Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T08:38:26.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Cause, Teleology, and Method

from PART I - SCIENCES OF THE SOCIAL TO THE LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Stephen Turner
Edited by
Theodore M. Porter  and
Dorothy Ross
Theodore M. Porter
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Dorothy Ross
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Get access

Summary

The model of social science established in methodological writings of the 1830s and 1840s formed an ideal that has endured to the beginning of the twenty-first century. Subsequent authors have been obliged to excuse the social sciences for their failure to achieve this ideal model of science, to reinterpret the successes of social science in terms of it, or to construct alternative conceptions of social science in contrast to it. The ideal was worked out in two closely related texts, Auguste Comte’s (1798–1857) Cours de Philosophie Positive and John Stuart Mill’s (1806–1873) A System of Logic. The positive achievement of these texts was to clarify the application of the notion of “law” to the subject matter of social science. Their negative achievement was to eliminate, as much as possible, the role of teleological thinking (explanation appealing to purposes or “final causes”) from the study of the social realm.

The subject of this chapter will be the reformulation of the ideas of cause and teleology before and during the period of Mill and Comte, and its aftermath up to the early twentieth century in the thinking of several founding figures of disciplinary social science. The discussion to be examined here focused on the problem of the sufficiency of causal explanations, and particularly on the question of whether some particular fact could be explained without appeal to purpose. In response to such questions, the defenders of the new conception attempted to replace older terms with new ones, replacing “purpose” with “function,” for example.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 57 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, , The Works of Aristotle, trans. and ed. Ross, David (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930), Physica, Vol. II, 195a, and De Partibus Animalium, Vol. V, 642a.Google Scholar
Boutroux, ÉmileThe Contingency of the Laws of Nature, trans. Rothwell, Fred (Chicago: Open Court, 1920).Google Scholar
Comte, AugusteThe Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, trans. Martineau, Harriet (New York: Calvin Blanchard, 1855).Google Scholar
Comte, AugustePhilosophie Première: Cours de philosophie positive, ed. Serres, Michel, Dagonet, François, and Sinaceur, Allal (Paris: Hermann, 1975)Google Scholar
Gassendi, Cf. Pierre in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. II, trans. Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, and Musdoch, Dugald (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Grande, Francisco and Visscher, Maurice B., Claude Bernard and Experimental Medicine (Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman, 1967).Google Scholar
Hooker, RichardLaws, in The Works of Mr. Richard Hooker with an Account of His Life and Death by Isaac Walton, vol. 1, 7th ed., arranged by Rev. Keble, John, revised by Rev. Church, R. W. and Rev. Paget, F. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888), Book I, chap. 3, sect. 2.Google Scholar
Hume, DavidEnquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 2nd ed., ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902), sect. IV, pt. II.Google Scholar
Kant, ImmanuelThe Critique of Judgement, trans. Meredith, James Creed (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Kolakowski, LeszekGod Owes Us Nothing: A Brief Remark on Pascal’s Religion and on the Spirit of Jansenism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Lauan, Larry “British Methodological Thought,” in his Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1981).Google Scholar
Manuel, Frank E. and Manuel, Fritzie P., Utopian Thought in the Western World (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Martineau, HarrietThe Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte (New York: Calvin Blanchard, 1858).Google Scholar
Mill, John StuartA System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive (1843) in Collected Works, ed. Robson, J. M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Mill, John StuartAutobiography and Literary Essays, Vol. I, in Collected Works, ed. Robson, J. M. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Mill, John StuartPrinciples of Political Economy, ed. Ashley, W. J. (London: Longmans, Green, 1929).Google Scholar
Reid, , Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, in Works of Thomas Reid, D. D., 6th ed., ed. Hamilton, William (Edinburgh: Maclachan and Stewart, 1785), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Scharf, Robert C.Comte after Positivism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, HerbertEssays Scientific, Political and Speculative, vol. 2 (New York: Appleton, 1901).Google Scholar
Spencer, HerbertSelected Writings, ed. Peel, J. D. Y. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Turner, StephenThe Search for a Methodology of Social Science: Durkheim, Weber, and the Nineteenth-Century Problem of Cause, Probability, and Action (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” (1898), in The Portable Veblen, ed. Lerner, Max (New York: Viking Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Viner, JacobThe Role of Providence in the Social Order (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Voltaire, , Philosophical Dictionary (1764), trans. Woolf, H. I. (New York: Knopf, 1924).Google Scholar
Weber, MaxThe Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and ed. Shils, Edward A. and Finch, Henry A. (New York: Free Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Wolff, Christian “Deutsche Theology” (1725), in Gesammelte Werke (New York: Hildesheim, 1962), vol. 1.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×