Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:46:33.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Manipulating animal behavior to ensure reintroduction success

from Part III - Behavior-based management: using behavioral knowledge to improve conservation and management efforts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2016

Debra Shier
Affiliation:
University of California Los Angeles, USA
Oded Berger-Tal
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
David Saltz
Affiliation:
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A key pathway through which animals interact with their surroundings is behavior. In a sense, the behavior of an animal is a mediator between the animal and its surroundings, allowing the animal the opportunity to adjust and improve its performance in an ever-changing environment. This is what makes behavior such an important part of conservation and management (Chapter 1). Since behavior is central for the adaptation of animals to their environment, ineffective or inappropriate behavior can greatly reduce animals’ fitness, cause management programs to fail and exacerbate human–wildlife conflict. It is in these cases that managers need to intervene and modify the problematic behavior in order to mitigate its conservation implications.

Natural selection has shaped animal behavior to ensure that organisms respond adaptively to their environment (Chapter 2). For animals that are flexible in their behavior, much of this adaptation is modified by learning through experience. If the environment is altered abruptly (often as a result of anthropogenic activity) the existing behavioral patterns may reduce fitness and even lead species toward extinction (e.g. ecological traps – see Chapter 4). This is especially true for captive-raised individuals. Because the environment in which an animal is raised will strongly affect its behavior as an adult, animals raised in captivity and later released into the wild may, therefore, show maladaptive behaviors if the conditions in which they were raised did not prepare them for life in the wild.

In order to successfully modify detrimental behaviors in wildlife, we must have a firm understanding of how the animal in question perceives its environment and of the learning processes underlying the behaviors it displays. Chapter 3 of this volume is dedicated to learning, while Chapter 6 centers on animals’ sensory systems and on how to use our knowledge of these systems in order to successfully manipulate animal behavior. In this chapter I will focus on the pivotal role of behavioral modifications of captive-bred animals targeted for reintroduction into the wild.

In response to rapid loss of species, worldwide captive breeding followed by reintroduction to the wild has become an increasingly common approach to species conservation (Chapter 8). In theory, captive breeding of wild animals allows for the propagation of a large number of animals because they are protected from environmental elements such as weather extremes, low food availability, predators, diseases and negative impacts from humans.

Type
Chapter
Information
Conservation Behavior
Applying Behavioral Ecology to Wildlife Conservation and Management
, pp. 275 - 304
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberts, A.C. 2007. Behavioral considerations of headstarting as a conservation strategy for endangered Caribbean rock iguanas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102: 380–391.Google Scholar
Bateson, P.P.G. 1981. Ontogeny. In McFarland, D. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Animal Behavior, pp 414–426. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beck, B.B., Rapaport, L.G. and Wilson, A.C. 1994. Reintroduction of captive-born animals. In Feistner, A. (ed.) Creative Conservation, pp 265–286. London: Chapman and Hall.
Bell, J.A., Livesey, P.J. and Meyer, J.F. 2009. Environmental enrichment influences survival rate and enhances exploration and learning but produces variable responses to the radial maze in old rats. Developmental Psychobiology, 51: 564–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berejikian, B.A., Tezak, E.P. and LaRae, A.L. 2003. Innate and enhanced predator recognition in hatchery-reared chinook salmon. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 67: 241–251.Google Scholar
Berger-Tal, O. and Saltz., D. 2014. Using the movement patterns of reintroduced animals to improve reintroduction success. Current Zoology, 60: 515–526.Google Scholar
Biggins, D., Vargas, A., Godbey, J.L. and Anderson, S.H. 1999. Influences on pre-release experience on reintroduced black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). Biological Conservation, 89: 121–129.Google Scholar
Blumstein, D.T. 2006. The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology, 112: 209–217.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V.A. and Salvanes, A.G.V. 2005. Environmental variability in the early rearing environment generates behaviourally flexible cod: implications for rehabilitating wild populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B, 272: 1107–1113.Google Scholar
Bremner-Harrison, S., Prodohl, P.A. and Elwood, R.W. 2004. Behavioural trait assessment as a release criterion: boldness predicts early death in a reintroduction programme of captive-bred swift fox (Vulpes velox). Animal Conservation, 7: 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bright, P.W. and Morris, P.A. 1994. Animal translocation for conservation: performance of dormice in relation to release. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31: 699–708.Google Scholar
Brown, C. and Laland, K. 2001. Social learning and life skills training for hatchery reared fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 59: 471–493.Google Scholar
Brown, G.E. and Smith, R.J.F. 1998. Acquired predator recognition in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): conditioning hatchery-reared fish to recognize chemical cues of a predator. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55: 611–617.Google Scholar
Burley, N. 1981. Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. Science (Washington, DC), 211: 721–722.Google Scholar
Caesar, C., Byrne, R., Young, R.J. and Zuberbuehler, K. 2012. The alarm call system of wild black-fronted titi monkeys, Callicebus nigrifrons.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66: 653–667.Google Scholar
Campbell, M.W. and Snowdon, C.T. 2006. Auditory playback alone is insufficient to condition captive-reared cotton-top tamarins to mob a predator. American Journal of Primatology, 68: 56.Google Scholar
Campbell, M.W. and Snowdon, C.T. 2009. Can auditory playback condition predator mobbing in captive-reared Saguinus oedipus? International Journal ofPrimatology, 30: 93–102.Google Scholar
Carlile, P.A., Peters, R.A. and Evans, C.S. 2006. Detection of a looming stimulus by the Jacky dragon: selective sensitivity to characteristics of an aerial predator. Animal Behaviour, 72: 553–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlstead, K. 1996. Effects of captivity on the behavior of wild mammals. In Kleiman, D.G., Allen, M.E., Thompson, K.V. and Lumpkin, S. (eds.) Wild Mammals in Captivity, pp. 317–333. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Caro, T.M. 2005. Antipredator Defenses in Birds and Mammals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cheney, D.L. and Seyfarth, R.M. 1990. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chivers, D.P. and Smith, R.J.F. 1994. Fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, acquire predator recognition when alarm substance is associated with the sight of unfamiliar fish. Animal Behaviour, 48: 597–605.Google Scholar
Chivers, D.P. and Smith, R.J.F. 1995. Free-living fathead minnows rapidly learn to recognize predators. Journal of Fish Biology, 46: 949–954.Google Scholar
Chivers, D.P. and Smith, R.J.F. 1998. Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator–prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience, 5: 338–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chizar, D., Smith, H.M. and Racliffe, C.W. 1993. Zoo and laboratory experiments on the behavior of snakes: assessments of competence in captive-raised animals. American Journal of Zoology, 33: 109–116.Google Scholar
Crane, A.L. and Mathis, A. 2011. Predator-recognition training: a conservation strategy to increase postrelease survival of hellbenders in head-starting programs. Zoo Biology, 30: 611–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C.R. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Davis, J.M. and Stamps, J.A. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19: 411–416.Google Scholar
de Azevedo, C.S. and Young, R.J. 2006a. Do captive-born greater rheas Rhea americana Linnaeus (Rheiformes, Rheidae) remember antipredator training?Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23: 194–201.Google Scholar
de Azevedo, C.S. and Young, R.J. 2006b. Shyness and boldness in greater rheas Rhea americana Linnaeus (Rheiformes, Rheidae): the effects of antipredator training on the personality of the birds. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23: 202–210.Google Scholar
Dittman, A.H., Quinn, T.P. and Nevitt, G.A. 1996. Timing of imprinting to natural and artificial odors by coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53: 434–442.Google Scholar
Drickamer, L.C., Gowaty, P.A. and Holmes, C.M. 2000. Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Animal Behaviour, 59: 371–378.Google Scholar
Eaton, R.C., Bombardieri, R.A. and Meyer, D.L. 1977. The Mauthner initiated startle response in Teleost fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 66: 65–82.Google Scholar
El Balaa, R. and Blouin-Demers, G. 2011. Anti-predatory behaviour of wild-caught vs captive-bred freshwater angelfish, Pterophyllum scalare.Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 27: 1052–1056.Google Scholar
Elgar, M.A. 1989. Predator vigilance and group size in mammals and birds: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biological Reviews, 64: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, T., Hughes, R.N. and Howell, B.R. 2002. Artificial dietary regime may impair subsequent foraging behaviour of hatchery-reared turbot released into the natural environment. Journal of Fish Biology, 61: 252–264.Google Scholar
Endler, J.A. 1986. The newer synthesis some conceptual problems in evolutionary biology. Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 224–244.
Endler, J.A. 1991. Interactions between predators and prey. In Krebs, J.R. and Davies, N.B. (eds.) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edn.Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publication.
Ferrari, M.C.O., Wisenden, B.D. and Chivers, D.P. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 88: 698–724.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. and Lindenmayer, D.B. 2000. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations. Biological Conservation, 96: 1–11.Google Scholar
Frankham, R. and Loebel, D.A. 1992. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: rapid genetic adaptation to captivity. Zoo Biology, 11: 333–342.Google Scholar
Galef, B.G. 1988. Imitation in animals: history, definition, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In Zentall, T.R. and Galef, B.G. (eds.) Social Learning: Psychological and Biological Perspectives, pp. 3–28. New Jersey: L. Erlbaum.
Garcia, J., Hankins, W.G. and Rusiniak, K.W. 1974. Behavioral regulation of the milieu interne in man and rat. Science (Washington DC), 185: 824–831.Google Scholar
Gazdewich, K.J. and Chivers, D.P. 2002. Acquired predator recognition by fathead minnows: influence of habitat characteristics on survival. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28: 439–445.Google Scholar
Giles, N. 1984. Development of the overhead fright response in wild and predator-naive three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus.Animal Behaviour, 32: 276–279.Google Scholar
Grahn, M., Landefors, A. and von Schantz, T. 1998. The importance of mate choice in improving viability in captive populations. In Caro, T. (ed.) Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology, pp. 341–363. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Griffin, A.S. 2004. Social learning about predators: A review and prospectus. Learning & Behavior, 32: 131–140.Google Scholar
Griffin, A.S., Blumstein, D.T. and Evans, C.S. 2000. Training captive-bred or translocated animals to avoid predators. Conservation Biology, 14: 1317–1326.Google Scholar
Griffin, A.S. and Evans, C.S. 2003. The role of differential reinforcement in predator avoidance learning. Behavioural Processes, 61: 87–94.Google Scholar
Griffith, B., Scott, J.M., Carpenter, J.W. and Reed, C. 1989. Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy. Science, 245: 477–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R.A. and Pavajeau, L. 2008. Captive breeding, reintroduction, and the conservation of amphibians. Conservation Biology, 22: 852–861.Google Scholar
Halpin, Z.T. 1983. Naturally occurring encounters between black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus) and snakes. American Midland Naturalist, 109: 50–54.Google Scholar
Hawkins, L.A., Magurran, A.E. and Armstrong, J.D. 2008. Ontogenetic learning of predator recognition in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar.Animal Behaviour, 75: 1663–1671.Google Scholar
Heatley, J.J. 2002. Antipredator conditioning in Mississippi sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis pulla). M.S. Thesis. Louisiana State University, pp. 1–96.
Hediger, H. 1964. Wild Animals in Captivity (Translated by Sircom, G.; Foreword by Hindle, Edward.). London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.
Hess, E.H. 1972. The natural history of imprinting. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 193: 1972.Google Scholar
Heyes, C.M. and Galef, B.G. 1996. Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. London: Academic Press.
Hoogland, J.L. 1995. The Black-Tailed Prairie Dog: Social Life of a Burrowing Mammal.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Houser, A., Gusset, M., Bragg, C.J., Boast, L.K. and Somers, M.J. 2011. Pre-release hunting training and post-release monitoring are key components in the rehabilitation of orphaned large felids. South African Journal of Wildlife Research, 41: 11–20.Google Scholar
Kitchener, A.C. 1999. Watch with mother: a review of social learning in the Felidae. Mammalian Social Learning: Comparative and Ecological Perspectives: 236–258.
Kleiman, D.G. 1989. Reintroduction of captive mammals for conservation. Bioscience, 39: 152–161.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D.G., Beck, B.B., Baker, A.et al. 1990. The conservation program for the golden lion tamarin, Leontopithecus rosalia.Endangered Species Update, 8:82–85.Google Scholar
Kotrschal, A. and Taborsky, B. 2010. Environmental change enhances cognitive abilities in fish. PLoS Biology, 8: e1000351.Google Scholar
Kraaijeveld-Smit, F.J.L., Griffiths, R.A., Moore, R.D. and Beebee, T.J.C. 2006. Captive breeding and the fitness of reintroduced species: a test of the responses to predators in a threatened amphibian. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43: 360–365.Google Scholar
Krause, J. 1993. Transmission of fright reaction between different species of fish. Behaviour, 127: 37–48.Google Scholar
Letty, J., Marchandeau, S., Clobert, J. and Aubineau, J. 2000. Improving translocation success: an experimental study of anti-stress treatment and release method for wild rabbits. Animal Conservation, 3: 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lickliter, R. and Ness, J.W. 1990. Domestication and comparative psychology: status and strategy. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104: 211–218.Google Scholar
Maier, J.X., Neuhoff, J.G., Logothetis, N.K. and Ghanzanfar, A.A. 2004. Multisensory integration of looming signals by rhesus monkeys. Neuron, 43: 177–181.Google Scholar
Maloney, R.F. and McLean, I.G. 1995. Historical and experimental learned predator recognition in free-living New Zealand robins. Animal Behaviour, 50: 1193–1201.Google Scholar
Manassa, R.P., Dixson, D.L., McCormick, M.I. and Chivers, D.P. 2013a. Coral reef fish incorporate multiple sources of visual and chemical information to mediate predation risk. Animal Behaviour, 86: 717–722.Google Scholar
Manassa, R.P., McCormick, M.I., Chivers, D.P. and Ferrari, M.C.O. 2013b. Social learning of predators in the dark: understanding the role of visual, chemical and mechanical information. Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B, 280: 20130720.Google Scholar
Maynard, D.J., Flagg, T.A. and Mahnken, C.V.M. 1995. A review of seminatural culture strategies for enhancing the postrelease survival of anadromous salmonids. In Schramm, H.L. and Piper, R.G. (eds.) American Fisheries Society Symposium; Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems, pp. 307–314.
McLean, I., Lundie-Jenkins, G. and Jarman, P.J. 1996. Teaching an endangered mammal to recognise predators. Biological Conservation, 75: 51–62.Google Scholar
McLean, I., Holzer, C. and Studholme, B. 1999. Teaching predator recognition to a naive bird. Biological Conservation, 87: 123–130.Google Scholar
McLean, I., Schmitt, N.T., Jarman, P.J., Duncan, C. and Wynne, C.D.I. 2000. Learning for life: training marsupials to recognise introduced predators. Behaviour, 137: 1361–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, I.G. 1997. Conservation and the development of behavior. In Clemmons, J.R. and Buchholz, R. (eds.) Behavioral Approaches to Conservation in the Wild, pp. 132–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McPhee, M.E. 2003. Generations in captivity increases behavioral variance: considerations for captive breeding and reintroduction programs. Biological Conservation, 115: 71–77.Google Scholar
McPhee, M.E. and McPhee, N.F. 2012. Relaxed selection and environmental change decrease reintroduction success in simulated populations. Animal Conservation, 15: 274–282.Google Scholar
Meehan, C.L. and Mench, J.A. 2007. The challenge of challenge: can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102: 246–261.Google Scholar
Mesquita, F.d.O and Young, R.J. 2007. The behavioural responses of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to anti-predator training. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 106: 144–154.Google Scholar
Miller, B., Ralls, K., Reading, R., Scott, J. and Estes, J. 1999. Biological and technical considerations of carnivore translocation: a review. Animal Conservation, 2: 59–68.Google Scholar
Miller, B.D., Biggins, D., Hanebury, L. and Vargas, A. 1994. Reintroduction of the black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes). In Olney, P.J.S., Mace, G.M. and Feistner, A.T.C. (eds.) Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals, pp. 455–464. London: Chapman and Hall.
Mirza, R.S. and Chivers, D.P. 2000. Predator-recognition training enhances survival of brook trout: evidence from laboratory and field enclosure studies. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78: 2198–2208.Google Scholar
Moehrenschlager, A. and Macdonald, D.W. 2003. Movement and survival parameters of translocated and resident swift foxes Vulpes velox.Animal Conservation, 6: 199–206.Google Scholar
Moorhouse, T.P., Gelling, M. and Macdonald, D.W. 2009. Effects of habitat quality upon reintroduction success in water voles: evidence from a replicated experiment. Biological Conservation, 142: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseby, K.E., Cameron, A. and Crisp, H.A. 2012. Can predator avoidance training improve reintroduction outcomes for the greater bilby in arid Australia?Animal Behaviour, 83: 1011–1021.Google Scholar
Narins, P.M., Grabul, D.S., Soma, K.K., Gaucher, P. and Hodl, W. 2005. Cross-modal integration in a dart-poison frog. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 2425–2429.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, S., Webb, J.K. and Shine, R. 2010. Conditioned taste aversion enhances the survival of an endangered predator imperilled by a toxic invader. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47: 558–565.Google Scholar
Olson, J.A., Olson, J.M., Walsh, R.E. and Wisenden, B.D. 2012. A method to train groups of predator-naive fish to recognize and respond to predators when released into the natural environment. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32: 77–81.Google Scholar
Ortega-Reyes, L. and Provenza, F.D. 1993. Amount of experience and age affect the development of foraging skills of goats browsing blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosissima). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 36: 169–183.Google Scholar
Owings, D.H. and Coss, R.G. 1977. Snake mobbing by California ground squirrels: adaptive variation and ontogeny. Behaviour, 62: 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owings, D.H. and Loughry, W.J. 1985. Variation in snake-elicited jump-yipping by black-tailed prairie dogs: ontogeny and snake-specificity. Zeitschrift fuer Tierpsychologie, 70: 177–200.Google Scholar
Owings, D.H. and Owings, S.C. 1979. Snake-directed behavior by black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Zeitschrift fuer Tierpsychologie, 49: 35–54.Google Scholar
Partan, S.R. and Marler, P. 2005. Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. American Naturalist, 166: 231–245.Google Scholar
Pettifer, H.L. 1981. The experimental release of captive-bred cheetah (Acinonyn jubatus) into the natural environment. Chapman, J.A. and Pursley, D. (eds.) Worldwide Furbearer Conference Proceedings, pp. 1001–1024.
Price-Rees, S.J., Webb, J.K. and Shine, R. 2013. Reducing the impact of a toxic invader by inducing taste aversion in an imperilled native reptile predator. Animal Conservation, 16: 386–394.Google Scholar
Price, E.O. 1970. The effect of early outdoor experience on the behavior of a genetically heterogeneous strain of the laboratory rat. American Zoologist, 10: 291.Google Scholar
Price, E.O. 1984. Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Quarterly Review of Biology, 59: 1–32.Google Scholar
Quader, S. 2005. Mate choice and its implications for conservation and management. Current Science (Bangalore), 89: 1220–1229.Google Scholar
Rabin, L.A. 2003. Maintaining behavioural diversity in captivity for conservation: Natural behaviour management. Animal Welfare, 12: 85–94.Google Scholar
Rauterberg, S., Sonoda, L.T., Fels, M.et al. 2013. Cognitive enrichment in the farrowing pen – a first approach to use early behavioural conditioning of suckling piglets to reduce aggressive behaviour during rearing. Zuchtungskunde, 85: 376–387.Google Scholar
Reading, R.P., Miller, B. and Shepherdson, D. 2013. The value of enrichment to reintroduction success. Zoo Biology, 32: 332–341.Google Scholar
Seddon, P.J., Armstrong, D.P. and Maloney, R.F. 2007. Developing the science of reintroduction biology. Conservation Biology, 21: 303–312.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, J. and Forthman, D.L. 1998. Evolution, ecology, and enrichment. Basic considerations for wild animals in zoos. In: Shepherdson, D.J., Mellen, J.D. and Hutchins, M. (eds.) Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals.Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Shier, D.M. 2013. Captive breeding, anti-predator behavior and reintroduction of the Pacific pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris pacificus), annual report to United States Fish and Wildlife Service. San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA, p. 41.
Shier, D.M. and Owings, D.H. 2006. Effects of predator training on behavior and post-release survival of captive prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Biological Conservation, 132: 126–135.Google Scholar
Shier, D.M. and Owings, D.H. 2007. Effects of social learning on predator training and post-release survival in juvenile black-tailed prairie dogs (Cynomys ludovicianus). Animal Behaviour, 73: 567–577.Google Scholar
Shier, D.M. and Swaisgood, R.R. 2012. Fitness costs of neighborhood disruption in translocations of a solitary mammal. Conservation Biology, 26: 116–123.Google Scholar
Short, J., Bradshaw, S.D., Giles, J., Prince, R.I.T. and Wilson, G.R. 1992. Reintroduction of macropods (Marsupialia: Macropodoidea) in Australia – a review. Biological Conservation, 62: 189–204.Google Scholar
Short, J. and Smith, A. 1994. Mammal decline and recovery in Australia. Journal of Mammalogy, 75: 288–297.Google Scholar
Shyne, A. 2006. Meta-analytic review of the effects of enrichment on stereotypic behavior in zoo mammals. Zoo Biology, 25: 317–337.Google Scholar
Sih, A. 2013. Understanding variation in behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change: a conceptual overview. Animal Behaviour, 85: 1077–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.J.F. 1999. What good is smelly stuff in the skin? Cross function and cross taxa effects in fish “alarm substances.” In: Johnson, R.E., Muller-Schwarze, D. and Sorensen, P.W. (eds.) Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates. New York: Springer.
Soule, M.E. 1986. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sunderland: Sinauer.
Stamps, J.A. and Swaisgood, R.R. 2007. Someplace like home: experience, habitat selection and conservation biology. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102: 392–409.Google Scholar
Stoinski, T.S. and Beck, B.B. 2004. Changes in locomotor and foraging skills in captive-born, reintroduced golden lion tamarins (Leontopithecus rosalia rosalia). American Journal of Primatology, 62: 1–13.Google Scholar
Stoinski, T.S., Beck, B.B., Bloomsmith, M.A. and Maple, T.L. 2003. A behavioral comparison of captive-born, reintroduced golden lion tamarins and their wild-born offspring. Behaviour, 140: 137–160.Google Scholar
Stynoski, J.L. and Noble, V.R. 2012. To beg or to freeze: multimodal sensory integration directs behavior in a tadpole. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66: 191–199.Google Scholar
Swaisgood, R. and Shepherdson, D. 2006. Environmental Enrichment as a Strategy for Mitigating Stereotypies in Zoo Animals: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Oxon: Cabi Publishing.
Swaisgood, R.R. 2010. The conservation–welfare nexus in reintroduction programs: a role for sensory ecology. Animal Welfare, 19: 125–137.Google Scholar
Teixeira, B. and Young, R.J. 2014. Can captive-bred American bullfrogs learn to avoid a model avian predator?Acta Ethologica, 17: 15–22.Google Scholar
Teixeira, C.P., De Azevedo, C.S., Mendl, M., Cipreste, C.F. and Young, R.J. 2007. Revisiting translocation and reintroduction programmes: the importance of considering stress. Animal Behaviour, 73: 1–13.Google Scholar
Valutis, L.L. and Marzluff, J.M. 1999. The appropriateness of puppet-rearing birds for reintroduction. Conservation Biology, 13: 584–591.Google Scholar
Vargas, A. and Anderson, S.H. 1998. Ontogeny of black-footed ferret predatory behavior towards prairie dogs. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 76: 1696–1704.Google Scholar
Vargas, A. and Anderson, S.H. 1999. Effects of experience and cage enrichment on predatory skills of black-footed ferrets (Mustela nigripes). Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 263–269.Google Scholar
Villalba, J.J., Provenza, F.D. and Han, G.-d. 2004. Experience influences diet mixing by herbivores: implications for plant biochemical diversity. Oikos, 107: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watters, J.V. and Meehan, C.L. 2007. Different strokes: can managing behavioral types increase post-release success?Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102: 364–379.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, J., Micheletta, J., Powell, L.E., Bordier, C. and Waller, B.M. 2013. The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates. Plos One, 8: e70308.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. 1999. Invasions. Ecography, 22: 5–12.Google Scholar
Wisenden, B.D., Klitzke, J., Nelson, R., Friedl, D. and Jacobson, P.C. 2004. Predator-recognition training of hatchery-reared walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) and a field test of a training method using yellow perch (Perca flavescens). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 61: 2144–2150.Google Scholar
Wolf, C.M., Garland, T. Jr. and Griffith, B.J. 1998. Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis and phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biological Conservation, 86: 243–255.Google Scholar
Yamanashi, Y. and Hayashi, M. 2011. Assessing the effects of cognitive experiments on the welfare of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) by direct comparison of activity budget between wild and captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 73: 1231–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoerg, S.I. 1994. Captive breeding and anti-predator behavior of the Heermann's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys heermanni). 1993 Annual Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, pp. 1–50.
Yoerg, S.I. 1995. Captive breeding and anti-predator behavior of the Heermann's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys heermanni). 1994 Annual Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, p. 1–49.
Yoerg, S.I. 1996. Captive breeding and anti-predator behavior of the Heermann's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys heermanni). 1995 Annual Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, pp. 1–48.
Yoerg, S.I. and Shier, D.M. 1997. Maternal presence and rearing condition affect responses to a live predator in kangaroo rats, Dipodomys heermanni arenae.Journal of Comparative Psychology, 111: 362–369.Google Scholar
Yoerg, S.I. and Shier, D.M. 2000. Captive breeding and anti-predator behavior of the Heermann's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys heermanni). Final Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, pp. 1–56.
Young, R.J. 1997. The importance of food presentation for animal welfare and conservation. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 56: 1095–1104.Google Scholar
Young, R.J. 2003. Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
Zidon, R.D., Salta, D., Shore, L.S. and Motro, U. 2009. Behavioral changes, stress, and survival following reintroduction of Persian fallow deer from two breeding facilities. Conservation Biology, 23: 1026–1035.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×