Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 April 2025
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Concept and Ethics of Manipulation , pp. 223 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Ackerman, F. “The concept of manipulativeness.” Philosophical Perspectives 9 (1995): 335–340.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. and Honneth, A. “Autonomy, vulnerability, recognition, and justice,” in Christman, J. and Anderson, J. (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 127–149.Google Scholar
Ariely, D. Predictably Irrational, Revised and Expanded Edition (New York: HarperCollins, 2009).Google Scholar
Arpaly, N. Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Arpaly, N. and Schroeder, T. “Praise, blame, and the whole self.” Philosophical Studies 93.2 (1999): 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Baier, A. “Why honesty is a hard virtue?,” in Flanagan, O. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Identity, Character, and Morality (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1990), 259–282.Google Scholar
Ball, T. “Manipulation: As old as democracy itself (and sometimes dangerous),” in Le Cheminant, W. and Parrish, J. M. (eds.), Manipulating Democracy (New York: Routledge, 2010), 41–58.Google Scholar
Barnhill, A. “What is manipulation?” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, M. “Manipulativeness.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 77.2 (2003): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, M. “The mens rea and moral status of manipulation,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. “Ego depletion and self-control failure: An energy model of the self’s executive function.” Self and Identity 1.2 (2002): 129–136.Google Scholar
Baym, G. From Cronkite to Colbert: The Evolution of Broadcast News (Boulder: Paradigm, 2010).Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T. “Manipulative advertising.” Business & Professional Ethics Journal 3 (1984): 1–22.Google Scholar
Beerbohm, E. and Davis, R. “Gaslighting citizens.” American Journal of Political Science 67.4 (2023): 867–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bělohrad, R. “The nature and moral status of manipulation.” Acta Analytica 34.4 (2019): 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, P. “Free agency and self-worth.” The Journal of Philosophy 91.12 (1994): 650–668.Google Scholar
Block, N. “Review of Alva Noë, action in perception.” The Journal of Philosophy 102 (2005): 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, J. “Between reason and coercion: Ethically permissible influence in health care and health policy contexts.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22.4 (2012): 345–366.Google ScholarPubMed
Blumenthal-Barby, J. “A framework for assessing the moral status of ‘manipulation’,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 121–134.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, J. Good Ethics and Bad Choices: The Relevance of Behavioral Economics for Medical Ethics (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, J. and Burroughs, H. “Seeking better health care outcomes: The ethics of using the ‘nudge’.” The American Journal of Bioethics 12.2 (2012): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boorstin, D. The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America (New York: Vintage, 1992 [1962]).Google Scholar
Bratman, M. “Planning agency, autonomous agency,” in Taylor, J. S. (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and Its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, R. Parleying with Certain People of Importance in Their Day (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1887).Google Scholar
Bruderman, E. “The nature of aesthetic manipulation in consumer culture.” South African Journal of Philosophy 35.2 (2016): 210–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, S. “Appearing respectful: The moral significance of manners.” Ethics 109.4 (1999): 795–826.Google Scholar
Buss, S. “Valuing autonomy and respecting persons: Manipulation, seduction, and the basis of moral constraints.” Ethics 115.2 (2005): 195–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, S. and Westlund, A. “Personal Autonomy,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, 15 February 2018. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/personal-autonomy/.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V. et al. “When likeness goes with liking: The case of political preference.” Political Psychology 28.5 (2007): 609–632.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. “Perceiving mental states.” Consciousness and Cognition 36 (2015): 498–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, T. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Cave, E. “What’s wrong with motive manipulation?” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (2007): 129–144.Google Scholar
Cholbi, M. “The implications of ego depletion for the ethics and politics of manipulation,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 201–220.Google Scholar
Chong, D. and Druckman, J. “Framing theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10.1 (2007): 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, revised edition (New York: William Morrow, 2006).Google Scholar
Cicero, . De Inventione. Translated by Hubbel, H. M. (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classics, 1949).Google Scholar
Cohen, S. “Abortion and moral perception.” Public Affairs Quarterly 28.1 (2014): 1–18.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. “Are all deceptions manipulative or all manipulations deceptive?” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 25.2 (2023): 282–306.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. “Human being as existential paradox.” Appraisal: A Journal of Constructive and Post-Critical Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Studies 10 (2014): 28–32.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. “Manipulation and deception.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96.3 (2018): 483–497.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. “The moral gradation of media of deception.” Theoria 84.1 (2018): 60–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. “A philosophical misunderstanding at the basis of opposition to nudging.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15.10 (2015): 39–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S. and Zultan, R. “Genomic privacy, identity and dignity.” Journal of Medical Ethics 48.5 (2022): 317–322.Google ScholarPubMed
Coons, C. and Weber, M. “Introduction: Investigating the core concept and its moral status,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craswell, R. “Interpreting deceptive advertising.” Boston University Law Review 65 (1985): 657–732.Google Scholar
Dante, . Il Convivio (The Banquet). Translated by Lansing, R. H. (Garland Library of Medieval Literature, 1990).Google Scholar
de Montaigne, M. “Of friendship,” in The Complete Works of Montaigne. Translated by Frame, D. M. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Dean, R. and Sensen, O. (eds.). Respect: Philosophical Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Disch, L. “Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation.” American Political Science Review 105.1 (2011): 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, J. “The virtues of ignorance.” The Journal of Philosophy 86.7 (1989): 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. “Rhetoric in democracy: A systemic appreciation.” Political Theory 38.3 (2010): 319–339.Google Scholar
Dworkin, A. “Against the male flood: Censorship, pornography, and equality,” in Cornell, D. (ed.), Feminism and Pornography (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Engelen, B. “Nudging and rationality: What is there to worry?” Rationality and Society 31.2 (2019): 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen, B. and Nys, T. “Nudging and autonomy: Analyzing and alleviating the worries.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11.1 (2020): 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, D. “Autonomy as non‐alienation, autonomy as sovereignty, and politics.” Journal of Political Philosophy 30.2 (2022): 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyal, N. “Nudging by shaming, shaming by nudging.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management 3.2 (2014): 53–56.Google ScholarPubMed
Eyal, N. and Hoover, R. Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products (London: Penguin Books, 2013).Google Scholar
Faden, R., Beauchamp, T., and King, N. M. P. A Theory and History of Informed Consent (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., and Ubel, P. A. “How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: Shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey.” Patient Education and Counseling 57.3 (2005): 294–299.Google Scholar
Fallis, D. “Deceiving versus manipulating: An evidence‐based definition of deception.” Analytic Philosophy (2022): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, A. “Then again, what is manipulation? A broader view of a much-maligned concept.” Philosophical Explorations 25.2 (2022): 170–188.Google Scholar
Fischer, J. M. and Ravizza, M. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishkin, J. “Manipulation and democratic theory,” in Le Cheminant, W. and Parrish, J. M. (eds.), Manipulating Democracy (New York: Routledge, 2010), 31–40.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. “The present status of the innateness controversy,” in RePresentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. “Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.” Journal of Philosophy 68 (1971): 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, B. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. Edited by Labaree, L.W. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Freud, S. Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis. Translated by Strachey, J. (New York: W. W. Norton, 1977).Google Scholar
Freud, S. “Observations on transference-love,” in Strachey, J. (ed.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, 24 vols. (London: Hogarth Press, 1964), vol. 12, 157–171.Google Scholar
Gellrich, M. “Socratic magic: Enchantment, irony, and persuasion in Plato’s dialogues.” The Classical World 87.4 (1994): 275–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Goldstein, D. G. “Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.” Psychological Review 103.4 (1996): 650–669.Google ScholarPubMed
Godwin, W. Enquiry into Political Justice and Its Influence on Morals and Happiness, 4th ed., vol. 1 (London: J. Watson, 1842 [1793]).Google Scholar
Goldberg, W. “Two nations, one web: Comparative legal approaches to pornographic obscenity by the United States and the United Kingdom.” Boston University Law Review 90 (2010): 2121–2148.Google Scholar
Gorin, M. “Do manipulators always threaten rationality?” American Philosophical Quarterly 51.1 (2014): 51–61.Google Scholar
Gorin, M. “Paternalistic manipulation,” in Grill, K. and Hanna, J. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Paternalism (London: Routledge, 2018), 236–247.Google Scholar
Gorin, M. “Towards a theory of interpersonal manipulation,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorin, M. et al. “Justifying clinical nudges.” Hastings Center Report 47.2 (2017): 32–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Gray, J., Jones, J., and Thompson, E. Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era (New York: New York University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. Republic of Spin: An Inside History of the American Presidency (New York: W. W. Norton, 2016).Google Scholar
Greenspan, P. “The problem with manipulation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 40.2 (2003): 155–164.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. Studies in the Way of Words (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Grüne-Yanoff, T. “Old wine in new casks: Libertarian paternalism still violates liberal principles.” Social Choice and Welfare 38.4 (2012): 635–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. Ethics and Politics: Cases and Comments (Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006).Google Scholar
Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by McCarthy, T. 2 vols. (Boston: Beacon, 1984), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. Truth and Justification. Translated by Fultner, B. (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Haidt, J. “The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.” Psychological Review 108.4 (2001): 814–834.Google ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (New York: Vintage, 2013).Google Scholar
Handelman, S. Thought Manipulation: The Use and Abuse of Psychological Trickery (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, J. “Libertarian paternalism, manipulation, and the shaping of preferences.” Social Theory and Practice 41.4 (2015): 618–643.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. G. and Jespersen, A. M. “Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 4.1 (2013): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. and Welch, B. “Debate: To nudge or not to nudge.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18.1 (2010): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, M. “Metaphor and aspect seeing.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25.2 (1966): 205–212.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. Jr “Autonomy and benevolent lies.” Journal of Value Inquiry 18 (1984): 251–267.Google Scholar
Hill, T. E. Jr “The importance of autonomy,” in Autonomy and Self-Respect (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. “The will to believe,” in The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy (New York: Dover, 1956).Google Scholar
Jay, M. The Virtues of Mendacity (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Jongepier, F. and Klenk, M. The Philosophy of Online Manipulation (New York: Routledge, 2022).Google Scholar
Kant, I. The Critique of Judgment. Translated by Bernard, J. H. (London: Macmillan and Co., 1914).Google Scholar
Kant, I. Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Gregor, M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiener, M. “When do nudges undermine voluntary consent?” Philosophical Studies 178.12 (2021): 4201–4226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaidman, S. and Beauchamp, T. The Virtuous Journalist (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Klemp, N. “When rhetoric turns manipulative: Disentangling persuasion and manipulation,” in Le Cheminant, W. and Parrish, J. M. (eds.), Manipulating Democracy (New York: Routledge, 2010), 59–86.Google Scholar
Klenk, M. and Hancock, J. “Autonomy and online manipulation.” Internet Policy Review (2019): 1–11.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. “The right to lie: Kant on dealing with evil.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 15 (1986): 325–349.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. “The case for motivated reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108.3 (1990): 480–498.Google ScholarPubMed
Lakdawala, C. In the Zone: The Greatest Winning Streaks in Chess History (Almaar: New In Chess, 2020).Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Langton, R. Sexual Solipsism: Philosophical Essays on Pornography and Objectification (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. “The idea of a life plan.” Social Philosophy and Policy 16.1 (1999): 96–112.Google Scholar
Long, T. “Information manipulation and moral responsibility,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machkovech, S. “Report: Facebook helped advertisers target teens who feel ‘worthless’.” (2017). Available at http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/facebook-helped-advertisers-target-teens-who-feel-worthless/.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. “Introduction: Autonomy refigured,” in Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 3–34.Google Scholar
Macklin, R. Man, Mind, and Morality: The Ethics of Behavior Control (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1982).Google Scholar
Maimonides, . The Guide for the Perplexed. Translated by Friedlander, M. (New York: Dover Publication, 1956).Google Scholar
Mandava, A. and Millum, J. “Manipulation in the enrollment of research participants.” Hastings Center Report 43.2 (2013): 38–47.Google ScholarPubMed
Manne, K. “Non-Machiavellian manipulation and the opacity of motive,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 221–245.Google Scholar
Manson, N. and O’Neill, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuse, H. “Aggressiveness in advanced industrial society,” in Negations: Essays in Critical Theory (London: Allen Lane, 1968), 187–202.Google Scholar
Masrour, F. “Is perceptual phenomenology thin?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83.2 (2011): 366–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, H. and Sperber, D. “Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34.2 (2011): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michelangelo, . The Sonnets of Michael Angelo Buonarroti. Translated by Symonds, J. A. (New York: GP Putnam’s Sons, 1948).Google Scholar
Mills, C. “Manipulation as an aesthetic flaw,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 135–150.Google Scholar
Mills, C. “Politics and manipulation.” Social Theory and Practice 21.1 (1995): 97–112.Google Scholar
Moher, E. and El Emam, K. “The perilous promise of privacy,” in Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., and Robertson, C. T. (eds.), Nudging Health: Health Law and Behavioral Economics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016), 244–256.Google Scholar
Moliere, . “Le Misanthrope,” in Moliere: The Complete Richard Wilbur Translations, vol. 2 (New York: Library of America, 2021).Google Scholar
Mouffe, C. “Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?” Social Research 66.3 (1999): 745–758.Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. “The sovereignty of good over other concepts.” The Sovereignty of Good (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970), 74–102.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. The Big Book of Concepts (Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanay, B. “Do we see apples as edible?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92.3 (2011): 305–322.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. et al. “The concept of voluntary consent.” American Journal of Bioethics 11.8 (2011): 6–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Nietzsche, F. Beyond Good and Evil. Translated by Zimmern, H., in The Complete Works of Friedrich Nietzsche, vol. 12 (Edinburgh: T. N. Foulis, 1909–1913).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. Human, All Too Human. Translated by Hollingdale, R. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Noggle, R. “The ethics of manipulation,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, April 21, 2022. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/ethics-manipulation/.Google Scholar
Noggle, R. “Manipulation, salience, and nudges.” Bioethics 32.3 (2018): 164–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noggle, R. “Manipulative actions: A conceptual and moral analysis.” American Philosophical Quarterly 33.1 (1996): 43–55.Google Scholar
Noggle, R. “Pressure, trickery, and a unified account of manipulation.” American Philosophical Quarterly 57.3 (2020): 241–252.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. “Objectification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 24.4 (1995): 249–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakeshott, M. “The voice of poetry in the conversation of mankind,” in Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1991), 488–541.Google Scholar
Oshana, M. “Personal autonomy and society.” Journal of Social Philosophy 29.1 (1998): 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadaki, L. “What is objectification?” Journal of Moral Philosophy 7.1 (2010): 16–36.Google Scholar
Parker, D. “Rhetoric, ethics, and manipulation.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (1972): 69–87.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. “Legitimacy problems in deliberative democracy.” Political Studies 51.1 (2003): 180–196.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. “The idea of public reason revisited.” University of Chicago Law Review 64.3 (1997): 765–807.Google Scholar
Reason, J. et al. “Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction?” Ergonomics 33 (1990): 1315–1332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseau, J. J. The Social Contract. Translated by Bennett, J. Available at www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/rousseau1762book4.pdfGoogle Scholar
Sacks, O. The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat, and Other Clinical Tales (New York: Summit Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. Being and Nothingness. Translated by Barnes, H. (London: Methuen, 1958).Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schiller, F. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters. Translated by Snell, R. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. The Permanence of the Political: A Democratic Critique of the Radical Impulse to Transcend Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Scruton, R. Conservatism: An Invitation to the Great Tradition (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (London: Henry Pordes, 1993).Google Scholar
Sher, S. “A framework for assessing immorally manipulative marketing tactics.” Journal of Business Ethics 102.1 (2011): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, S. “Paternalism, unconscionability doctrine, and accommodation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 29.3 (2000): 205–250.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. “Which properties are represented in perception?” in Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Perceptual Experience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006), 481–503.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, L. “Freedom, blame, and moral community.” The Journal of Philosophy 71.3 (1974): 72–84.Google Scholar
Strudler, A. “On the ethics of deception in negotiation.” Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (1995): 805–822.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. Choosing Not to Choose: Understanding the Value of Choice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. “Fifty shades of manipulation.” Journal of Marketing Behavior 1 (2016): 213–244.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. “Manipulation as theft.” Journal of European Public Policy 29.12 (2022): 1959–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susser, D., Roessler, B., and Nissenbaum, H. “Online manipulation: Hidden influences in a digital world.” Georgetown Law and Technology Review 4 (2019): 1–45.Google Scholar
Swift, J. “The art of political lying.” Available at www.fountainheadpress.com/expandingthearc/assets/swiftpoliticallying.pdf.Google Scholar
Taber, C. and Lodge, M. “Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50.3 (2006): 755–769.Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C., and Rogers, T. “On the misplaced politics of behavioural policy interventions.” Nature Human Behaviour 1.7 (2017): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. “Socrates the sophist,” in Judson, L. and Karasmanis, V. (eds.), Remembering Socrates (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), 157–168.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Todd, P. “Manipulation,” in LaFollette, H. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, 11 vols. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013), vol. 5, 3139–3145.Google Scholar
Tolstoy, L. “The Kreutzer Sonata,” in The Kreutzer Sonata and Other Stories. Translated by McDuff, D. (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1985), 25–118.Google Scholar
Tsai, G. “Rational persuasion as paternalism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2014): 78–112.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.” Science 211 (1981): 453–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.” Science 185.4157 (1974): 1124–1131.Google ScholarPubMed
University of Oklahoma Institute of Group Relations and Sherif, M. Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment (Norman: University Book Exchange, 1961).Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. “Discourse and manipulation.” Discourse & Society 17.3 (2006): 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volandes, A. et al. “Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: Randomised controlled trial.” BMJ 338 (2009): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Kleist, H. “On the marionette theatre.” Translated by Neumiller, T. The Drama Review 16.3 (1972): 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. “Deliberation, and what else?” in Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 58–69.Google Scholar
Ware, A. “The concept of manipulation: Its relation to democracy and power.” British Journal of Political Science 11.2 (1981): 163–181.Google Scholar
Whitfield, G. “On the concept of political manipulation.” European Journal of Political Theory 21.4 (2022): 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G. Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words that Remade America (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. On Certainty. Translated by Paul, D. and Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1958).Google Scholar
Wood, A. “Coercion, manipulation, exploitation,” in Coons, C. and Weber, M. (eds.), Manipulation: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014), 17–50.Google Scholar
Yeung, K. “‘Hypernudge’: Big data as a mode of regulation by design.” Information, Communication & Society 20.1 (2017): 118–136.Google Scholar
Zell, E. et al. “The better-than-average effect in comparative self-evaluation: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 146.2 (2020): 118–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed