Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- General Introduction
- 1 ALBERT THE GREAT: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 2 BONAVENTURE: Conscience and Synderesis
- 3 GILES OF ROME: On the Rule of Princes (selections)
- 4 PETER OF AUVERGNE: Commentary and Questions on Book III of Aristotle's Politics (selections)
- 5 HENRY OF GHENT: Is It Rational for Someone without Hope of a Future Life to Choose to Die for the Commonwealth?
- 6 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Does a Human Being Following the Dictates of Natural Reason Have to Judge that He Ought to Love God More than Himself?
- 7 JAMES OF VITERBO: Does a Human Being Have a Greater Natural Love for God than for Himself, or Vice Versa?
- 8 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Reply to James of Viterbo on Love of God and Self
- 9 HENRY OF GHENT: Is a Subject Bound to Obey a Statute When It Is Not Evident that It Promotes the Common Utility?
- 10 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Are Subjects Bound to Pay a Tax When the Need for It Is Not Evident?
- 11 JAMES OF VITERBO: Is It Better to Be Ruled by the Best Man than by the Best Laws?
- 12 JOHN OF NAPLES: Should a Christian King Use Unbelievers to Defend His Kingdom?
- 13 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Using and Enjoying
- 14 AUGUSTINE OF ANCONA: Summa on Ecclesiastical Power (selections)
- 15 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Is an Errant Individual Bound to Recant at the Rebuke of a Superior?
- 16 JEAN BURIDAN: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 17 JOHN WYCLIF: On Civil Lordship (selections)
- Index
7 - JAMES OF VITERBO: Does a Human Being Have a Greater Natural Love for God than for Himself, or Vice Versa?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- General Introduction
- 1 ALBERT THE GREAT: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 2 BONAVENTURE: Conscience and Synderesis
- 3 GILES OF ROME: On the Rule of Princes (selections)
- 4 PETER OF AUVERGNE: Commentary and Questions on Book III of Aristotle's Politics (selections)
- 5 HENRY OF GHENT: Is It Rational for Someone without Hope of a Future Life to Choose to Die for the Commonwealth?
- 6 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Does a Human Being Following the Dictates of Natural Reason Have to Judge that He Ought to Love God More than Himself?
- 7 JAMES OF VITERBO: Does a Human Being Have a Greater Natural Love for God than for Himself, or Vice Versa?
- 8 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Reply to James of Viterbo on Love of God and Self
- 9 HENRY OF GHENT: Is a Subject Bound to Obey a Statute When It Is Not Evident that It Promotes the Common Utility?
- 10 GODFREY OF FONTAINES: Are Subjects Bound to Pay a Tax When the Need for It Is Not Evident?
- 11 JAMES OF VITERBO: Is It Better to Be Ruled by the Best Man than by the Best Laws?
- 12 JOHN OF NAPLES: Should a Christian King Use Unbelievers to Defend His Kingdom?
- 13 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Using and Enjoying
- 14 AUGUSTINE OF ANCONA: Summa on Ecclesiastical Power (selections)
- 15 WILLIAM OF OCKHAM: Is an Errant Individual Bound to Recant at the Rebuke of a Superior?
- 16 JEAN BURIDAN: Questions on Book X of the Ethics
- 17 JOHN WYCLIF: On Civil Lordship (selections)
- Index
Summary
Introduction
James of Viterbo was born around 1255. Having joined the Augustinian Order about 1270, he went to Paris to study theology ca. 1278–83. He became a regent master around 1293, succeeding Giles of Rome to the Augustinian chair and teaching there until 1297, when he left Paris to direct the Augustinian school at Naples. James was made Bishop of Benevento in September 1302 and Archbishop of Naples three months later. He died in 1308. He is better known, perhaps, for his pro-papal treatise De regimine Christiano (trans. R. W. Dyson, Woodbridge, 1995), written after, or just before, he became Bishop of Benevento. His teaching at Paris survives in the form of four quodlibets. The approach taken in these disputations is notable for its reserve and prudence. It is thus characteristic of James to clarify various alternative views before setting down his own answer to a question. In the debate over the relationship between essence and existence, for example, he referees between the positions already established by Giles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, and Godfrey of Fontaines (CHLMP, pp. 404–5). When he confronts the problem of self-love in Book IX of the Ethics, it therefore comes as no surprise to find him clarifying a range of different expositions before tentatively (‘as I think’) putting forward his own. At the same time, and as is also the case in De regimine Christiano, such studied moderation should not necessarily be taken at face value.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts , pp. 285 - 300Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000