Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Classical standards in the period
- 2 Innovation and modernity
- 3 The French Revolution
- 4 Transcendental philosophy and Romantic criticism
- 5 Nature
- 6 Scientific models
- 7 Religion and literature
- 8 Language theory and the art of understanding
- 9 The transformation of rhetoric
- 10 Romantic irony
- 11 Theories of genre
- 12 Theory of the novel
- 13 The impact of Shakespeare
- 14 The vocation of criticism and the crisis of the republic of letters
- 15 Women, gender and literary criticism
- 16 Literary history and historicism
- 17 Literature and the other arts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
10 - Romantic irony
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Introduction
- 1 Classical standards in the period
- 2 Innovation and modernity
- 3 The French Revolution
- 4 Transcendental philosophy and Romantic criticism
- 5 Nature
- 6 Scientific models
- 7 Religion and literature
- 8 Language theory and the art of understanding
- 9 The transformation of rhetoric
- 10 Romantic irony
- 11 Theories of genre
- 12 Theory of the novel
- 13 The impact of Shakespeare
- 14 The vocation of criticism and the crisis of the republic of letters
- 15 Women, gender and literary criticism
- 16 Literary history and historicism
- 17 Literature and the other arts
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
More than any other element of Romantic aesthetics, Romantic irony contradicts the pervasive popular view of what Romanticism means. Irony is the other side of Romanticism, attuned to rationality rather than feeling, to calculation rather than sentiment, to self-reflection rather than self-expression. Conventional accounts of Romanticism have often been distorted by failing to take account of its central role for romantic aesthetics, not just in the theoretical sites where one might expect to find it (most notably the German romantic theories of Friedrich Schlegel and Karl Solger), but in innumerable literary texts where one might simply read past it (the poetry of Keats, for instance, or Mary Shelley's Frankenstein). Seen genetically, Romantic irony links Romanticism both to the immediate past (to such late Enlightenment figures as Immanuel Kant or William Godwin) and to subsequent revivals of romantic sensibility or epistemology (Friedrich Nietzsche's self-critical romanticism, Oscar Wilde's aestheticism, even postmodern theory and practice). Indeed, a scrupulous genealogy of Romantic irony might well confirm Friedrich Schlegel's claim that it is the incomprehensibilities of irony on which, ‘the salvation of families and nations rests … and of states and systems’ (‘Ber die Unverständlichkeit’, Kritische Ausgabe, II, p. 370). Or if not that much, a good deal nonetheless.
Although irony has long had its own secure niche within literary criticism, it was the New Criticism of the 1940s that gave it a particularly privileged position within Anglo–American critical discourse. Cleanth Brooks articulated most forcefully the new role assigned to irony when he described it as ‘the most general term we have for the kind of qualification which the various elements in a context receive from the context’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 203 - 225Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
References
, ‘Ironie als literarisches Prinzip’, in Ironie und Dichtung, (ed.), Munich: Beck, 1970.Google Scholar
, Irony and the discourse of modernity, Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1990.Google Scholar
, Klassische Ironie, romantische Ironie, tragische Ironie: zum Ursprung dieser Begriffe, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1972.Google Scholar
, Der Begriff der Kunstkritik in der deutschen Romantik, in Gesammelte Schriften, and (eds.), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974, vol. I.Google Scholar
, Romantic irony in French literature: from Diderot to Beckett, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
, L'ironie romantique: spectacle et jeu de Mme de Staël à Gérard de Nerval, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1974.Google Scholar
, ‘Irony as a principle of structure’, in Critical theory since Plato, (ed.), New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1971.Google Scholar
, ‘“Transcendental buffoonery”: irony as process in Schlegel's “Über die Unverständlichkeit”’, Studies in Romanticism, 26 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Schumann's systems of musical fragments and Witz’, in Nineteenth-century music and the German Romantic ideology, New York: Schirmer Books, 1993.Google Scholar
, ‘Ironie und System: Friedrich Schlegels “Philosophische Lehrjahre” (1797–1799)’, Philosophisches Jahrbuch der Görres-Gesellschaft 97 (1990).Google Scholar
, ‘Romantic irony’, in European Romanticism: literary cross-currents, modes, and models, (ed.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
, The Romantic irony of semiotics: Friedrich Schlegel and the crisis of representation, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Self, text, and romantic irony: the example of Byron, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Romantic irony and English literary history’, in The Romantic heritage: a collection of critical essays, (ed.), Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, 1983.Google Scholar
, ‘Platonic dialogue and romantic irony: prolegomenon to a theory of Romantic narrative’, Canadian review of comparative literature 3 (1976).Google Scholar
, Irony and ethics in narrative: from Schlegel to Lacan, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
, ‘Romantic irony and romantic arabesque prior to Romanticism’, German quarterly 42 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The subjectivity or objectivity of Friedrich Schlegel's poetic irony’, Germanic review 26 (1951).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Theorie der Mischung und Universalpoesie’, Die frühromantische Theorie der Mischung: über den Zusammenhang von romantischer Dichtungstheorie und zeitgenössischer Chemie, Munich: Hueber, 1968.Google Scholar
, The concept of irony, with constant reference to Socrates, (trans.), New York: Harper, 1965.Google Scholar
, ‘Fichtean irony and some principles of Romantic quest’, Studies in Romanticism 23, (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The word ‘irony’ and its context (1500–1755), Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
and , The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, and (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988.Google Scholar
and , L'absolu littéraire: théorie de la littérature du romantisme allemand, Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1978 (trans. and , The literary absolute: the theory of literature in German Romanticism, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1988).Google Scholar
, Irony/humor: critical paradigms, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
, ‘Richness, chaos and form: a dialogue concerning Laurence Sterne’, in Soul and form, (trans.), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1974.Google Scholar
, ‘The rhetoric of temporality’, in Blindness and insight: essays in the rhetoric of contemporary criticism, Theory and History of Literature 7, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar
, Philosophical writings, (trans.), Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
, Schriften: die Werke Friedrich von Hardenbergs, and (eds.), 5 vols., Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1960–1988.Google Scholar
, Humor als dichterische Einbildungskraft: Studien zur Erzählkunst des poetischen Realismus, Munich: Fink, 1976.Google Scholar
, Horn of Oberon: Jean Paul Richter's school for aesthetics, (trans.), Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
, A world of possibilities: romantic irony in Victorian literature, Columbus, OH: Ohio University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
, Über die Sprache und die Weisheit der Indier: ein Beitrag zur BegrÜndung der Altertumskunde, Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1977 (trans. , The aesthetic and miscellaneous works of Frederick von Schlegel, London: Bohn, 1849).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Geschichte der alten und neuen Literatur, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, (ed.), vol. VI, Munich: Schöningh, 1961.Google Scholar
, ‘Fragments’, in German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
, Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, (ed.), vol. II, Munich: Schöningh, 1967.Google Scholar
, Charakteristiken und Kritiken II (1802–1829), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, (ed.), vol. III, Munich: Schöningh, 1975.Google Scholar
, Fragmente zur Poesie und Literatur I, Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, (ed.), vol. XVI, Munich: Schöningh, 1981.Google Scholar
, Friedrich Schlegel's ‘Lucinde’ and the fragments, (trans.), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar
, Literary notebooks (1797–1801), (ed.), London: University of London, Athlone Press, 1957.Google Scholar
, Philosophische Lehrjahre I (1796–1806), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, (ed.), vol. XVIII, Munich: Schöningh, 1963.Google Scholar
, Philosophische Vorlesungen I (1800–1807), Kritische Friedrich-Schlegel-Ausgabe, (ed.), vol. XII, Munich: Schöningh, 1964.Google Scholar
, ‘Rethinking romantic irony: Puškin, Byron, Schlegel and The queen of spades’, Slavic and East European journal 36, (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Irony and the use–mention distinction’, in Radical pragmatics, (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1981.Google Scholar
, ‘Toward a definition of romantic irony in English literature’, in Romantic and Modern: revaluations of literary tradition, (ed.), Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1977.Google Scholar
, ‘Friedrich Schlegel and romantic irony, with some remarks on Tieck's comedies’, in On textual understanding and other essays, (trans.), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Google Scholar
, ‘Friedrich Schlegel's practice of literary theory’, The Germanic review 69, (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.), German aesthetic and literary criticism: the Romantic ironists and Goethe, Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
, Metahistory: the historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by