Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:48:10.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The impacts of invasive species on coastal marine ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Julie L. Lockwood  and
Orin J. Robinson
Edited by
Brooke Maslo  and
Julie L. Lockwood
Julie L. Lockwood
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Orin J. Robinson
Affiliation:
The State University of New Jersey
Brooke Maslo
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Julie L. Lockwood
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Invasive species are an increasing presence in coastal marine ecosystems, and their ecological and economic impacts have been sometimes severe (Rilov & Crooks, 2009). Such impacts have stirred academic interest as well as directed policy and management actions designed to ameliorate or forestall further negative consequences (Ruiz et al., 2000). We review two key pieces of invasion ecology that dictate how we study the impact of coastal marine invaders, and we set available empirical evidence generated from research on marine invaders in this context. We show that significant gaps remain in our knowledge of the impacts of coastal marine invaders. These gaps include bias in the taxonomic groups and coastal habitats studied, incomplete documentation of ecological impacts, and scientific uncertainty in when negative impacts are likely to occur and how long they may persist. These gaps combine to inhibit comprehensive regulatory actions that are aimed at reducing the inflow of non-native species into coastal waters and executing effective eradication or control measures for those species that impose negative impacts.

The invasion process

One of the consistent themes across chapters in this volume is that invasive species can cause major changes to coastal ecosystems (e.g. Chapters 4 and 5). As is true across a variety of other ecosystems, coastal marine invaders can impose significant stress on co-occurring native species exacerbating what is already a precarious existence for many species (Rilov & Crooks, 2009; see also Chapter 7). Despite their occasionally large impacts, coastal marine invaders are only a small subset of all the non-native species established in coastal ecosystems, and a yet smaller subset of all the non-native species that were transported into these ecosystems and released there (Ruiz et al., 2000; Miller & Ruiz, 2009). In other words, of all the coastal marine species which have been entrained in a transport process (e.g. via ballast water, aquaria trade), only a fraction of them will go on to garner attention as having become widespread and imposing negative impacts on native species and ecosystems, or having become “invasive.” There is much general debate about what that invasive fraction may be, but it can be as low as 10% and as high as 50% depending on the taxa considered and the habitat into which non-natives are released (Ricciardi et al., 2013). Even the highest estimated fraction of 50% indicates that there are as many non-native species in an ecosystem that do not have recorded impacts as there are those that do.

Type
Chapter
Information
Coastal Conservation , pp. 245 - 264
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araújo, R., Violante, J., Pereira, R., et al. (2011). Distribution and population dynamics of the introduced seaweed Grateloupia turuturu (Halymeniaceae, Rhodophyta) along the Portuguese coast. Phycologia, 50, 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, S. B., Fisher, N. S. & Cole, J. J. (2007). Dissolved organic matter and persistence of the invasive zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) under low food conditions. Limnology and Oceanography, 52, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E. B., Hacker, S. D., Kennedy, C., et al. (2011). The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs, 81, 169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C., Martineau, C., Frenette, J., Dodson, J. J. & Vincent, W. F. (2006). Trophic position of zebra mussel veligers and their use of dissolved organic carbon. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 1473–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bax, N., Carlton, J. T., Mathews-Amos, A., et al. (2001). The control of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. Conservation Biology, 15, 1234–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bax, N., Williamson, A., Aguero, M., Gonzalez, E. & Geeves, W. (2003). Marine invasive alien species: A threat to global biodiversity. Marine Policy, 27, 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shlomo, R., Reem, E., Douek, J. & Rinkevich, B. (2010). Population genetics of the invasive ascidian Botryllus schlosseri from South American coasts. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 412, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, M. J. & Peterson, C. H. (2006). When r-selection may not predict introduced-species proliferation: Predation of a nonnative oyster. Ecological Applications, 16, 718–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, T. M., Pysek, P., Bacher, S., et al. (2011). A proposed united framework for biological invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 26, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodey, T. W., Bearhop, S., Roy, S. S., Newton, J. & McDonald, R. A. (2010). Behavioral responses of invasive American mink Neovison vison to an eradication campaign, revealed by stable isotope analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. E. (2009). Competition in marine invasions. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, M. (2009). An overview of risk assessment in a marine biosecurity context. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlton, J. T. (1999). The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In Sandlund, O. T., Schei, P. J. & Viken, A. (eds.), Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casal, C. M. V. (2006). Global documentation of fish introductions: The growing crisis and recommendations for action. Biological Invasions, 8, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. N. & Carlton, J. T. (1998). Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science, 279, 555–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, J. L., Weinersmith, K. L., Brodin, T., Saltz, J. B. & Sih, A. (2011). Behavioural syndromes in fishes: A review with implications for ecology and fisheries management. Journal of Fish Biology, 78, 395–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crooks, J. A. (2005). Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion. Ecoscience, 12, 316–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, J. A. (2009). The role of exotic marine ecosystem engineers. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, J. A. & Rilov, G. (2009). Future directions for marine invasion research. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, J. A. & Soule, M. E. (1999). Lag times in population explosions of invasive species: Causes and implications. In Sandlund, O. T., Schei, P. J. & Viken, A. (eds.), Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Rivera, C. E., Steves, B. P., Fofonoff, P. W., Hines, A. H. & Ruiz, G. M. (2011). Potential for high-latitude marine invasions along western North America. Diversity and Distributions, 17, 1198–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Duque, E. & Veleggia, C. (1994). Meta-analysis: A valuable tool in conservation research. Conservation Biology, 8, 555–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fofonoff, P. W., Ruiz, G. M., Hines, A. H., Steves, B. D. & Carlton, J. T. (2009). Four centuries of biological invasions in tidal waters of the Chesapeake Bay Region. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 479–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosholz, E. (2002). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, S. D., Zarnetske, P., Seabloom, E., et al. (2012). Subtle differences in two non-native congeneric beach grasses significantly affect their colonization, spread and impact. Oikos, 121, 138–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, C. L., Everett, R. A., Parker, N. & Campbell, M. L. (2009). Marine bioinvasion management: Structural framework. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindell, J. S. & Warry, F. Y. (2010). Nutritional support of estuary perch (Macquaria colonorum) in a temperate Australian inlet: Evaluating the relative importance of invasive Spartina. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 90, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, C., Titelman, J., Hansson, L. J., Haraldsson, M. & Ditlefsen, C. R. (2011). The invasive ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi poses no threat to Baltic cod eggs and larvae. Limnology and Oceanography, 56, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. P, Lodge, D. M. & Finnoff, D. C. (2007). Risk assessment for invasive species produces net bioeconomic benefits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 203–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ketternring, K. M. & Adams, C. R. (2011). Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 970–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimbro, D. L., Grosholz, E. D., Baukus, A. J., et al. (2009). Invasive species cause large-scale loss of native California oyster habitat by disrupting trophic cascades. Oecologia, 160, 563–575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F. & Marchetti, M. P. (2013) Invasion Ecology, 2nd edn. London: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Miller, A. W. & Ruiz, G. M. (2009). Differentiating successful and failed invaders: Species pools and the importance of defining vector, source and recipient regions. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchin, D., Gollasch, S., Cohen, A. N., Hewitt, C. L. & Olenin, S. J. (2009). Characterizing vectors of marine invasion. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteleone, D. M. & Duguay, L. E. (1988). Laboratory studies of predation by the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi on the early stages in the life history of the bay anchovy, Anchoa mitchilli. Journal of Plankton Research, 10, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, I. M., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., et al. (1999). Impact: Toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions, 1, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, 52, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S. L. (1991). The Balance of Nature?Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Preisler, R. K., Wasson, K., Wolff, W. J. & Tyrrell, M. C. (2009). Invasion of estuaries vs the adjacent open coast: A global perspective. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pysek, P., Richardson, D. M., Pergl, J., et al. (2008). Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 23, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P. & Lockwood, J. L. (2013). Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of non-native species. Ecological Monographs, 83, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rilov, G. (2009). The integration of invasive species into marine ecosystems. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (2009). Marine bioinvasions: Conservation hazards and vehicles for ecological understanding. In Rilov, G. & Crooks, J. A. (eds.), Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 204. Berlin: Springer, pp. 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruesink, J. L., Lenihan, H. S., Trimble, A. C., et al. (2005). Introduction of non-native oysters: Ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 36, 643–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, G. M., Fofonoff, P., Hines, A. H. & Grosholz, E. D. (1999). Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: Assessing the impacts and interactions. Limnology and Oceanography, 44, 950–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, G. M., Fofonoff, P. W., Carlton, J. T., Wonham, M. J. & Hines, A. H. (2000). Invasions of coastal marine communities in North America: Apparent patterns, processes, and biases. Annual Reviews in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 31, 481–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, G. M., Fofonoff, P. W., Steves, B., Foss, S. F. & Shiba, S. N. (2011). Marine invasion history and vector analysis of California: A hotspot for western North America. Diversity and Distributions, 17, 362–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. (2003). Eradication: Preventing invasions at the outset. Weed Science, 51, 247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D. & Gibbons, L. (2004). Now you see them, now you don’t: Population crashes of established introduced species. Biological Invasions, 6, 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D., Parker, I. M. & Windle, P. N. (2005). Introduced species policy, management, and future research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3, 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M. and Pace, M. L. (2006). Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 645–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, J., Kollmann, J., Markussen, B. & Otte, A. (2010). Impact assessment revisited: Improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biological Invasions, 12, 2025–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thieltges, D. W., Strasser, M. & Reise, K. (2006). How bad are invaders in coastal waters? The case of the American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in western Europe. Biological Invasions, 8, 1673–1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thresher, R. E. & Kuris, A. M. (2004). Options for managing invasive marine species. Biological Invasions, 6, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissot, B. N., Best, B. A., Borneman, E. H., et al. (2010). How U.S. ocean policy and market power can reform the coral reef wildlife trade. Marine Policy, 34, 1385–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, M. S., Wernberg, T., Oldern, J. D., Griffin, J. N. & Silliman, B. R. (2011). A framework to study the context-dependent impact of marine invasions. Journal of Experimental and Marine Biology and Ecology, 400, 322–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, W. C., MacKinnon, C., Rogriquez, L. F., Proctor, C. & Ruiz, G. M. (2002). Effect of an invasive crab upon a marine fishery: Green crab, Carcinus maena, predation upon a venerid clam, Katelysia scalarina, in Tasmania (Australia). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 272, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Zhang, Z. X., Nie, M., et al. (2008). Exotic Spartina alterniflora provides compatible habitats for native estuarine crab Sesarma dehaani in the Yangtze River estuary. Ecological Engineering, 34, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigle, S. M., Smith, L. D., Carlton, J. T. & Pederson, J. (2005). Assessing the risk of introducing exotic species via the live marine species trade. Conservation Biology, 19, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wotton, D. M. & Hewitt, C. L. (2004). Marine biosecurity post-border management: Developing incursion response systems for New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Resources, 38, 553–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokomizo, H., Possingham, H. P., Thomas, M. B. & Buckley, Y. M. (2009). Managing the impact of invasive species: The value of knowing the density-impact curve. Ecological Applications, 19, 376–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaiko, A., Lehtiniemi, M., Narscius, A. & Olenin, S. (2011). Assessment of bioinvasion impacts on a regional scale: A comparative approach. Biological Invasions, 13, 1739–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajicek, P., Hardin, S. & Watson, C. (2009). A Florida marine ornamental pathway risk analysis. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 17, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×