Advocacy for Children's Rights

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511500114.003

3 - Advocacy for Children's Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2009

Mark A. Small and

Susan P. Limber

Edited by

Bette L. Bottoms ,

Margaret Bull Kovera and

Bradley D. McAuliff

Show author details

Mark A. Small: Affiliation:
Professor of Psychology Institute on Family and Neighborhood Life at Clemson University
Susan P. Limber: Affiliation:
Director of the Center for Youth Participation and Human Rights Institute on Family and Neighborhood Life and Associate Professor of Psychology at Clemson University
Bette L. Bottoms: Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Margaret Bull Kovera: Affiliation:
Florida International University
Bradley D. McAuliff: Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Advocacy on behalf of children is more than simply the provision of needed services to children. Advocacy efforts represent an attempt to increase the responsiveness and accountability of all institutions affecting children. As Melton (1983) notes, “whether the intent is to increase children's self-determination or to enhance the social, education, and medical resources to which children are entitled, child advocates have as their mission social action on behalf of children” (p. 1).

Although social scientists often conduct and report research related to child well-being, these efforts frequently fail to take into account larger social trends affecting children and families. Moreover, they often fall short of informing advocacy efforts – either in helping to set an agenda for advocacy or in evaluating advocacy efforts. The intent of this chapter is to provide an overview of child advocacy issues for social scientists in order to facilitate a greater connection between social scientists and child advocates. We begin by noting some significant social trends influencing the nature of child advocacy. These include the changing nature of the American family, the changing nature of social institutions, and the shift in responsibility for children's welfare from the federal government to state and community organizations. Next, a brief history of advocacy is presented, noting philosophical differences between those who push for increasing self-determination of children and those who primarily advocate for improved health and safety conditions for children.

Type: Chapter
Information: Children, Social Science, and the Law , pp. 51 - 75

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500114.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Annie E. Casey Foundation (2000). 2000 KIDS COUNT Data Book. Baltimore: Author

Ariès, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York: Vintage Books

Bachu, A. (1999). Trends in premarital childbearing: 1930 to 1994 (P23–197). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau

Brinig, M. F., & Buckley, F. H. (1997). Welfare magnets: The race for the top. Supreme Court Economic Review, 5, 141–178Google Scholar

Bryson, K., & Casper, L. M. (1998). Household and family characteristics: March 1997 (P20–509). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau

Campbell, J. A. (1999). Health insurance coverage (P60–208). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau

Centre for Human Rights. (1987). Status of human rights instruments. New York: United Nations

Cherny, I., & Perry, N. W. (1996). Children's attitudes toward their rights: An international perspective. In E. Verhellen (Ed.), Monitoring children's rights (pp. 241–250). New York: Kluwer Law International

Children's Defense Fund (1997). Poverty matters: The cost of child poverty in America. Washington, DC: Author

Cohen, C. P., & Naimark, H. (1991). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: Individual rights concepts and their significance for social scientists. American Psychologist, 46, 60–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Dalaker, J. (1999). Poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau

Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979)

Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents' and young adults' conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166CrossRef Google Scholar

Kaufman, N. H. (1990). Human rights treaties and the Senate: A history of opposition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press

Kaufman, N. H. (1994, May). The concept of family in international law. Paper presented at the International Colloguium on the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. Charleston, S.C

Limber, S. P., & Flekk⊘y, M. G. (1995). The U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child: Its relevance for social scientists. Social Policy Report, 9(2), 1–15Google Scholar

Limber, S. P., & Wilcox, B. L. (1996). Application of the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child to the United States. American Psychologist, 51, 1246–1250CrossRef Google Scholar

Melton, G. B. (1982). Children's rights: Where are the children?American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 530–538CrossRef Google Scholar

Melton, G. B. (1983). Child advocacy: Psychological issues and interventions. New York: Plenum

Melton, G. B. (1987). The clashing of symbols: Prelude to child and family policy. American Psychologist, 42, 345–354CrossRef Google Scholar

Melton, G. B. (1991a). Preserving the dignity of children around the world: The U.N. Convention on the rights of the Child. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 343–350CrossRef Google Scholar

Melton, G. B. (1991b). Socialization in the global community: Respect for the dignity of children. American Psychologist, 46, 66–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Melton, G. B. (1996). The child's right to a family environment: Why children's rights and family values are compatible. American Psychologist, 51, 1234–1238CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Melton, G. B. (1998). Children's rights in the health care system: The evolving framework in international human rights law. Childrenz Issues, 2 (2), 37–41Google Scholar

Melton, G. B., & Kaufman, N. H. (1997). Monitoring of children's rights. In A. Ben-Arieh & H. Wintersberger (Eds.), Monitoring and measuring the state of children: Beyond survival (Eurosocial Report No. 62, pp. 81–88). Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare and Policy Research

Melton, G. B., & Limber, S. P. (1992). What children's rights mean to children: Children's own views. In M. Freeman & P. Veerman (Eds.), The ideologies of children's rights (pp. 167–187). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer

Melton, G. B., Thompson, R. A., & Small, M. A. (in press). Toward a child-centered, neighborhood-based child protection system. Westport, CT: Praeger

Mnookin, R. H. (1978). Children's rights: Beyond kiddie libbers and child savers. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 7, 163–167CrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy-Berman, V., Leveśque, H. L., & Berman, John J. (1996). U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child: A cross cultural view. American Psychologist, 51, 1257–1261CrossRef Google Scholar

Parham v. J. R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979)

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104–193, 110 Stat. 2105

Small, M. A., & Schwartz, I. M. (1990). Policy implications for children's law in the aftermath of Maryland v. Craig. Seton Hall Constitutional Law Journal, 1, 109–130Google Scholar

Takanishi, R. (1978). Childhood as a social issue: Historical roots of contemporary child advocacy movements. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 8–28CrossRef Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly. (1989, November 17). Adoption of a Convention on the Rights of the Child. U.N. Doc. A/Res/44/25

U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1990). Critical first steps in response to a national emergency. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1991). Creating caring communities: Blueprint for an effective federal policy on child abuse and neglect. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1992). The continuing child protection emergency: A challenge to the nation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1993). Neighbors helping neighbors: A new national strategy for the protection of children. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. (1995). A nation's shame: Fatal child abuse and neglect in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996). At-risk and delinquent youth: Multiple federal programs raise efficiency questions (GAO/HEHS-96-34). Washington, DC: U.S. Governent Printing Office

U.S. General Accounting Office. (1998). Welfare reform: States' efforts to expand child care programs (GAO/HEHS-98-27). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

Walker, N. E., Brooks, C. M., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Children's rights in the United States: In search of a national policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Weithorn, L. A. (1998). Youth participation in family and community decision making. Family Futures, 2(1), 6–9Google Scholar