Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:19:47.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Self-examination: breasts, testicles

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
R. Glynn Owens
Edited by
Susan Ayers ,
Andrew Baum ,
Chris McManus ,
Stanton Newman ,
Kenneth Wallston ,
John Weinman  and
Robert West
R. Glynn Owens
Affiliation:
The University of Auckland
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Technological advances have provided the means whereby several cancers can be screened by a range of devices. These include the use of automated cytology scanning for abnormal cells in cervical smears, mammographic techniques for the early detection of breast tumours, and the use of genetic screening methods to detect various cancers which are to a greater or lesser degree genetically determined (e.g. some breast and colonic cancers) (see ‘Screening: cancer’). Such developments notwithstanding, there remains a potential role for self-examination procedures since (a) there remain many cancers for which technological procedures are not available (b) some procedures involve elements of risk, for example, the use of ionizing radiation in mammography, which limit the frequency with which they can be applied and (c) practical constraints may limit the applicability of the procedures to only a subset of those at risk.

For example, in the UK some 1 in 12 women will have breast cancer at some point in their lives, but for a number of reasons, (including logistical reasons and variation in the characteristics of the disease in women of different ages), screening by invitation is currently available only once every three years, and only to women in the 50–64 age group (with plans for extension up to age 70 in the near future). Yet breast cancer is far from unknown in younger women, and nor is it unknown for a tumour to grow to a significant size in less than the three-year time interval between successive examinations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 870 - 871
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Becker, M. H. (1974). The Health Belief Model and sick role behaviour. Health Education Monographs, 2, 409–19.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. G. & Wickersham, D. (1990). Encouraging the practice of testicular self-examination: a field application of the theory of reasoned action. Health Psychology, 9, 154–63.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. E. & Owens, R. G. (1984). Factors affecting promptness of reporting in breast cancer patients. Hygie: International Journal of Health Education, 2, 29–32.Google Scholar
Fish, J. & Wilkinson, S. (2003). Understanding lesbians' healthcare behaviour: the case of breast self-examination. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 235–45.Google Scholar
Gil, F., Mendez, I., Sirgo, A.et al. (2003). Perception of breast cancer risk and surveillance behaviours of women with family history of breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 12, 821–7.Google Scholar
Ivaz, S. (2002). Testicular cancer awareness. Family Practice, 19, 707.Google Scholar
Lechner, L., Oenema, A. & Nooijer, J. (2002). Testicular self-examination (TSE). among Dutch young men aged 15–19: determinants of the intention to practice TSE. Health Education Research, 17, 73–84.Google Scholar
Luszczynska, A. & Schwarzer, R. (2003). Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: a longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology and Health, 18, 93–108.Google Scholar
Owens, R. G., Duffy, J. E. & Ashcroft, J. J. (1985). Women's responses to detection of breast lumps: a British study. Health Education Journal, 44, 69–70.Google Scholar
Owens, R. G. & Heron, K. (1990). Accuracy of estimates of delay by women seeking breast cancer treatment. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 7, 193–7.Google Scholar
Petro-Nustus, W. & Mikhail, B. I. (2002). Factors associated with breast self-examination among Jordanian women. Public Health Nursing, 19, 263–71.Google Scholar
Philip, J., Harris, W. G., Flaherty, C.et al. (1984). Breast self-examination; clinical results from a population-based prospective study. British Journal of Cancer, 50, 7–12.Google Scholar
Reno, D. R. (1988). Men's knowledge and health beliefs about testicular cancer and testicular self-examination. Cancer Nursing, 11, 112–17.Google Scholar
Rudolf, V. M. (1988). The practice of TSE among college men: effectiveness of an educational program. Oncology Nursing, Forum, 15, 45–8.Google Scholar
Sadler, G. R., Takahashi, M. & Nguyen, T. (2003). Japanese-American women: behaviors and attitudes toward breast cancer education and screening. Health Care for Women International, 24, 18–26.Google Scholar
Sheley, J. F., Kinchen, E. W., Morgan, D. H. & Gordon, D. F. (1991). Limited impact of testicular self-examination promotion. Journal of Community Health, 16, 117–24.Google Scholar
Umeh, K. & Rogan-Gibson, J. (2001). Perceptions of threat, benefits, and barriers in breast self-examination amongst young asymptomatic women. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 361–72.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×