Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Theory and Research on Undergraduate Research
- Part II Implementation, Approaches, Methods
- Part III Disciplines
- 17 Introduction
- Part III.1 STEM
- Part III.2 Health
- 24 Undergraduate Research in Medicine
- 25 Undergraduate Research in Health Sciences
- 26 Undergraduate Research in Nursing
- 27 Undergraduate Research in the Exercise Science Discipline
- Part III.3 Social Sciences
- Part III.4 Humanities
- Part III.5 Arts & Design
- Part III.6 Disciplines A–Z
- Part IV International Perspective
- Part V Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
- Index
- References
24 - Undergraduate Research in Medicine
from Part III.2 - Health
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Theory and Research on Undergraduate Research
- Part II Implementation, Approaches, Methods
- Part III Disciplines
- 17 Introduction
- Part III.1 STEM
- Part III.2 Health
- 24 Undergraduate Research in Medicine
- 25 Undergraduate Research in Health Sciences
- 26 Undergraduate Research in Nursing
- 27 Undergraduate Research in the Exercise Science Discipline
- Part III.3 Social Sciences
- Part III.4 Humanities
- Part III.5 Arts & Design
- Part III.6 Disciplines A–Z
- Part IV International Perspective
- Part V Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
- Index
- References
Summary
The discipline of medicine advances through research. The medical education community worldwide recognizes that the evolving field of medicine and its progress requires that medical students participate in research. Undergraduate research during premedical and/or medical studies influences the practice of clinical medicine and facilitates the development of physician-scientists. The essential nature of the discipline, the structures and length of medical education worldwide, and the opportunities for research activity are important to understand. Implementation programs that use a competency-based medical education approach find that research is important for meeting medical board competencies. Curricular and research participation barriers exist, but models that integrate research and provide mentored experiences within the academic and training environment can decrease these barriers. Further growth of research preparation in medicine and enhancement of competencies is possible through assessment and continuous quality improvement.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research , pp. 241 - 249Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abu-Zaid, A., & Alkattan, K. (2013). Integration of scientific research training into undergraduate medical education: A reminder call. Medical Education Online, 18(1), 22832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amorim, F. F., Santana, L. A., Toledo, I. L., da Rocha, Jr., Gomes da Silva, E. F., de Amorim Teixeira Balieiro, C. C., , V., & Quadros de Almeida, K. J. (2017). Undergraduate research in medical education. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 63(12), 1017–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ASEAN University Network. (2020). Guide to AUN-QA assessment at programme level, version 4.0. http://qa.ku.ac.th/web2016/pdf/aun2020%20V4.pdfGoogle Scholar
Association of American Medical Colleges. (2014). Medical school graduation questionnaire. www.aamc.org/download/397432/data/Google Scholar
The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. The State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Cain, L., Kramer, G., & Ferguson, M. (2019). The medical student summer research program at the University of Texas medical branch at Galveston: Building research foundations. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1581523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraverty, D., Jeffe, D. B., & Tai, R. H. (2018). Transition experiences in MD–PhD programs. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 17, Article 41, 1–12.Google Scholar
Cluver, J., Book, S., Brady, K., Back, S., & Thornley, N. (2014). Engaging medical students in research: Reaching out to the next generation of physician–scientists. Academic Psychiatry, 38(3), 345–349.Google Scholar
Dankner, R., Gabbay, U., & Leibovici, L. (2018). Implementation of a competency-based medical education approach in public health and epidemiology training of medical students. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 7, 13.Google Scholar
Dharmasaroja, P. (2020). Integration of the WFME standards and AUN-QA criteria for student assessment in undergraduate medical education. Ramathibodi Medical Journal, 43(4), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiBiase, R. M., Beach, M. C., Carrese, J. A., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Wheelan, S. J., Atkinson, M. A., Geller, G., Gebo, K. A., et al. (2020). A medical student scholarly concentrations program: Scholarly self-efficacy and impact on future research activities. Medical Education Online, 25(1), 1786210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1786210Google Scholar
Imafuku, R., Saiki, T., Kawakami, C., & Suzuki, Y. (2015). How do students’ perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? International Journal of Medical Education, 6, 47–55.Google Scholar
Mahomed, S., Ross, A., & Van Wyk, J. (2021). Training and assessing undergraduate medical students’ research: Learning, engagement and experiences of students and staff. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine, 13(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moller, R., & Shoshan, M. (2019). Does reality meet expectations? An analysis of medical students’ expectations and perceived learning during mandatory research projects. BMC Medical Education, 19, 93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munabi, I. G., Katabira, E. T., & Konde-Lule, J. (2006). Early undergraduate research experience at Makerere University Faculty of Medicine: A tool for promoting medical research. African Health Sciences, 6(3), 182–186.Google ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, C. C., de Souza, R. C., Abe, E. H., Silva Moz, L. E., de Carvalho, L. R., & Domingues, M. A. (2014). Undergraduate research in medical education: A descriptive study of students’ views. BMC Medical Education, 14, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ommering, B. W., van Blankenstein, F. M., Waaijer, C. J., & Dekker, F. W. (2018). Future physician–scientists: Could we catch them young? Factors influencing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for research among first-year medical students. Perspectives on Medical Education, 7(4), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, S., Walsh, C. M., & Udell, J. A. (2019). Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: A national cross-sectional survey study. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 140.Google Scholar
Randall, D. C., Wilbur, F. H., & Burkholder, T. J. (2004). Two models for an effective undergraduate research experience in physiology and other natural sciences. Advances in Physiology Education, 28(2), 68–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribgy, P. G., & Gururaja, R. P. (2017). World medical schools: The sum also rises. JRSM Open, 8(6), 2054270417698631. https://doi.org/10.1177/2054270417698631Google Scholar
Riley, S. C., Morton, J., Ray, D. C., Swann, D. G., & Davidson, D. J. (2013). An integrated model for developing research skills in an undergraduate medical curriculum: Appraisal of an approach using student selected components. Perspectives in Medical Education, 2(4), 230–247.Google Scholar
Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science, 316(5824), 548–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 9–20.Google Scholar
Schammel, C. M., Schisler, N., Thompson, L. K., Pollard, A. J., Schammel, D. P., McKinley, B., & Trocha, S. D. (2008). Training undergraduates in clinical research: The Furman Oncology Research Team (FORT). Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 4, 31–38.Google Scholar
Taylor, T., & Swanberg, S. M. (2020). A comparison of peer and faculty narrative feedback on medical student oral research presentations. International Journal of Medical Education, 11, 222–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent-Ruz, P., Grabowski, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The impact of early participation in undergraduate research: Experiences on multiple measures of premed path success. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 1(3), 13–18.Google Scholar
World Federation of Medical Education. (2021). Basic medical education standards. Retrieved January 25, 2022, from http://wfme.org/standards/bmeGoogle Scholar
Zavlin, D., Jubbal, K. T., Noé, J. G., & Gansbacher, B. (2017). A comparison of medical education in Germany and the United States: From applying to medical school to the beginnings of residency. German Medical Science, 15, Doc. 15.Google Scholar