Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics
- Part II Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics
- Part III Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics
- Index
- References
1 - Introduction
Directions in Sociopragmatics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics
- Part II Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics
- Part III Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics
- Index
- References
Summary
Sociopragmatics encompasses the study of social dimensions of language use. This chapter discusses directions in the rapidly growing field of sociopragmatics. It begins by first introducing the rationale for producing the first handbook of sociopragmatics, before briefly discussing the different, albeit complementary, ways in which the scope of sociopragmatics has been framed in the field. In the course of this discussion we draw particular attention to three key anchors of sociopragmatic research: social, interactional and normative dimensions of language use. We then offer an overview of the contents of the handbook, explaining how we have brought together a range of different research areas, topics and approaches under the umbrella of sociopragmatics. We conclude with thoughts on the place of sociopragmatics with respect to the broader field of pragmatics.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics , pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Allan, K. and Jaszczolt, K. M. (eds.). (2012). The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. ([1962] 1975). How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Edited by Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barron, A., Grundy, P. and Gu, Y. (eds.). (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A., ed., Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–76.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, W., Jucker, A. H. and Schneider, K. P. (eds.). (2011–). Mouton Handbooks in Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–36.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethdology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. and Culpeper, J. (2018). Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Ilie, C. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 213–39.Google Scholar
Haugh, M., Kadar, D. and Mills, S. (2013). Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 1–11.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2018). Sociolinguistics vs. pragmatics. In Ilie, C. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan (ed.). (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p’s and q’s’. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 8, 292–305.Google Scholar
Leech, G. (1977). Language and tact (Series A, Paper No. 46). Linguistic Agency University of Trier.Google Scholar
Marmaridou, S. (2011). Pragmalinguistics and sociopragmatics. In Bublitz, W. and Norrick, N. R., eds., Foundations of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Mey, J. (2005). What is in a (hand)book? Reflections on a recent compilation: Review of Horn, R. Laurence and G. Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2, 347–58.Google Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2012). Societal pragmatics. In Chapelle, C. A., ed., The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Őstman, J.-O. and Verschueren, J. (1995–). Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In Basso, K., Selby, H. and Henry, A., eds., Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11–55.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by