Book contents
- Collective Aquifer Governance
- Collective Aquifer Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Overview of the History of Collective Action on Subsurface Resources
- 3 Governance of Groundwater and Aquifers
- 4 Unitization and Collective Aquifer Governance Agreements
- 5 Determination and Redetermination
- 6 The Role of the Expert
- 7 The Next Transresource
- 8 Pore Spaces
- 9 Application to an Aquifer System
- 10 Getting Around Agreeing to Disagree
- 11 Serious Gaming and Unitization
- 12 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research
- Appendix Model Collective Aquifer Governance Agreement
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
8 - Pore Spaces
The Agua Caliente Litigation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2022
- Collective Aquifer Governance
- Collective Aquifer Governance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Overview of the History of Collective Action on Subsurface Resources
- 3 Governance of Groundwater and Aquifers
- 4 Unitization and Collective Aquifer Governance Agreements
- 5 Determination and Redetermination
- 6 The Role of the Expert
- 7 The Next Transresource
- 8 Pore Spaces
- 9 Application to an Aquifer System
- 10 Getting Around Agreeing to Disagree
- 11 Serious Gaming and Unitization
- 12 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research
- Appendix Model Collective Aquifer Governance Agreement
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The litigation between the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and several water districts in southern California may address the unclear ownership of aquifer pore spaces directly. In this case, the tribal parties have claimed a federally reserved right to aquifer pore spaces as a component of the mineral estate of their reservation. This directly addresses whether parties may have exclusive rights to store water in an aquifer or must share storage rights with others. The resolution of this question has important implications to aquifer unitization, including defining the necessary parties to the agreement and the allocation of shares. The court has several potential methods of resolving this question, which would determine the basis of public and private rights to the use of the aquifer.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Collective Aquifer GovernanceDispute Prevention for Groundwater and Aquifers through Unitization, pp. 97 - 119Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022