Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T14:37:06.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Antislavery in the Age of Rights

Or, the Rights of Slaves Confront the Right to Slaves

from Part I - A Revolution in Rights?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2025

Dan Edelstein
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Jennifer Pitts
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

This chapter draws attention to the curious ways in which rights and liberty did – and did not – overlap in the context of eighteenth-century abolitionist movements. Many eighteenth-century anti-slavery activists initially focused on improving enslaved people’s condition through legal rights rather than granting them liberty. In Spanish and French empires, there were fairly elaborate legal codes restricting slaveholders from exercising especially cruel and arbitrary punishments or practices. The British Empire was in fact an outlier in its lack of any such restrictions. At the same time, slavery was increasingly regarded as unnatural and a violation of natural rights, a view that triumphed in Somerset v. Steuart (1772). Emancipation in the northern United States also granted some rights before liberty. Conversely, the Haitian Declaration of 1804 spoke of liberty, but not rights, and even liberty was a collective, rather than individual good.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Brown, C. L., Moral Capital: Foundations of British Abolitionism (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina, 2006).Google Scholar
Bush, J., “Free to Enslave: The Foundations of Colonial American Slave Law,” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 5/2 (1993), 417–70.Google Scholar
Davis, D. B., The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823 (Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Davis, T. J., “Emancipation Rhetoric, Natural Rights, and Revolutionary New England: A Note on Four Black Petitions in Massachusetts, 1773–1777,” New England Quarterly 62/2 (1989), 248–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La Fuente, A., “Slave Law and Claims-Making in Cuba: The Tannenbaum Debate Revisited,” Law and History Review 22/2 (2004), 339–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, F. T. H., “Montesquieu’s Influence on Anti-Slavery Opinion in England,” Journal of Negro History 18/4 (1933), 414–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffield, J. (ed.), The Haitian Declaration of Independence: Creation, Context, and Legacy (Charlottesville, University of Virginia Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Geggus, D., “Racial Equality, Slavery and Colonial Secession during the Constituent Assembly,” American Historical Review 94/5 (1989), 12901308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghachem, M., The Old Regime and the Haitian Revolution (New York, Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, de Secondat, C. L., Baron de, The Spirit of the Laws, ed. Cohler, A. M., Miller, B. C., and Stone, H. S. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Nesbitt, N., Universal Emancipation: The Haitian Revolution and the Radical Enlightenment (Charlottesville, University of Virginia Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Polgar, P., Standard-Bearers of Equality: America’s First Abolition Movement (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, J., You Are All Free: The Haitian Revolution and the Abolition of Slavery (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Sharp, G., A Representation of the Injustice and Dangerous Tendency of Tolerating Slavery, or of Admitting the Least Claim of Private Property in the Persons of Men in England… (London, B. White and R. Horsfield, 1769).Google Scholar
Watson, A., Slave Law in the Americas (Athens, University of Georgia Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Winter, S., “From Procedural Law to the ‘Rights of Humanity’: Habeas Corpus, ex parte Somerset (1771–72) and the Movement toward Collective Representation in Early British Antislavery Cases,” in Cavanaugh, E. (ed.), Empire and Legal Thought: Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity (Leiden, Brill, 2020) pp. 388424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×