Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-2wr7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-06T12:32:21.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Stoic ethics

from PART V - ETHICS AND POLITICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Brad Inwood  and
Pierluigi Donini
Edited by
Keimpe Algra ,
Jonathan Barnes ,
Jaap Mansfeld  and
Malcolm Schofield
Brad Inwood
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Pierluigi Donini
Affiliation:
State University of Milan
Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Jonathan Barnes
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Jaap Mansfeld
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Malcolm Schofield
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Foundations and first principles

Stoic ethics starts from foundations and first principles which are more explicit than those of most ancient ethical systems. Chrysippus announced in his Propositions in Physics that ‘there is no other or more fitting way to tackle the theory of good and bad things, the virtues, and happiness than on the basis of nature as a whole and the administration of the cosmos’ (Plu. De Stoicis In Platonis Rempublicam commentarii 1035c). This explicit statement about starting points puts the emphasis on nature in the cosmic sense, i.e. the nature of the entire providentially governed cosmos; but elsewhere Chrysippus turns to a more inclusive sense of nature: when he says ‘Where should I begin from and what should I take as the starting point for the appropriate and as the raw material for virtue, if I skip over nature and what accords with nature?’ (Plu. De communibus notitiis adversus Stoicos. 1069e), it is clear that the nature in question is not just cosmic. Crucial ethical concepts also find their roots in the nature of humans and in theories about what accords with human nature.

The central importance of human nature clearly goes back to the founder of the school. In the list of titles given by Diogenes Laertius (VII.4) we find a treatise On the life according to nature and one On impulse, also titled On human nature. But we have no record of an On goals or On virtue; indeed, the main evidence given for Zeno's views on the telos is the work On human nature (D.L. VII.87). Whatever the rôle of human as opposed to cosmic nature in Zeno's thinking, it is striking that the major ethical treatises (aside from the Republic) suggest a strong interest in the former.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy , pp. 675 - 738
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, J. E. (1988a) ‘Naturalism in Greek ethics: Aristotle and after’, in Cleary, & Shartin, (1988).Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1989a) ‘Cicero on Stoic moral philosophy and private property’, in Griffin, & Barnes, (1989).Google Scholar
Annas, J. E. (1993a) The Morality of Happiness (New York/Oxford).Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (1990) ‘“Domina et regina virtutum”: justice and societas in the De Officiis’, Phronesis 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausland, H. W. (1989) ‘On the moral origin of the Pyrrhonian philosophy’, Elenchos 10.Google Scholar
Blundell, M. W. (1990) ‘Parental nature and Stoic ōίκ∊ίωσις’, AncPhil 10.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (1996) ‘The έπ∊λ∊νστική δϋναμιζ in Aristo's psychology of action’, Phronesis 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1956) ‘Theophrastus and Zeno on nature in moral theory’, Phronesis 1.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1991) ‘On a book-title by Chrysippus: on the fact that the ancients admitted dialectic along with demonstrations’, OSAP suppl. vol.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. (1989) ‘Greek philosophers on euthanasia and suicide’, in Brody, B. A., ed. (1989) Suicide and Euthanasia: Historical and Contemporary Themes, Philosophy and Medicine 35 (Dordrecht).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, Ph. (1977) ‘The four Stoic personae’, ICS 2.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. & Funghi, M. S. (1988) ‘Un testo sul concetto stoico di progresso morale (PMilVogliano inv. 1241)’, in Aristoxenica, Menandrea, Fragmenta philosophica. Studi e testi per il Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini 3 (Florence).Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1995a) ‘Pathos nello stoicismo romano’, Elenchos 16.Google Scholar
Donini, P. L. (1995b) ‘Struttura delle passioni e del vizio e loro cura in Crisippo’, Elenchos 16.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990) The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis, moral development and social interaction in early Stoic philosophy, Studies in Hellenistic civilization 2 (Aarhus).Google Scholar
Forschner, M. (1981) Die Stoische Ethik: über den Zusammenhang von Natur-, Sprachu. Moralphilosophie im altstoischen System (Stuttgart; repr. Darmstadt 1995).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Huby, P. M., Sharples, R. W. & Gutas, D., edd. (1992b) Theophrastus of Eresus: Sources for his Life, Writings, Thought, and Influence, 2 vols., Philosophia Antiqua (Leiden).Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1986b) ‘The Stoic doctrine of the affections of the soul’, in Schofield & Striker (1986a).Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1983) ‘Did Chrysippus understand Medea?’, Phronesis 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. (1988) ‘Personhood and personality: the four- personae theory in Cicero De Officiis I’, OSAP 6.Google Scholar
Giusta, M. (1964–7) I dossografi di etica, 2 vols., Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia, Università di Torino vol. 15, fasc. (Turin).Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. (1983) ‘Oikeiôsis in Arius Didymus’, in Fortenbaugh (1983).Google Scholar
Gosling, J. (1987) ‘The Stoics and ακρασια’, Apeiron 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (1986) ‘Philosophy, Cato and Roman suicide’, G & R 33.Google Scholar
Hadot, I. (1969b) ‘Epicure et l'enseignement philosophique hellénistique et romain’, Actes du VIIIe Congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé (1968).Google Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. (1965) ‘The final good in Aristotle's ethics’, Philosophy 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. (1968) Aristotle's Ethical Theory (Oxford).Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1984) ‘Hierocles. Theory and argument in the second century ad’, OSAP 2.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism (Oxford).Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1993) ‘Seneca and psychological dualism’, in Brunschwig, & Nussbaum, (1993).Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1995) (rev. Annas 1993a) AncPhil 15.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1980a) Aristone di Chio e lo stoicismo antico, Elenchos 1 (Naples).Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1986) ‘Stoic and Aristotelian conceptions of happiness’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a).Google Scholar
Kenny, A. (1992) Aristotle on the Perfect Life (Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1972) ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, BRL 55.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1971) ‘Stoic intermediates and the end for man’, in Long (1971a).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. repr. from CQ 5 (1955).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1978c) ‘Moral actions and rules in Stoic ethics’, in Rist (1978b).Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1983) ‘Euemptosia – proneness to disease’, in Fortenbaugh (1983).Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. (1978a) ‘Emotion and decision in Stoic psychology’, in Rist (1978).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1967) ‘Carneades and the Stoic telos’, Phronesis 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1968) ‘Aristotle's legacy to Stoic ethics’, BICS 15.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1971b) ‘Freedom and determinism in the Stoic theory of human action’, in Long, (1971a).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1974) Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics (London; 2nd edn, Berkeley 1986).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1978c) ‘Dialectic and the Stoic sage’, in Rist (1978b) ; repr. in Long, (1996).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988a) ‘Stoic eudaimonism’, in Cleary & Shartin (1988) ; repr. in Long, (1996).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1988b) ‘Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy’, CQ 38 ; repr. in Long, (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. (1991b) ‘The harmonics of Stoic virtue’, OSAP, suppl. vol. 1991 ; repr. in Long, (1996).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. & Sedley, D. N., edd. (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols.: i. Translations of the principal sources with philosophical commentary; ii. Greek and Latin texts with notes and bibliography (Cambridge, various reprints).Google Scholar
Luschnat, O. (1958) ‘Das Problem des ethischen Fortschritts in der alten Stoa’, Philologus 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebel, G. (1935) ‘Der Begriff des Kathēkon in der alten Stoa’, Hermes 70.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1987) ‘The Stoics on the extirpation of the passions’, Apeiron 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton).Google Scholar
Pembroke, S. (1971) ‘Oikeiōsis’, in Long, (1971a).Google Scholar
Philippson, R. (1932) ‘Das “erste Naturgemäβe”’, Philologus 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1940) Grundfragen der stoischen Philosophie, Abh. der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Kl. 3e Folge, 26.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. repr. in Tarán, L., ed. (1987) Greek & Roman Philosophy (New York/London).Google Scholar
Reesor, M. E. (1989) The Nature of Man in Early Stoic Philosophy (London).Google Scholar
Rieth, O. (1934) ‘Über das Telos der Stoiker’, Hermes 69.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1969a) Stoic Philosophy (Cambridge; later repr.).Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. (1977) ‘Zeno and Stoic consistency’, Phronesis 22 ; repr. in Anton & Preuss (1983).Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1985) Aristotle and the Stoics, PCPhS suppl. vol. 10 (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Sandbach, F. H. (1989 (1975)) The Stoics, 2nd edn (Bristol (London)).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1984) ‘Ariston of Chios and the unity of virtue’, AncPhil 4.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. A. (1951) A History of Greek Political Thought, 2nd edn 1968 (London).Google Scholar
Soreth, M. (1968) ‘Die zweite Telosformel des Antipater von Tarsos’, AGPh 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmetz, P. (1994) ‘Die Stoa’, in Flashar, (1994).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1983) ‘The role of oikeiōsis in Stoic ethics’, OSAP 1 ; repr. in Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1986) ‘Antipater, or the art of living’, in Schofield, & Striker, (1986a) ; repr. in Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Striker, G. (1991) ‘Following nature. A study in Stoic ethics’, OSAP 10 ; repr. in Striker, (1996).Google Scholar
Tsekourakis, D. (1974) Studies in the Terminology of Early Stoic Ethics, Hermes Einzelschr. 32 (Wiesbaden).Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (1989) L'etica degli antichi, Manuali Laterza 4 (Rome/Bari).Google Scholar
Voelke, A.-J. (1973) L'idée de volonté dans le Stoïcisme (Paris).Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1978) ‘Two notes on Stoic terminology’, AJPh 99.Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1990) ‘Stoic values’, The Monist 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. R. (1991) Cicero: On Stoic Good and Evil. De Finibus bonorum et malorum 3 and Paradoxa Stoicorum (Warminster).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×