Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:33:21.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Dualist tonal space and transformation in nineteenth-century musical thought

from A - Mapping tonal spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Thomas Christensen
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Introduction: tonal systems without scales

Nineteenth-century music theory in German-speaking countries divides reasonably into two main traditions: thorough-bass styles of music theory and harmonic dualism. The approaches are usually thought of nowadays as scale-degree theory and functionalism, respectively; since the emphasis in the account here is on chord structure and chordal relations as expressions of such structure, the traditions are characterized so as to foreground these particular aspects in their approach.

Interestingly, by the last half of the nineteenth century, the two traditions had become connected to different geo-political formations in Central Europe, such that we may properly speak of thorough-bass theory as Viennese (or more generally, Austrian) and harmonic dualism as Prussian, in the sense that these approaches were developed or extended within the context and dynamic of relevant educational institutions and their corresponding research ethoi in those two areas. A third major tradition, the fundamental-bass theory emanating from the work of Rameau, was more international in scope and influence. In spite of obvious dissimilarities, it was considered by harmonic dualists (in particular, Riemann) to form an important early articulation of a number of theoretical concepts basic to their own approach, a judgment shared less positively by Heinrich Schenker, who saw Riemann’s approach to tonality as little more than warmed-over Rameau. This particular alignment of approaches seems based entirely on whether one held that the structure-forming relations within chords could withstand registral rearrangement (as both Riemann and Rameau did) or not (as asserted by thorough-bass theorists).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balinfante, A.De leer der tonale functien in conflict met die der polaire tegenstelling,Orgaan van de Vereeniging van Muziek-Onderwijzers en -Onderwijzeressen 4/9 (1904)Google Scholar
Bernstein, D.Schoenberg contra Riemann: Stufen, Regions, Verwandtschaft, and the Theory of Tonal Function,Theoria 6 (1992)Google Scholar
Braunschweig, F. Vieweg, 1877; trans. Ellis, A. J. as On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music, 2nd edn., London, Longman and Green, 1885; reprint, New York, Dover, 1954Google Scholar
Burnham, S.Method and Motivation in History of Harmonic Theory,Music Theory Spectrum (The Journal of the Society for Music Theory), University of California Press, 197914 (1992)Google Scholar
Cohn, R.Introduction to Neo-Riemannian Theory: A Survey and a Historical Perspective,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195742 (1999)Google Scholar
Cohn, R.Maximally Smooth Cycles, Hexatonic Systems, and the Analysis of Late-Romantic Triadic Progressions,” Music Analysis 15/1 (1996)Google Scholar
Cohn, R.Neo-Riemannian Operations, Parsimonious Trichords, and their Tonnetz Representations,Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195741 (1997)Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C.War Zarlino Dualist?,” Die Musikforschung (1957)Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, C.Untersuchungen über die Entstehung der harmonischen Tonalität, Kassel, Bärenreiter, 1968; trans. Gjerdingen, R. as Studies on the Origin of Harmonic Tonality, Princeton University Press, 1990
Goetschius, P.The Theory and Practice of Tone-Relations, New York, G. Schirmer, 1917Google Scholar
Gollin, E.Some Aspects of Three-Dimensional Tonnetze,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195742 (1998)Google Scholar
Bewerung, H. as Harmony Simplified, London, Augener, 1896Google Scholar
Harrison, D.Harmonic Function in Chromatic Music: A Renewed Dualist Theory and an Account of Its Precedents, University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar
Hauptmann, M.Ein Brief M. Hauptmann’s über Helmholtz’s ‘Tonempfindungen,’Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung 1/40 (1863), cols.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, M.Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik, Leipzig, Breitkopf and Härtel, , 1853; trans. Heathcote, W. as The Nature of Harmony and Metre, London, S. Sonnenschein, 1888
Helmholtz, H.Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologischer Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik, (1863) 4th edn.,Google Scholar
Hildesheim, G. Olms, 1967; trans. Bomberger, E. D. as “‘Our Conservatories,’ from Präludium und Studien (1895) by Hugo Riemann, H.The Bulletin of Historical Research in Music Education 15 (1994)
Hyer, B.Reimag(in)ing Riemann,Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195739 (1995)Google Scholar
Klumpenhouwer, H.Some Remarks on the Use of Riemann Transformations,” Music Theory Online 0/9 (1994)Google Scholar
Kopp, D.The Function of Function,” Music Theory Online 1/3 (1995)Google Scholar
Krumhansl, C.Perceived Triad Distance: Evidence supporting the Psychological Reality of Neo-Riemannian Transformations,Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195742 (1999).Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F.Tonal Pitch Spaces,” Music Perception, Berkeley, University of California Press, 19835 (1988)Google Scholar
Levarie, S.Musical Polarity: Major and Minor,International Journal of Musicology 1 (1992)Google Scholar
Lewin, D.A Formal Theory of Generalized Tonal Functions,Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195726 (1982)Google Scholar
Lewin, D.Cohn Functions,Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195740 (1996)Google Scholar
Lewin, D.Some Notes on Analyzing Wagner: The Ring and Parsifal,19th Century Music 16 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, D.Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1987Google Scholar
Lewin, D.Music Form and Transformations: 4 Analytic Essays, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1993Google Scholar
Maegaard, J.Harmonisk analyse af det 19. arhundredes musik: En teoretisk overvejelse,Musik & Forskning 15 (1989–90); reprint in Zur harmonischen Analyse der Musik des 19. Jahrhunderts: Eine Theoretische Erwagung, Wiesbaden, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1990Google Scholar
McClelland, C.State, Society and University in Germany 1700–1914, Cambridge University Press, 1980Google Scholar
Munnich, R.Von Entwicklung der Riemannschen Harmonielehre und ihrem Verhältnis zu Oettingen und Stumpf,” trans. Wason, R., Indiana Theory Review 16 (1995)Google Scholar
Oettingen, A. von, Harmoniesystem in Dualer Entwicklung: Studien zur Theorie der Musik, Leipzig, W. Gläser, 1866Google Scholar
Wason, R. and Marvin, E. West as “Riemann’s ‘Ideen zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen’: An Annotated Translation,” Journal of Music Theory, New Haven, Yale University Press, 195736 (1992)
Riemann, H.Ideen zu einer ‘Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen,’Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters 21 (1914); trans.Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Unsere Konservatorien,” in Präludien und Studien, vol. I, Leipzig, H. Seemann, 1895Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Grosse Kompositionslehre, 2 vols., Berlin, W. Spemann, 1902–03Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Handbuch der Harmonielehre (1887), 3rd edn., Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1898Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Skizze einer Neuen Methode der Harmonielehre, Leipzig, Breitkopf und Härtel, 1880Google Scholar
Riemann, H.Vereinfachte Harmonielehre, oder die Lehre von den Tonalen Funktionen der Akkorde, London, Augener, 1893; trans.Google Scholar
Seidel, W.Ältere und neuere Musik: Über Hugo Riemanns Bild der Musikgeschichte”, in Alte Musik im 20. Jahrhundert: Wandlungen und Formen ihrer Rezeption, ed. Schubert, G., Mainz, Schott, 1995Google Scholar
Wason, R. W.Progressive Harmonic Theory in the Mid-nineteenth Century,Journal of Musicological Research 8 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wason, R. W.Viennese Harmonic Theory from Albrechtsberger to Schenker and Schoenberg, University of Rochester Press, 1995Google Scholar
Wuensche, G.Hugo Riemann’s Musical Theory,Studies in Music 2 (1977)Google Scholar
Zarlino, G.Le istitutioni harmoniche, Venice, Franceschi, 1558Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×