Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction Multilingualism
- Part I Theoretical Approaches to L3/Ln
- 1 Generative Approaches to Third Language Acquisition
- 2 The Usage-Based Approach
- 3 Third Language Acquisition from a Complexity Dynamic Systems Theory Approach
- 4 A Critical Sociolinguistics Perspective on L3 Acquisition
- Part II L3/Ln across Linguistic Domains
- Part III Becoming and Staying Multilingual at Different Ages
- Part IV L3/Ln in Action
- Part V L3/Ln and Cognition
- Part VI Research Methods in L3/Ln
- Index
- References
4 - A Critical Sociolinguistics Perspective on L3 Acquisition
from Part I - Theoretical Approaches to L3/Ln
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction Multilingualism
- Part I Theoretical Approaches to L3/Ln
- 1 Generative Approaches to Third Language Acquisition
- 2 The Usage-Based Approach
- 3 Third Language Acquisition from a Complexity Dynamic Systems Theory Approach
- 4 A Critical Sociolinguistics Perspective on L3 Acquisition
- Part II L3/Ln across Linguistic Domains
- Part III Becoming and Staying Multilingual at Different Ages
- Part IV L3/Ln in Action
- Part V L3/Ln and Cognition
- Part VI Research Methods in L3/Ln
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter on a critical sociolinguistics offers a revealing angle on the acquisition of a third language by providing qualitative information about the context in which acquisition takes place. It is an approach that places at the center of inquiry, concerns of power, inequality, and social inclusion. The goal is to promote reflection on certain assumptions and methodologies associated with mainstream L3 acquisition research and, also, to present data and cases from qualitative ethnographic studies that seek to challenge current thinking. Despite ontological differences regarding the sorts of questions and frameworks to account for knowledge in the field of third language acquisition, many researchers recognize the need to go beyond the boundaries of processing and cognitive predictions and their related methodologies to provide a more holistic, dynamic, and comprehensive understanding. This recognition of the social – even if it is defined as a limited to a set of variables (i.e., age, gender, class) or assigned to a cognitive subsystem – allows L3 researchers to account for the wide variation in individual developmental differences in the process of acquiring a third or additional language.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Third Language Acquisition , pp. 96 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The Williams James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2020). L1, L2 and L3. Same or Different? Second Language Research, 37(3), 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardel, C., & Sanchez, L. (Eds.) (2020). Third Language Acquisition: Age, Proficiency and Multilingualism. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. M. (2001). World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2007). Lingua franca English, Multilingual Communities and Language Acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 923–939.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S., & Wurr, A. (2011). Multilingual Communication and Language Acquisition: New Research Directions. The Reading Matrix, 11(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Codo, E., & Sunyol, A. (2019). “A Plus for Our Students”: The Construction of Mandarin Chinese as an Elite Language in an International School in Barcelona. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(5), 436–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V., & Li, W. (2016). The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Multicompetence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, M., & Peutrell, R. (2019). Brokering Britain: Educating Citizens – Exploring ESOL and Citizenship. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Approach to Second Language Acquisition. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
De Costa, P., Park, J., & Wee, L. (2016). Language Learning as Linguistic Entrepreneurship: Implications for Language Education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 695–702.Google Scholar
De Costa, P., Sung-Yul Park, J., & Wee, L. (2021). Why Linguistic Entrepreneurship. Multilingua, 40(2), 139–153.Google Scholar
De Vogelaer, G., Chevrot, J.-P., Katerbow, M., & Nardy, A. (2017). Bridging the Gap between Language Acquisition and Sociolinguistics. In De Vogelaer, G. & Katerbow, M. (Eds.), Acquiring Sociolinguistic Variation (pp. 1–42) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A. (2009). Marketing, Management and Performance: multilingualism as Commodity in a Tourism Call Centre. Language Policy, 8, 27–50.Google Scholar
Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (Eds). (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat. (2021). What Languages Are Studied the Most in the EU? Eurostat. September 24. https://ec.Europa.Eu/Eurostat/Web/Products-Eurostat-News/-/Edn-20210924-2.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2011). The Government of Self and Others. Lectures at the College de France 1982–1983. New York: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Mayo, M. D. P. (2012). Cognitive Approaches to L3 Acquisition. International Journal of English Studies, 12(1), 129–146.Google Scholar
Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. In Dil, A. S. (Ed.), The Ecology of Language. Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (2010). The Commodification of Language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 101–114.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (2020). Sociolinguistic Frontiers: Emancipation and Equality. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 262, 121–126.Google Scholar
Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., & Pujolar, J. (2018). Critical Sociolinguistic Research Methods. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hewings, A., & Tagg, C. (2012). The Politics of English: Conflict, Competition, Co-existence. Abingdon: Routledge and Open University.Google Scholar
Jaspers, J., & Malai Madsen, L. (Eds.) (2018). Critical Perspectives on Linguistic Fixity and Fluidity: Languagised Lives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J., Cogo, A. & Dewey, M. (2011). Review of Developments in Research into English as a Lingua Franca. Language Teaching, 44(3), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1992). World Englishes: Approaches, Issues and Resources. Language Teaching, 25(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Klimava, H. (2022). Language and Access to Work: The Role of English in Recruiting. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Autonomous University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Klimava, H. Rubio, G., & Moyer, M. (2017). The Logic of English in Recruiting. Manuscript and paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Belfast, Northern Ireland. July 16–21.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lemke, T (2001). The Birth of Bio-Politics: Michael Foucault’s Lectures at the College de Franceon Neo-liberal Governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. L. (1995). The Regulation of Social Meaning. University of Chicago Law Review, 62, 943–1047.Google Scholar
Martin Jones, M. (1989). Language, Power and Linguistic Minorities: The Need for an Alternative Approach to Bilingualism, Language Maintenance, and Shift. In Grillo, R. (Ed.), Social Anthropology and the Politics of Language (pp. 106–125). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin-Rojo, L., & de Percio, A. (Eds.) (2019). Language and Neoliberal Governmentality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R., & Bhatt, R. M. (2008). World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, M. (2018). English in Times of Crisis. Mobility and Work among Young Spaniards in London. Language and Intercultural Communication, 4, 424–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, M. (2016). Translanguaging: Language Bilingualism and Education. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(1), 125–130.Google Scholar
Moyer, M. (2000). Some Considerations for Explaining Mixed Languages. Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 3(2), 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. (1997). Media lengua and Linguistic Theory. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 33(4), 409–422.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structures in Code-Switching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, B., & DePalma, R. (2017). Language-Learning Holidays: What Motivates People to Learn a Minority Language? International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(4), 332–349.Google Scholar
Park, J. S.-Y., & Wee, L. (2012). Markets of English: Linguistic Capital and Language Policy in a Globalizing World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2020). Translingual Entanglements of English. World Englishes, 39, 222–235.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Makoni, S. (2020). Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics from the Global South. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piller, I., & Takahashi, K. (2006). A Passion for English: Desire and the Language Market. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Bilingual Minds. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pujolar, J. (2019). Linguistic Entrepreneurship: Neoliberalism, Language Learning, and Class. In Martin-Rojo, L., Del Percio, A., & Block, D. (Eds.), Language and Neoliberal Governmentality (pp. 113–134). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (Ed.) (2000). Language, Politics and Language Policy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (2013). The Gatekeeping of Babel: Job Interviews and the Linguistic Penalty. In Duchêne, A., Moyer, M, & Roberts, C (Eds.), Language, Migration and Social Inequality (pp. 81–94). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., Cabrelli Amaro, J., & De Bot, K. (2013). Third Language Acquisition. In Herschensohn, J. & Young-Scholten, M (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 372–393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Laura. (2020). Multilingualism from a Language Acquisition Perspective. In Bardel, C. & Sánchez, L. (Eds.), Third Language Acquisition: Age, Proficiency and Multilingualism (pp. 15–41). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. Woolard, K., & Kroskrity, P. (1998). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, B. (2018). Chinese as a Global Language: Negotiating Ideologies and Identities. Global Chinese, 4(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (2019). A Modified and Enriched Theory of Language Policy and Management. Language Policy, 18, 323–338.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W. (2005). Critical Theory in Language Policy. In Ricento, T. (Ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method (pp. 42–59). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W., & Tsui, B. M. (2014). Language Diversity and Language Policy in Educational Access and Equity. Review of Research in Education, 38, 189–214.Google Scholar
Tupas, R. (Ed.) (2015). Unequal Englishes: The Politics of Englishes Today. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Urciouli, B. (2008). Skills and Selves in the New Workplace. American Ethnologist, 35(2), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urla, J. (2019). Governmentality and Language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48, 261–278.Google Scholar
Valax, P, (2011). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: A Critical Analysis of Its Impact on a Sample of Teachers and Curricula Within and Beyond Europe. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/5546.Google Scholar
Wee, L. (2018). World Englishes, Second Language Acquisition and the Linguistic System Conundrum. World Englishes, 37, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, K. (2020). “You Have to Be against Bilingualism!” Sociolinguistic Theory and Controversies over Bilingualism in Catalonia. Word, 66(4), 255–281.Google Scholar
Woolard, K., & Schieffelin, B. (1994). Language Ideologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82Google Scholar
Woolard, K., Schieffelin, B., & Kroskrity, P. (1994). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woydack, J. (2019). Linguistic Ethnography of a Multilingual Call Center. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar