Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:18:09.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

31 - The psychology of music

from B - Music psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Robert Gjerdingen
Edited by
Thomas Christensen
Thomas Christensen
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

The psychology of music is a subfield of psychology that addresses questions of how the mind responds to, imagines, controls the performance of, and evaluates music. The history of this subfield has been greatly influenced by the major trends and developments in the parent discipline, and the organization of this chapter follows the traditional rubrics of that history. Earlier in the twentieth century there was a frequent distinction made between Tonpsychologie (the study of vibration, the ear, and the sensation of sound) and Musikpsychologie (the study of music as a form of cognition). Though the distinction seems less clear-cut today, this chapter recognizes its historical force and focuses on the latter category, with the former receiving extended treatment in Chapter 9, passim.

Since at least the seventeenth century, proponents of one or another theory of music have frequently used the psychology of music as a touchstone. They assert propositions in the general form of “musical relationship has a valuation because there exists a relevant phenomenon or principle in the psychology of music.” For example, one might view Rameau as having asserted that “the fifth and third, as progressions of the fundamental bass have the qualities of being good, natural, and fitting because Sauveur and other acousticians have shown these intervals to be present in every musical tone, as a macrocosm within a microcosm.” Or Riemann could be viewed as having asserted that “harmonic relationships based on progressions of a major third or perfect fifth between the chordal ‘roots’ have the qualities of being directly intelligible and foundational because Helmholtz and other physiologists have shown that the frequency analysis of the inner ear privileges these intervals.”

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Western Music Theory , pp. 956 - 981
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angell, J. R.Psychology, New York, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1904Google Scholar
Aristoxenus, , Elementa rhythmica, trans. and ed. Pearson, L. as Elementa rhythmica: The Fragment of Book II and the Additional Evidence for Aristoxenean Rhythmic Theory, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1990Google Scholar
Ash, M. G.Gestalt Psychology in German Culture, 1890–1967, Cambridge University Press, 1995Google Scholar
Bacon, F.Novum Organum, London, 1620Google Scholar
Bacon, F.The twoo bookes of Francis Bacon: of the proficience and advancement of learning, divine and humane (Advancement of Learning), London, H. Tomes, 1605Google Scholar
Bartlett, F.Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, 1932Google Scholar
Basevi, A.Introduzione ad un nuovo sistema d’armonia, Florence, Tofani, 1862Google Scholar
Bharucha, J. J. “Music Cognition and Perceptual Facilitation: A Connectionist Framework,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 5 (1987)Google Scholar
Bharucha, J. J. and Olney, K. L., “Tonal Cognition, Artificial Intelligence and Neural Nets,” Contemporary Music Review 4 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, W. V. D.Studies in Melody, Baltimore, Review Publishing Company, 1910Google Scholar
Boring, E. G. “The Psychology of Controversy,” Psychological Review 36 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boring, E. G.A History of Experimental Psychology, 2nd edn., New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950Google Scholar
Boring, E. G.Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology, New York, Appleton-Century, 1942Google Scholar
Brennan, J. F.History and Systems of Psychology, 3rd edn., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall, 1991Google Scholar
Brentano, F.Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt, Leipzig, 1874Google Scholar
Comte, A.Cours de philosophie positive, 2nd edn., Paris, 1864Google Scholar
Cooper, G. W. and Meyer, L. B., The Rhythmic Structure of Music, University of Chicago Press, 1960Google Scholar
Danziger, K. “Social Context and Investigative Practice in Early Twentieth-Century Psychology,” in Psychology in Twentieth-Century Thought and Society, ed. Ash, M. and Woodward, W., Cambridge University Press, 1987Google Scholar
Della Corte, A., La critica musicale e i critici, Turin, Unione Tipografico, 1961Google Scholar
Deutsch, D., ed., The Psychology of Music, New York, Academic Press, 1982; 2nd edn. 1999Google Scholar
Diserens, C. M.The Influence of Music on Behavior, Princeton University Press, 1926Google Scholar
Dowling, W. J. and Harwood, D. L., Music Cognition, New York, Academic Press, 1986Google Scholar
Drobisch, M. W.Nachträge zur Theorie der musikalischen Verhältnisse, Leipzig, Hirzel, 1855Google Scholar
Ehrenfels, C. von, “Über Gestaltqualitäten,” Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 14 (1890)Google Scholar
Farnsworth, P. R.The Social Psychology of Music, New York, Dryden Press, 1958Google Scholar
Francès, R.La Perception de la musique, Paris, J. Vrin, 1958; trans. Dowling, W. J. as The Perception of Music, Hillsdale, NJ, L. Erlbaum, 1988Google Scholar
Gjerdingen, R. O. “An Experimental Music Theory?” in Rethinking Music, ed. Cook, N. and Everist, M., Oxford University Press, 1999Google Scholar
Gjerdingen, R. O. “Categorization of Musical Patterns by Self-Organizing Neuronlike Networks,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 8 (1990)Google Scholar
Gjerdingen, R. O. “Using Connectionist Models to Explore Complex Musical Patterns,” Computer Music Journal 13 (1989); reprinted inGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O.The Organization of Behavior: A Neurop sychological Theory, New York, Wiley, 1949Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H.Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik (1863), 4th edn., Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877; trans. Ellis, A. J. as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longman and Green, 1885; reprint, New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar
Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N., “Receptive Fields, Binocular Interaction and Functional Architecture in the Cat’s Visual Cortex,” Journal of Physiology 160 (1962)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huron, D. and Sellmer, P., “Critical Bands and the Spelling of Vertical Sonorities,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 10 (1992)Google Scholar
Krumhansl, C. L.Cognitive Foundations of Musical Pitch, New York, Oxford University Press, 1990Google Scholar
Kurth, E.Musikpsychologie, Bern, Krompholz, 1931Google Scholar
Leman, M. “The Ontogenesis of Tonal Semantics: Results of a Computer Study,” in Music and Connectionism, ed. Todd, P. and Loy, G., Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1991Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. “Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems,” in Generative Processes in Music, ed. Sloboda, J., Oxford University Press, 1988Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R., A Generative Theory of Tonal Music, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1983Google Scholar
Locke, J.An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London, T. Basset, 1690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
London, J. “Some Examples of Complex Meters and Their Implications for Models of Metric Perception,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983– 13 (1995)Google Scholar
Lorenz, C. “Untersuchungen über die Auffassung von Tondistanzen,” Philosophische Studien 6 (1890)Google Scholar
Mach, E. “Vom räumlichen Sehen” (1865), in Populärwissenschaftliche Vorlesungen, Leipzig, 1911Google Scholar
Meyer, L. B. “Exploiting Limits: Creation, Archetypes and Change,” Daedalus 109 (1980)Google Scholar
Meyer, L. B.Emotion and Meaning in Music, University of Chicago Press, 1956Google Scholar
Meyer, L. B.Explaining Music: Essays and Explorations, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1973Google Scholar
Meyer, M. F.The Musician’s Arithmetic; Drill Problems for an Introduction to the Scientific Study of Musical Composition, Columbia, University of Missouri Press, 1929Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two,” Psychological Review 63 (1956), and (1994)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, G. A. and Heise, G. A., “The Trill Threshold,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mursell, J. L.The Psychology of Music, New York, Norton, 1937Google Scholar
Music and Connectionism, ed. Todd, P. M. and Loy, D. G., Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1991Google Scholar
Narmour, E.The Analysis and Cognition of Basic Melodic Structures: The Implication–Realization Model, University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar
Narmour, E.The Analysis and Cognition of Melodic Complexity: The Implication–Realization Model, University of Chicago Press, 1992Google Scholar
Parncutt, R.Harmony: A Psychoacoustical Approach, New York, Springer, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plomp, R. and Levelt, W. J. M., “Tonal Consonance and Critical Bandwidth,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 38 (1965)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wason, R. and West Marvin, E. in Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1957– 36 (1992)Google Scholar
Révész, G.Ervin Nyiregyházy: psychologische Analyse eines musikalisch hervorragenden Kindes, Leipzig, 1916; trans. Révész, as The Psychology of a Musical Prodigy, London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., 1925Google Scholar
Révész, G.Zur Grundlegung der Tonpsychologie, Leipzig, Veit, 1913Google Scholar
Riemann, H. “Ideen zu einer ‘Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,’” (1914); reprint in Frankfurter Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft 2 (1999); trans.Google Scholar
Schoen, M.The Psychology of Music: A Survey for Teacher and Musician, New York, Ronald Press, 1940Google Scholar
Seashore, C. E.Psychology of Music, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1938Google Scholar
Seashore, C. E.The Psychology of Musical Talent, Boston, Silver, Burdett, 1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serafine, M. L.Music as Cognition: The Development of Thought in Sound, New York, Columbia University Press, 1988Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” Bell Systems Technical Journal 27 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, R. N. “Circularity in Judgements of Relative Pitch,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 36 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, A. “An Objective Analysis of Artistic Violin Performance,” University of Iowa Studies in the Psychology of Music 4 (1936)Google Scholar
Stumpf, C. “Vergleichung der Tondistanzen,” Zeitschrift für Psychologie (1890)Google Scholar
Stumpf, C.Tonpsychologie, 2 vols., Leipzig, S. Hirzel, 1883–1890Google Scholar
Terhardt, E., Stoll, G. and Seewann, M., “Algorithm for Extraction of Pitch and Pitch Salience from Complex Tonal Signals,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1982)Google Scholar
Titchener, E. B.An Outline of Psychology, New York, Macmillan, 1896Google Scholar
Tolman, E. C. “Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men,” Psychological Review 55 (1948)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wundt, W.Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie, Leipzig, W. Engelmann, 1874Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×