Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:02:11.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Zoology

from PART II - ANALYSIS AND EXPERIMENTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2009

By
Mario Di Gregorio
Edited by
Peter J. Bowler  and
John V. Pickstone
Peter J. Bowler
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast
John V. Pickstone
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

Zoology, the study of the animal kingdom, is no longer seen as a coherent branch of science. The specialization of the twentieth century has seen zoology’s territory divided among a host of separate disciplines. But in the nineteenth century that specialization was only beginning, and many naturalists would still have called themselves “zoologists,” their primary concern being to gain an understanding of the animal kingdom as a whole, its diversity of structure and function, and the ways in which its component species were related.

Exploration and the description of new species continued to drive home the sheer diversity of nature: Zoologists searched for the “natural system” of relationships but disagreed over how to uncover it. Philosophical naturalists started from a priori assumptions and abstract principles, searching for unity and symmetry in the array of natural forms. Many were influenced by various forms of idealist philosophy proclaiming that nature was the manifestation of a rational Mind. Others adopted a more empirical approach, starting from the study of particular cases; these naturalists were more likely to include information on the habits, distribution, and ecological relationships of species. There were constant disagreements over the relative significance of “form” (internal biological constraints) and “function” (adaptation to the environment) in determining the structure of individual species. The advent of evolutionism transformed biologists’ ideas on the nature of the relationships between species, although the theory’s impact on practice is less easy to define.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 205 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, W. C., Emerson, A. E., Park, T., Park, O., and Schmidt, K. P., Principles of Animal Ecology (Philadelphia: Saunders, 1949).Google Scholar
Allen, Garland E., Life Science in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Appel, Toby A., The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987);Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Michael, “Huxley’s Defence of Darwinism,” Annals of Science, 32 (1975);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, P. J., Life’s Splendid Drama: Evolutionary Biology and the Reconstruction of Life’s Ancestry, 1860–1940 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), chap. 8.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J., The Non-Darwinian Revolution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988);Google Scholar
Browne, Janet, Charles Darwin: Voyaging (London: Jonathan Cape, 1995).Google Scholar
Browne, Janet, The Secular Ark: Studies in the History of Biogeography (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, F. and Smith, S., eds., The Correspondence of Charles Darwin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), vol. 2, 320.Google Scholar
Caron, Joseph, “‘Biology’ and the Life Sciences: A Historiographical Contribution,” History of Science, 26 (1988).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claus, Carl, Grundzuege der Zoologie (Marburg: Elwertsche, 1868).Google Scholar
Coleman, W., “Morphology and the Evolutionary Synthesis,” in The Evolutionary Synthesis, ed. Mayr, E. and Provine, W. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980);Google Scholar
Coleman, William, Georges Cuvier, Zoologist (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1964);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, William, “Morphology between Type Concept and Descent Theory,” Journal of the History of Medicine, 31 (1976).Google ScholarPubMed
Corsi, Pietro, The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France, 1790–1830 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988);Google Scholar
Darwin, C., Monograph of the Sub-class Cirripedia (London: Ray Society, 1851);Google Scholar
Darwin, C., The Formation of Vegetable Mould, Through the Action of Worms, with Observations on their Habits (London: John Murray, 1881).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles, ed., The Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Beagle, 5 pts. (London: Smith, Elder, 1838–43).Google Scholar
Darwin, , On the Origin of Species, 6th ed. (London, 1872), chap. 6.Google Scholar
De Beer, G., Vertebrate Zoology (London: Sidgwick and Jackson, 1928).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, The Politics of Evolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, Archetypes and Ancestors (London: Blond and Briggs, 1982).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, Huxley: The Devil’s Disciple (London: Michael Joseph, 1994).Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian, Huxley: Evolution’s High Priest (London: Michael Joseph, 1997).Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, Mario A., “In Search of the Natural System: Problems of Zoological Classification in Victorian Britain,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 4 (1982).Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, M. A., “Hugh Edwin Strickland (1811–53) on Affinities and Analogies: or, The Case of the Missing Key,” Ideas and Production, 7 (1987).Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, M. A., T. H. Huxley’s Place in Natural Science (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1984);Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, M. A., “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Carl Gegenbaur, Ernst Haeckel, the Vertebral Theory of the Skull, and the Survival of Richard Owen,” Journal of the History of Biology, 28 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Gregorio, M. A., From Here to Eternity: Ernst Haeckel and Scientific Faith (Goettingen: Van den hoek and Ruprecht, 2005);Google Scholar
Di Gregorio, M. A., “The Dinosaur Connection: A Reinterpretation of T. H. Huxley’s Evolutionary View,” Journal of the History of Biology, 15 (1982);Google Scholar
Dohrn, Anton, trans. M. T. Ghiselin, “The Origin of Vertebrates and the Principle of Succession of Functions,” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 16 (1993).Google Scholar
Fleming, John, History of British Animals (Edinburgh: Duncan and Malcolm, 1828).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things (New York: Pantheon, 1970).Google Scholar
Gadow, Hans, A Classification of Vertebrates, Recent and Extinct (London: A. and C. Black, 1875).Google Scholar
Gegenbaur, Carl, Grundzuege der vergleichenden Anatomie, 1st ed. (Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman, 1859), 2nd ed. (Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman, 1870).Google Scholar
Geison, G. L., Michael Foster and the Cambridge School of Physiology (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T., The Triumph of the Darwinian Method (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles C., Genesis and Geology (New York: Harper, 1959).Google Scholar
Gruber, J. W. and Thackaray, J. C., Richard Owen Commemoration (London: Natural History Museum, 1992);Google Scholar
Haberling, W., Johannes Mueller: Das Leben des rheinischen Naturforschers (Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1924).Google Scholar
Heuss, Theodor, Anton Dohrn: A Life for Science (New York: Springer, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S., Origins and Species (New York: [Garland, 1991).Google Scholar
Hull, David L., Science as a Process (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, T. H., Scientific Memoirs (London: Macmillan, 1898–1902), vol. 1;Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., The Oceanic Hydrozoa (London, 1859);Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., “Fragments Relating to Philosophical Zoology, Selected from the Works of K. E. von Baer,” Taylor’s Scientific Memoirs, Natural History, 3 (1853).Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., The Crayfish: An Introduction to the Study of Zoology (London: Kegan Paul, 1879).Google Scholar
Jardine, William, Memoirs of the Late Hugh Edwin Strickland (London: Van Voorst, 1858);Google Scholar
Krausse, E., Ernst Haeckel (Leipzig: Teubner, 1987);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankester, E. R., “On the Use of the Term Homology in Modern Zoology, and the Distinction between Homogenic and Homoplastic,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6 (1870).Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy, The Strategy of Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982);Google Scholar
Lohff, B., “Johannes Muellers Rezeption der Zellenlehre in seinem ‘Handbuch der Physiologie der Menschen’,” Medizinhistorisches Journal, 13 (1978).Google Scholar
Lubosch, E., “Geschichte der vergleichenden Anatomie,” in Handbuch der Anatomie der Wirbelthiere, ed. Bolk, L. et al., 7 vols. (Berlin: Urban und Schwarzenberg, 1931–8), vol. 1;Google Scholar
Lurie, Edward, Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Macleay, W. S., Horae Entomologicae (London: S. Bagster, 1819).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maienschein, Jane, Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991);Google Scholar
McOuat, Gordon R., “Species, Rules and Meaning: The Politics of Language and the Ends of Definitions in 19th-Century Natural History,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 27 (1996);CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melville, Richard V., Towards Stability in the Names of Animals: A History of the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, 1895–1995 (London: International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, 1995).Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, H., “Considérations sur quelques principes relatifs à la classification naturelle des animaux,” Annales des sciences naturelles, 3 (1844).Google Scholar
Mivart, St. G., On the Genesis of Species (London: Macmillan, 1871);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naeff, A., Idealistische Morphologie und Phylogenie (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1919);Google Scholar
Nyhart, Lynn K., Biology Takes Form: Animal Morphology and the German Universities, 1800–1900 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
O’Hara, Robert J., “Representations of the Natural System in the 19th Century,” in Picturing Knowledge, ed. Baigrie, Brian S. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996);Google Scholar
Ospovat, Dov, The Development of Darwin’s Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Ospovat, Dov, “The Influence of Karl Ernst von Baer’s Embryology, 1828–1859,” Journal of the History of Biology, 9 (1976).Google ScholarPubMed
Owen, Richard, Lectures on Invertebrate Animals (London: Longmans, 1843), p..Google Scholar
Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith R., and Maienschein, Jane, eds., The American Development of Biology (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehbock, Philip F., The Philosophical Naturalists (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J., The Meaning of Evolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques, “Darwin, Haeckel et les francais,” in De Darwin au darwinisme: Science et idéologie, ed. Conry, Yvette (Paris: J. Vrin, 1983);Google Scholar
Rupke, icolaas A., Richard Owen: Victorian Naturalist (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994);Google Scholar
Rupke, Nicolaas A., “Richard Owen’s Vertebrate Archetype,” Isis, 84 (1993);Google ScholarPubMed
Russell, E. S., Form and Function (London: John Murray, 1916).Google Scholar
Semper, Karl, Der Haeckelismus in der Zoologie (Hamburg, 1876);Google Scholar
Semper, Karl, The Natural Conditions of Existence as They Affect Animal Life (London: Kegan Paul, 1881).Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip R., ed., Richard Owen: The Hunterian Lectures in Comparative Anatomy (London: Natural History Museum, 1992).Google Scholar
Sloan, Philip R., “Darwin’s Invertebrate Program, 1826–1836: Preconditions for Transformism,” in The Darwinian Heritage, ed. Kohn, David (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Starck, D., “Die idealistische Morphologie und ihre Wirkung,” Medizinhistorisches Journal, 15 (1980);Google Scholar
Starck, D., “Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere von Gegenbaur bis heute,” Verhandlungen der deutschen zoologischen Gesesselschaft Jena (1966).Google Scholar
Stearn, W. T., The Natural History Museum at South Kensington (London: Heinemann, 1981);Google Scholar
Strickland, H. E., “Observations upon the Affinities and Analogies of Organized Beings,” Magazine of Natural History, 4 (1840),Google Scholar
Strickland, H. E., “On the Method of Discovering the Natural System in Zoology and Botany,” Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6 (1840–1), at p. 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uschmann, G., Geschichte der Zoologie und der zoologischen Anstalten in Jena, 1779–1919 (Jena: Gustav Fischer, 1959);Google Scholar
von Engelhardt, D., Historisches Bewusstsein in der Naturwisssenschaft von der Aufklaerung bis zum Positivismus (Freiburg: Alber, 1979).Google Scholar
Winsor, M. P., Reading the Shape of Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, M. P., “A Historical Consideration of the Siphonophores,” Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 73 (1971–2).Google Scholar
Winsor, Mary P., Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×