Hondius, Ewoud and Voermans, Wim (eds.), Introduction to Dutch Law, 5th ed. (Wolters Kluwer, 2016) 317.Google Scholar

Zoethout, Carla M., ‘On Blasphemy, an Idealistic Constitutional Provision and Militant Democracy: Constitutional Topics in the Netherlands’ (2016) 22 European Public Law 461.Google Scholar