Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:00:06.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part 3 - Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Edited by
Danko Šipka  and
Wayles Browne
Danko Šipka
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Wayles Browne
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics , pp. 261 - 498
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Akhutina, T., Kurgansky, A., Polinsky, M., & Bates, E. (1999). Processing of grammatical gender in a three-gender system: Experimental evidence from Russian. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, A. & Arsenijević, B. (2012). The two faces of agreement. Language, 88(2), 388–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenijević, B. (2021). No gender in ‘gender agreement’: On declension classes and gender in Serbo-Croatian. Balcania et Slavia, 1(1), 11–46.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, B. & Mitić, I. (2016a). Effect of animacy and agentivity on the processing of agreement in Serbo-Croatian. In Halupka-Rešetar, S. & Martínez-Ferreiro, S., eds., Studies in Languages and Mind, Selected Papers from Third Novi Sad Workshop on Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and Clinical Linguistic Research, Novi Sad: Faculty of Philosophy, pp. 41–77.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, B. & Mitić, I. (2016b). On the (in)dependence of gender with respect to number in agreement with coordinated subjects: An experimental study. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 24, 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badecker, W. & Kuminiak, F. (2007). Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production: Evidence from gender and case in Slovak. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. & Nevins, A. (2008). Russian genitive plurals are impostors. In Bachrach, A. & Nevins, A., eds., Inflectional Identity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 237–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2006). Case and agreement with genitive of quantification in Russian. In Boeckx, C., ed., Agreement Systems, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2009). Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(3), 455–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W. (1993). Serbo-Croat. In Comrie, B. and Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 306–387.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
Citko, B. (2004). Agreement asymmetries in coordinate structures. In Arnaudova, O., Browne, W., Rivero, M. L., & Stojanović, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 12. The Ottawa Meeting 2003, Ann Arbor, MI: Slavic Publications, pp. 91–108.Google Scholar
Citko, B. (2018). Complementizer agreement with coordinated subjects in Polish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1979). The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 15, 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1983). Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (2006). Agreement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Driemel, I. & Stojković, J. (2019). How to agree with a QNP. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (1994). Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 570–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. & Willer-Gold, J. (2014). Agreement strategies with conjoined subjects in Croatian. In Jaworski, S. & Witkoś, J., eds., New Insights into Slavic Linguistics, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
Kučerová, I. (2018). On the lack of φ-feature resolution in DP coordinations: Evidence from Czech. In Lenertová, D., Meyer, R., Šimík, R., & Szucsich, L., eds., Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2016, Berlin: Language Science Press, pp. 169–191.Google Scholar
Lorimor, H., Bock, K., Zalkind, E., Sheyman, A., & Beard, R. (2008). Agreement and attraction in Russian. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 769–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyskawa, P. (2020). The structure of Polish numerically-quantified expressions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madariaga, N. & Igartua, I. (2017). Idiosyncratic (dis)agreement patterns: The structure and diachrony of Russian paucal subjects. Scando-Slavica, 63(2), 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marušič, F. & Nevins, A. (2010). Two types of neuter: Closest-conjunct agreement in the presence of ‘5&ups’. In Browne, W., Cooper, A., Fisher, A., Kesici, E., Predolac, N., & Zec, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 18. The Second Cornell Meeting, 2009, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 301–317.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Nevins, A., & Badecker, B. (2015). The grammars of conjunction agreement in Slovenian. Syntax, 18(1), 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirković, J. & Macdonald, M. C. (2013). When singular and plural are both grammatical: Semantic and morphophonological effects in agreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(3), 277–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitić, I. & Arsenijević, B. (2019). Plural conjuncts and syncretism facilitate gender agreement in Serbo-Croatian: Experimental evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, A. & Puškar, Z. (2018). Closest conjunct agreement is an illusion: Evidence from gender agreement in Serbo-Croatian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 36, 1207–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2006). Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24(2), 433–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and Categories. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Prażmowska, A. (2016). Full agreement with coordinate subjects in Polish: Gender resolution rules revisited. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 64(11), 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puškar, Z. (2018). Interactions of gender and number agreement: Evidence from Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian. Syntax, 21(3), 257–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristić, B., Molinaro, N., & Mancini, S. (2016). Agreement attraction in Serbian: Decomposing markedness. The Mental Lexicon, 11(2), 242–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. (2012). The effect of grammatical gender in Russian spoken-word recognition. In Makarova, V., ed., Russian Language Studies in North America. New Perspectives in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, New York, NY: Anthem Press, pp. 107–132.Google Scholar
Sekerina, I. A. (2017). Slavic psycholinguistics in the 21st century. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25(2), 463–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slioussar, N. & Malko, A. (2016). Gender agreement attraction in Russian: Production and comprehension evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steriopolo, O. (2018). Morphosyntax of gender in Russian sex-differentiable nouns. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 26(2), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroińska, M. (1992). Numerals and agreement in Polish. Canadian Slavonic Papers, Revue Canadienne des Slavistes, 34(4), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, O. (2015). Polish gender, subgender, and quasi-gender. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 23(1), 83–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, S. & Zlatić, L. (2003). The Many Faces of Agreement. Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse Factors in Serbo-Croatian Agreement, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijević, B., Batinić, M., Čordalija, N., Kresić, M., Leko, N., Marušič, L., Milićev, T., Milićević, N., Mitić, I., Nevins, A., Peti-Stantić, A., Stanković, B., Šuligoj, T., & Tušek, J. (2016). Conjunct agreement and gender in South Slavic: From theory to experiments to theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 24(1), 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijević, B., Batinić, M., Becker, M., Čordalija, N., Kresić, M., Leko, N., Marušič, F. L., Milićev, T., Milićević, N., Mitić, I., Peti-Stantić, A., Stanković, B., Šuligoj, T., Tušek, J., & Nevins, A. (2018). When linearity prevails over hierarchy in syntax. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America PNAS, 115(3), 495–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Bhatt, R. (2002). The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics, 10, 43–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, V. (2000). The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billings, L. & Rudin, C. (1996). Optimality and superiority: A new approach to overt multiple wh-ordering. In Toman, J., ed., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 3. The College Park Meeting, 1995, Ann Arbor, MI. Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 35–60.Google Scholar
Bondaruk, A. (1995). Resumptive pronouns in English and Polish. In Gussmann, E., ed., Licensing in Syntax and Phonology, Lublin: Folium, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar
Borsley, R. D. (1983). A note on the Generalized Left Branch Condition. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 169–174.Google Scholar
Borsley, R. D. & Jaworska, E. (1989). On Polish PPs. Linguistics, 27, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2002). On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2009). More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica, 63, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2009). On relativization strategies and resumptive pronouns, In Zybatow, G., Junghanns, U., Lenertová, D., & Biskup, P., eds., Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
Broihier, K. (1995). Optimality-Theoretic Rankings with Tied Constraints. Slavic Relatives, Resumptive Pronouns, and Learnability. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Grimshaw, J. (1978). The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 9, 331–391.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1972). Conjoined question words and the limitation of English surface structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 223–226.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1986). Relative Clauses in Serbo-Croatian in Comparison with English. PhD thesis, University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T., & Akmajian, A., eds., Formal Syntax, New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Citko, B. (1998). On multiple wh movement in Slavic. In Bošković, Ž, Franks, S., & Snyder, W., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 6. The Connecticut Meeting, 1997, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 97–114.Google Scholar
Citko, B. (2001). Deletion under identity in relative clauses. In Kim, M. & Strauss, U., eds., Proceedings of the 31st North East Linguistics Society, Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
Citko, B. (2005). On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 475–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. (2006). The interaction between across-the-board wh-movement and Left Branch Extraction. Syntax, 9, 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. (2009). What don’t free relatives, correlatives, and wh-questions have in common? In Lipták, A., ed., Correlatives Crosslinguistically, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 49–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. (2010). On the distribution of -kolwiek ‘ever’ in Polish free relative clauses. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 18, 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. (2011). Symmetry in syntax: Merge, Move and Labels, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. & Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2013). Towards a new typology of coordinated wh- questions. Journal of Linguistics, 49, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. & Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2016). Multiple (coordinated) (free) relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 34, 393–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citko, B. & Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2020). Conjunction saves multiple sluicing: How *(and) why?, Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1): 92. doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1112.Google Scholar
Citko, B. & Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2021). Merge: Binarity in (Multidominant) Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corver, N. (1990). The Syntax of Left Branch Extraction. PhD thesis, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Dimova, E. (2014). A new look at multiple free relatives: Evidence from Bulgarian. Paper presented at SLS 9, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Dukova-Zheleva, G. (2010). Questions and Focus in Bulgarian. PhD thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Dyła, S. (1984). Across-the-board dependencies and case in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 701–705.Google Scholar
Fanselow, G. & Ćavar, D. (2002). Distributed deletion. In Alexiadou, A., ed., Theoretical Approaches to Universals, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, J., Lipinska-Grzegorek, M., & Zabrocki, T. (1978). An Introductory English-Polish Contrastive Grammar, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S & Progovac, L. (1994). On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics. Indiana Linguistic Studies, 7, 69–78.Google Scholar
Giltner, D. (2018). Head-Raising and Head-Matching in Russian Relative Clauses: Diagnostic Study. Honors thesis, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2007). About Sharing, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2013). The syntax of relative clauses in Croatian. Linguistic Review, 30. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2013-0002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gračanin-Yuksek, M. (2017). Conjoined wh-questions. In Everaert, M. & van Riemsdijk, H., eds., The Companion to Syntax, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1127–1161.Google Scholar
Gribanova, V. (2009). Structural adjacency and the typology of interrogative interpretations. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebenyova, L. (2006). Sluicing puzzles in Russian. In Lavine, J., Franks, S., Tasseva-Kurktchieva, M., & Filip, H., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14. The Princeton Meeting, 2005, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 157–171.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, G. (2001). Multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groos, A. & van Riemsdijk, H. (1981). Matching effects in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In Brandi, L., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L., eds., Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Guz, W. (2017). Resumptive pronouns in Polish co relative clauses. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25, 95–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hladnik, M. (2015). Mind the Gap. Resumption in Slavic Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Izvorski, R. (1996). The syntax and semantics of correlative proforms. In Kusumo, K., ed., Proceedings of NELS 26, pp. 133–147.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. (1995). On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Bach, E. et al., eds., Quantification in Natural Languages, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 451–486.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2003). Topicality and superiority in Bulgarian wh-questions. In Arnaudova, O., Browne, W., Rivero, M. L., & Stojanović, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Languages 12. The Ottawa Meeting, 2003, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 207–228.Google Scholar
Hulsey, S. & Sauerland, U. (2006). Sorting out relative clauses. Natural Language Semantics, 14, 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krapova, I. (2010). Bulgarian relative and factive clauses with an invariant complementizer. Lingua, 120, 1240–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krapova, I., & Cinque, G. (2008). On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh- fronting. In Zybatow, T. et al., eds., Formal Description of Slavic Languages: The Fifth Conference (FDSL5), Leipzig 2003, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 318–336.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O. (2001). More of a good thing: Russian synthetic and analytic comparatives. In Toman, J., ed., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 10. The Second Ann Arbor Meeting, 2001, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 143–161.Google Scholar
Mitrenina, O. (2010). Correlatives: Evidence from Russian. In Zybatow, G. et al., eds., Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics: Proceedings of Formal Description of Slavic Languages 7.5, Frankfurt am Main, 2010, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 135–151.Google Scholar
Pancheva, R. (2006). Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic. In Lavine, J., Franks, S., Tasseva-Kurktchieva, M., & Filip, H., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 14. The Princeton Meeting, 2005, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 236–257.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2007). The universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica, 61, 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1998). Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. Is the best good enough? In Barbosa, P., Fox, D., Hagstrom, P., McGinnis, M., & Pesetsky, D., eds., Optimality and Competition in Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 337–384.Google Scholar
Pęzik, P. (2015). Spokes: A search and exploration service for conversational corpus data. In Odijk, J., ed., Selected Papers from the CLARIN 2014 Conference, October 24–25, 2014, Soesterberg, The Netherlands [Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, 116], Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (1998). Determiner phrase in a language without determiners. Journal of Linguistics, 34, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, N. (2001). Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures, Oxford & New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rudin, C. (1988). On multiple questions and multiple wh fronting. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6, 445–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudin, C. (2007). Multiple wh-relatives in Slavic. In Compton, R., Goledzinowska, M., & Savchenko, U., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15. The Toronto Meeting, 2006, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 282–307.Google Scholar
Rudin, C. (2013). Aspects of Bulgarian Syntax: Complementizers and Wh Constructions, 2nd revised ed., Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Scott, T. (2012). Whoever Doesn’t Hop Must Be Superior: The Russian Left-Periphery and the Emergence of Superiority. PhD thesis, Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
Šimík, R. (2016). On the semantics of Czech free relatives. In Zikova, M. & Caha, P., eds., Linguistica Brunensia 64/1: Festschrift for Petr Karlik, Brno: Masaryk University, pp. 109–129.Google Scholar
Šimík, R. (2018). Ever free relatives crosslinguistically. In Sauerland, U. & Solt, S., eds., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 22, Vol. 2, ZASPiL 61, ZAS, Berlin, pp. 375–392.Google Scholar
Sobin, N. (1990). On the syntax of English echo questions. Lingua, 81, 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepanov, A. (1998). On wh-fronting in Russian. In Tamanji, P. N & Kusumoto, K., eds., NELS 28, Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 453–467.Google Scholar
Stepanov, A. (2000). WH-scope marking in Slavic. Studia Linguistica, 54, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturgeon, Anne. (2007). Another look at multiple wh-questions in Czech. In Compton, R., Goledzinowska, M., & Savchenko, U., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 15. The Toronto Meeting, 2006, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 402–416.Google Scholar
Szczegielniak, A. (2004). Relativization That You Did. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Tomaszewicz, B. (2011). Against spurious coordination in multiple wh questions. In Washburn, M. B. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 186–195.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1988). On Government. PhD thesis, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J.-R. (1974). French Relative Clauses. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Veselovská, L. (2021). Wh-Questions: A Case Study in Czech. Olomouc Modern Language Monographs, Volume 11, Olomouc: Palacky University Olomouc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, M. De. (2002). The Syntax of Relativization. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Wachowicz, K. A. (1974). Against the universality of a single wh-question movement. Foundations of Language, 11, 155–166.Google Scholar

References

Andrejčin, L., Ivanov, M., & Popov, K. (1957). Săvremeni bălgarski ezik, čast II, Sofija: Dăržavno izdatelstvo ‘Narodna prosveta’.Google Scholar
Andrews, A. D. (2007). Relative clauses. In Shopen, T., ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Second edition, Volume II: Complex Constructions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arxipov, A. V. (2005). K tipologii komitativnyx konstrukcij. Čast’ I. opredelenie i formal’naja tipologija. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 76–100.Google Scholar
Arxipov, A. V. (2008). K tipologii komitativnyx konstrukcij. Čast’ II. polisemija komitativnyx konstrukcij. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 3, 22–50.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1986). Relative Clauses in Serbo-Croatian in Comparison with English (New Studies, 4), Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (2009). On conjoined questions and conjoined relative clauses in English and Serbo-Croatian. In Franks, S., Chidambaram, V., & Joseph, B., eds., A Linguist’s Linguist: Studies in South Slavic Linguistics in honor of E. Wayles Browne, Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Büring, D. & Hartmann, K. (2015). Semantic coordination without syntactic coordinators. In Toivonen, I., Csúri, P., & van der Zee, E., eds., Structures in the Mind. Essays on Language, Music, and Cognition in Honor of Ray Jackendoff, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R. & Blakemore, D. (2005). Introduction to coordination: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Lingua, 115, 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (2020). The Syntax of Relative Clauses: A Unified Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, A. & Smith, N. (2005). What is coordination? Lingua, 115, 395–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, S. (2014). Is there really a syntactic category of subordination? In Herlin, I, Kalliokoski, J, & Visapää, L, eds., Contexts of Subordination – Cognitive, Typological and Discourse Perspectives, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 73–91.Google Scholar
Culicover, P. W. & Jackendoff, R. (1997). Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 195–217.Google Scholar
Čordalija, N., Jovović, I., & Leko, N. (2020). Postverbal conjoined subjects and closest conjunct agreement in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian: An experimental study. Suvremena lingvistika, 89, 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagnac, A. (2012). How do you double your C? Evidence from an Oïl dialect. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 9, 77–94.Google Scholar
Delmonte, V. & Fernández-Soriano, O. (2009). Force and finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21, 23–49.Google Scholar
Dobrušina, N. R. (2016). Soslagatel’noe naklonenie v russkom jazyke: opyt issledovanija grammatičeskoj semantiki, Prague: Animedia Company.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, C. & Ramm, W. (2008). Editor’s introduction: Subordination and coordination from different perspectives. In Fabricius-Hansen, C. & Ramm, W., eds., ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Studies in Language Companion Series 98), Amsterdam: Benjamins 2008, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (2017). Slavic generative syntax. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 25(2), 199–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. & Willer-Gold, J. (2014). Agreement strategies with conjoined subjects in Cro. In Jaworski, S. & Witkoś, J., eds., New Insights into Slavic Linguistics, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Fried, M. (2010). Accusative resumptive pronoun in the Czech relative clauses with absolutive relativizer co. Korpus – gramatika – axiologie, 1, 16–29.Google Scholar
Fried, M. & Lipská, K. (2020). Dvě relativizační strategie v češtině: konstrukčněgramatický přístup. Naše řeč 103(1–2), 37–54.Google Scholar
Gladrow, W. & Kosta, P. (1999). Syntax und Syntaxkonzeptionen. In Jachnow, H., ed., Handbuch der sprachwissenschaftlichen Russistik und ihrer Grenzdisziplinen, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. 386–424.Google Scholar
Gołąb, Z. & Friedman, V. A. (1972). The relative clause in Slavic. In Peranteau, P. M., Levi, J. N., & Phares, G. C., eds., The Chicago Which Hunt: Papers from the Relative Clause Festival, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 30–46.Google Scholar
González i Planas, F. (2014). On quotative recomplementation: Between pragmatics and morphosyntax. Lingua, 146, 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2004). Coordinating constructions: An overview. In Haspelmath, M., ed., Coordinating Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 58], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2007). Coordination. In Shopen, T., ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Second Edition, Volume II: Complex Constructions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–51.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, E. (1993). Dialectal variation inside CP as parametric variation. In Abraham, W. & Bayer, J, eds., Dialektsyntax (Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 5), Opladen: WestdeutscherVerlag, pp. 161–179.Google Scholar
Hudeček, L. & Vukojević, L. (2006). Ne samo … nego/već (i) ustrojstva. Rasprave Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 32, 127–158.Google Scholar
Hurford, J. R. (2014). The Origins of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jahić, D., Halilović, S., & Palić, I. (2000). Gramatika bosanskoga jezika, Zenica: Dom štampe.Google Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. (2005). The syntax of correlative adverbs. Lingua, 115, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordanoska, I. (2017). Coordination, Conditionals and Questions: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation. MA Thesis, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Katičić, R. (1991). Sintaksa hrvatskoga književnog jezika, Zagreb: HAZU – Globus.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. L. & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar.Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Klemensiewicz, Z. (1953). Zarys składni polskiej, Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Koneski, B. (1976). Gramatika na makedonskiot literaturen jazik, Skopje: Kultura.Google Scholar
Kordić, S. (1995). Relativna rečenica, Zagreb: Hrvatsko filološko društvo – Matica hrvatska.Google Scholar
Kordić, S. (2008). Koordinacija i subordinacija u složenim rečenicama slavenskih jezika.Južnoslovenski filolog, 64, 189–197.Google Scholar
Kortmann, B. (2001). Adverbial clauses. In Smelser, N. J. & Baltes, P. B., eds., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol 1, Amsterdam: Pergamon, pp. 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krvina, D. & Žele, A. (2018). Vezniki: poskus opredelitve njihove vloge v slovenskih zloženih povedih. Jezikoslovni zapiski, 24, 1–25.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2005). Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementiser system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society, 103(3), 339–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, A. (2006). The dual complementizer system in Southern Italy: Spirito Greco, materia Romanza? In Lepschy, A. L. & Tosi, A., eds., Rethinking Languages in Contact: the Case of Italian, London: Modern Humanities Research Association and Routledge, pp. 112–126.Google Scholar
Lohninger, M. & Wurmbrand, S. (2020). Typology of complement clauses. In Benz, A., Frey, W., Krifka, M., McFadden, T., & Żygis, M., eds., Handbook of Clausal Embedding, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Nevins, A., & Saksida, A. (2007). Last-conjunct agreement in Slovenian. FASL, 15, 210–227.Google Scholar
Marušič, F. & Nevins, A. (2010). Two types of neuter: Closest-conjunct agreement in the presence of ‘5&ups’. FASL, 18, 301–317.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Nevins, A., & Badecker, B. (2015). The grammars of conjunction agreement in Sln. Syntax, 18(1), 39–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascarenhas, S. (2014). Complementizer doubling in European Portuguese. Rivista di grammatica generativa, 36, 105–116.Google Scholar
McCloskey, J. (2006). Questions and questioning in a local English. In Zanuttini, R., Campos, H., Herburger, E., & Portner, P. H, eds., Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 87–126.Google Scholar
Mihaljević, M. (2013). Parenteza s glagolima govorenja u hrvatskom jeziku. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 39(2), 527–544.Google Scholar
Mihaljević, M. (2018). The structure of coordination: Evidence from Croatian Church Slavonic. FASL, 25, 200–213.Google Scholar
Mihaljević, M. (2019). Udvajanje dopunjača u hrvatskome crkvenoslavenskom jeziku. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje, 45(2), 571–600.Google Scholar
Mihaljević, M., Šimić, A., & Vela, J. (2021). Iz sintakse Drugoga beramskog brevijara. In Mihaljević, M. & Radošević, A., eds., Studije o Drugome beramskom brevijaru, Zagreb: Staroslavenski institut, pp. 325–350.Google Scholar
Minova-Gjurkova, L. (2011). Sintaksa na makedonskiot standarden jazik, treto dopolneto izdanie, Skopje: 2-ri Avgust S.Google Scholar
Mithun, M. (1988). The grammaticization of coordination. In Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. A., eds., Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munaro, N. (2016). A diachronic approach to complementizer doubling in Italo-Romance and the notion of downward reanalysis. Rivista di grammatica generativa, 38, 215–228.Google Scholar
Paoli, S. (2004). The ‘double CHE constructions’: A comparative perspective. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics, 107, 193–209.Google Scholar
Pašov, P. (2005). Bălgarska gramatika, Sofia: Izdatelska kăšta “Hermes”.Google Scholar
Palašić, N. (2018). O granicama (i dodirima) koordinacije i subordinacije. In Palić, I., ed., Sarajevski filološki susreti 4. Zbornik radova (knjiga 1), Sarajevo: Bosansko filološko društvo, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
Petrović, V. (2004). Upotreba veznika kako i da u komplementnoj klauzi srpskog jezika.Slavia Meridionalis, 4, 35–44.Google Scholar
Plesničar, V. (2015). Podvajanje veznikov okoli podrednih stavkov v slovenščini. In Marušič, F., Mišmaš, P., & Žaucer, R., eds., Škrabčevi dnevi 9: Zbornik prispevkov s simpozija 2015, Nova Gorica: Založba Univerze v Novi Gorici, pp. 113–126.Google Scholar
Plesničar, V. (2020). Complementizer doubling in Sln. subordinate clauses. In Marušič, F., Mišmaš, P., & Žaucer, R., eds., Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2017, Berlin: Language Science Press, pp. 233–255.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (2013). The complementiser system in spoken English: Evidence from broadcast media. In Camacho-Taboada, V., Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., Martín-González, J., & Reyes-Tejedor, M., eds., Information Structure and Agreement, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 11–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A. (2018). Colloquial English: Structure and Variation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribarova, Z. & Ribarova, S. (2015). Češka gramatika s vježbama, Zagreb: Porfirogenet d.o.o.Google Scholar
Sesar, D. (2018). Pregled slovačke sintakse, Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu FF press.Google Scholar
Silić, J. & Pranjković, I. (2005). Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika za gimnazije i visoka učilišta, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Stankovska, P. (2013). Češka skladnja, Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta.Google Scholar
Stankovska, P. (2018). Infinitiv jako pravovalenční doplnění sloves v češtině a ve slovinštině. Prace filologiczne, 72, 345–355.Google Scholar
Stassen, L. (2000). AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology, 4, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Švedova, N. J., ed. (1980). Russkaja grammatika. Tom II: Sintaksis, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A., Longacre, R. E., & Hwang, S. J. (2007). Adverbial clauses. In Shopen, T., ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Second edition, Volume II: Complex Constructions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlik, M. & Žele, A. (2019). Sln. comitative constructions with dual personal pronouns. Rhema, 3, 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Večerka, R. (1961). Syntax aktivních participií v staroslověnštině, Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Večerka, R. (1996). Altkirchenslavische (altbulgarische) Syntax III. Die Satztypen: der einfache Satz, Freiburg im Breisgau: Weiher.Google Scholar
Večerka, R. (2002). Altkirchenslavische (altbulgarische) Syntax IV. Die Satztypen: der zusammengesetzte Satz, Freiburg im Breisgau: Weiher.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J. (2015). The Syntax of Multiple-que Sentences in Spanish. Along the Left Periphery, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Viti, C. (2013). Forms and functions of subordination in Indo-European. Historische Sprachforschung/Historical Linguistics, 126, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, B. (2009). Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiemer, B. (2021). A general template of clausal complementation and its application to South Slavic: Theoretical premises, typological background, empirical issues. In Wiemer, B. & Sonnenhauser, B., eds., Clausal Complementation in South Slavic, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 29–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willer-Gold, J. et al. (2016). Conjunct agreement and gender in South Slavic: From theory to experiments to theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 24(1), 187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Akiner, S. (1983). The syntax of the numeral in Byelorussian, compared with Ukrainian, Russian and Polish. Slavonic and East European Review, 61(1), 55–68.Google Scholar
Babby, L. (1987). Case, prequantifiers, and discontinuous agreement in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 5(1), 91–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, J. (2012). The Syntax of Russian, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bernard, R. (1954). Alcune osservazioni sul plurale secondo in bulgaro moderno. Richerche slavistiche, 3, 30–42.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2006). Case checking vs. case assignment and the case of adverbial NPs. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(3), 522–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, M. Z. (1975). Polish Reference Grammar, The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W. (1993). Serbo-Croat. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 306–387.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. & Krapova, I. (2007). A note on Bulgarian numeral classifiers. In Alboiu, G., Avram, A. A., Avram, L., & Isac, D., eds., Pitar Moş: A Building with a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, Bucharest: Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, pp. 45–51.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1978). Numerous squishes and squishy numerals in Slavonic. International Review of Slavic Linguistics, 3, 43–73.Google Scholar
Corbett, G. G. (1979). Adjective movement. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 8, 1–10.Google Scholar
Feldstein, R. & Franks, S. (2002). Polish, Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1994). Parametric properties of numeral phrases in Slavic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12(4), 570–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (2002). A Jakobsonian feature based analysis of the Slavic numeric quantifier genitive. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10, 141–181.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (2018). A Bulgarian solution to the Slavic Q question? In Franks, S., Chidambaram, V., Joseph, B., & Krapova, I., eds., Katerino Mome: Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin, Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 93–120.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (2020). Microvariation in the South Slavic Noun Phrase, Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Friedman, V. (1993). Macedonian. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
Herrity, P. (2000). Slovene: A Comprehensive Grammar, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huntley, D. (1993). Old Church Slavonic. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 125–187.Google Scholar
Ionin, T. & Matushansky, O. (2018). Cardinals: The Syntax and Semantics of Cardinal-Containing Expressions, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, C. (2003). Macedonian, 2nd ed., Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Mayo, P. (1993). Belorussian. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 887–946.Google Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (1985). Poverxnostnyj sintaksis russkix čislovyx vyraženij [Wiener Slawischer Almanach Sonderband 16], Vienna: Institut für Slawistik der Universität Wien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, C. (1982/1988). The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT. [Revised version published in 1988 by Kluwer: Dordrecht.]Google Scholar
Nicolova, R. (2017). Bulgarian Grammar, Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Pancheva, R. (2018). How many flowers! So many colors! Number marking in cardinality exclamatives in Bulgarian. In Franks, S., Chidambaram, V., Joseph, B., & Krapova, I., eds., Katerino Mome: Studies in Bulgarian Morphosyntax in Honor of Catherine Rudin, Bloomington, IN: Slavica, pp. 197–233.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2006). Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24(2), 433–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and Categories. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (2013). Russian Case Morphology and the Syntactic Categories, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, R. (1993). Polish. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 686–758.Google Scholar
Slobodchikoff, T. (2019). The Evolution of the Slavic Dual: A Biolinguistic Perspective, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Stateva, P. & Stepanov, A. (2016). Agreement errors and structural distance: A corpus study of Bulgarian. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 61(3), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, O. (2002). A Grammar of Contemporary Polish, Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Suprun, A. E. (1959). O russkix čislitel‘nyx, Frunze: Kirgizskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar
Wągiel, M. (2023). Grammatical gender meets classifier semantics: Evidence from Slavic numerals. In Gribanova, V., Grimberg, S., Petersen, E., Portelance, E., & Waldon, B., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 27. The Stanford Meeting, 2018, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 284–307.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, S. R. (1993). Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language, 69(1), 68–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avgustinova, T. (1994). On Bulgarian verbal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 2(1), 29–47.Google Scholar
Avgustinova, T. (1997). Word Order and Clitics in Bulgarian. Doctoral dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
Barić, E. et al. (2005). Hrvatska gramatika, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. C. (1987). Word-order change in progress: The case of Slovene and Serbo-Croat and its relevance for Germanic. Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 269–287. www.jstor.org/stable/4175891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2001). On the Nature of the Syntax-Phonology Interface: Cliticization and Related Phenomena, Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2004). Clitic placement in South Slavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 12(1/2), 37–90.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2016). On second position clitics crosslinguistically. In Marušič, F. & Žaucer, R., eds., Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In Honor of Janez Orešnik, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, W. (1974). On the problem of enclitic placement in Serbo-Croatian. In Brecht, R. D. & Chvany, C. V., eds., Slavic Transformational Syntax [Michigan Slavic Materials 10], Ann Arbor, MI: Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, University of Michigan, pp. 36–52.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1975a). Notes on clauses as subjects. In Filipović, R., ed., Contrastive Analysis of English and Serbo-Croatian, Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics, University of Zagreb, pp. 143–145.Google Scholar
Browne, W. (1975b). Serbo-Croatian enclitics for English-speaking learners. In Filipović, R., ed., Contrastive Analysis of English and Serbo-Croatian, Zagreb: Institute of Linguistics, University of Zagreb, pp. 105–134 [Reprinted in Journal of Slavic Linguistics 12(1–2) (2004), pp. 249–283].Google Scholar
Browne, W. (2010). Syntactic studies in Burgenland Croatian: The order of clitics. Balkanistica, 23, 21–41.Google Scholar
Browne, W. & Alt, T. (2004). A Handbook of Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian. Durham, NC: Slavic and East European Language Research Center. www.seelrc.org:8080/grammar/pdf/compgrammar_bcs.pdf.Google Scholar
Cetnarowska, B. (2004). The scale of pronominal strength in Polish: An OT analysis of unstressed and weak pronouns. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 39, 39–57.Google Scholar
Ćavar, D. (1999). Aspects of the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Doctoral dissertation, University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Diesing, M. & Zec, D. (2017). Getting in the first word: Prosody and predicate initial sentences in Serbian. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvořak, B. (2007). Slovenian clitic pronouns and what is so special about them. Slovenski jezik/Slovene Linguistic Studies, 6, 209–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.17161/SLS.1808.4408.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (2008). Clitic placement, prosody, and the Bulgarian verbal complex. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 1(1), 91–137. doi:10.1353/jsl.0.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (2016). Clitics become minimal(ist). In Marušič, F. & Žaucer, R., eds., Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In Honor of Janez Orešnik, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 91–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. & Holloway King, T. (2000). A Handbook of Slavic Clitics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frleta, T. (2018). Pravilo “drugog mjesta” u hrvatskom jeziku ili o polu(ne)slobodnom redu riječi. Jezik: časopis za kulturu hrvatskoga književnog jezika, 65(1), 11–23.Google Scholar
Gladney., F. V. (1983). Handbook of Polish, Urbana, IL: G and G Press.Google Scholar
Golden, M. (2003). Clitic placement and clitic climbing in Slovenian. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 56(3), 208–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, M. & Sheppard, M. (2000). Slovene pronominal clitics. In Beukema, F & den Dikken, M., eds., The Clitic Phenomena in European Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, M. L. (2006). A Short Reference Grammar of Standard Slovene, SEELRC Reference Grammar Network.Google Scholar
Gribble, C. (1988). On clitics in Old Bulgarian and Old Russian. In Schenker, A., ed., American Contributions to the 10th International Congress of Slavists, Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Hana, J. (2007). Czech Clitics in Higher Order Grammar. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2006). Word-prosodic typology. Phonology, 23, 225–257. doi:10.1017/S0952675706000893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katičić, R. (2002). Sintaksa hrvatskog književnog jezika, Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus, HAZU.Google Scholar
Kedveš, A. & Werkmann, A. (2013). Zanaglasnice u nastavi hrvatskoga jezika – između predodžbe i prakse. Rasprave, 39(2), 457–473.Google Scholar
Lenertová, D. (2004). Czech pronominal clitics. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 12(1–2), 135–171. www.jstor.org/stable/24599870.Google Scholar
Marković, M. & Milićev, T. (2012). Clitic placement and the properties of the Intonational Phrase in Serbian. In Halupka-Rešetar, S., Marković, M., Milićev, T., & Milićević, N., eds., Selected Papers from SinFonIJA 3, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, pp. 175–204.Google Scholar
Marušič, F. (2008). Slovenian clitics have no unique syntactic position. In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J., & Bethin, C., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, 2007, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 266–281.Google Scholar
Marušič, F. (2018). Slovenski jezik II – skladnja. Class lecture notes, University of Nova Gorica. www.ung.si/~fmarusic/ung/sj_4/index.html.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Mišmaš, P., & Žaucer, R. (2011). Some notes on the Slovenian second position conjunction pa. Paper presented at GLiP 7 in Wroclaw, Poland. Dec 2–4, 2011. www.ung.si/~fmarusic/pub/marusicetal_2011_pa_pa_glip_handout.pdf.Google Scholar
Marušič, F. & Žaucer, R. (2017). Coordinate structure constraint: A-/A’-movement vs. clitic movement. Linguistica Brunensia, 65(2), 69–85.Google Scholar
Migdalski, K. (2009). On the emergence of the second position cliticization in Slavic. In Zybatow, G., Junghanns, U., Lenertová, D., & Biskup, P., eds., Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure: Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 183–196.Google Scholar
Milićević, J. (2019). Clitic pseudo-climbing out of dependent infinitive phrases in Serbian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 27(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2019.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišeska Tomić, O. (1996). The Balkan Slavic clausal clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 14, 811–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišeska Tomić, O. (2001). Operator clitics. In Gerlach, B. & Grijzenhout, J., eds., Clitics in Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, Vol. 36, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.36.15mis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orešnik, J. (1984). Slovenske breznaglasnice se vedejo predvsem kot proklitike. Jezik in slovstvo, 29(4), 129.Google Scholar
Orešnik, J. (1985). O naslonskem nizu v knjižni slovenščini. Jezik in slovstvo, 31(6), 213–215.Google Scholar
Pešikan, M. (1958). O mestu enklitike u rečenici. Naš jezik, 9, 305–311.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. (1993). Slovene. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 388–451.Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (1993). Locality and subjunctive-like complements in Serbo-Croatian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 1(1), 116–144. www.jstor.org/stable/24599042.Google Scholar
Rappaport, G. C. (1988). On the relationship between prosodic and syntactic properties of pronouns in the Slavic languages. In Schenker, A. M. (ed.) American Contributions to the Tenth International Congress of Slavists. Sofia, September 1988, Bloomington, In: Slavica, pp. 301–327.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T. (1994). Serbo-Croatian second position clitic placement and the phonology-syntax interface. In Carnie, A. & Harley, H. with Bures, T., eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21, Papers on Phonology and Morphology, Cambridge, MA: MITWPL, pp. 373–473.Google Scholar
Sławski, F. (1946). Miejsce enklityki odmiennej w dziejach języka bułgarskiego, Kraków: Polska Akademia Umiejętności.Google Scholar
Stegovec, A. (2020). Taking case out of the Person-Case Constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 38, 261–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-019-09443-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stjepanović, S. (1998). On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from clitic climbing and VP ellipsis. In Bošković, Ž, Franks, S., & Snyder, W., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 6. The Connecticut Meeting, 1997, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 267–286.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (2014). The simple sentence. In Gutschmidt, K., Kempgen, S., Berger, T., & Kosta, P., eds., Die slavischen Sprachen Band 2/The Slavic Languages Volume 2, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1675–1699.Google Scholar
Toman, J. (1996). A note on clitics and prosody. In Halpern, A. L. & Zwicky, A. M., eds., Approaching Second. Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena. CSLI Lecture Notes 61, Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 505–510.Google Scholar
Toporišič, J. (1976). Slovenska slovnica, Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Toporišič, J. (2000). Slovenska slovnica, 4th ed., Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, J. ([1892] 2020). On a Law of Indo-European Word Order: Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung [Classics in Linguistics 7], Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Werle, A. (2009). Word, Phrase, And Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts – Amherst.Google Scholar
Zimmerling, A. & Kosta, P. (2013). Slavic clitics: A typology. STUF-Language Typology and Universals, 66(2), 178–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Arsenijević, B. (2007). Slavic verb prefixes are resultative. In de Saussure, L., Moeschler, J., & Puskás, G., eds., Tense, Mood and Aspect: Theoretical and Descriptive Issues, New York, NY: Brill, pp. 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2001). The case of Slavic predicates. In Strigin, A. et al., eds., ZAS Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Berlin: ZAS, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2012). The Syntax of Russian, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. & Rubin, E. J. (1991). The unification of instrumental case assignment in Russian. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, 9(1), 99–126.Google Scholar
Borkovskij, V. I. (1978). Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka: sintaksis – prostoe predloženie, Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1974). The second dative: A transformational approach. In Brecht, R. & Chvany, C., eds., Slavic Transformational Syntax, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, pp. 123–150.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (2014). The overgeneration problem and the case of semipredicatives in Russian. In Bondaruk, A., Dalmi, G., & Grosu, A., eds., Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, Agreement, and Case, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–60.Google Scholar
Franks, S. & Hornstein, N. (1992). Second predication in Russian and proper government of PRO. In Larson, R. K., Iatridou, S., Lahiri, U., & Higginbotham, J., eds., Control and Grammar, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academia, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. (1929). Historická mluvnice jazyka českého IV. Skladba, Prague: Česká akademie věd a umění.Google Scholar
Graščenkov, P. (2018). Grammatika prilagatel’nogo. Tipologija ad’ektivnosti i atributivnosti, Moscow: Jask.Google Scholar
Gulgowski, P. (2013). Resultative and goal phrases in Polish and English: Interaction with aspect. Questions and Answers in Linguistics, 1(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habul-Šabanović, I. (2019). Small clauses in English and Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian. Književni jezik, 30, 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, E. J. (2016). Bolgarskie konstrukcii s predikativnym opredeleniem: v poiskax prototipičeskoj modeli. Studia Slavica Hungarica, 61(2), 285–301.Google Scholar
Lomtev, T. P. (1956). Očerki po istoričeskomu sintaksisu russkogo jazyka, Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
Lopatina, L. E. (1966). K istorii tvoritel’nogo predikativnogo v slavjanskix jazykax. Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR, 25(6), 500–508.Google Scholar
Madariaga, N. (2006). Why Russian semi-predicative items always agree. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14(2), 45–78.Google Scholar
Madariaga, N. (2008). New Case Relations in Old and Present-Day Russian: The Role of Peripheral Core Syntactic Interactions in Grammar Change. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Marvin, T., & Žaucer, R. (2003). Depictive secondary predication in Slovenian. In Browne, W., Kim, J.-Y., Partee, B., & Rothstein, R., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 11. The Amherst Meeting, 2002, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 373–392.Google Scholar
Marušič, F., Marvin, T., & Žaucer, R. (2008). Depictive secondary predication with no PRO. In Zybatow, G., Szucsich, L., Junghanns, U., & Meyer, R., eds., Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 423–434.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. (1981). Predicate Nominals: A Partial Surface Syntax of Russian, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A. (1999). Case Assignment and the Complement-Adjunct Dichotomy: A Non-configurational Constraint-Based Approach. PhD Dissertation, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Richardson, K. (2006). Case and aspect in Ukrainian depictive secondary predicates. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 28, 245–257.Google Scholar
Richardson, K. (2007). Case and Aspect in Slavic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S. (1983). The Syntactic Forms of Predication. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2017). Secondary predication. In Everaert, M. & van Riemsdijk, H., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 209–233.Google Scholar
Šarić, L. (2008). Secondary predicates in Croatian. In Schroeder, C., Hentschel, G., & Boeder, W., eds., Secondary Predicates in Eastern European Languages and Beyond, Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag der Carl von Ossietzky, pp. 295–325.Google Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. (2017). Depictive secondary predicates in typological perspective. In Everaert, M. & van Riemsdijk, H., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom115.Google Scholar
Silić, J. & Pranjković, I. (2005). Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika, Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. & Zaretskaya, M. (1998). Verb prefixation in Russian as lexical subordination. Linguistics, 36, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stassen, L. (2001). Nonverbal predication in the Circum-Baltic languages. In Dahl, Ö & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., eds., Circum-Baltic Languages. Vol. 2. Grammar and Typology, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 569–590.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. (1981). Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Strigin, A. & Demjjanow, A. (2001). Secondary predication in Russian. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 25, 1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Švedova, N. J. (1952). Polnye i kratkie formy imen prilagatel’nyx v sostave skazuemogo v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke. Učenyje zapiski MGU, 150, 73–132.Google Scholar
Szajbel-Keck, M. (2015). Secondary Predication in Polish. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1986). The semantics of case in Russian predicate complements. Russian Linguistics, 10, 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Večerka, R. (1993). Altkirchenslavische (altbulgarische) Syntax II: die innere Satzstruktur [Monumenta linguae slavicae dialecti veteris. Fontes et dissertations XXXIV(XXVII–2)], Freiburg: U. W. Weiher.Google Scholar
Xodova, K. I. (1960). Značenija tvoritel’nogo bespredložnogo v staroslavjanskom jazyke. Učenye zapiski Instituta slavjanovedenija AN SSSR, 19, 101–158.Google Scholar
Žaucer, R. (2002). The Role of Verbal Prefixes in Slavic: Evidence from Slovenian Locative Denominal Verbs. MA thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

References

Abels, K. (2005). ‘Expletive negation’ in Russian: A conspiracy theory. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 13(1), 5–74.Google Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2004). The case of Q. In Arnaudova, O., Browne, W., Rivero, M. L., & Stojanović, D., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Languages 12. The Ottawa Meeting, 2003, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Betsch, M. (2003). Questions as indirect requests in Russian and Czech. In Jaszczolt, K. & Turner, K., eds., Meaning through Language Contrast. Vol. 2, Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2001). Investigation into the Interaction between the Indefinites and Negation, Berlin: Akademie Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2002). Towards a binding analysis of negative polarity items in Polish. In Kosta, P. & Frasek, J., eds., Current Approaches to Formal Slavic Linguistics, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 377–404.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2003). (Negative) polarity items in Polish: Towards a uniform account. In Maienborn, C., ed., (A)Symmetrien – (A)Symmetries. Beiträge zu Ehren von Ewald Lang – Papers in Honor of Ewald Lang, Tübingen: Stauffenburg, pp. 25–56.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2008a). The puzzle of kolwiek-pronouns in Polish. In Jayez, J. & Tovena, L., eds., Free Choice: Facts, Models and Problems, Hamburg: University of Hamburg, pp. 3–12. http://elico.linguist.jussieu.fr/FCesslli08proceedings.pdf (accessed August 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Błaszczak, J. (2008b). What HAS to BE used? Existential, locative, and possessive sentences in Polish. In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J., & Bethin, C., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, 2007, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, A. (1985). The problem of the negated imperative in perfective verbs revisited. Russian Linguistics, 9(2/3), 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. (1999). The Syntax of Negation in Russian, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Brown, S. & Franks, S. (1995). Asymmetries in the scope of Russian negation. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 3(2), 239–287.Google Scholar
Denić, M., Steinert-Threlkeld, S., & Szymanik, J. (2020). Complexity/informativeness trade-off in the domain of indefinite pronouns. In Rhyne, J. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 30th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Washington, DC: LSA, pp. 166–184.Google Scholar
Durst-Andersen, P. (1995). Imperative frames and modality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18(6), 611–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embick, D. (1995). Mobile inflection in Polish. In Beckman, J. N., ed., Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 25. Vol. 2, Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 127–142.Google Scholar
Garzonio, J. (2019). Negative concord in Russian. An overview. In Krapova, I. et al., eds.,Studi di linguistica slava. Nuove prospettive e metodologie di ricercar, Venice: Edizioni Ca‘ Foscari, pp. 175–189.Google Scholar
Geist, L. (2008). Specificity as referential anchoring: Evidence from Russian. In Grønn, A., ed., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Oslo: ILOS, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Geist, L. (2010). Indefinitpronomina im Russischen und Spezifizität. Zeitschrift für Slawistik, 55(2), 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & Quer, J. (1995). Two mechanisms for the licensing of negative indefinites. In Gabriele, L. et al., eds., Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Mid-America. Vol. 2, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, pp. 103–105.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & Quer, J. (1997). Long distance licensing of negative indefinites. In Forget, D. et al., eds., Negation and Polarity: Syntax and Semantics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A. & Yoon, S. (2013). No NPI licensing in comparatives. In Baglini, R. et al., eds., Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Vol. 2, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago: CLS, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Lohndal, T. (2010). Negative concord and (multiple) Agree: A case study of West Flemish. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L. & Zanuttini, R. (1991). Negative heads and the Neg Criterion. The Linguistic Review, 8(2–4), 233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, B. (2004). The grammaticalization of the analytical imperatives in Russian, Polish and Serbian/Croatian. Welt der Slaven, 49(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
Hartmann, J. & Milićević, N. (2008). The syntax of existential sentences in Serbian. In Antonenko, A., Bailyn, J., & Bethin, C., eds., Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, 2007, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications, pp. 168–184.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). Indefinite Pronouns, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. (2001). A Natural History of Negation, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Huntley, D. (1993). Old Church Slavonic. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 125–187.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. (2007). Property-denoting NPs and non-canonical genitive case. In Friedman, T. & Gibson, M., eds., Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XVII, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistic Circle, pp. 148–165.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. (2010). Genitive objects, existence and individuation. Russian Linguistics, 34(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klockmann, H. (2014). Case alternations: The interaction of semi-lexicality and case assignment. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 9(3), 111–136.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. E. (1997). Negation and the grammaticalization of have and want futures in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue Canadienne des Slavistes, 39(3/4), 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasovitsky, A., Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2011). Changing semantic factors in case selection: Russian evidence from the last two centuries. Morphology, 21(3), 573–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kryshevich, O. (2010). The Genitive of Negation in Ukrainian. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. (2008). Licensing of Negative Polarity Particles Yet, Anymore, Either and Neither: Combining Downward Monotonicity and Assertivity. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lindstedt, J. (2010). Mood in Bulgarian and Macedonian. In Thieroff, R. & Rothstein, B., eds., Mood in the Languages of Europe. Vol. 2: Slavic and Other European Languages, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, S. (2000). Polarity in natural language: Predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 213–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyutikova, E. (2021). On the structure of Russian infinitival clauses, with special attention to negative concord. Talk given at Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 30, MIT.Google Scholar
Matushansky, O. (2010). Some cases of Russian. In Zybatow, G. et al., eds., Formal Studies in Slavic Linguistics [Proceedings of FDSL 7.5], Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 117–135.Google Scholar
Migdalski, K. (2006). The Syntax of Compound Tenses in Slavic, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Migdalski, K. (2013). Diachronic source of two cliticization patterns in Slavic. In Meklenborg Salvesen, C. & Petter Helland, H., eds., Challenging Clitics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišeska Tomić, O. (2001). The Macedonian negation operator and cliticization. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 19(3), 647–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolova, R. (2017). Bulgarian Grammar, Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Padučeva, E. (2015). Snjataja utverditel‘nost‘ i neveridikal‘nost‘ (na primere russkix mestoimenij otricatel‘noj poljarnosti). Russian Linguistics, 39(2), 129–162.Google Scholar
Penka, D. (2016). Negation and polarity. In Riemer, N., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 303–319.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2006). Negative polarity items in Russian and the Bagel problem. In Przepiórkowski, A. & Brown, S., eds., Negation in Slavic, Bloomington, IN: Slavica Publishers, pp. 153–178.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and Categories. PhD Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pirnat, Ž. (2015). Genesis of the genitive of negation in Balto-Slavic and its evidence in contemporary Slovenian. Slovenski jezik, 10, 3–52.Google Scholar
Progovac, L. (1993). Negative polarity: Downward entailment and binding. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(2), 149–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (1994). Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Progovac, L. (2000). Coordination, c-command, and logophoric n-words. In Horn, L. & Kato, Y., eds., Studies on Negation and Polarity, Oxford & New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przepiórkowski, A. (2000). Long distance genitive of negation in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 8(1/2), 119–158.Google Scholar
Rejzek, J. (2015). Český etymologický slovník, Prague: Leda.Google Scholar
Snoj, M. (2016). Slovenski etimološki slovar. 3. pregledana in dopolnjena izd, Ljubljana: Modrijan.Google Scholar
Spencer, A. & Luís, A. R. (2012). Clitics. An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (2004). Positive polarity – negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(2), 409–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szucsich, L. (2010). Mood in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian. In Thieroff, R. & Rothstein, Bj, eds., Mood in the Languages of Europe. Vol. 2: Slavic and Other European Languages, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1975). Hierarchies in the genitive of negation. Slavic and East European Journal, 19(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, J. & Gybels, P. (2014). On negation, indefinites, and negative indefinites in Yiddish. In Aptroot, M. & Hansen, B., eds., Yiddish Language Structures, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 185–230.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J., Nomachi, M., & Krasnoukhova, O. (2021). Connective negation and negative concord in Balto-Slavic. In Arkadiev, P. et al., eds., Studies in Baltic and Other Languages, Vilnius: Vilnius University Press, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Večerka, R. (1989). Altkirchenslavische (altbulgarische) Syntax I: Die lineare Satzorganisation, Freiburg: U. W. Weiher.Google Scholar
Veselinova, L. (2008). Negation of Non-Verbal and Existential Sentences in Slavic Languages. Ms. Stockholm. www2.ling.su.se/staff/ljuba/LL_summary.pdf (accessed August 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Veselinova, L. (2010). Standard and special negators in the Slavonic languages: Synchrony and diachrony. In Hansen, B. & Grković-Major, J., eds., Diachronic Slavonic Syntax. Gradual Changes in Focus, Munich: Otto Sagner, pp. 195–208.Google Scholar
Vince, J. (2008). Uzmak genitiva izravnoga objekta. Slovo [Zagreb] (56–57), 615–626.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (2013). Negation in the history of Slavonic languages. In Willis, D. et al., eds., The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Vol. 1: Case Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 341–398.Google Scholar
Witkoś, J. (2008). Genitive of negation in Polish and single-cycle derivations. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 16(2), 247–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Zovko Dinković, I. & Ilc, G.. (2017). Pleonastic negation from a cross-linguistic perspective. Jezikoslovlje 18(1): 159–180.Google Scholar
Zwarts, F. (1998). Three types of polarity items. In Hamm, F. & Hinrichs, E., eds., Plurality and Quantification, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 177–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bunčić, D. (2018). Impersonal constructions in Slavic languages and the agentivity of the verb. In Kempgen, S., Wingender, M., & Franz, N., eds., Deutsche Beiträge zum 16. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Belgrad, Wiesbaden, pp. 101–110.Google Scholar
Christensen, J. L. (1993). Polish impersonal constructions in się. In Yokoyama, O. T., ed., Harvard Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Vol II, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Djurkovic, M. (2004). Passive and impersonal in English and Serbian. In Hendriks, H., ed., Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 10, Cambridge: Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, pp. 49–101.Google Scholar
Dziwirek, K. (1994). Polish Subjects, New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. (2007). Constructing grammatical meaning: Isomorphism and polysemy in Czech reflexivization. Studies in Language, 31(4), 721–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, V. A. (1993). Macedonian. In Comrie, B. & Corbett, G. G., eds., The Slavonic Languages, London & New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 249–305.Google Scholar
Fužeron, I. [Fougeron] & Brejar, Ž. (2001). KOGDA Ja NUŽNO? Izvestiia RAN. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 2001, 53–57.Google Scholar
Israeli, A. (2013). Dative-infinitive constructions in Russian. Taxonomy and semantics. In Kor Chahine, I., ed., Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israeli, A. (2014). Dative-infinitive BY constructions in Russian. Taxonomy and semantics. In Witkoś, J. & Jaworsky, S., eds., New Insights into Slavic Linguistics, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 141–159.Google Scholar
Israeli, A. (2016). Dative-infinitive constructions with the particle ŽE in Russian. Taxonomy and semantics. Slavic and East European Journal, 2(60), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, E. J. (2016). Bezličnye predloženija s objazatelʹnym mestoimennym vyraženiem èksperiencera v bolgarskom jazyke. In Zimmerling, A. V. & Ljutikova, E. A., eds., Arhitektura klauzy v parametričeskih modeljah, Moscow: JaSK, pp. 332–370.Google Scholar
Krzek, M. (2014). The structure of null subject DPs and agreement in Polish impersonal constructions. In Bondaruk, A. et al., eds., Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, Agreement, and Case, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 129–163.Google Scholar
Malicka-Kleparska, A. Reflexive impersonals in Polish. www.researchgate.net/publication/322137864_Reflexive_impersonals_in_Polish (accessed August 29, 2023).Google Scholar
Milićević, J., (2013). Impersonal constructions in Serbian. A description within a meaning-text linguistic model. In Kor Chahine, I., ed., Current Studies in Slavic Linguistics, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 169–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, E. V. (2012). Neopredelenno-ličnoe predloženie i ego podrazumevaemyj sub‘’ekt. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1, 27–41.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. & Moore, J. (2002). Language-internal explanation: The distribution of Russian impersonals. Language, 78(4), 619–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pešková, A. (2019). Slavic and Romance pro-drop in contrast. Evidence from Czech and Spanish. Languages in Contrast, 19(2), 310–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivero, M. L. & Sheppard, M. M. (2003). Indefinite reflexive clitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 21(1), 89–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, K. (2012). Pragmatically motivated null subjects in English: A relevance theory perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 53, 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerling, A. V. (2012). Nekanoničeskie podležaščie v russkom jazyke. In Voejkova, M. D., ed., Ot značenija k forme, ot formy k značeniju: Sbornik statej v čest’ 80-letija Aleksandra Vladimiroviča Bondarenko, Moscow: Jazyki, pp. 568–590.Google Scholar

References

Abraham, W. & Leisiö, L., eds. (2006). Passivization and Typology, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A. & Dorian, E. (2012). The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics, 48(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babby, L. (1998). Voice and diathesis in Slavic. Paper presented at the Workshop Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax. Bloomington, IN, 5–7 June 1998.Google Scholar
Bahrt, N. (2020). Towards a Typology of Voice Syncretism. PhD Thesis, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Bondarenko, A. (2022). The dog bites: On the “aggressive” antipassive in Slavic and Baltic. Language: Codification, Competence, Communication, 1(6–7), 40–61.Google Scholar
Borik, O. & Gehrke, B. (2016). Imperfective past passive participles in Russian. In Lenertová, D, Meyer, R, Šimík, R., & Szucsich, L, eds., Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistics 2016, Berlin: Language Science Press, pp. 53–76.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2003). Passives and impersonals. Journal of Linguistics, 39(3), 473–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1977). In defense of spontaneous demotion: The impersonal passive. In Cole, P. & Saddock, J., eds., Grammatical Relations (Syntax and Semantics 8), New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1987). Russian. In Comrie, B., ed., The World’s Major Languages, London & New York, NY: Croom Helm & Oxford University Press, pp. 329–347; 2nd ed. 2009, pp. 274–288; 3rd ed. 2018, pp. 282–297.Google Scholar
Creissels, D. (1995). Éléments de syntaxe générale, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, M. (1999). Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect, Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. & Aikhenvald, A. (2011). A typology of argument-determined constructions. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Leiden & Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 44–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Đurković, M. (2004). Passive and impersonal in English and Serbian. In Hendriks, H, ed., Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics, 10, Cambridge: Research Centre for English and Applied Linguistics, pp. 49–101.Google Scholar
Fehrmann, D., Junghanns, U., & Lenertová, D. (2010). Two reflexive markers in Slavic. Russian Linguistics, 34, 203–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-010-9062-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Féry, C. & Ishihara, S., eds. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frąckowiak, E. & Rivero, M.-L. (2008). Distinguishing between unintentional agents and unintentional causers. In Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, p. 12.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1995). Voice alternations. In Franks, S., Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 333–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. (2006). Agent backgrounding as a functional domain: Reflexivization and passivization in Czech and Russian. In Lyngfelt, B. & Solstad, T., eds., Demoting the Agent. Passive, Middle and other Voice Phenomena, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geniušienė, E. (1987). The Typology of Reflexives [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 2], Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (2001). De-transitive voice. In Givón, T. (2001), Syntax: An Introduction, Vol. 1, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 91–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guentcheva, Z. (2004). Remarks on the interaction between voice and aspect in the Slavic domain. In Xrakovskij, V., Mal’čukov, A., & Dmitrenko, S., eds., 40 let Sankt-Peterburgskoj tipologičeskoj škole, Moscow: Znak, pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1990). The grammatizication of passive morphology. Studies in Language, 14(1), 25–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. & Müller-Bardey, T. (2004). Valency change. In Booij, G., Lehmann, C., & Mugdan, J., eds., Morphology. A Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, Vol. 2, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1130–1145.Google Scholar
Holvoet, A. & Linde-Usiekniewicz, J. (2015). The middle voice in Polish: An attempt at rehabilitation. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 10(3), 105–124.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56(2), 251–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israeli, A. (1997). Semantics and Pragmatics of the “Reflexive” Verbs in Russian [Slavistische Beiträge, Vol. 349], Munich: Otto Sagner Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivić, M. (2005 [1959]). Značenja srpskohrvatskog instrumentala i njihov razvoj: sintaksičko-semantička studija, Belgrade: Beogradska knjiga/Institut za srpski jezik SANU.Google Scholar
Janic, K. (2014). A rare type of reflexive use in Slavonic languages. New Insights into Slavic Linguistics, 3, 161–178.Google Scholar
Janic, K. (2016). L’antipassif dans les langues accusatives, Brussels: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, D. (2007). Rethinking the passive/anticausative distinction. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 770–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazenin, K. (2008). The passive voice. In Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W., & Raible, W., eds., Language Typology and Language Universals, 2, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 899–916.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. & Dryer, M. (2007). Passive in the world’s languages. In Shopen, T., ed., Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 325–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, S. (1993). The Middle Voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibort, A. (2004). Passive and Passive-Like Constructions in English and Polish. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knjazev, J. (1988). Resultative, passive and perfect in Russian. In Nedjalkov, V., ed., Typology of Resultative Constructions, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 343–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knjazev, J. (2007). Grammatičeskaja semantika: Russkij jazyk v tipologičeskoj perspektive, Moscow: Jazyki.Google Scholar
König, E. & Gast, V. (2008). Reciprocity and reflexivity – description typology and theory. In König, E., & Gast, V., eds. (2008), Reciprocals and Reflexives. Theoretical and Typological Explorations, The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, T. & Slocum, J. (2013). Old Church Slavonic online. www.utexas.edu/cola/centers.Google Scholar
Kučanda, D. (1992). Funkcionalni pristup analizi pasiva u hrvatskom. Suvremena lingvistika, 18(2), 175–184.Google Scholar
Kulikov, L. (2012). Voice typology. In Song, J. J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 368–398.Google Scholar
Kulikov, L. & Lavidas, N. (2015). Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European. In Kulikov, L. & Lavidas, N., eds., Proto-Indo-European Syntax and Its Development, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lavine, J. E. (2005). The morphosyntax of Polish and Ukrainian -no/-to. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 13(1), 75–117.Google Scholar
Levine, J. S. (2010). On the status of Russian perfective passive in -sja. Russian Language Journal/Russkij jazyk, 60 [Special Issue: Divergent Thinking: Prospectives on the Language Enterprise in the 21st Century – Presented to Richard D. Brecht by His Students and Colleagues], 37–51.Google Scholar
Lenardič, J. (2020). A syntactic re-analysis of the Slovenian impersonal se-construction. In Marušič, F., Mišma, P., & Žaucer, R., eds., Advances in Formal Slavic Linguistic 2017 [Open Slavic Linguistics 3], Berlin: Language Science Press, pp. 151–178.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, A. (2011). Reciprocity and similar meanings in Slavic languages and SAE. In Kosta, P., & Schûrcks, L., eds. Formalization of Grammar in Slavic Languages [Potsdam Linguistic Investigations 6], pp. 297–314.Google Scholar
Lunt, H. (2001). Old Church Slavonic Grammar, Berlin & New York, NY: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malicka-Kleparska, A. (2016). Old Church Slavonic as a language with the middle voice morphology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 13(2), 215–230.Google Scholar
Marušič, F. & Žaucer, R. (2014). The involuntary state/FEEL-LIKE construction: What aspect cannot do. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 22(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslov, Y. (1988). Resultative, perfect and aspect. In Nedjalkov, V., ed., Typology of Resultative Constructions, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (1974). Opyt teorii lingvističeskix modelej Smysl-Tekst. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (1988). Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (1993). The inflectional category of voice: Towards a more rigorous definition. In Comrie, B. & Polinsky, M., eds., Causativity and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (2001). Communicative Organization in Natural Language, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (2006a). Voice. In Aspects of the Theory of Morphology, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 181–162.Google Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. (2006b). Zero sign in morphology. In Aspects of the Theory of Morphology, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 469–516.Google Scholar
Mel‘čuk, I. & Xolodovič, A. (1970). K teorii gramatičeskogo zaloga (opredelenie, isčislenie). Narody Azii i Afriki, 4, 111–124.Google Scholar
Miličevič, J. (2022). A sketch of the grammatical voice in Serbian. In L. Iomdin, J. Miličevič, & A. Polguère, eds., Lifetime Linguistic Inspirations: To Igor Mel’čuk from Colleagues and Friends for his 90th Birthday, Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 295–308.Google Scholar
Nedashkivska Adams, A. (1998). -no/-to and voice: Statality and actionality in contemporary Ukrainian. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 40(3–4), 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, V., et al. ed. (2007). Reciprocal Constructions, 4 vols., Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraić Rabušić, I. (2017). Podjela konstrukcija sa se u hrvatskom jeziku. Suvremena lingvistika, 43(84), 173–198.Google Scholar
Padućeva, E. (2003). Semantic and pragmatic inferences of decausative verbs. Studies in Communication Science, 3(1), 133–154.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. & Postal, P. (1977). Toward a universal characterization of passivization. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 394–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percov, N. (2003). Vozvratnye stradatel’nye formy russkogo glagola v svjazi s problemoj suščestvovanija v morfologii. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 43–71.Google Scholar
Piper, P., Antonić, I., Ružić, V., Tanasić, S., Popović, L., & Tošović, B. (2005). Sintaksa savremenoga srpskog jezika: prosta rečenica, Belgrade & Novi Sad: Beogradska knjiga & Matica srpska.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. (2014). Fear and loathing of the English passive. Language and Communication, 37, 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plungjan, V. (2003). Obščaja morfologija. Vvedenije v problematiku, Moscow: URSS.Google Scholar
Rivero, M.-L. & Milojević Sheppard, M. (2003). Indefinite reflexive clitics in Slavic: Polish and Slovenian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 89–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronko, R. (2017). Nominative object in Modern North Russian dialects. Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 61/LNG/2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3087849 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3087849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M. (1985). Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language, 61(4), 821–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, M., ed. (1988). Passive and Voice [Typological Studies in Language 16], Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A. (1984). The Passive: A Comparative Linguistic Analysis, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. (1988). The passive in Slavic. In Shibatani, , pp. 243–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, A. (2013). Passive constructions. In Dryer, M. & Haspelmath, M., eds., The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/107 (accessed August 1, 2022).Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. & Baker, D. (2013). Passive agents: Prototypical vs. canonical passives. In Brown, D., Chumakina, M., & Corbett, G., eds., Canonical Morphology and Syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–189.Google Scholar
Spalatin, L. (1973). Some Serbo-Croatian equivalents of the English passive. The Yugoslav Serbo-Croatian-English Contrastive Project, 8, 115–131.Google Scholar
Tanasić, S. (2014). Sintaksa pasiva u savremenom srpskom jeziku, Belgrade: Beogradska knjiga/Institut za srpski jezik SANU.Google Scholar
Tesnière, L. (1959). Éléments de syntaxe structurale, Paris: Klincksieck [English translation by T. Osborne & S. Kahane, Elements of Structural Syntax, 2015, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins].Google Scholar
Timberlake, A. (1974). The Nominative Object in Slavic, Baltic and West Finnic, Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topolińska, Z. (2003). Pasivot kako (semantička i) gramatička kategorija (vo makedonskiot i polskiot jazik). Južnoslovenski filolog LIX, 17–34.Google Scholar
Toyota, J. & Mustafović, M. (2006). Grammatical voice and tense-aspect in Slavic. In Abraham, & Leisiö, , pp. 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlik, M. & Žele, A. (2020). Sub‘’jektno-impersonal’nye refleksivnye konstrukcii v slovenskom jazyke. Slavistica Vilnensis, 65(2), 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xolodovič, A. ed. (1974). Tipologija passivnyx konstrukcij (datezy i zalogi), Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, V., ed. (1978). Problemy teorii grammatičeskogo Zaloga, Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, V., ed. (1981). Zalogovye konstrukcii v raznostrukturnyx jazykax, Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar

References

Bailyn, J. F. (2004). Generalized inversion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, J. F. (2018). Russian word order and the fate of syntactic theory. Paper presented at the Conference on Typology of Morphosyntactic Parameters, Moscow, October 2018.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2002). On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry, 33(3), 351–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryzgunova, E. (1971). O smyslorazličitel’nyx vozmožnostjax russkoj intonacii. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 42–51.Google Scholar
Bryzgunova, E. (1981). Zvuk i intonacija russkoj reči, Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chvany, C. V. (1973). Notes on root and structure-preserving in Russian. In Corum, C. W., Cedric Smith-Stark, T., & Weiser, A., eds., You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 52–290.Google Scholar
Fanselow, G. & Lenertová, D. (2011). Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 169–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, J. (1964). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux linguistiques de Prague, 1, 267–280.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1971). On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty Brněnské univerzity A, 19, 135–144.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1974). Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of functional sentence perspective. In Daneš, F., ed., Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1984). Carriers of communicative dynamism. Prague Studies in English, 18, 63–73.Google Scholar
Geist, L. (2008). Specificity as referential anchoring: Evidence from Russian. In Grønn, A., ed., Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, Oslo: University of Oslo, pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Hlavsa, Z. (1975). Denotace objektu a její prostředky v současné češtině, Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Ionin, T. (2001). Scope in Russian: Quantifier Movement and Discourse Function. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Ionin, T. (2002). The one girl who was kissed by every boy: Scope, scrambling, and discourse function in Russian. In van Koppen, M., Sio, J., & de Vos, M., eds., Proceedings of ConSOLE X, Leiden, pp. 79–94.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1984). Morphological observations on Slavic declension (The structure of Russian case forms). In Waugh, L. R. & Halle, M., eds., Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931–1981, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822885.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasinskaja, K. (2016). Information structure in Slavic. In Féry, C. & Ishihara, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasinskaja, K. & Šimík, R. (forthcoming). Slavonic free word order. In Fellerer, J. & Bermel, N., eds., The Oxford Guide to Slavonic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, T. H. (1995). Configuring Topic and Focus in Russian, Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Krámský, J. (1972). The Article and the Concept of Definiteness in Language, The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuboň, V., Lopatková, M., & Hercig, T. (2016). Searching for a measure of word order freedom. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1649, 11–17. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1649/11.pdf.Google Scholar
Kučerová, I. (2007). The Syntax of Givenness. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavine, J. & Freidin, R. (2002). The subject of defective T(ense) in Slavic. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 10(1), 253–289.Google Scholar
Mahajan, A. (1990). The A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Müller, G. (2004). On decomposing inflection class features: Syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In Müller, G., Gunkel, L., & Zifonun, G., eds., Explorations in Nominal Inflection, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 189–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereltsvaig, A. (2019). Is the OVS order in Russian like that in Hixkaryana? Talk given at FASL 29, Stony Brook, May 3–5, 2019.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1976). The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. PhD dissertation, MIT. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/16400.Google Scholar
Rudin, C. (1997). Kakvo li e li: Interrogation and focusing in Bulgarian. Balkanistica, 10, 335–346.Google Scholar
Sgall, P., Hajičová, E., & Panevová, J. (1986). The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A. & Uhlířová, L. (1998). An overview of word order in Slavic languages. In Siewierska, A., ed., Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 105–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwedek, A. (1974). A note on the relation between the article in English and word order in Polish (Part 1 and 2). Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 2, 213–225.Google Scholar
Titov, E. (2012). Information Structure of Argument Order Alternations. PhD thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Titov, E. (2013a). Scrambling and interfaces. In Bildhauer, F. & Grubic, M., eds., Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure. Vol. 17. Information Structure: Empirical Perspectives on Theory, Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
Titov, E. (2013b). Do contrastive topics exist? Journal of Linguistics, 49(2), 413–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titov, E. (2017). The canonical order of Russian objects. Linguistic Inquiry, 48(3), 427–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titov, E. (2019). Accusative unaccusatives. In Brown, J., Schmidt, A., & Wierzba, M., eds., Of Trees and Birds: A Festschrift in Honour of Gisbert Fanselow, Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam, pp. 243–256.Google Scholar
Titov, E. (2020). Optionality of movement. Syntax, 23(4), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, O. (1986). Discourse and Word Order, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Syntax
  • Edited by Danko Šipka, Arizona State University, Wayles Browne, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
  • Online publication: 16 May 2024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Syntax
  • Edited by Danko Šipka, Arizona State University, Wayles Browne, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
  • Online publication: 16 May 2024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Syntax
  • Edited by Danko Šipka, Arizona State University, Wayles Browne, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Slavic Linguistics
  • Online publication: 16 May 2024
Available formats
×