Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T10:40:44.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Weber, Durkheim and the sociology of the modern state

from Part III - Science, modernism and politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Antonino Palumbo  and
Alan Scott
Edited by
Terence Ball  and
Richard Bellamy
Terence Ball
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Richard Bellamy
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access

Summary

Modern social theory offers three main models of the state: an instrumentalist, a realist and a pluralist. These models can be respectively represented by the names Karl Marx, Max Weber and Emile Durkheim. Of those three theorists, perhaps only Marx can claim to be a key originator of ‘his’ model of the state. In Weber’s political sociology the influence of political realism stretching back at least as far as Machiavelli and Hobbes is quite transparent. Furthermore, while rejecting any form of socialism and what he took to be the economic reductionism of Marxist theory, Weber nevertheless sought to retain elements of a materialist methodology denuded of its original political aim. Finally, Weber’s conception of power as an expression of will, and his view of both politics and society as increasingly rationalised (and ‘disenchanted’) and as sites of eternal struggle owe a great deal to his reading of Nietzsche. His achievement might be described as one of synthesising elements of realism, materialism and nihilism, and of translating these into the language of the modern social sciences. In Durkheim’s political sociology the influence of both French and German political theory is no less evident. His view of the state as the deliberative organ of political societies and as the guardian of their conscience collective echoes Rousseau’s general will, French socialist thought (in particular Saint–Simon’s) and Comte’s positivist approach to the study of society. Moreover, his emphasis upon the normative role of secondary associations (as both a source of identity and as a counter-balance to the growing power of the state) has precedence not only in Montesquieu and Tocqueville, but also in those German political theorists who tried to rescue elements of the ‘Standestaat’ (polity of estates) for a modern pluralist society. Durkheim’s objective was to use scientific method to show how the individual and the social, the value of freedom and the requirement of solidarity, might be reconciled.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought , pp. 368 - 391
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, Walter L. (1993). Avant-garde Florence: From Modernism to Fascism, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Walter (1997). ‘Futurism, Mass Culture, and Women: The Reshaping of the Artistic Vocation, 1909–1920’, Modernism/Modernity 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T. W. et al. (1969). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Neuwied, trans. Adey, Glyn and Frisby, David as The Positivismusstreit in German Sociology, London, 1976.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1984 [1970]). Aesthetic Theory, trans. Lenhardt, Christian, London and New York.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor (1991). The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, ed. Bernstein, J. M., London.Google Scholar
Allen, A. L. and Regan, M. C. (1998) (eds.). Debating Democracy’s Discontent: Essays on American Politics, Law, and Public Philosophy, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. (1950). The American People and Foreign Policy, New York.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. (1954). The Appeals of Communism, Princeton, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney (1963). The Civic Culture: Politics, Attitudes, and Democ-racy in Five Nations, Princeton, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Perry (1974). Lineages of the Absolutist State, London.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry (1998). The Origins of Postmodernity, London.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F. R. (1996). Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy Beyond Fact and Value, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Annan, Noël (1959). The Curious Strength of Positivism in English Political Thought, London.Google Scholar
Annan, Noël (1991). Our Age: The Generation that Made Post-War Britain, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Ansbacher, Heinz L. and Ansbacher, Rowena R. (1956) (eds.). The Individual Psychology of Alfred Adler: A Systematic Presentation in Selections from his Writings, New York.Google Scholar
Antliff, Mark (1993). Inventing Bergson: Cultural Politics and the Parisian Avant-garde, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Apollinaire, Guillaume (1972a [1912]). ‘Reality, Pure Painting’, in Apollinaire on Art: Es-says and Reviews 1902–1918, ed. Breunig, Leland C., trans. Suleiman, Susan, New York.Google Scholar
Apollinaire, Guillaume (1972b [1913]). ‘Modern Painting’, in Apollinaire on Art: Essays and Reviews 1902–1918, ed. Breunig, Leland C., trans. Suleiman, Susan, New York.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism, New York.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958). The Human Condition, Chicago.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (1982). ‘The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems’, Ethics 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. (1973). ‘Some Ordinalist-Utilitarian Notes on Rawls’s Theory of Justice’, Journal of Philosophy 70.Google Scholar
Asendorf, Christoph (1993). Batteries of Life: On the History of Things and their Perception in Modernity, trans. Reneau, Don, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Avineri, S. and de-Shalit, A. (1992) (eds.). Communitarianism and Individualism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Aye r, A. J. (1967). ‘Man as a Subject for Science’, in Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics, and Society, 3rd series, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. (1968). The Origins of Pragmatism, London, Melbourne and Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürger, Peter (2000). Der Ursprung des Postmodernen Denkens, Weilerswist.Google Scholar
Badiou, Alain (2000). Ethics: An Essay on the Understanding of Evil, trans. Hallward, Peter, London.Google Scholar
Ball, T., Farr, J. and Hanson, R. (1989) (eds.). Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence (1984). ‘Marxian Science and Positivist Politics’, in Ball, Terence and Farr, James (eds.) After Marx, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ball, Terence (1988). Transforming Political Discourse: Political Theory and Critical Conceptual History, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1965). Political Argument. London; 2nd edn 1990, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1973). The Liberal Theory of Justice, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1989). Theories of Justice, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1995). Justice as Impartiality, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (1998). ‘International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’, in Mapel, D. R. and Nardin, T. (eds.) International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Basu, K., Pattanaik, P. and Suzumura, K. (1995) (eds.). Choice, Welfare, and Development: A Festschrift in Honour of Amartya K. Sen, Oxford.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles (1964 [1863]). The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, ed. and trans. Maine, Jonathan, New York.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles (1975 [1887]). ‘Journaux intimes’, in Oeuvres complètes, Paris, vol. I.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles (1991 [1861–1869]). The Flowers of Evil and Paris Spleen, trans. Crosby, Leland H., Brockport, N.Y.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles (1992 [1846]). ‘The Salon of 1846’, in Selected Writings on Art and Literature, trans. Charvet, P. E., London.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (1994 [1981]). Simulacra and Simulation, trans. Glaser, Sheila Faria, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bayles, M. D. (1992). Hart’s Legal Philosophy: An Examination, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, David (1974). Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics, London.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (1987). Modern Italian Social Theory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (1992). Liberalism and Modern Society: An Historical Argument, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Benda, Julien (1927). Le trahison des clercs, Paris; trans. Aldington, Richard as The Treason of the Intellectuals, New York and London, 1969.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1977). Nation Building and Citizenship, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1978a [1929]). ‘Surrealism’, in Reflections, ed. Demetz, Peter, trans. Jephcott, Edmund, New York and London.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1978b [1936]). ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, in Illuminations, ed. Arendt, Hannah, trans. Zohn, Harry, New York.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1978c [1939]). ‘On Some Motifs in Baudelaire’, in Illuminations, ed. Arendt, Hannah, trans. Zohn, Harry, New York.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter (1983 [1938]). ‘The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire’, in Charles Baudelaire: Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism, trans. Zohn, Harry.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I. and Peters, R. S. (1959). Social Principles and the Democratic State, London.Google Scholar
Beran, H. (1987). The Consent Theory of Political Obligation, London.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard (1952). Content Analysis in Communications Research, Glencoe, III.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard, Lazarsfeld, Paul F. and McPhee, William N. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1910 [1889]). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, trans. Pogson, F. L., London.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1911 [1907]). Creative Evolution, trans. Mitchell, Arthur, London.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1931). An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. Hulme, T. E., London.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1935 [1932]). The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C.London.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1962). ‘Does Political Theory Still Exist?’, in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, 2nd series, Oxford.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah (1969). ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in Berlin, I., Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bernays, Edward L. (1923). Crystallizing Public Opinion, New York.Google Scholar
Bernays, Edward L. (1928). Propaganda, New York.Google Scholar
Bersani, Leo (1990). The Culture of Redemption, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbach, Norman (1961). Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1987 [1984]). The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game, ed. Bellamy, Richard, trans. Griffen, R., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1993 [1958, 1960]). Teoria generale del diritto, Turin.Google Scholar
Bobbio, N. (1995 [1990]). The Age of Rights, trans. Cameron, A., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1991). The Political Ontology of Martin Heidegger, trans. Collier, Peter, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1992b). Les règles de l’art: genèse et structure du champ littéraire, Paris.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1877). Mr Sidgwick’s Hedonism, London.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1902 [1893]). Appearance and Reality, London.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. (1969 [1874]). The Presuppositions of Critical History, Don Mills, Ontario.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. (1959). Ethical Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. (1992a). Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Breton, André (1981 [1924]). ‘Three Dada Manifestos’, in Motherwell, Robert (ed.) The Dada Painters and Poets: An Anthology, Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Browning, Don (1973). Generative Man: Psychoanalytic Perspectives, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan (1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape, New York.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. (1975). The Limits of Liberty, Chicago.Google Scholar
Buckle, Henry Thomas (1882). History of Civilisation in England, 3 vols., London.Google Scholar
Burston, Daniel (1991). The Legacy of Erich Fromm, Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burtt, S. (1993). ‘The Politics of Virtue Today: A Critique and a Proposal’, American Political Science Review 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1920). The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into its Origins and Grounds, London.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York and London.Google Scholar
Callinicos, Alex (1989). Against Postmodernism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst (1950). The Problem of Knowledge: Philosophy, Science and History since Hegel, trans. Woglom, Leland H. and Hendel, Charles W., New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Catlin, George E. G. (1927). The Science and Methods of Politics, London.Google Scholar
Catlin, George E. (1930). A Study of the Principles of Politics, London.Google Scholar
Catlin, George (1936). ‘Propaganda as a Function of Democratic Government’, in Childs, Harwood L. (ed.) Propaganda and Dictatorship, Princeton, N.J..Google Scholar
Cendrars, Blaise (1922 [1917]). ‘Profound Today’, Broom 1.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, James S. (1962) (ed.). The Limits of Behavioralism in Political Science, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Charlton, D. G. (1959). Positivist Thought in France during the Second Empire, 1852–1870, Oxford.Google Scholar
Charney, Leo and Schwartz, Vanessa R. (1995) (eds.). Cinema and the Invention of Modern Life, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Cladis, Mark S. (1992). A Communitarian Defense of Liberalism: Emile Durkheim and Contemporary Social Theory, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Clark, Ronald (1980). Freud: The Man and the Cause, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, Peter (1981 [1978]). Liberals and Social Democrats, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cocks, Geoffrey (1997 [1985]). Psychotherapy in the Third Reich, New York.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1978). Karl Marx’s Theory of History: A Defense, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1988). History, Labour and Freedom: Themes from Marx, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1989). ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. (1995). Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Marshall (1983) (ed.). Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence, Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar
Coles, Robert (1970). Erik H. Erikson: The Growth of his Work, Boston.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. B. (1946). The Idea of History, Oxford.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan (1979). Liberalism and Sociology: L. T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England, 1880–1914, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Winch, Donald and Burrow, John (1983). That Noble Science of Politics: Studies in Nineteenth Century Intellectual History, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte, Auguste (1975 [1830–1842]). Cours de philosophie positive, reprinted as Philosophie première: Cours de philosophie positive, LeHons 1 B 45, ed. Serres, Michel, Dagognet, François and Simceur, Albul; and Physique sociale: Cours de philosophie positive, LeHons 46 B 60, ed. Enthoven, Jean-Paul, Paris.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. (1991). Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox, Ithaca, N.Y. and London.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. (1969) (ed.). The Bias of Pluralism, New York.Google Scholar
Crespigny, A. and Wertheimer, A. (1970) (eds.). Contemporary Political Theory, New York.Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard (1959). The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions, Berkeley, Calif. and London.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1909). Logica come scienza del concetto puro, 2nd edn, Bari.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1917). Teoria e storia della storiografia, Bari.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1927 [1917]). An Autobiography, trans. Collingwood, R. G., with preface by Smith, J. A., Oxford.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto (1945 [1924]). Politics and Morals, trans. Castiglione, Leland J., New York.Google Scholar
Dagger, R. (1997). Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism, New York.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1961). ‘The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest’, American Political Science Review 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Mary (1978). Gyn/Ecology: The Metaphysics of Radical Feminism, Boston.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (1975) (ed.). Reading Rawls: Critical Studies of A Theory of Justice, New York.Google Scholar
Davison, Ned (1966). The Concept of Modernism in Hispanic Criticism, Boulder, Colo.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1984). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Hurley, Robert, Seem, Mark and Lane, Helen R., London.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1973 [1967]). Speech and Phenomena, trans. Allison, Leland B., Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1974 [1967]). Of Grammatology, trans. Spivak, Gayatri, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1978 [1967]). Writing and Difference, trans. Bass, Alan, London.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1981a [1972]). Dissemination, trans. Johnson, Barbara, London.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1981b [1967]). Positions, trans. Bass, Alan, London.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1982 [1972]). Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, Alan, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1992). ‘Force of Law’, in Cornell, Drucilla and Rosenfeld, Michael (eds.) Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, New York and London.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1994). Specters of Marx, trans. Kamuf, Peggy, New York.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Helene (1944–1945). The Psychology of Women, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Helene (1991 [1925]). Psychoanalysis of the Sexual Functions of Women, ed. Roazen, Paul, trans. Mosbacher, Eric, London.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1903). Studies in Logical Theory, with members and Fellows of the University of Chicago Department of Philosophy, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1928). The Public and its Problems, London.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary G. and Farr, James (1998). ‘“Politics Would Undoubtedly Unwoman Her”: Gender, Suffrage, and American Political Science’, in Silverberg, Helene (ed.) Gender and American Social Science: The Formative Years, Princeton, N.J..Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm (1989 [1883]). Introduction to the Human Sciences (vol. I of Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected Works), trans. and ed. Makkreel, Leland A. and Rodi, Frithjof, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. (1985). The Concept of Human Rights, New York.Google Scholar
Doob, Leonard W. (1935). Propaganda: Its Psychology and Technique, New York.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1957). The Economic Theory of Democracy, New York.Google Scholar
Drake, Richard (1981). ‘The Theory and Practice of Italian Nationalism, 1900–1906’, Journal of Modern History 51.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna (1994). The Visible Word: Experimental Typography and Modern Art, 1909–1923, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1885). ‘Review of Fouillée’s La propriété sociale et la démocratie’, in Giddens, A. (1986) (ed.) Durkheim on Politics and the State, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1887). ‘Review of Labriola’s Essais sur la conception matérialiste de l’histoire’, in Giddens, A. (1986) (ed.) Durkheim on Politics and the State, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1897). ‘Review of Merlino’s Formes et essence du socialisme’, in Giddens, A. (1986) (ed.) Durkheim on Politics and the State, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1912). Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse, Paris.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1915). Germany Above All: German Mentality and the War, Paris.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1957). Professional Ethics and Civic Morals, trans. Brookfield, C., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1960). ‘Pragmatism and Sociology’, in Wolff, K. H. (ed.) Emile Durkheim, 1858–1917, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1969 [1898]). ‘Individualism and the Intellectuals’, Political Studies 17.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1971 [1928]) Le socialisme, intro. Mauss, M., 2nd edn, Paris.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1976 [1930]) Le suicide: étude de sociologie, 2nd edn, Paris; trans. Spaulding, Leland A. and Simpson, George as Suicide: A Study in Sociology, 1951.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1983 [1913]). Pragmatism and Sociology, ed. Allcock, Leland B., trans. Whitehouse, J. C., Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1984 [1893/1902]). The Division of Labour in Society, trans. Halls, W. D., London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously, London.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981). ‘What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 10.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1992). ‘Liberal Community’, in Avineri, S. and de-Shalit, A. (eds.) Communitarianism and Individualism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom, New York.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1953). The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, Chicago.Google Scholar
Easton, David (1969). ‘The New Revolution in Political Science’, American Political Science Review 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, W. A. (1999) (ed.). The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings, Lanham, Md.Google Scholar
Ellenberger, Henri (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry, New York.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1985). Making Sense of Marx, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik H. (1950). Childhood and Society, New York.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik (1958). Young Man Luther: A Study in Psychoanalysis and History, New York.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis, New York.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik (1969). Gandhi’s Truth: On the Origins of Militant Nonviolence, New York.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1995) (ed.). New Communitarian Thinking: Persons, Virtues, Institutions, and Communities, Charlottesville, Va.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (1997) (ed.). The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society, New York.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1963). The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics, New York.Google Scholar
Farr, James (1984). ‘Marx and Positivism’, in Ball, Terence and , James Farr (eds.) After Marx, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farr, James (2004). ‘Political Science’, in Porter, Theodore M. and Ross, Dorothy (eds.) The Cambridge History of Science: The Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. VII, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feigl, Herbert (1969). ‘The Wiener Kreis in America’, in Fleming, Donald and Bailyn, Bernardy (eds.) The Intellectual Migration: Europe and America, 1930–1960, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc and Renault, Alain (1990). Heidegger and Modernity, trans. Philip, Franklin, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
FitzGerald, Michael C. (1995). Making Modernism: Picasso and the Creation of the Market for Twentieth-Century Art, New York.Google Scholar
Flathman, R. (1973) (ed.). Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy, New York.Google Scholar
Foster, Hal (1993). Compulsive Beauty, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1967 [1961]). Madness and Civilisation: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, London.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1970 [1966]). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. Sheridan, Alan, London.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1972 [1969]). The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. Sheridan, Alan, London.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1973 [1964]). The Birth of the Clinic, trans. Alan, Sheridan, London.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1979 [1975]). Discipline and Punish, trans. Alan, Sheridan, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1981 [1976]). History of Sexuality, vol. I: An Introduction, trans. Hurley, Robert, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1982). ‘Afterword: The Subject and Power’, in Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Rabinow, Paul, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Brighton.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1991 [1978]). Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori, trans. Goldstein, R. James and James, Cascaito, New York.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael (1978). The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform, Oxford.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vols. IV–V, ed. Strachey, James, London, 1953–1974.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1901). The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. VI, ed. Strachey, James, London, 1953–1974.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1921). Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, in The Standard Edition of the Com-plete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XVIII, ed. Strachey, James, London, 1953–1974.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1927). The Future of an Illusion, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XXI, ed. Strachey, James, London, 1953–1974.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1930). Civilization and its Discontents, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XXI, ed. Strachey, James, London, 1953–1974.Google Scholar
Friedman, Leonard J. (1999). Identity’s Architect: A Biography of Erik H. Erikson, New York.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1992). ‘Feminism and Modern Friendship: Dislocating the Community’, in Avineri, S. and de-Shalit, A. (eds.) Communitarianism and Individualism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich (1941). Escape from Freedom, New York.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich (1947). Man for Himself: An Inquiry into the Psychology of Ethics, New York.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich (1956). The Sane Society, London.Google Scholar
Fromm, Erich (1958 [1955]). ‘The Human Implications of Instinctivistic “Radicalism”: A Reply to Herbert Marcuse’, in Voices of Dissent, ed. Howe, Irving, New York.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. (1969). The Morality of Law, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Galipeau, C. (1994). Isaiah Berlin’s Liberalism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B. (1966). Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, New York.Google Scholar
Galston, W. (1991). Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gane, Mike (1984). ‘Institutional Socialism and the Sociological Critique of Communism’, Economy and Society 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gavison, R. (1987) (ed.). Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H. L. A. Hart, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter (1968). Weimar Culture: The Outsider as Insider, New York.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest (1983). Nations and Nationalism, Oxford.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. (1959). Propaganda Analysis: A Study of Inferences Made from Nazi Pro-paganda in World War II, Evanston, Ill.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and Morality, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. (1982). Human Rights: Justification and Applications, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. (1996). The Community of Rights, Chicago.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1985). The Nation-State and Violence, vol. II of A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1986) (ed.). Durkheim on Politics and the State, trans. Hall, W. D., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Girard, René (1980 [1961]). ‘“Triangular” Desire’, in Desire, Deceit, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Studies, trans. Freccero, Yvonne, Baltimore, Md., and London.Google Scholar
Gleizes, Albert (1981 [1920]). ‘The Dada Case’, in Motherwell, R. (ed.) Dada Painters and Poets, Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Gleizes, Albert and Metzinger, Jean (1964 [1912]). ‘Cubism’, in Herbert, Robert L. (ed.) Modern Artists on Art, Englewood Cliffs, N.J..Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joseph, Solnit, Albert J., Goldstein, Sonja and Freud, Anna (1996). The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative, New York.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert (1995). Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. (1995). Isaiah Berlin, London.Google Scholar
Green, L. (1988). The Authority of the State, Oxford.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1888a [1881]). ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract’, in Green, T. H., Works, ed. Nettleship, R. L., London, vol. III.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. (1888b [1886]). ‘Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation’, in Green, T. H., Works, ed. Nettleship, R. L., London, vol. II.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Clement (1992 [1961]). ‘Modernist Painting’, in Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul (eds.) Art in Theory 1900–1990, Oxford and Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Grogin, R. C. (1988). The Bergsonian Controversy in France, 1900–1914, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Guest, S. (1992). Ronald Dworkin, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G. (1993). The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation, Chicago.Google Scholar
Gutmann, A. (1992). ‘The Communitarian Critics of Liberalism’, in Avineri, S. and de Shalit, A. (eds.) Communitarianism and Individualism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1969a [1963]). ‘Analytische Wissenschaftstheorie und Dialektik’, in Adorno et al. Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Neuwied.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1969b [1964]). ‘Gegen einen positivisch halbierten Rationalismus’, in Adorno et al. Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie, Neuwied.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1971). ‘Discussion on “Value Freedom and Objectivity”’, in Stammer, O. (ed.) Max Weber and Sociology Today, trans. Morris, Kathleen, Oxford.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1982) The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols., trans. McCarthy, ThomasBoston and London, 1984.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1987a). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, trans. Lawrence, FrederickCambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1987b [1981]). The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. II: Lifeworld and System, trans. McCarthy, Thomas, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1992 [1962]). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Burger, Thomas, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1993 [1981]). ‘Modernity – an Incomplete Project’, in Docherty, Thomas (ed.) Postmodernism: A Reader, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1996). ‘The European Nation–State – Its Achievements and its Limits: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship’, in Balakrishnan, G. (ed.) Mapping the Nation, London.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John (2003 [1787–1788]). The Federalist, ed. Ball, Terence, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampshire, S. (1978) (ed.). Public and Private Morality, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handlin, Oscar (1963). ‘The Modern City as a Field of Historical Study’, in Handlin, Oscar and Burchard, John (eds.) The Historian and the City, Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (1988). Morality within the Limits of Reason, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1963). Freedom and Reason, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hare, R. (1981). Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsanyi, J. (1982). ‘Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour’, in Sen, A. and Williams, B. A. O. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’, Philosophical Review 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1963). Law, Liberty, and Morality, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1973). ‘Rawls on Liberty and its Priority’, University of Chicago Law Review 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. and Honoré, A. M. (1959). Causation in the Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1962 [1927]). Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward, Oxford.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1975–). Gesamtausgabe, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1976). ‘Only a God Can Save Us: Der Spiegel’s Interview with Martin Heidegger’, Philosophy Today 20 (4/4).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1979–1987 [1961]). Nietzsche, 4 vols., trans. Stambaugh, Joan, Krell, David Farrell and Capuzzi, Frank A., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1993). ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, in Krell, David Farrell (ed.) Basic Writings, New York revised edn.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics, trans. , William McNeill and , Nicholas Walker, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1999a). >Ontology – The Hermeneutics of Facticity, trans. Buren, John, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1999b). Contributions to Philosophy: From Enowning, trans. Emad, Parvis and , Kenneth Maly, Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Held, David (1993). ‘From City-States to a Cosmopolitan Order?’, in Held, David (ed.) Prospects for Democracy, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hempel, Carl G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York and London.Google Scholar
Hennis, Wilhelm (2000). Max Weber’s Central Questions, 2nd edn of Max Weber, Essays in Reconstruction (1988), trans. Tribe, K., Newbury.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul Q. (1994). Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul Q. (1997). From Statism to Pluralism, London.Google Scholar
Hirst, Paul Q. and Thompson, Grahame (1999). Globalization in Question, 2nd edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1968 [1651]). Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B., Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, Leonard (1906). Morals in Evolution: A Study in Comparative Ethics, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, Leonard (1913). Development and Purpose: An Essay towards a Philosophy of Evolution, London.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric (1994). The Age of Extremes: A History of the World, 1914–1991, New York.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Edward (1994). The Drive for Self: Alfred Adler and the Founding of Individual Psychology, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard (1944). Social Darwinism in American Thought, 1860–1915, Philadelphia and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, Max and Adorno, Theodor (1972 [1944]). Dialectic of Enlightenment, trans. Cumming, J., New York.Google Scholar
Horney, Karen (1937). The Neurotic Personality of our Time, London.Google Scholar
Horney, Karen (1967). Feminine Psychology, New York.Google Scholar
Horton, J. (1992). Political Obligation, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, J. and Mendus, S. (1994) (eds.). After MacIntyre: Critical Perspectives, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hughes, H. Stuart (1979 [1958]). Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought 1890–1930, 2nd edn, New York.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (1992). Reading Dworkin Critically, New York.Google Scholar
Hylton, Peter (1990). Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1998). Isaiah Berlin: A Life, New York.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce (1985a [1974]). Speculum of the Other Woman, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce (1985b [1977]). This Sex which is not One, Ithaca, N.Y.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Russell (1975). Social Amnesia: A Critique of Conformist Psychology from Adler to Laing, Boston.Google Scholar
James, William (1891). The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
James, William (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience, London.Google Scholar
James, William (1976 [1907]). Pragmatism, New York.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, Durham, N.C.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin (1973). The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923–50, Boston.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin (1992). ‘“The Aesthetic Ideology” as Ideology; or, What Does it Mean to Aestheticize Politics?’, Cultural Critique 9.Google Scholar
Jencks, Charles (1991 [1978]). The Language of Post-modern Architecture, revised and enlarged edn, London.Google Scholar
Jensen, Robert (1992). ‘Selling Martyrdom’, Art in America 80.Google Scholar
Jensen, Robert (1994). Marketing Modernism in Fin-de-Siècle Europe, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1993). ‘Durkheim’s Intellectual Development: The Problem of the Emergence of the New Morality and New Institutions as a Leitmotif in Durkheim’s Oeuvre’, in Turner, Stephen P. (ed.) Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Moralist, London and New York.Google Scholar
Johnston, William M. (1972). The Austrian Mind: An Intellectual and Social History, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Jones, Ernest (1953–1957). The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, vols. I–III, New York.Google Scholar
Jones, P. (1994). Rights, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, Carl J. (1966 [1953]). Tw o Essays on Analytical Psychology, in The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, ed. Read, Herbert, Fordham, Michael and Adler, Gerhard, 2nd edn, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Kandinsky, Wassily (1977 [1911]). Concerning the Spiritual in Art, trans. Sadler, M. T. H., New York.Google Scholar
Karl, Barry S. (1974). Charles E. Merriam and the Study of Politics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kavka, G. (1986). Hobbesian Moral and Political Philosophy, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. J. (1990). Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremy Bentham and the Civil Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State, trans. Wedberg, A., Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kern, Stephen (1983). The Culture of Time and Space 1880–1918, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
King, Richard (1972). The Party of Eros: Radical Social Thought and the Realm of Freedom, Chapel Hill, N.C.Google Scholar
Klein, Naomi (2001). ‘Reclaiming the Commons’, New Left Review 9.Google Scholar
Klosko, G. (1991). ‘Reformist Consent and Political Obligation’, Political Studies 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klosko, G. (1992). The Principle of Fairness and Political Obligation, Lanham, Md.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas (1963). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago.Google Scholar
Kukathas, C. and Pettit, P. (1990) (eds.). Rawls’ A Theory of Justice and its Critics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, Community, and Culture, Oxford.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile (2000). Pluralist Thought and the State in Britain and France, 1900–25, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe and Nancy, Jean-Luc (1988 [1978]). The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism, trans. Bernard, Philip and Lester, Cheryl, Albany, N.Y.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter (1956) (ed.). Philosophy, Politics, and Society, 1st series, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lassman, Peter and Speirs, Ronald (1994) (eds.). Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. (1927a). Propaganda Technique in the World War, New York.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. and Blumenstock, Dorothy (1939). World Revolutionary Propaganda: A Chicago Study, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. and Leites, Nathan (1949). Language of Politics: Studies in Quantitative Semantics, New York.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D., Casey, Ralph D. and Smith, Bruce Lannes (1935). Propaganda and Promotional Activities: An Annotated Bibliography, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1927b). ‘The Theory of Political Propaganda’, American Political Science Review 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1928). ‘The Function of the Propagandist’, International Journal of Ethics 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1934). ‘Propaganda’, in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, London and New York, vol. XII.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1935a). World Politics and Personal Insecurity, New York.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1935b). ‘The Person: Subject and Object of Propaganda’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1936). ‘The Scope of Research on Propaganda and Dictatorship’, in Childs, Harwood L. (ed.) Propaganda and Dictatorship, Princeton, N.J..Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1941). Democracy through Public Opinion, Menasha, Wisc.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold (1942). ‘The Developing Science of Democracy’, in White, Leonard D. (ed.) The Future of Government in the United States: Essays in Honor of Charles E. Merriam, Chicago.Google Scholar
Leites, Nathan (1953). A Study of Bolshevism, Glencoe, Ill.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1969 [1961]). Totality and Infinity, trans. Lingis, Alphonso, London and The Hague.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1981 [1974]). Otherwise than Being, or, Beyond Essence, trans. Lingis, Alphonso, London and The Hague.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1990 [1961]). ‘Heidegger, Gargarin and Us’, in Difficult Freedom: Essays on Judaism, trans. Hand, Seán, London.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel (1996 [1964]). ‘Meaning and Sense’, in Bernasconi, R., Critchley, S. and Peperzaak, A. (eds.) Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, Bloomington, Ind..Google Scholar
Levine, Donald (1995). Visions of the Sociological Tradition, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter (1913). Preface to Politics, New York.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter (1922). Public Opinion, New York.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter (1955). The Public Philosophy, Boston.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1959). Political Man, New York.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Jill (1991). German Expressionism: Primitivism and Modernity, New Haven, Conn. and London.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1963 [1689–1690]). Tw o Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, P., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1975 [1690]). An Essay on Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H., Oxford.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David (1992). Solidarity and Schism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lowell, A. Lawrence (1921 [1913]). Public Opinion and Popular Government, New York.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1969). The End of Liberalism, New York.Google Scholar
Lucas, J. (1980). On Justice, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg (1964 [1955]). ‘The Ideology of Modernism’, in his Realism in Our Time, trans. John, and Mander, Necke, New York.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven (1973). Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work, London.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984 [1979]). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1993 [1974]). Libidinal Economy, trans. Grant, Iain Hamilton, London.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1981). H. L. A. Hart, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1995). ‘Sovereignty, Democracy and Subsidiarity’, in Bellamy, Richard, Bufacchi, Vittorio and Castiglione, Dario (eds.) Democracy and Constitutional Culture in the Union of Europe, London.Google Scholar
Macdonald, M. (1951). ‘The Language of Political Theory’, in Flew, A. (ed.) Logic and Language, 1st series, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst (1914 [1886]). The Analysis of the Sensations, trans. from first German edn Williams, C. M., revised and supplemented Sydney Waterlow, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1966). A Short History of Ethics, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1973). ‘The Essential Contestability of Some Social Concepts’, Ethics 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame, Ind.; 2nd edn 1984.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Ind. and London.Google Scholar
Macke, August (1974 [1912]). ‘Masks’, in Kandinsky, Wassily and Marc, Franz (eds.) The Blaue Reiter Almanac, ed. Lankheit, Klaus, New York.Google Scholar
Macy, Jesse (1917). ‘The Scientific Spirit in Politics’, American Political Science Review 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane (1956a [1886–1895]). ‘Crisis in Poetry’, in Selected Prose Poems, Essays, and Letters, trans. Cook, Bradford, Baltimore, Md..Google Scholar
Mallarmé, Stéphane (1956b [1894]). ‘Mystery in Literature’, in Selected Prose Poems, Essays, and Letters, trans. Cook, Bradford, Baltimore, Md..Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest (1975). Late Capitalism, revised edn, trans. Joris de Bres, London.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1993). The Sources of Social Power, vol. II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manuel, Frank E. (1956). The New World of Henri Saint-Simon, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank (1962). The Prophets of Paris, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Mapel, D. R. and Nardin, T. (1998) (eds.). International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert (1955). Eros and Civilization, Boston.Google Scholar
Marinetti, F. T. (1983a [1913]). ‘Distruzione della sintassi, immaginazione senza fili, parole in libertà’, in Teoria e invenzione futurista, ed. Maria, Luciano, Milan.Google Scholar
Marinetti, F. T. (1983b [1919]). ‘Democrazia futurista’, in Teoria e invenzione futurista, ed. Maria, Luciano, Milan.Google Scholar
Martin, M. (1987). The Legal Philosophy of H. L. A. Hart: A Critical Appraisal, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1993). A System of Rights, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayer, Arno (1981). The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War, New York.Google Scholar
McCoy, Charles and Playford, John (1967) (eds.). Apolitical Politics, New York.Google Scholar
McLeod, C. (1998). Liberalism, Justice, and Markets: A Critique of Liberal Equality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMylor, P. (1994). Alisdair MacIntyre: Critic of Modernity, London.Google Scholar
McPherson, T. (1967). Political Obligation, London.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles E. (1919). ‘American Publicity in Italy’, American Political Science Review 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Charles (1921). ‘The Present State of the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merriam, Charles (1931). The Making of Citizens: A Comparative Study of Methods of Civic Training, Chicago.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles (1934). Civic Education in the United States, New York.Google Scholar
Merriam, Charles (1970 [1925]). New Aspects of Politics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1961 [1865]). Auguste Comte and Positivism, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Mill, John (1974 [1859]). On Liberty, ed. Himmelfarb, Gertrude, New York.Google Scholar
Mill, John (1987 [1872]). The Logic of the Moral Sciences, reprint of A System of Logic, book VI, 8thedn, intro. Ayer, A. J., London.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1983). ‘Linguistic Philosophy and Political Theory’, in Miller, D. and Siedentop, L. (eds.) The Nature of Political Theory, Oxford.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Miller, James G. (1956). ‘Toward a General Theory for the Behavioral Sciences’, in White, Leonard D. (ed.) The State of the Social Sciences, Chicago.Google Scholar
Miller, D. and Walzer, M. (1995) (eds.). Pluralism, Justice, and Equality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr. (1969). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, London.Google Scholar
Moréas, Jean (1992 [1886]). ‘A Literary Manifesto’, in Weber, Eugen (ed.) Movements, Currents, Trends: Aspects of European Thought in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Lexington, Mass. and Toronto.Google Scholar
Muirhead, J. H. (1931). The Platonic Tradition in Anglo-Saxon Philosophy, London.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. (1996). Liberals and Communitarians, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Munro, William B. (1927). The Invisible Government, New York.Google Scholar
Nettleship, R. L. (1888). ‘Memoir’, in Green, T. H., Works, ed. Nettleship, R. L., London, vol. III.Google Scholar
Nicholls, Peter (1995). Modernisms, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1969 [1883–1885]). Thus Spoke Zarathustra, trans. Hollingdale, R. J., Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1973 [1886]). Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Hollingdale, R. J., Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1979). Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks from the Early 1870s, ed. and trans. Breazeale, Daniel, Atlantic Highlands, N.J.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1996) [1887]. On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. Smith, Douglas, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich (1999 [1872]). The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, trans. Speirs, Ronald, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1989). The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations, New York.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Herman and Federn, Ernst (1962–1975). Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society, vols. I–IV, trans. Nunberg, Leland M., New York.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix E. (1975 [1968]). Moral Principles in Political Philosophy, New York.Google Scholar
Ott, Hugo (1993). Martin Heidegger, a Political Life, trans. Blunden, Allan, London.Google Scholar
Owen, David (1994). Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault, London.Google Scholar
Parekh, B. (1996). ‘Political Theory: Traditions in Political Philosophy’, in Goodin, R. E. and Klingemann, H.-D. (eds.) A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo (1902). Les systèmes socialistes, Paris.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo (1923 [1916]). Tr attato di sociologia generale, 2nd edn, Florence.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo (1982 [1896]). Cours d’économie politique, in Oeuvres complètes, ed. Busino, Giovanni, vol. XXIV, Geneva.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1947 [1937]). The Structure of Social Action, New York.Google Scholar
Paul, J. (1981) (ed.). Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. (1986 [1878]). ‘How to Make Our Ideas Clear’, in Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, ed. Kloegel, Leland J. W., Bloomington, Ind., vol. III.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlef (1989). Max Webers Diagnose der Moderne, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Pickering, Mary (1993). Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography, vol. I, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilkington, A. E. (1976). Bergson and his Influence: A Reassessment, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. (1965–1966). ‘Obligation and Consent’, American Political Science Review 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, J. P. (1938). Consent, Freedom and Political Obligation, Oxford; 2nd edn 1968.Google Scholar
Plant, R., Lesser, H. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (1980). Political Philosophy and Social Welfare, London.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Theodore (1992). Historical Understanding in the Thought of Wilhelm Dilthey, Lewiston, Queenston and Lampeter.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco (1990). The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl (1945). The Open Society and its Enemies, 2 vols., London.Google Scholar
Prager, Jeffery (1981). ‘Moral Integration and Political Inclusion: A Comparison of Durkheim’s and Weber’s Theories of Democracy’, Social Forces, 59(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinton, A. (1967) (ed.). Political Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rabinbach, Anson (1992). The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue and the Origins of Modernity, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1955). ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, Philosophical Review 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1958). ‘Justice as Fairness’, Philosophical Review 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1964). ‘Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play’, in Hook, S. (ed.) Law and Philosophy, New York.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism, New York.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples; with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1986). The Morality of Freedom, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reich, Wilhelm (1970 [1935]). The Mass Psychology of Fascism, New York.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. (1966). Distributive Justice: A Constructive Critique of the Utilitarian Theory of Distribution, Indianapolis, Ind. and New York.Google Scholar
Ricci, David M. (1984). The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin (1983 [1964]). The Politics of Conscience: T. H. Green and his Age, Lanham, Md.Google Scholar
Rickert, Heinrich (1962 [1898]). Science and History: A Critique of Epistemology, ed. Goddard, Arthur, trans. Reisman, George, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Rieff, Philip (1959). Freud: The Mind of the Moralist, London.Google Scholar
Rieff, Philip (1966). The Triumph of the Therapeutic: Uses of Faith After Freud, New York.Google Scholar
Ringer, Fritz (forthcoming). Reading Max Weber, Chicago.
Roazen, Paul (1990). Encountering Freud: The Politics and Histories of Psychoanalysis, New Brunswick, N.J.Google Scholar
Roazen, Paul (1992a [1975]). Freud and his Followers, New York.Google Scholar
Roazen, Paul (1992b [1985]). Helene Deutsch: A Psychoanalyst’s Life, New York.Google Scholar
Roazen, Paul (1997 [1976]). Erik H. Erikson: The Power and Limits of a Vision, New York.Google Scholar
Roazen, Paul (1999 [1968]). Freud: Political and Social Thought, New Brunswick, N.J.Google Scholar
Roazen, Paul (2001a). The Historiography of Psychoanalysis, New Brunswick, N.J.Google Scholar
Roazen, Paul (2001b). ‘The Exclusion of Erich Fromm from the IPA’, Contemporary Psychoanalysis 37(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul (1969). The Freudian Left, New York.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (1986) (ed.). Analytical Marxism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1980). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1993 [1983]). ‘Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism’, in Docherty, Thomas (ed.) Postmodernism: A Reader, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin (2000). The Follies of Globalisation Theory, London.Google Scholar
Ross, Dorothy (1991). The Origins of American Social Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan (1995). John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism, New York and London.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge; 2nd edn 1998.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1982). ‘Contractualism and Utilitarianism’, in Sen, A. and Williams, B. A. O. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Schaar, John (1961). Escape From Authority: The Perspectives of Erich Fromm, New York.Google Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang (1986 [1977]). The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Schivelbusch, Wolfgang (1995 [1983]). Disenchanted Night: The Industrialization of Light in the Nineteenth Century, trans. Davies, Angela, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, D. (1990). ‘Justifying the State’, Ethics 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1928). Verfassungslehre, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schorske, Carl (1979). Fin-de-Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture, New York.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph (1943). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London.Google Scholar
Scott, Alan (2000). ‘Capitalism, Weber and Democracy’, Max Weber Studies, 1(1).Google Scholar
Seel, Martin (1989). ‘Heidegger und die Ethik des Spiels’, in Blasche, Siegfried (ed.) Martin Heidegger: Innen und Aussenansichten, Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Seidelman, Raymond with Harpham, Edward J. (1985). Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884–1984, Albany, N.Y.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1973). On Economic Inequality, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982). ‘Equality of What?’, in Sen, A., Choice, Welfare, and Measurement, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality Reexamined, Oxford.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. and Williams, B. A. O. (1982) (eds.). Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharaf, Myron (1983). Fury on Earth: A Biography of Wilhelm Reich, New York.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. (1989). ‘Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, G. (1987). Desert, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. N. (1957). After Utopia, Princeton, N.J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, H. (1980). Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1874). The Methods of Ethics, London.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1979). Moral Principles and Political Obligations, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. (1996). ‘Associative Political Obligations’, Ethics 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, W. M. (1963). European Positivism in the Nineteenth Century: An Essay in Intellectual History, Ithaca, N. Y.Google Scholar
Simpson, Christopher (1994). The Science of Coercion: Communication Research and Psychological Warfare, 1945–1960, Oxford.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1979). Practical Ethics, Cambridge; 2nd ed., 1993.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1990). The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. (1973). ‘An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics’, in Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. A. O., Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bruce Lannes (1969). ‘The Mystifying Intellectual History of Harold D. Lasswell’, in Rogow, Arnold A. (ed.) Politics, Personality, and Social Science in the Twentieth Century: Essays in Honor of Harold D. Lasswell, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, Laurence D. (1986). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of the Alliance, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert and Tanenhaus, Joseph (1967). The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism, Boston.Google Scholar
Sorel, Georges (1936 [1908]). Reflections on Violence, ed. Shils, E. A., trans. Hulme, T. E. and Roth, J., London.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1865). First Principles of a New System of Philosophy, New York.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1904). Autobiography, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert (1966 [1892]). The Man versus the State, 2nd edn, Osnabrück.Google Scholar
Sperber, Manes (1974). Masks of Loneliness: Alfred Adler in Perspective, New York.Google Scholar
Spragens, T. A. Jr. (1995). ‘Communitarian Liberalism’, in Etzioni, A. (ed.) New Communitarian Thinking, Charlottesville, Va.Google Scholar
Sproule, J. Michael (1997). Propaganda and Democracy: The American Experience of Media and Mass Persuasion, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Steel, Ronald (1980). Walter Lippmann and the American Century, Boston.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. (1994). An Essay on Rights, Oxford.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo (1962). ‘An Epilogue’, in Storing, Harbert J. (ed.) Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics, New York.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Harry Stack (1953). Conceptions of Modern Psychiatry, New York.Google Scholar
Sultan, Stanley (1987). Eliot, Joyce and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Sumner, William Graham (1925 [1883]). What Social Classes Owe to Each Other, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
Taine, Hippolyte (1863). Histoire de la littérature anglaise, Paris.Google Scholar
Tam, H. (1998). Communitarianism: A New Agenda for Politics and Citizenship, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taruskin, Richard (1982). ‘From Firebird to The Rite: Folk Elements in Stravinsky’s Scores’, Ballet Review 10.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1964). The Explanation of Behaviour, London.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1975). Hegel, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1985). Philosophical Papers, vol. II: Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Taylor, Seth (1990). Left-wing Nietzscheans: The Politics of German Expressionism 1910–1920, Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Clara (1950). Psychoanalysis: Evolution and Development, New York.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (1992). Coercion, Capital, and the European States, AD 990–1992, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tiryakian, Edward. A. (1965). ‘A Problem for the Sociology of Knowledge: The Mutual Unawareness of Emile Durkheim and Max Weber’, European Journal of Sociology 7(2).Google Scholar
Truman, David (1955). ‘The Impact on Political Science of the Revolution in the Behavioral Sciences’, in Bailey, S. K. (ed.) Research Frontiers in Politics and Government, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Tully, J. with Weinstock, D. M. (1994) (eds.). Philosophy in an Age of Pluralism: The Philosophy of Charles Taylor in Question, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzara, Tristan (1981a [1918]). ‘Dada Manifesto 1918’, in Motherwell, R. (ed.) Dada Painters and Poets, Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Tzara, Tristan (1981b [1920]). ‘Manifesto on Feeble Love and Bitter Love’, in Motherwell, R. (ed.), Dada Painters and Poets, Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Voegelin, Eric (1952). The New Science of Politics, Chicago.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1984). Theories of Rights, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wallas, Graham (1948 [1908]). Human Nature in Politics, London.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1977). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ward, L. F. (1898). Dynamic Sociology, 2nd edn, 2 vols., New York.Google Scholar
Ward, L. F. (1903). Pure Sociology, New York.Google Scholar
Watson, John B. (1925). Behaviourism, London.Google Scholar
Waxman, Chaim (1968) (ed.). The End of Ideology Debate, New York.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1895). ‘The Nation State and Economic Policy (Inaugural Lecture)’, in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds.) Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1910). ‘Diskussionsrede dortselbst zu dem Vortrag von A. Ploetz über “Die Begriffe Rasse und Gesellschaft”’, in Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Soziologie und Sozialpolitik, ed. Weber, Marianne, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1917). ‘Suffrage and Democracy in German’, in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds.) Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1918a). ‘Parliament and Government in Germany under a New Political Order’, in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds.) Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1918b). ‘Socialism’, in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds.) Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1919a). ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’, in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds.) Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1919b). ‘The President of the Reich’, in Lassman, P. and Speirs, R. (eds.) Weber: Political Writings, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1930 [1904/1905]). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. Parsons, T., London.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1948). From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, trans. and ed. Gerth, Hans and Mills, C. Wright, London.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1978 [1917–1919]). Gesammelte Politische Schriften, ed. Winckelmann, J., including ‘Der Reichspräsident’ (February 1919); ‘Politik als Beruf’ (October 1919); ‘Parlament und Regierung im neugeordneten Deutschland’ (May 1918); ‘Wahlrecht und Demokratie in Deutschland’ (December 1917).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1984 [1918]) ‘Der Sozialismus’, in Mommsen, W. and Hubinger, G. (eds.) Gesamtausgabe, vol. II: Zur Politik im Weltkrieg.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1989 [1894]). ‘Developmental Tendencies in the Situation of East Elbian Rural Workers’, in Tribe, Keith (ed.) Reading Weber, London.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul Julian (1991). Darwinism and Social Darwinism in Imperial Germany: The Contribution of the Cell Biologist Oscar Hertwig (1849–1922), Stuttgart and New York.Google Scholar
Weldon, T. D. (1953). The Vocabulary of Politics, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. H. (1997). ‘Associative Allegiances and Political Obligations’, Social Theory and Practice 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Leonard D. (1950). ‘Political Science, Mid-Century’, Journal of Politics 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. A. O. (1973). ‘A Critique of Utilitarianism’ in Smart, J. C. C. and Williams, B. A. O., Utilitarianism: For and Against, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter (1958). The Idea of a Social Science, London.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm (1919). Lehrbuch der Geschichte der Philosophie, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wo rringer, Wilhelm (1953 [1908]). Abstraction and Empathy: A Contribution to the Psychology of Style, trans. Bullock, Michael, London.Google Scholar
Wohl, Robert (1994). A Passion for Wings: Aviation and the Western Imagination 1908–1918, New Haven, Conn. and London.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan and Surkin, Martin (1970) (eds.). An End to Political Science, New York.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. (1991). Robert Nozick: Property, Justice and the Minimal State, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. P. (1970). In Defense of Anarchism, New York; 3rd edn Berkeley, Calif., 1998.Google Scholar
Wolff, R. P. (1977). Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of A Theory of Justice, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. (1960). Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought, London.Google Scholar
Woodward, Ralph Lee Jr. (1971). Positivism in Latin America, 1850–1900, Lexington, Mass., Toronto and London.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, N.J. and Oxford.Google Scholar
Zola, Emile (1992 [1883]). The Ladies’ Paradise, trans. Vizetelly, H., Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.Google Scholar
Zweig, Stefan (1953). The World of Yesterday, London.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×