Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Editors
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Overview of the Handbook
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Models and Measures
- Part III Linguistic Theories and Frameworks
- Part IV First Language Processing
- Part V Bilingual Acquisition and Processing
- Part VI Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part I - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- About the Editors
- About the Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Overview of the Handbook
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Models and Measures
- Part III Linguistic Theories and Frameworks
- Part IV First Language Processing
- Part V Bilingual Acquisition and Processing
- Part VI Language Disorders, Interventions, and Instruction
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Working Memory and Language , pp. 17 - 28Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Allen, R., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 298–313.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (1966a). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (1966b). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory, theories models and controversy. The Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 12.11–12.29.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2009). Working memory and binding in sentence recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 438–456.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2019). From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model. Memory & Cognition, 47, 575–588.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Allen, R. J. (2021). A multicomponent model of working memory. In Logie, R. H., Camos, V., & Cowan, N. (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (pp 10–43). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., & Lewis, V. J. (1981). Inner active processes in reading: The inner voice, the inner ear and the inner eye. In Lesgold, A. M. & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.), Interactive Processes in Reading (pp. 107–129). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.Google Scholar
Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2015). Working memory: Loss and reconstruction Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Besner, D., Davies, J., & Daniels, S. (1981). Phonological processes in reading: The effects of concurrent articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.Google Scholar
Conrad, R. (1962). Practice, familiarity and reading rate for words and nonsense syllables. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing. A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, G. F. (1969). Machiavelli and the devil’s advocate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Danks, J. H. (1969). Grammatical structure and recall: A function of the space in immediate memory or of recall delay? Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 113–117.Google Scholar
Hitch, G. J., Allen, R. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2020). Attention and binding in visual working memory: Two forms of attention and two kinds of buffer. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 280–293.Google Scholar
Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 14, 339–373.Google Scholar
Larsen, J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression and manual tapping: Do they have a common source? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 56, 1249–1268.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., & Oberauer, K. (2009). No evidence for temporal decay in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1545–1551.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattys, S., & Baddeley, A. D. (2019). Working memory and second language accent acquisition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 1113–1123.Google Scholar
Norris, D., Butterfield, S., Hall, J., & Page, M. P. A. (2018). Phonological recoding under articulatory suppression. Memory & Cognition, 46, 173–180.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K. (2021). Towards a theory of working memory: From metaphors to mechanisms In Logie, R. H., Camos, V., & Cowan, N. (Eds.), Working memory: State of the science (pp. 116–149). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savin, H. B., & Perchonok, E. (1965). Grammatical structure and immediate recall of English sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 348–353.Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Independent functioning of verbal memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 261–273.Google Scholar
Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 77, 1863–1860.Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task-dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar