Book contents
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Genealogies
- Part II Thinking the World
- Part III Transregional Worlding
- Part IV Cartographic Shifts
- Part V World Literature and Translation
- Part VI Poetics, Genre, Intermediality
- Part VII Scales, Polysystems, Canons
- 36 Spatial Scale and the Urban Everyday: The Physiology as a Traveling Genre (Paris, St. Petersburg, Tiflis)
- 37 Imaginative Geographies in the Medieval Islamic Republic of Letters
- 38 The Anthology as the Canon of World Literature
- 39 Data Worlds: Patterns, Structures, Libraries
- Part VIII Modes of Reading and Circulation
- Part IX The Worldly and the Planetary
- Index
- References
36 - Spatial Scale and the Urban Everyday: The Physiology as a Traveling Genre (Paris, St. Petersburg, Tiflis)
from Part VII - Scales, Polysystems, Canons
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2021
By
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- The Cambridge History of World Literature
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Genealogies
- Part II Thinking the World
- Part III Transregional Worlding
- Part IV Cartographic Shifts
- Part V World Literature and Translation
- Part VI Poetics, Genre, Intermediality
- Part VII Scales, Polysystems, Canons
- 36 Spatial Scale and the Urban Everyday: The Physiology as a Traveling Genre (Paris, St. Petersburg, Tiflis)
- 37 Imaginative Geographies in the Medieval Islamic Republic of Letters
- 38 The Anthology as the Canon of World Literature
- 39 Data Worlds: Patterns, Structures, Libraries
- Part VIII Modes of Reading and Circulation
- Part IX The Worldly and the Planetary
- Index
- References
Summary
World literary studies appears caught between several competing models, each privileging the determining force of a given spatial scale – the global versus the local, national, or regional, - or a specific patterning of space – vertical structure versus horizontal network. This article seeks to test a multiscalar and transregional method of analysis which might place these models in sharper dialogue. It does so by addressing the physiology, a popular quasi-journalistic nineteenth-century genre dedicated to the taxonomic description of mores, customs and social types found in the everyday life of the modern city. Arising in Paris and other metropolises of western Europe, the physiology was soon adapted to the very different circumstances of the Russian capital St. Petersburg, before shifting to the Russian colonial administrative centre of Tiflis (Tbilisi), today the capital of Georgia. This article explores the poetics and cultural politics of the physiology’s adaptation to three distinct urban contexts, in what might be seen as a movement from centre to colonial periphery via the Russian semi-periphery. In doing so it seeks to link genre theory to debates within critical geography on spatial scale, while also entering debates in urban studies and the sociology of culture on metropolitan and peripheral modernization, particularly as it relates to the correlation between the state, the market, and the literary public sphere. Drawing on the work of Henri Lefebvre and Harry Harootunian on the uneven spatio-temporal rhythms of the urban everyday, the article also addresses the limits of such canonical interventions as Walter Benjamin’s critique of the Parisian flâneur and Jürgen Habermas’s account of the bourgeois public sphere.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of World Literature , pp. 693 - 729Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Amossy, Ruth. 1989. “Types ou stéréotypes? Les ‘Physiologies’ et la littérature industrielle” [Types or Stereotypes? The “Physiologies” and Industrial Literature], Romantisme, No. 64: 113–23.Google Scholar
Annenkov, P. V. 1983. “Pis’ma iz-za granitsy” [Letters from Abroad]. In Parizhskie pis’ma [Parisian Letters], ed. Konobeevskaia, I. N. . Nauka, 5–83.Google Scholar
Anon. 1843 .“Literaturnaia letopis’” [Literary Chronicle]. Biblioteka dlia chteniia [Library for Reading], no. 57, Мarch-April, Section VI, p. 16.Google Scholar
Avermaete, Tom, Karakayali, Serhat, and von Osten, Marion, eds. 2010. Black Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1975. “Epos i roman: O metodologii issledovaniia romana” [Epic and Novel: On the Methodology of Researching the Novel]. Voprosy literatury i èstetiki: Issledovaniia raznykh let [Questions of Literature and Aesthetics: Investigations from Various Years]. Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 447–83.Google Scholar
Balzac, Honoré de. 1938. “Physiologie gastronomique” [Gastronomical Physiology]. In Oeuvres complètes [Complete Works], Vol. 39 . Conard.Google Scholar
Balzac, Honoré de 1840. “Avant-propos à la Comédie humaine” [Foreword to the Human Comedy]. In La Comédie humaine [The Human Comedy]. Vol. I. Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bater, James H. 1984. “The Soviet City: Continuity and Change in Privilege and Place.” In The City in Cultural Context, ed. Agnew, John, Mercer, John, and Sopher, David. Allen and Unwin, 134–62.Google Scholar
Batiushkov, Konstantin. 1934. “Progulka po Moskve.” In Sochineniia. Academia, 297–309.Google Scholar
Batiushkov, Konstantin. 1977. “Progulka v Akademiiu khudozhestv.” In Opyty v stikhakh i proze. Nauka, 71–94.Google Scholar
Belinskii, Vissarion. 1953–59. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Collected Works]. 13 vols. Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1986 “Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century.” In Reflections. Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, trans. Edmund Jephcott, ed. Demetz, Peter. Schocken Books, 146–62.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 2002. “Paris, Capital of the Nineteenth Century.” In The Arcades Project, trans. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 3–26.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 2003. “The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire.” In Selected Writings, Vol. IV: 1938–1940, ed. Eiland, Howard and Michael, W. Jennings. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 3–92.Google Scholar
Bogomolov, Igor’. 1963. Armeniia v tvorchestve Iakova Polonskogo [Armenia in the Work of Iakov Polonskii]. Izdatel’stvo AN Armianskoi SSR.Google Scholar
Bogomolov, Igor’ 1966. Polonskii v Gruzii [Polonskii in Georgia]. Literatura da khelovneba.Google Scholar
Bogomolov, Igor’ 1983. “Russkie pisateli v Gruzii v pervoi polovine XIX veka” [Russian Writers in Georgia in the First Half of the 19th Century]. In Russkie pisateli v Gruzii [Russian Writers in Georgia]. Merani, n.p.Google Scholar
Bogomolov, Igor’ 2002. Gruziia stala traditsiei dlia vsei russkoi poezii [Georgia Has Become a Tradition for All Russian Poetry]. Izdatel’stvo Tbilisskogo universiteta,Google Scholar
Bowman, Herbert. 1954. Vissarion Belinski 1811–1848: A Study in the Origins of Social Criticism in Russia. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brower, Daniel R. 1990. The Russian City between Tradition and Modernity, 1850–1900. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckler, Julie. 2007. Mapping St. Petersburg: Imperial Text and Cityscape. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bulgarin, F. V. 1841. “Peterburgskie tipy” [Petersburg Types]. Severnaia pchela [Northern Bee], No. 22: 87–88.Google Scholar
Bulgarin, F. V. 2010a. Peterburgskie ocherki F.V. Bulgarina [The Petersburg Sketches of F. V. Bulgarin].Petropolis.Google Scholar
Bulgarin, F. V. 2010b. “Progulka po trotuaru Nevskogo prospekta.” In Peterburgskie ocherki F. V. Bulgarina [The Petersburg Sketches of F. V. Bulgarin]. Petropolis, 43–81.Google Scholar
Burton, Richard D. E. 1994. The Flâneur and His City: Patterns of Daily Life in Paris 1815–1851. University of Durham.Google Scholar
Casanova, Pascale. 1999. La République mondiale des lettres [The World Republic of Letters]. Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. 2014. “World Against Globe: Towards a Normative Conception of World Literature.” New Literary History, Vol. 45, No. 3 (Summer): 303–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. J. 1984. The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and His Followers. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Margaret. 1996. “Panoramic Literature and the Invention of Everyday Genres.” In Cinema and the Invention of Modern Life, ed. Charney, Leo and Schwartz, Vanessa R.. University of California Press, 227–52.Google Scholar
Curmer, L., ed. 1841–42. Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Encyclopédie morale du XIX-e siècle [The French Painted by Themselves: A Moral Encyclopedia of the 19th Century]. 8 vols. L. Curmer.Google Scholar
D’haen, Theo. 2012. “Mapping World Literature.” In The Routledge Companion to World Literature, ed. D’haen, Theo, Damrosch, David, and Kadir, Djelal. Routledge, 413–22.Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, Fedor. 1845. “Zuboskal” [The Banterer]. Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the Fatherland], No. 43: 43–48.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel, Schluchter, Wolfgang, and Wittrock, Björn, eds. 2001. Public Spheres and Collective Identities. Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Ely, Christopher. 2002. This Meager Nature: Landscape and National Identity in Imperial Russia. Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Priscilla Parkhurst. 1994. “The Flâneur: The City and Its Discontents.” In Paris as Revolution: Writing the Nineteenth-Century City, University of California Press, 80–114.Google Scholar
Fusso, Susanne. 1993. Designing Dead Souls: An Anatomy of Disorder in Gogol’. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilpin, William. 1792. Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty, on Picturesque Travel; and on Sketching Landscape, to Which is Added a Poem, on Landscape Painting. Printed for R. Blamire.Google Scholar
Grigorovich, D. 1987. Literaturnye vospominaniia [Literary Reminiscences]. Khudozhestvennaia literature.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Dorothy J., ed. 2006. The Novel: An Anthology of Criticism and Theory, 1900–2000. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry. 2000. History’s Disquiet: Modernity, Cultural Practice, and the Question of Everyday Life. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Harootunian, Harry. 2005. “Some Thoughts on Comparability and the Space-Time Problem.” boundary 2, Vol. 32, No. 2 (Summer): 24–52.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. 1985. “Paris, 1850–1870.” In Consciousness and the Urban Experience. Johns Hopkins University Press, 63–220.Google Scholar
Hetzel, Pierre-Jules, ed. 1845–46. Le Diable à Paris. Paris et les Parisiens. Moeurs et coutumes, caractères et portraits des habitants de Paris, tableau complet de leur vie privée, publique, politique, artistique, littéraire, industrielle [The Devil in Paris. Paris and the Parisians. Ways and Customs, Characters and Portraits of the Residents of Paris, Complete Picture of Their Private, Public, Political, Artistic, Literary, and Industrial Life]. 2 vols. Typographie Lacrampe et Comp.Google Scholar
Holland, Kate. 2017. “Narrative Tradition on the Border: Alexander Veselovsky and Narrative Hybridity in the Age of World Literature.” Poetics Today, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept.): 429–52.Google Scholar
Hölscher, Lucian. 1978. “Öffentlichkeit” [Public Sphere]. In Geschichtiliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland [Fundamental Concepts of History: A Historical Lexicon to the Political and Social Language in Germany], ed. Bruner, Otto, Conze, Werner and Koselleck, Reinhart. Vol. IV. Klett-Cotta, 413–67.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Terrence K., and Wallerstein, Immanuel, et al. eds. 1982. World-Systems Analysis. Theory and Methodology. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Huart, Louis. 1841. Physiologie du flâneur [Physiology of the Flâneur]. Illust. Marie-Alexandre Alophe, Honoré Daumier, and Théodore Maurisset. Aubert-Lavigne.Google Scholar
Iakimovich, T. 1963. Frantsuzskii realisticheskii ocherk, 1830–1848gg. [The French Realist Sketch, 1830–1848]. Izdatel’stvo akademii nauk.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. 2002. A Singular Modernity. Essay on the Ontology of the Present. Verso.Google Scholar
Jersild, Austin. 2002. Orientalism and Empire: North Caucasus Mountain Peoples and the Georgian Frontier, 1845–1917. McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Jersild, Austin, and Melkadze, Nineli. 2002. “The Dilemmas of Enlightenment in the Eastern Borderlands: The Theater and Library in Tbilisi.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Winter): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keats, John. 1899. The Complete Poetical Works and Letters of John Keats. The Cambridge Edition. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
Kliger, Ilya. 2017. “Historical Poetics between Russia and the West: Towards a Nonlinear Model of Literary History and Social Ontology.” Poetics Today, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept.): 453–84.Google Scholar
Kliger, Ilya. 2018. “Scenarios of Power in Turgenev’s First Love: Russian Realism and the Allegory of the State.” Comparative Literature, Vol. 70, No. 1: 25–45.Google Scholar
Kliger, Ilya, and Maslov, Boris, guest eds. 2017 . “Special Section: Historical Poetics in Theory.” Poetics Today, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Sept.): 417–548.Google Scholar
Komarovich, V. L. 1924. “Idei frantsuzskix sotsial’nykh utopii v mirovozzrenii Belinskogo” [The Ideas of French Social Utopias in Belinskii’s Worldview]. In Venok Belinskomu [A Wreath for Belinskii], ed. Piksanov, N. K.. Novaia Moskva, 243–72.Google Scholar
Konechnyi, Al’bin. 2010. “Bulgarin bytopisatel’ i Peterburg v ego ocherkakh.” In Peterburgskie ocherki F.V. Bulgarina. Petropolis, 5–42.Google Scholar
Kuleshov, V. I. 1958.“Otechestvennye zapiski” i literatura 40-kh godov XIX veka [“Notes of the Fatherland” and the Literature of the 1840s]. Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Lacroix, Auguste de. 1841–42. “Le flâneur.” In Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Encyclopédie morale du XIX-e siècle. 9 vols. L. Curmer, Vol. III, 65–72.Google Scholar
Larousse, Pierre, ed. 1874. Grand dictionnaire universel du XIX siècle [Great Universal Dictionary of the 19th Century]. Vol. 12 . Administration du grand dictionnaire universel.Google Scholar
Lauster, Martina. 2007a. Sketches of the Nineteenth Century: European Journalism and its Physiologies, 1830–1850. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauster, Martina. 2007b. “Walter Benjamin’s Myth of the Flâneur.” Modern Language Review, Vol. 102, No. 1 (January): 139–56.Google Scholar
Lavater, Johann Kaspar. 1775–78. Physiognomische Fragmente zur Beförderung der Menschenkenntnis und Menschenliebe [Physiognomic Fragments for the Advancement of Human Understanding and Human Love]. 4 vols. Heinrich Steiner und Companie.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1986. La Production de l’éspace [The Production of Space]. 3rd ed. Éditions Anthropos.Google Scholar
Le Men, Ségolène. 1993. “Peints par eux-mêmes … ” [Painted by Themselves …]. In Les Français peints par eux-mêmes: Panorama social du XIXe siècle [The French, Painted by Themselves: A Social Panorama of the 19th Century], ed. Le Men, Ségolène and Abélès, Luce. Éditions de la Réunion des musées nationaux, 4–46.Google Scholar
Lukács, György (Georg). 1964. “The International Significance of Russian Democratic Literary Criticism.” In Studies in European Realism, Grosset and Dunlap, 97–126.Google Scholar
Lukács, György 1977. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of the Great Epic Literature. Trans. Anna Bostock. 3rd ed. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Makharadze, N. A. 1984. Russkaia gazeta na Kavkaze v 40–50-e gody XIX veka (Zakavkazskii vestnik i Kavkaz v 1845–1856 gg.) [The Russian Newspaper in the Caucasus in the 1840s and 50s: The Transcaucasian Herald and Caucasus, 1845–1856]. Izdatel’stvo Tbilisskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Malia, Martin. 1961. Alexander Herzen and the Birth of Russian Socialism, 1812–1855. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinova, Ol’ga Iu. 2012. “Obshchestvo, publika, obshchestvennost’ v Rossii serediny XIX – nachala XX veka: Otrazhenie v poniiatiiakh praktik publichnoj kommunikatsii i obshchestvennoi samodeiatel’nosti” [Society, Public, Sociality in Mid-19th – Early 20th-Century Russia: Their Reflection in Terms of Practices of Public Communication and Independent Social Activity]. In Poniatiia o Rossii: K istoricheskoi semantike imperskogo perioda [Understandings of Russia: Toward a Historical Semantics of the Imperial Period]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 428–63.Google Scholar
Marullo, Thomas Gaiton. 2009. “Editor’s Introduction.” In Petersburg: The Physiology of a City, ed. Nekrasov, Nikolai, trans. Thomas Gaiton Marullo, Northwestern University Press, xix–xci.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael. 2000. Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Meilakh, B. S. 1973. “Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie zhanra povesti natural’noi shkoly” [The Theoretical Foundation of the Natural School’s Narrative Genre]. Russkaia povest’ XIX veka [Russian Narrative of the 19th Century]. Nauka, 247–58.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2003. “More Conjectures.” New Left Review, No. 20 (March/April): 73–81.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2011. “World-Systems Analysis, Evolutionary Theory, Weltliteratur.” In Immanuel Wallerstein and the Problem of the World: System, Scale, Culture, ed. Palumbo-Liu, David, Robbins, Bruce, and Tanoukhi, Nirvana. Duke University Press, 67–77.Google Scholar
Morozova, S. N. 2010. “Kavkazskie motivy v tvorchestve Ia. Polonskogo. Sbornik ‘Sazandar’” [Caucasian Motifs in the Work of Ia. Polonskii: The Collection Sazandar]. Izvestiia Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Volgograd State Pedagogical University], Vol. 46, No. 2: 139–41.Google Scholar
Nechaeva, V. S. 1967. V. G. Belinskii. Zhizn’ i tvorchestvo, 1842–1848 [V. G. Belinskii: Life and Work, 1842–1848]. Nauka, 102–37.Google Scholar
Nekrasov, Nikolai. 1843. “Ocherki russkikh nravov, ili litsevaia storona i iznanka roda chelovecheskogo. Sochinenia Faddeia Bulgarina” [Sketches of Russian Morals, or the Outer and Inner Sides of the Human Race. Works of Faddei Bulgarin.] Otechestvennye zapiski [Notes of the Fatherland], No. 5, section VI, 25–29.Google Scholar
Nekrasov, Nikolai. 1967. “Fiziologiia Peterburga. Chast’ pervaia” (1845). In Sobranie sochinenii v vos’mi tomakh. Vol. VII. Khudozhestvennaia literatura, 96–97.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, Veena Talwar. 1984. The Making of Colonial Lucknow, 1856–1877. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orsini, Francesca. 2015. “The Multilingual Local in World Literature.” Comparative Literature, Vol. 67, No. 4: 345–74.Google Scholar
Paris, ou le livre des Cent-et-un [Paris, or the Book of the One Hundred and One]. 1831–34. 15 vols. Ladvocat.Google Scholar
Parry, Benita. 2009. “Aspects of Peripheral Modernisms.” Ariel: A Historical Review of English International Literature, Vol. 40, No. 1: 27–55.Google Scholar
Polonskii, Iakov. 1846a “Kratkii ocherk nekotorykh gorodov Kavkaza i Zakavkazskogo kraia” [Brief Survey of Some Cities of the Caucusus and the Transcaucasian Region]. In Kavkazskii kalendar’ na 1847 g. [Caucasian Almanac for the Year 1847]. Tipografiia Kantseliarii Namestnika Kavkazskogo, 53–113.Google Scholar
Polonskii, Iakov. 1846b. “Statisticheskii ocherk Tiflisa” [Statistical Survey of Tiflis]. In Kavkazskii kalendar’ na 1847 g., 147–73.Google Scholar
Polonskii, Iakov. 1847. “Pis’mo v Moskvu” [A letter to Moscow]. Zakavkazskii vestnik [Transcaucasian Herald], No. 6 (February 27): 47–48.Google Scholar
Polonskii, Iakov. 1850. “Tiflis na litso i naiznanku” [Tiflis Outside and In]. Zakavkazskii vestnik [Transcaucasian Herald], Nos. 7, 8, 10, 11, 15.Google Scholar
Polonskii, Iakov. 1933a. Ia. P. Polonskii, Stikhotvoreniia i poèmy [Ia. P. Polonskii, Lyrics and Long Poems]. Ed. and intro. Eikhenbaum, B. M.. Sovetskii pisatel’.Google Scholar
Polonskii, Iakov. 1933b.“A Stroll through Tiflis” [Progulka po Tiflisu]. In Stikhotvoreniia i poèmy, ed. Eikhenbaum, B. M.. Sovetskii pisatel’.Google Scholar
Preiss(-Basset), Nathalie. 1999. Les Physiologies en France au XIXe siècle: étude historique, littéraire et stylistique [Physiologies in France in the 19th Century: A Historical, Literary, and Stylistic Study]. Éditions Inter-Universitaires.Google Scholar
Punter, David. 1994. “The Picturesque and the Sublime: Two Worldscapes.” In The Politics of the Picturesque: Literature, landscape, and aesthetics since 1770, ed. Copley, Stephen and Garside, Peter. Cambridge University Press, 220–39.Google Scholar
Ram, Harsha. 2016. “The Scale of Global Modernisms: Imperial, National, Regional, Local.” PMLA, Vol. 131, No. 5 (October): 1372–85.Google Scholar
Reeve, Helen. 1959. “Utopian Socialism in Russian Literature, 1840–1860s.” American Slavic and East European Review, No. 18: 374–93.Google Scholar
Rhinelander, L. H. 1996.“Viceroy Vorontsov’sAdministration of the Caucasus.” In Transcaucasia, Nationalism and Social Change: Essays in the History of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, ed. Suny, Ronald Grigor. University of Michigan Press, 87–104.Google Scholar
Romanenko, Svetlana M. 2006. “Kavkazskii mif v russkom romantizme i ego evoliutsiia v tvorchestve Ia. P. Polonskogo” [The Caucasian Myth in Russian Romanticism and its Evolution in the Work of Ia. P. Polonskii]. Ph.D. dissertation in Philological Sciences, Tomsk State University.Google Scholar
Sieburth, Richard. 1985. “Une idéologie du lisible: le phénomène des Physiologies” [An Ideology of the Legible: The Phenomenon of the Physiologies]. Romantisme, No. 47: 39–60.Google Scholar
Terras, Victor. 1974. Belinskij and Russian Literary Criticism: The Heritage of Organic Aesthetics. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Texier, Edmond. 1851. Histoire des Journaux: Biographie des journalistes contenant l’histoire politique, littéraire, industrielle, pittoresque et anecdotique de chaque journal publié à Paris et la biographie de ses rédacteurs [History of Journals: Biography of Journalists, Containing the Political, Literary, Industrial, Picturesque and Anecdotal Story of Each Journal Published in Paris and the Biography of its Editors]. Pagnerre.Google Scholar
Tseitlin, A. G. 1965. Stanovlenie russkogo realizma (Russkii fiziologicheskii ocherk) [The Making of Russian Realism: The Russian Physiological Sketch]. Nauka.Google Scholar
van Biesbrock, Hans-Rüdiger. 1978. Die literarische Mode der Physiologien in Frankreich (1840–1842) [The Literary Mode of the Physiologies in France, 1840–1842]. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The Capitalist World Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Harry B. 1971. “Belinskij and the Aesthetics of Utopian Socialism.” SEEJ, No. 15: 293–304.Google Scholar
WreC (Warwick Research Collective). 2015. Combined and Uneven Development. Towards a New Theory of World-Literature. Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Z.Z. 1843. “Russkaia literatura” [Russian Literature].Severnaia pchela [Northern Bee], No. 81: 322–23.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by