Animals Used for Food in the Past: As Seen by Their Remains Excavated from Archaeological Sites

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521402149.007

I.4 - Animals Used for Food in the Past: As Seen by Their Remains Excavated from Archaeological Sites

from Part I - Determining What Our Ancestors Ate

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Elizabeth Wing

Edited by

Kenneth F. Kiple and

Kriemhild Coneè Ornelas

Show author details

Kenneth F. Kiple: Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Animal remains excavated from archaeological sites are, to a large extent, the remnants of animals that were used for food. These remains include the fragmentary bones and teeth of vertebrates, the shells of mollusks, the tests of echinoderms, and the exoskeletal chitin of crustacea and insects. As with all archaeological remains, they represent discarded fragments of a previous way of life.

Organic remains are particularly subject to losses from the archaeological record, through the destructive nature of food preparation and consumption, the scavenging of refuse by other animals, and the deterioration that results from mechanical and chemical forces over time. Other losses come through excavation with inappropriate sieving strategies in which the remains of smaller individuals or species are lost. Nonetheless, despite all of these opportunities for the loss and destruction of organic material, animal remains constitute a major class of the archaeological remains from most sites and in some sites, such as shell mounds, they are the most obvious of the remains. However, even among those remains that are preserved, care must be taken in evaluating the extent to which they may represent a contribution to the prehistoric diet.

One reason for such caution is that all remains recovered are not necessarily those of animals that were consumed. For example, along the Gulf coast of Mexico, dogs were definitely eaten and probably even raised for food (Wing 1978). Their remains were often burned, disarticulated, and associated with those of other food remains. But in the West Indies, complete or nearly complete skeletons of dogs are found in burials and they are rarely associated with midden refuse, suggesting that dogs were not a regular item in the diet (Wing 1991).

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge World History of Food , pp. 51 - 58

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521402149.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agenbroad, L. D. 1984. New World mammoth distribution. In Quaternary extinctions: A rehistoric revolution, ed. Martin, P. S. and Klein, R. G.. Tucson, Ariz.Google Scholar

Armitage, Philip L. 1986. Domestication of animals. In Bioindustrial ecosystems, ed. Cole, D. J. A. and Brender, G. C.. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Balme, Jane. 1983. Prehistoric fishing in the lower Darling, western New South Wales. In Animals and archaeology, ed. Grigson, C. and Clutton-Brock, J.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Binford, Lewis R. 1978. Nunamuit ethnoarchaeology. New York.Google Scholar

Claasen, Cheryl. 1986. Shellfishing seasons in the prehistoric southeastern United States. American Antiquity 51.Google Scholar

Davis, Simon J. M. 1987. The archaeology of animals. New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar

Flannery, T. F., and White, J. P.. 1991. Animal translocation. National Geographic Research and Exploration 7.Google Scholar

GordonBuikstra, Claire C. Jane E.. 1981. Soil pH, bone preservation, and sampling bias at mortuary sites. American Antiquity 46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Groves, Colin P. 1989. Feral mammals of the Mediterranean islands: Documents of early domestication. In The walking larder, ed. Clutton-Brock, J.. London.Google Scholar

Hamblin, Nancy L. 1984. Animal use by the Cozumel Maya. Tucson, Ariz.Google Scholar

Higgs, E. S., and Vita-Finzi, C.. 1972. Prehistoric economies: A territorial approach. In Papers on economic prehistory, ed. Higgs, E. S.. London.Google Scholar

Linares, Olga F. 1976. “Garden hunting” in the American tropics. Human Ecology 4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Linares, Olga F., and Ranere, Anthony J., eds. 1980. Adaptive radiations in prehistoric Panama. Peabody Museum Monographs No. 5. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

MacArthur, Robert H., and Wilson, Edward O.. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar

Meehan, Betty. 1982. Shell bed to shell midden. Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar

Neusius, S. W. 1996. Game procurement among temperate horticulturalists: The case for garden hunting by the Dolores Anasazi. In Case studies in environmental archaeology, ed. Reitz, E. J., Newsom, L. A., and Scudder, S. J.. New York.Google Scholar

Nietschmann, Bernard. 1973. Between land and water: The subsistence ecology of the Miskito Indians. New York.Google Scholar

Payne, Sebastian. 1973. Kill-off patterns in sheep and goats: The mandibles from Asvan Kale. Anatolian Studies 23.CrossRef Google Scholar

Perkins, Dexter Jr., and Daly, Patricia. 1968. A hunter’s village in Neolithic Turkey. Scientific American 219.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quilter, Jeffery, Ojeda, Bernardino E., Pearsall, Deborah M., et al. 1991. Subsistence economy of El Paraiso, an early Peruvian site. Science 251.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Quitmyer, Irvy R. 1985. The environment of the Kings Bay locality. In Aboriginal subsistence and settlement archaeology of the Kings Bay locality, Vol. 2, ed. Adams, W. H.. University of Florida, Reports of Investigations No. 2. Gainesville.Google Scholar

Reitz, Elizabeth J., and Scarry, C. Margaret. 1985. Reconstructing historic subsistence with an example from sixteenth-century Spanish Florida. Society for Historical Archaeology, Special Publication No. 3. Glassboro, N.J.Google Scholar

Rostlund, Erhard. 1952. Freshwater fish and fishing in North America. University of California Publications in Geography, Vol. 9. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Schalk, Randall F. 1977. The structure of an anadromous fish resource. In For theory building in archaeology, ed. Binford, L. R.. New York.Google Scholar

Speth, John D. 1983. Bison kills and bone count. Chicago.Google Scholar

Weselkov, Gregory A. 1987. Shellfish gathering and shell midden archaeology. In Advances in archaeological method and theory, Vol. 10, ed. Schiffer, M. B.. San Diego, Calif.Google Scholar

Wheat, Joe Ben. 1972. The Olsen-Chubbuck site: A Paleo-Indian bison kill. American Antiquity 27.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Alwyne, and Locker, Alison. 1985. The estimated size of sardines (Sardina pilchardus) from amphorae in a wreck at Randello, Sicily. Journal of Archaeological Science 12.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wing, Elizabeth S. 1978. Use of dogs for food: An adaptation to the coastal environment. In Prehistoric coastal adaptations, ed. Stark, B. L. and Voorhies, B.. New York.Google Scholar

Wing, Elizabeth S. 1989. Human exploitation of animal resources in the Caribbean. In Biogeography of the West Indies, ed. Woods, C. A.. Gainesville, Fla.Google Scholar

Wing, Elizabeth S. 1991. Dog remains from the Sorcé Site on Vieques Island, Puerto Rico. In Beamers, bobwhites, and blue-points, ed. Purdue, J. R., Klippel, W. E., and Styles, B. W.. Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar

Woodhouse, David, and Woodhouse, Ruth. 1975. Archaeological atlas of the world. New York.Google Scholar

Yesner, David R. 1988. Effects of prehistoric human exploitation on Aleutian sea mammal populations. Arctic Anthropology 25.Google Scholar

Zeder, M. A., and Arter, S. R.. 1996. Meat consumption and bone use in a Mississippian village. In Case studies in environmental archaeology, ed. Reitz, E. J., Newsom, L. A., and Scudder, S. J.. New York.Google Scholar