Book contents
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I China, BRI and International Dispute Resolution
- 1 China and the Development of an International Dispute Resolution Mechanism for the Belt and Road Construction
- 2 One Belt, One Road, One Clause for Dispute Resolution?
- Part II China, BRI and International Trade Dispute Resolution
- Part III China, BRI and Investment Dispute Resolution
- Part IV China, BRI and Resolution of Maritime Disputes
- Index
2 - One Belt, One Road, One Clause for Dispute Resolution?
from Part I - China, BRI and International Dispute Resolution
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2021
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I China, BRI and International Dispute Resolution
- 1 China and the Development of an International Dispute Resolution Mechanism for the Belt and Road Construction
- 2 One Belt, One Road, One Clause for Dispute Resolution?
- Part II China, BRI and International Trade Dispute Resolution
- Part III China, BRI and Investment Dispute Resolution
- Part IV China, BRI and Resolution of Maritime Disputes
- Index
Summary
It examines the dispute solution options the contracting parties have when their cross-border transaction turns sour. The traditional answer is that international arbitration is the best option to govern cross-border disputes. Yet recent trends have improved the enforceability of foreign judgments. This chapter argues that the foreign judgment is catching up with the foreign arbitral award in terms of enforceability. After introducing the consistent enforceability of foreign judgments in common law countries, it highlights a number of contemporary trends that are gradually improving the enforceability of foreign judgments in civil law countries. In the end, it discusses the fledgling potential of the 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements to standardise the law and practice of enforcement of judgments made by designated courts in exclusive choice of court agreements.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ , pp. 23 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021