Athenian and Alexandrian Neoplatonism

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521040549.020

Chapter 19 - Athenian and Alexandrian Neoplatonism

from Part IV - THE LATER NEOPLATONISTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

Edited by

A. H. Armstrong

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Proclus and his predecessors

With the death of Iamblichus it is to Athens that serious philosophical history must move. The Athenians learnt much from him, and the work of a younger contemporary of his, Theodorus of Asine, is probably to be seen as only reinforcing the lesson. Plutarch of Athens undergoes the same influence, and in the hands of his pupils Syrianus and even Proclus the main themes of Neoplatonism do little else than become more systematized and more canonical. Plato, Iamblichus, Syrianus: that was the road to knowledge according to the last holder of the chair.

When Proclus came to Athens, Plutarch held the chair but was too old to lecture (he died in 431 or 432). Later writers speak of him as though he were the first of the Neoplatonists of Athens. Much of the psychology which Proclus learnt from him privately is taken for granted by Simplicius and the Alexandrians. But its essential character was simply what Iamblichus had emphasized: Aristotle and Plato were not at loggerheads, the De anima represented sound psychology, the Timaeus and Parmenides the theology which would complete it. In a number of details, too, when he was not just repeating Alexander of Aphrodisias, Plutarch followed Iamblichus or a common source. But the philosophically important fact is that he at least theoretically conceded that psychology as the study of a soul in a body can be pursued independently of metaphysics.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy , pp. 302 - 326

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521040549.020 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

,Anonymus Taurinensis Ed. Kroll, W., ‘Ein neuplatonischer Parmenides-commentar in einem Turiner Palimpsest’, in Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 47 (1892).Google Scholar

Beutler's, R. article, Realencyclopa¨die der klassischen Altertumswissensch, xxi, 1 (1951), col. 962–75.

,Chaldaean Oracles. ed. Kroll, W., De Oraculis Chaldaicis. Breslau, 1894 (reprinted Hildesheim, 1962).Google Scholar

Courcelle, P. ‘Boèce et l'école d'Alexandrie’, in Mélanges de l'école française de Rome, 53 (1935).Google Scholar

,DamasciusDubitationes et solutiones de primis principiis, ed. Ruelle, C. A., 2 vols. Paris, 1889.Google Scholar

,DamasciusLife of Isidoros, ed. Zintzen, E.. Hildesheim, 1965.Google Scholar

,DamasciusLife of Isidoros, ed. and tr. Asmus, R.. Leipzig, 1911 [extracts from Photius, Bibliotheca cod. 242. (Migne, Migne, Patrologia Graeca 103)].

and Diogenes Laertius, ed. Cobet, C. G., Paris, 1878).Google Scholar

,Eunapius. Lives of the Sophists, ed. Giangrande, J.. Rome, 1956.Google Scholar

Grondijs, L. H. ‘L'âme, le nous et les hénades dans la théologie de Proclus’, in Mededelingen der koninklijke nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde, N.R. 23 (1960).Google Scholar

,Hermias AlexandrinusIn Platonis Phaedrum scholia, ed. Couvreur, P.. Paris, 1901.Google Scholar

,HieroclesCommentarius in aureum carmen, ed. Mullach, F. W. A., in Fragmenta philosophorum graecorum, I. Paris, 1883.

,IamblichusDe communi mathematica scientia, ed. Festa, N.. Leipzig, 1891.Google Scholar

,IamblichusDe Mysteriis, ed Places, E. (with French translation, introduction and notes). Paris 1966.Google Scholar

,IamblichusDe Mysteriis, ed. Parthey, G.. Berlin, 1857.Google Scholar

,IamblichusDe Mysteriis, German translation with introduction and notes by Hopfner, T. (Quellenschriften der griechischen Mystik, I). Leipzig, 1922.Google Scholar

,IamblichusDe vita pythagorica, ed. Deubner, L.. Leipzig, 1937.Google Scholar

,IamblichusProtrepticus, ed. Pistelli, L.. Leipzig, 1888.Google Scholar

,IamblichusTheologumena arithmeticae, ed. Falco, V.. Leipzig, 1922.Google Scholar

Jahn, A.Eclogae e Proclo De philos. Chald. ed. (Halle, 1891), p., 25–7Google Scholar

Joseph, H. W. B., Introduction to Logic, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1916).Google Scholar

Joseph, H. W. B.An Introduction to Logic, 2nd edn. Oxford, 1916.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. C., ‘Neoplatonic and Aristotelian logic’, Phronesis, I (1955–1956).Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O.The Great Chain of Being.Cambridge (Mass.), 1936.Google Scholar

,MarinusVita Procli, ed. Boissonade, J. F.. Leipzig, 1814Google Scholar

Marrou, H. I. ‘Synesius of Cyrene and Alexandrian Neoplatonism’, in Momigliano, A. (ed.), The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century.Oxford, 1963.Google Scholar

,OlympiodorusIn Platonis Gorgiam, ed. Norvin, W.. Leipzig, 1936.Google Scholar

,OlympiodorusIn Platonis Phaedonem, ed. Norvin, W.. Leipzig, 1913.Google Scholar

,OlympiodorusCommentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, ed. Westerink, L. G.. Amsterdam, 1956.Google Scholar

,PorphyryAd Gaurum, ed. Kalbfleisch, K., in Abhandlungen der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil.-hist. Kl. 1895, 33-62 [authenticity disputed]: French translation by Festugière, J. M., La Révélation d'Hermès Trismégiste, III, app. 1.Google Scholar

,PorphyryAd Marcellam, French translation by Festugière, A. J. M., in Trois divots païens, 11. Paris, 1934.

,PorphyryAgainst the Christians, fragments, ed. Harnack, A., in Abhandlungen der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, phil-hist. Kl. 1916, 1 (additions in ibid. Sitzungsberichte, 1921, 1 and 11).Google Scholar

,PorphyryCommentary on the Timaeus, fragments, ed. Sodano, R.. Naples, 1964.Google Scholar

,PorphyryDe abstinentia: in Porphyrii Opuscula Selecta, ed. Nauck, A., 2nd edn. Leipzig, 1886 (reprinted Hildesheim, 1963).Google Scholar

,PorphyryDe philosophia ex oraculis haurienda librorum reliquiae, ed. Wolff, G.. Berlin, 1856 (reprinted Hildesheim, 1962).Google Scholar

,PorphyryIsagoge sive quinque voces, ed. Busse, A., in Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca, IV, 1. Berlin, 1887.

,PorphyryIsagoge sive quinque voces, French translation with notes by Tricot, J.. Paris, 1947.Google Scholar

,PorphyryLetter to Anebo, ed. and tr. Sodano, A. R.. Naples, 1958 [reconstructed from Iamblichus, De Mysterüs].

,PorphyryLife of Plotinus. Printed in all editions and translations of Plotinus listed in previous section: with German translation and notes in Harder VC (1958).

,PorphyrySententiae ad intelligibilia.ducentes, ed. Mommert, B.. Leipzig, 1907.Google Scholar

(reprinted in Procli opera inedita, ed. Cousin, V., 2nd ed. Paris, 1864Google Scholar

,ProclusCommentarius in Parmenidem: pars ultima adhuc inedita, interprete Guillelmo de Moerbeka, ed. and tr. Klibansky, R., Labowsky, C., Anscombe, E.. London, 1953.Google Scholar

,ProclusCommentarius in Parmenidem, ed. Cousin, V., 2nd edn. Paris, 1864 (reprinted Hildesheim, 1961).Google Scholar

,ProclusCommentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, ed. Westerink, L. G.. Amsterdam, 1954.Google Scholar

,ProclusCommentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato, English translation with notes by O'Neill, W.. The Hague, 1965.Google Scholar

,ProclusEclogae de philosophia chaldaica, ed. Jahn, A.. Halle, 1891.Google Scholar

,ProclusElements of Theology, ed. and tr. Dodds, E. R., 2nd edn. Oxford, 1963.Google Scholar

,ProclusElements of Theology, French translation by Trouillard, J.. Paris, 1965.Google Scholar

,ProclusHymni, ed. Vogt, E.. Wiesbaden, 1957.Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Cratylum commentarii, ed. Pasquali, G.. Leipzig, 1908.Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Rempublicam commentarii, ed. Kroll, W., 2 vols. Leipzig, 1899–1901.Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Theologiam, ed. Portus, A.. Hamburg, 1618.Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Theologiam, Italian translation by Turolla, A.. Bari, 1957.Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Theologian, ed Saffrey, H. D. and Westerink, L. G. (with French translation, introduction and notes). Paris 1968– (in progress)Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Timaeum commentarii. French translation and commentary by Festugière, A.J.M.. Paris 1966–8.Google Scholar

,ProclusIn Platonis Timaeum commentarii, ed. Diehl, E., 3 vols. Leipzig, 1903–6.Google Scholar

,ProclusOn the Hieratic Art, ed. and tr. Bidez, J., in Catalogue des manuscrits alchimiques grecs, VI (appendix). Brussels, 1928.

,ProclusTria opsucula (De Decern Dubitationibus, De Providentia et Fato, De Malorum Subsistentia), ed. Boese, H.. Berlin, 1960.Google Scholar

Rosán, L. J., The Philosophy of Proclus (New York, 1949).Google Scholar

Rosán, L. J.The Philosophy of Proclus.New York, 1949 (with extensive bibliographies).Google Scholar

Rutten, C., Catégories du monde sensible dans les Ennéades de Plotin (Paris 1961).Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D. ‘Le chrétien Jean Philopon et la survivance de l'école d'Alexandrie au VIe siècle’, in Revue des études grecques, 72 (1954).Google Scholar

Sambursky, S., The Physical World of Late Antiquity (London, 1962), ch. vi, although it exaggerates Philoponus' scientific merits.Google Scholar

Sambursky, S.The Physical World of Late Antiquity.London, 1962.Google Scholar

Schröder, E., Plotins Abhandlung ΠΟΘΕΝ ΤΑ ΚΑΚΑ (Diss. Rostock, 1915) (Borna-Leipzig, 1916).Google Scholar

Shiel, J. ‘Boethius' commentaries on Aristotle’, in Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies, 4 (1958).Google Scholar

,Simplicius [The Alexandrian Neoplatonist commentaries on Aristotle are published in Commentaria in Aristotelem graeca. Berlin, 1882–1907.]

,Simplicius Ed. Schweighäuser, J., in Epicteti philosophia, IV. Leipzig, 1800.Google Scholar

,Simplicius. Commentarius in Epicteti Enchiridion, ed. Dübner, F., in Theophrasti characteres, etc. Paris, 1877.

,SynnesiusDe Providentia, ed. Terzaghi, N., in Synesii Cyrenensis opuscula. Rome, 1944. Migne, Migne, Patrologia Graeca 76.Google Scholar

Tatakis, B.La philosophic byzantine.Paris, 1949.Google Scholar

Trouillard, J. ‘Le sens des médiations proclusiennes’, in Revue philosophique de Louvain, 55 (1957).CrossRef Google Scholar

Vancourt, R.Les derniers commentateurs alexandrins d'Aristote: l'école d'Olympiodore, Étienne d'Alexandrie.Lille, 1941.Google Scholar

(Westerink, L. G., Damascius: Lectures on the Philebus wrongly attributed to Olympiodorus [Amsterdam 1959]).Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G.Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy.Amsterdam, 1962.Google Scholar