Book contents
- Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
- Ancient Religion and Cognition
- Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Funder Acknowledgement
- Introduction
- Part I Ritual
- Part II Representation
- Chapter 3 Ancient Greek Smellscapes and Divine Fragrances
- Chapter 4 Belief, Make-Believe, and the Religious Imagination
- Chapter 5 Chanting and Dancing into Dissociation
- Part III Gender
- Part IV Materiality
- Part V Texts
- Index
- References
Chapter 4 - Belief, Make-Believe, and the Religious Imagination
The Case of the Deus Ex Machina in Greek Tragedy
from Part II - Representation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 July 2022
Book contents
- Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
- Ancient Religion and Cognition
- Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Funder Acknowledgement
- Introduction
- Part I Ritual
- Part II Representation
- Chapter 3 Ancient Greek Smellscapes and Divine Fragrances
- Chapter 4 Belief, Make-Believe, and the Religious Imagination
- Chapter 5 Chanting and Dancing into Dissociation
- Part III Gender
- Part IV Materiality
- Part V Texts
- Index
- References
Summary
The chapter opens by making the case for a capacious understanding of the psychology of the religious imagination. Psychological capacities and propensities, it is suggested, are enabling as much as they are constraining, and religious actors creatively employ these capacities and propensities as much as they are unknowingly subject to them. The particular phenomenon for which this notion of the religious imagination is then explored in the bulk of the chapter is the deus ex machina of Greek tragedy; the relevant imaginative capacity is the human propensity for make-believe. The chapter argues that both externally, as a form of make-believe, and internally through details of the dialogue between god and characters, deus ex machina scenes pull systematically in two directions: the religious experience they enable is one in which there is room simultaneously for both belief and disbelief, trust and distrust, commitment and distance. A subsidiary strand of the argument aims to contribute to current debates about the notion of ‘belief’ in scholarship on Greek religion. The chapter emphasizes that ‘belief’ is usefully understood as sometimes including an attitudinal dimension. This attitudinal dimension comes to the fore in the deus scenes.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cognitive Approaches to Ancient Religious Experience , pp. 96 - 117Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ambasciano, L. and Pachis, P.. 2017. ‘Strangers in a Strange Land No More: Introducing the Book Review Symposium Section and Jennifer Larson’s Understanding Greek Religion (2016)’, Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4: 10–23.Google Scholar
Bontempi, M. 2013. La fiducia secondo gli antichi: ‘pistis’ in Gorgia tra Parmenide e Platone. Naples.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. 2009. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N. 2020. ‘Youth, Atheism, and (Un)Belief in Late Fifth-Century Athens’, in Edelmann-Singer, B., Nicklas, T., and Spittler, J. E., eds. Sceptic and Believer in Ancient Mediterranean Religions, 53–68. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. 2019. ‘Dare to Believe: Wonder, Trust and the Limitations of Cognition in Euripides’ Iphigenia in Tauris’, in Braund, D., Hall, E., and Wyles, R., eds. Ancient Theatre and Performance Culture around the Black Sea, 289–303. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. 2004. ‘Epiphany in the Eleusinian Mysteries’, Illinois Classical Studies 29: 85–109.Google Scholar
Connor, W. R. 1987. ‘Tribes, Festivals and Processions: Civic Ceremonial and Political Manipulation in Archaic Greece’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 107: 40–50.Google Scholar
Davies, J. P. 2018. ‘The Value(s) of Belief: Ancient Religion, Cognitive Scence, and Interdisciplinarity’, in Roubekas, N. P., ed. Theorizing ‘Religion’ in Antiquity, 32–58. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Dunn, F. M. 1996. Tragedy’s End: Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama. New York, NY, and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterling, P. E. 1993. ‘Gods on Stage in Greek Tragedy’, in Dalfen, J., Petersmann, G., and Schwarz, F. F., eds. Religio Graeco-Romana: Festschrift für Walter Pötscher, 77–86. Graz.Google Scholar
Edelmann-Singer, B., Nicklas, T., Spittler, J. and Walt, L., eds. 2020. Sceptic and Believer in Ancient Mediterranean Religions. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2015. ‘Φανερὰν ποιήσει τὴν αὑτοῦ διάνοιαν τοῖς θεοῖς: Some Ancient Greek Theories of (Divine and Mortal) Mind’, in Ando, C. and Rüpke, J., eds. Public and Private in Ancient Mediterranean Law and Religion, 53–73. Berlin.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2016. Envy, Poison, and Death: Women on Trial in Classical Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2019. ‘The (Ancient Greek) Subject Supposed to Believe’, Numen 66: 56–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahr, W. 1969. Θεοὺς νομίζειν: Zum Problem der Anfänge des Atheismus bei den Griechen. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Fragaki, H. 2012. ‘Automates et statues merveilleuses dans l’Alexandrie antique’, Journal des Savants: 29–67.Google Scholar
Frey, J., Schliesser, B., and Ueberschaer, N.. 2017. Das Verständnis des Glaubens im frühen Christentum und in seiner jüdischen und hellenistisch-römischen Umwelt. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Friend, S. 2016. ‘Fiction and Emotion’, in Kind, A., ed. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. London.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2015. ‘Belief vs. Practice’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, 21–28. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. 2017. ‘Cognitive Science of Religion As Challenge to Prevailing Models of Greek Religion?’, Journal of Cognitive Historiography 4: 30–35.Google Scholar
Koch Piettre, R. 2001. ‘Images et perceptions de la présence divine en Grèce ancienne’, Mélanges de l’École française de Rome – Antiquité 113: 211–224.Google Scholar
Koch Piettre, R. 2018. ‘Anthropomorphism, Theatre, Epiphany: From Herodotus to Hellenistic Historians’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 20: 189–209.Google Scholar
Lieberoth, A. 2013. ‘Religion and the Emergence of Human Imagination’, in Geertz, A. W., ed. Origins of Religion, Cognition and Culture, 160–177. Durham.Google Scholar
Lindsay, D. R. 1993. Josephus and Faith: Πίστις and Πιστεύειν as Faith Terminology in the Writings of Flavius Josephus and in the New Testament. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. 2012. When God Talks Back: Understanding the American Evangelical Relationship with God. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Marinatos, N. and Shanzer, D., eds. 2004. Divine Epiphanies in the Ancient World [Special issue]. Illinois Classical Studies 29.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. J. 1990. ‘Actors on High: The Skene Roof, the Crane, and the Gods in Attic Drama’, Classical Antiquity 9: 247–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastronarde, D. J. 2010. The Art of Euripides: Dramatic Technique and Social Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mikalson, J. D. 1991. Honor Thy Gods: Popular Religion in Greek Tragedy. Chapel Hill, NC, and London.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2015. Roman Faith and Christian Faith: Pistis and Fides in the Early Roman Empire and Early Churches. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, M. 2012. ‘The Uncanny Valley’, trans. K. F. MacDorman and N. Kageki, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 19(2): 98–100.Google Scholar
Panagiotidou, O. and Beck, R.. 2017. The Roman Mithras Cult: A Cognitive Approach. London.Google Scholar
Petridou, G. and Platt, V., eds. 2018. ‘Making Contact with the Divine Other. Means and Meanings’ [Special issue], Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 20(1): 185–274.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I.. 2016. Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion. Volume 1: Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2011. Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Platt, V. 2015. ‘Epiphany’, in Eidinow, E. and Kindt, J., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion, 491–504. Oxford.Google Scholar
Platt, V. J. 2018. “Double Vision: Epiphanies of the Dioscuri in Classical Antiquity”, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 20: 229–256.Google Scholar
Polvinen, M. 2017. ‘Cognitive Science and the Double Vision of Fiction’, in Burke, M. and Troscianko, E. T., eds. Cognitive Literary Science: Dialogues between Literature and Cognition, 135–150. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richardson, A. 2015. ‘Imagination: Literary and Cognitive Intersections’, in Zunshine, L., ed. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies, 225–245. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Sinos, R. H. 1993. ‘Divine Selection: Epiphany and Politics in Archaic Greece’, in Doughery, C. and Kurke, L., eds. Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece, 73–91. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spira, A. 1960. Untersuchungen zum deus ex machina bei Sophokles und Euripides. Kallmünz.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2016. Divination and Human Culture: A Cognitive History of Intuition in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 1987. ‘What Did Ancient Man See When He Saw a God? Some Reflections on Greco-Roman Epiphany’, in van der Plas, D., ed. Effigies Dei: Essays on the History of Religions, 42–55. Leiden.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. 2011. Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology. Leiden.Google Scholar