Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Chapter 6 Structuration Theory: Giddens and Beyond
- Chapter 7 An Activity Theory Approach to Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 8 A Bourdieusian Perspective on Strategizing
- Chapter 9 A Wittgensteinian Perspective on Strategizing
- Chapter 10 A Foucauldian Perspective on Strategic Practice: Strategy as the Art of (Un)folding
- Chapter 11 A Narrativity Approach to Strategy as Practice: Strategy-Making from Texts and Narratives
- Chapter 12 Actor–Network Theory and Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 13 A Dramaturgical Framework for Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 14 Schatzki’s Practice Theory and Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 15 An Economies-of-Worth Perspective on Strategy as Practice: Dealing with Strategic Pluralism through Legitimation, Localization and Materialization
- Chapter 16 Strategy as a Performative Practice: A Self-Referential, Knowledge-Based Perspective
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Chapter 16 - Strategy as a Performative Practice: A Self-Referential, Knowledge-Based Perspective
from Part II - Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2025
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Preface to the Third Edition
- Introduction: What Is Strategy as Practice?
- Part I Ontological and Epistemological Questions
- Part II Theoretical Resources: Social Theory
- Chapter 6 Structuration Theory: Giddens and Beyond
- Chapter 7 An Activity Theory Approach to Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 8 A Bourdieusian Perspective on Strategizing
- Chapter 9 A Wittgensteinian Perspective on Strategizing
- Chapter 10 A Foucauldian Perspective on Strategic Practice: Strategy as the Art of (Un)folding
- Chapter 11 A Narrativity Approach to Strategy as Practice: Strategy-Making from Texts and Narratives
- Chapter 12 Actor–Network Theory and Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 13 A Dramaturgical Framework for Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 14 Schatzki’s Practice Theory and Strategy as Practice
- Chapter 15 An Economies-of-Worth Perspective on Strategy as Practice: Dealing with Strategic Pluralism through Legitimation, Localization and Materialization
- Chapter 16 Strategy as a Performative Practice: A Self-Referential, Knowledge-Based Perspective
- Part III Theoretical Resources: Organization and Management Theories
- Part IV Methodological Resources
- Part V Substantive Topic Areas
- Index
- References
Summary
Jean-Pascal Gond, Guillaume Carton and Yuval Millo investigate how strategy as practice and the constitution of strategy as a specific body of expert knowledge can learn from each other. After exploring the diversity of usages and meanings of performativity mobilized by strategy as practice scholars, they adopt a Barnesian take on performativity as a knowledge-based set of practices, partially self-referential, and potentially self-validating. Their analysis extends our view of strategy as practice by providing a framework of strategy as performative practice articulated around three core mechanisms: strategy conventionalization, which explains how actors produce, and become embedded, within strategy discourse and knowledge; strategy engineering, which points to the processes whereby such strategy discourse and knowledge is materially embedded into devices, tools and techniques; and strategy commodification, which explains how market forces are involved in the reproduction of strategy discourse and knowledge. With the aim to make the strategy as practice framework deliver more extensively its academic and practical potential, the authors conclude by setting an integrative research agenda based on the ideas of performing strategy as practice and strategizing performativity.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 290 - 310Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Abrahamson, E. (1991), ‘Managerial fads and fashions: the diffusion and refection of innovations’, Academy of Management Review, 16/3: 586–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962), How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, B. (1983), ‘Social life as bootstrapped induction’, Sociology, 17/4: 524–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, B., Bloor, D. and Henry, J. (1996), Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M. (2020), ‘Accomplishing impact by performing our theories: it can be done, though not easily’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56/1: 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beunza, D. and Ferraro, F. (2019), ‘Performative work: bridging performativity and institutional theory in the responsible investment field’, Organization Studies, 40/4: 515–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beunza, D. and Stark, D. (2004), ‘Tools of the trade: the socio-technology of arbitrage in a Wall Street trading room’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13/2: 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldyrev, I. and Svejenova, S. (2016), ‘After the turn: how the performativity of economics matters’, in Boldyrev, I., and Svejenova, S. (eds), Enacting Dismal Science: New Perspectives on the Performativity of Economics: 1–27. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bourgoin, A. and Muniesa, F. (2016), ‘Building a rock-solid slide: management consulting, PowerPoint, and the craft of signification’, Management Communication Quarterly, 30/3: 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgoin, A., Bencherki, N. and Faraj, S. (2020), ‘“And who are you?”: a performative perspective on authority in organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 63/4: 1134–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, V., Gond, J.-P., Nyberg, D. and Wright, C. (2021), ‘Turning back the rising sea: theory performativity in the shift from climate science to popular authority’, Organization Studies, 42/12: 1909–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brès, L. and Gond, J.-P. (2014), ‘The visible hand of consultants in the construction of the markets for virtue: translating issues, negotiating boundaries and enacting responsive regulations’, Human Relations, 67/1: 1347–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabantous, L. and Gond, J.-P. (2011), ‘Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality’s Éternel Retour’, Organization Science, 22/3: 573–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabantous, L. and Gond, J.-P. (2015), ‘The resistible rise of Bayesian thinking in management: historical lessons from decision analysis’, Journal of Management, 41/2: 441–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabantous, L. and Gond, J.-P. (2019), ‘La performativité et le management stratégique’, in Liarte, S. (ed.), Les Grands Courant en Management Stratégique: 379–412. Paris: EMS.Google Scholar
Cabantous, L. and Sergi, V. (2018), ‘Seeing the potentialities at the intersection: a reflection on performativity and processuality mindsets’, M@N@Gement, 21/4: 1229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P. and Johnson-Cramer, M. (2010), ‘Decision theory as practice: crafting rationality in organizations’, Organization Studies, 31/11: 1531–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabantous, L., Gond, J.-P. and Wright, A. (2018), ‘The performativity of strategy: taking stock and moving ahead’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (2007), ‘What does it mean to say that economics is performative?’, in MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics: 311–57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2021), Markets in the Making: Rethinking Competition, Goods, and Innovation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. and Muniesa, F. (2005), ‘Peripheral vision: economic markets as calculative collective devices’, Organization Studies, 26/8: 1229–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. R. and Kornberger, M. (2008), ‘Strategy as practice?’ Strategic Organization, 6/1: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C., Clegg, S. R. and Kornberger, M. (2010), ‘Re-framing strategy: power, politics and accounting’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23/5: 573–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, G. (2020), ‘How assemblages change when theories become performative: the case of the Blue Ocean Strategy’, Organization Studies, 41/10: 1417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carton, G. and Mouricou, P. (2017), ‘Is management research relevant? A systematic analysis of the rigor-relevance debate in top-tier journals (1994–2013)’, M@n@gement, 20/2: 166–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochoy, F., Trompette, P. and Araujo, L. (2016), ‘From market agencements to market agencing: an introduction’, Consumption Markets & Culture, 19/1: 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crucini, C. and Kipping, M. (2001), ‘Management consultancies as global change agents? Evidence from Italy’, Journal of Organizational Changement Management, 14/6: 570–89.Google Scholar
d’Adderio, L. and Pollock, N. (2014), ‘Performing modularity: competing rules, performative struggles and the effect of organizational theories on the organization’, Organization Studies, 35/12: 1813–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Adderio, L., Glaser, V. and Pollock, N. (2019), ‘Performing theories, transforming organizations: a reply to Marti and Gond’, Academy of Management Review, 44/3: 676–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dameron, S., Lê, J. K. and LeBaron, C. (2015), ‘Materializing strategy and strategizing materials: why matter matters’, British Journal of Management, 26: S1–S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1988), A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Denis, J. (2006), ‘Préface: les nouveaux visages de la performativité’, Études de Communication. Langages, Information, Médiations, 29: 8–24.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48/2: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L. (2001), Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48/1: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, L. and Lempert, M. (2014), ‘Poetics and performativity’, in Enfield, N. J., Kockelman, P., and Sidnell, J. (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology: 485–515. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, M. (2007), ‘Theories of markets and theories of society’, American Behavioral Scientist, 50/8: 1015–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, M. and Khurana, R. (2013), ‘From social control to financial economics: the linked ecologies of economics and business in twentieth century America’, Theory and Society, 42/2: 121–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, N. (1996), ‘Operation centurion: managing transformation at Philips’, Long Range Planning, 29/5: 607–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesl, M., Stensaker, I. and Colman, H. L. (2021), ‘Strategy implementation: taking stock and moving forward’, Long Range Planning, 54/4: 102064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R. and Gehman, J. (2019), ‘Performativity: not a destination but an ongoing journey’, Academy of Management Review, 44/3: 679–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garud, R., Gehman, J. and Tharchen, T. (2018), ‘Performativity as ongoing journeys: implications for strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 500–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S. (2016), ‘To start practice theorizing anew: the contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness’, Organization, 23/5: 680–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghoshal, S. (2005), ‘Bad management theories are destroying good management practices’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, V. L. (2017), ‘Design performances: how organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines’, Academy of Management Journal, 60/6: 2126–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P. and Brès, L. (2020), ‘Designing the tools of the trade: how corporate social responsibility consultants and their tool-based practices created market shifts’, Organization Studies, 41/5: 703–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P. and Cabantous, L. (2015), ‘Performativity: towards a performative turn in organisational studies’, in Mir, R., Willmott, H., and Greenwood, M. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies: 508–16. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P. and Carton, G. (2022), ‘The performativity of theories’, in Neesham, C., Reihlen, M., and Schoeneborn, D. (eds), Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L. and Krikorian, F. (2018), ‘How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility’, Strategic Organization, 16/3: 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N. and Learmonth, M. (2016), ‘What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 18/4: 440–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. (2007), ‘How to do things with experimental economics’, in MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics: 128–62. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guérard, S., Langley, A. and Seidl, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking the concept of performance in strategy research: towards a performativity perspective’, M@n@gement, 16/5: 566–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983), Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, vol. 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, I. and MacKenzie, D. (2007), ‘Assembling an economic actor: the agencement of a Hedge Fund’, The Sociological Review, 55/1: 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, J. (2000), ‘Strategic decision making, discourse, and strategy as social practice’, Journal of Management Studies, 37/7: 955–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heusinkveld, S. and Benders, J. (2005), ‘Contested commodification: consultancies and their struggle with new concept development’, Human Relations, 58/3: 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heusinkveld, S. and Visscher, K. (2012), ‘Practice what you preach: how consultants frame management concepts as enacted practice’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28/4: 285–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G. P., Whittington, R., Johnson, G. and Schwarz, M. (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, co-ordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, R., Li, Z., Huang, C., Chu, R. and Fan, X. (2010), ‘Dropping the brand of Edinburgh School: an interview with Barry Barnes’, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 4/4: 601–17.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D. (2010), Mapping Strategic Diversity: Strategic Thinking from a Variety of Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003), ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Kaplan, S. (2015), ‘Strategy tools-in-use: a framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice’, Strategic Management Journal, 36/4: 537–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Pinch, T. (2013), ‘Sociomateriality is “the New Black”: accomplishing repurposing, reinscripting, and repairing in context’, M@n@gement, 5: 579–92.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R. and Cabantous, L. (2015), ‘Conducting global team-based ethnography: methodological challenges and practical methods’, Human Relations, 68/1: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Micro-strategy and strategising: introduction to the Special Issue’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J. and Shin, T. (2019), ‘Learning not to diversify: the transformation of graduate business education and the decline of diversifying acquisitions’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 64/2: 337–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1951), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kieser, A., Nicolai, A. T. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program’, Academy of Management Annals, 9/1: 143–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy‐as‐practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1996), Aramis or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ligonie, M. (2018), ‘The “forced performativity” of a strategy concept: exploring how shared value shaped a gambling company’s strategy’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 463–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. A. (1981), Statistics in Britain: 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. A. (2007), ‘Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivates markets’, in MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F., and Siu, L. (eds), Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics: 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. A. and Millo, Y. (2003), ‘Constructing a market, performing theory: the historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange1’, American Journal of Sociology, 109/1: 107–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marti, E. and Gond, J.-P. (2018), ‘When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity’, Academy of Management Review, 43/3: 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marti, E. and Gond, J.-P. (2019), ‘How do theories become self-fulfilling? Clarifying the process of Barnesian performativity’, Academy of Management Review, 44/3: 686–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, C. D. (2006), The World’s Newest Profession: Management Consulting in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1948), ‘The self-fulfilling prophecy’, Antioch Review, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and Gosling, J. (2002), ‘Educating managers beyond borders’, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1/1: 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosonyi, S., Empson, L. and Gond, J.-P. (2020), ‘Management consulting: towards an integrative framework of knowledge, identity, and power’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 22/2: 120–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, F. (2018), ‘Grappling with the performative condition’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 495–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottosson, M. and Galis, V. (2011), ‘Multiplicity justifies corporate strategy: the case of Stora Enso, 1990–2008’, Journal of Cultural Economy, 4/4: 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallï, P. (2018), ‘Ascribing materiality and agency to strategy in interaction: a language-based approach to the material agency of strategy’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 436–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2013), ‘Discourse revisited: dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 34/8: 935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, A. (1995), The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, N. and d’Adderio, L. (2012), ‘Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37/8: 565–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, P. and Chillas, S. (2014), ‘The state of affairs: critical performativity and the online dating industry’, Organization, 21/6: 797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Balogun, J. (2011), ‘Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence’, Journal of Management Studies, 48/5: 953–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D., Grossmann-Hensel, B. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2021), ‘Strategy as practice and routine dynamics’, in Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T., D’Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., and Seidl, D. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics: 481–500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, A., Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2009), ‘Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies’, Human Relations, 62/4: 537–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturdy, A., Clark, T., Fincham, R. and Handley, K. (2009), ‘Between innovation and legitimation – boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy’, Organization, 16/5: 627–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R. and van Every, E. J. (1999), The Emergent Organization: Communication as Its Site and Surface. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thévenot, L. (2001), ‘Organized complexity: conventions of coordination and the composition of economic arrangements’, European Journal of Social Theory, 4/4: 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Ende, L. and van Marrewijk, A. (2018), ‘The point of no return: ritual performance and strategy making in project organizations’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 451–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargha, Z. (2018), ‘Performing a strategy’s world: how redesigning customers made relationship banking possible’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 480–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, C., Bencherki, N., Cooren, F. and Sergi, V. (2018), ‘From “matters of concern” to “matters of authority”: studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach’, Long Range Planning, 51/3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M. and Elmes, M. B. (2007), ‘Technological embeddedness and organizational change’, Organization Science, 18/5: 832–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wæraas, A. and Sataøen, H. L. (2014), ‘Trapped in conformity? Translating reputation management into practice’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30/2: 242–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werle, F. and Seidl, D. (2015), ‘The layered materiality of strategizing: epistemic objects and the interplay between material artefacts in the exploration of strategic topics’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S67–S89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2015), ‘The massification of strategy’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: S13–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2019), Opening Strategy: Professional Strategists and Practice Change, 1960 to Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. and Cailluet, L. (2008), ‘The crafts of strategy: introduction to themed issue’, Long Range Planning, 41/3: 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. and Mayer, M. (2003), ‘Après le déf américain: la structure multidivisionnelle dans l’Europe post-McKinsey’, Entreprises et Histoire, 33/16: 41–56.Google Scholar
Whittington, R., Yakis-Douglas, B. and Ahn, K. (2016), ‘Cheap talk? Strategy presentations as a form of chief executive officer impression management’, Strategic Management Journal, 37/12: 2413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Jarzabkowski, P., Mayer, M., Mounoud, E. É. , Nahapiet, J. and Rouleau, L. (2003), ‘Taking strategy seriously – responsibility and reform for an important social practice’, Journal of Management Inquiry, 12/4: 396–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R., Molloy, E., Mayer, M. and Smith, A. (2006), ‘Practices of strategizing/organising: broadening strategy work and skills’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 615–29.Google Scholar
Wright, R. P., Paroutis, S. E. and Blettner, D. P. (2013), ‘How useful are the strategic tools we teach in business schools?’ Journal of Management Studies, 50/1: 92–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar