References

Horaƫiu Năstase

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 March 2019

Horaƫiu Năstase

Show author details

Horaƫiu Năstase: Affiliation:
Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: Classical Field Theory , pp. 455 - 457

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569392 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goldstein, H., Poole, C., and Safko, J., Classical mechanics, 3rd edition, Addison-Wesley, 2002.Google Scholar

Georgi, H., Lie algebras in particle physics, Perseus Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Course of theoretical physics, vol 2: The classical theory of fields, 4th edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2007.Google Scholar

Peskin, M. E. and Schroeder, D. V., An introduction to quantum field theory, Avalon Publishing, 1995.Google Scholar

Burgess, M., Classical covariant fields, Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M., Course of theoretical physics, vol. 6: Fluid mechanics, 2nd edition, Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 2007.Google Scholar

Bohr, T., Jensen, M. H., Paladin, G., and Vulpiani, A., Dynamical systems approach to turbulence, Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Babelon, O., Bernard, D., and Talon, M., Introduction to classical integrable systems, Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schwartz, M. D., Quantum field theory and the standard model, Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Sterman, G., An introduction to quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Weinberg, S., The quantum theory of fields, vol. I: Foundations, Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Alves, D. W. F., Hoyos, C., Nastase, H., and Sonnenschein, J., “Knotted solutions, from electromagnetism to fluid dynamics,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, no. 33, 1750200 (2017) [arXiv:1707.08578 [hep-th]].Google Scholar

Rajaraman, R., Solitons and instantons: An introduction to solitons and instantons in quantum field theory, North Holland, 1982.Google Scholar

Manton, N. and Sutcliffe, P., Topological solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Nastase, H., “DBI skyrmion, high energy (large s) scattering and fireball production,” [arXiv:hep-th/0512171].Google Scholar

Nastase, H., String theory methods for condensed matter physics, Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Nastase, H. and Sonnenschein, J., “More on Heisenberg’s model for high energy nucleon-nucleon scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 105028 (2015) [arXiv:1504.01328 [hep-th]].Google Scholar

Alvarez-Gaume, L. and Hassan, S. F., “Introduction to S duality in N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories: A pedagogical review of the work of Seiberg and Witten,” Fortsch. Phys. 45, 159 (1997) [hep-th/9701069].Google Scholar

Kolb, E. W. and Turner, M. S., The early universe, Westview Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Coleman, S. R., “Q balls,” Nucl. Phys. B 262, 263 (1985) Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B 269, 744 (1986)].Google Scholar

Lee, T. D. and Pang, Y., “Nontopological solitons,” Phys. Rept. 221, 251 (1992).Google Scholar

Taubes, C. H., “Arbitrary N-vortex solutions to the first order Landau-Ginzburg equations,” Commun. Math. Phys. 72, 277 (1980).Google Scholar

Samols, T. M., “Vortex scattering,” Commun. Math. Phys. 145, 149 (1992).Google Scholar

Manton, N. S. and Speight, J. M., “Asymptotic interactions of critically coupled vortices,” Commun. Math. Phys. 236, 535 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0205307].Google Scholar

Mohammed, A., Murugan, J., and Nastase, H., “Looking for a Matrix model of ABJM,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 086004 (2010) [arXiv:1003.2599 [hep-th]].Google Scholar

Mohammed, A., Murugan, J., and Nastase, H., “Abelian-Higgs and vortices from ABJM: Towards a string realization of AdS/CMT,” JHEP 1211, 073 (2012) [arXiv:1206.7058 [hep-th]].Google Scholar

Gervais, J. L., Jevicki, A., and Sakita, B., “Collective coordinate method for quantization of extended systems,” Phys. Rept. 23, 281 (1976).Google Scholar

Christ, N. H. and Lee, T. D., “Quantum expansion of soliton solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 12, 1606 (1975).Google Scholar

Gervais, J. L. and Jevicki, A., “Point canonical transformations in path integral,” Nucl. Phys. B 110, 93 (1976).Google Scholar

Gervais, J. L. and Jevicki, A., “Quantum scattering of solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 110, 113 (1976).Google Scholar

Jevicki, A. and Sakita, B., “The quantum collective field method and its application to the planar limit,” Nucl. Phys. B 165, 511 (1980).Google Scholar

Nastase, H., Stephanov, M. A., Nieuwenhuizen, P. van, and Rebhan, A., “Topological boundary conditions, the BPS bound, and elimination of ambiguities in the quantum mass of solitons,” Nucl. Phys. B 542, 471 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9802074].Google Scholar

Dunne, G. V., “Aspects of Chern-Simons theory,” [arXiv:hep-th/9902115].Google Scholar

Rao, S., “An Anyon primer,” [arXiv:hep-th/9209066].Google Scholar

Witten, E., “Three lectures on topological phases of matter,” Riv. Nuovo Cim. 39, no. 7, 313 (2016) [arXiv:1510.07698 [cond-mat.mes-hall]].Google Scholar

Moore, G. W. and Read, N., “Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect,” Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362 (1991).Google Scholar

Townsend, P. K., Pilch, K., and Nieuwenhuizen, P. van, “Selfduality in odd dimensions,” Phys. Lett. 136B, 38 (1984) Addendum: [Phys. Lett.137B, 443 (1984)].Google Scholar

Murugan, J. and Nastase, H., “A nonabelian particle-vortex duality in gauge theories,” JHEP 1608, 141 (2016) [arXiv:1512.08926 [hep-th]].Google Scholar

Murugan, J., Nastase, H., Rughoonauth, N., and Shock, J. P., “Particle-vortex and Maxwell duality in the AdS₄ × CP³/ABJM correspondence,” JHEP 1410, 51 (2014) [arXiv:1404.5926 [hep-th]].Google Scholar

Peebles, J., Principles of physical cosmology, Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. and Rosen, N., “On gravitational waves,” J. Franklin Inst., 223, 43 (1937).Google Scholar

Khan, K. A. and Penrose, R., “Scattering of two impulsive gravitational plane waves,” Nature 229, 185 (1971).Google Scholar

Vilenkin, A., “Gravitational field of vacuum domain walls and strings,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 852 (1981).Google Scholar

Vilenkin, A., “Gravitational Field of Vacuum Domain Walls,” Phys. Lett. 133B, 177 (1983).Google Scholar

Gott, J. R., III, “Gravitational lensing effects of vacuum strings: Exact solutions,” Astrophys. J. 288, 422 (1985).Google Scholar

Banados, M., Teitelboim, C., and Zanelli, J., “The black hole in three-dimensional space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992) [arXiv:hep-th/9204099].Google Scholar

Carlip, S., “The (2+1)-dimensional black hole,” Class. Quant. Grav. 12, 2853 (1995) [gr-qc/9506079].Google Scholar

Taub, A. H., “Empty space-times admitting a three parameter group of motions,” Annals Math. 53, 472 (1951).Google Scholar

Newman, E., Tamburino, L., and Unti, T., “Empty space generalization of the Schwarzschild metric,” J. Math. Phys. 4, 915 (1963).Google Scholar

Misner, C. W., “The flatter regions of Newman, Unti and Tamburino’s generalized Schwarzschild space,” J. Math. Phys. 4, 924 (1963).Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W. and Ellis, G. F. R., The large scale structure of space-time, Cambrigde University Press, 1973.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W., “Gravitational instantons,” Phys. Lett. A 60, 81 (1977).Google Scholar

Page, D. N., “Taub-NUT instanton with an horizon,” Phys. Lett. 78B, 249 (1978).Google Scholar

Eguchi, T. and Hanson, A. J., “Asymptotically flat selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity,” Phys. Lett. 74B, 249 (1978).Google Scholar

Gibbons, G. W. and Hawking, S. W., “Gravitational multi-instantons,” Phys. Lett. 78B, 430 (1978).Google Scholar

Eguchi, T. and Hanson, A. J., “Selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity,” Annals Phys. 120, 82 (1979).Google Scholar

Eguchi, T. and Hanson, A. J., “Gravitational instantons,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 11, 315 (1979).Google Scholar

Rubakov, V., Classical theory of gauge fields, Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive