Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:21:52.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anaesthesia and psychology

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Keith Millar
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

The introduction of anaesthesia using ether and chloroform in the mid-nineteenth century meant that patients were largely spared the horror of surgery whilst conscious or merely sedated. Oblivion and survival were not assured, however, when those volatile agents were administered by less skilled practitioners. Now, in the twenty-first century, anaesthesia is reassuringly safe. Although estimates show that some 0.1% of patients die during anaesthesia, mortality during this period is confounded with both the effects of surgery and the patient's state of health which may compromise survival during a procedure. Deaths caused by the anaesthetic are therefore very rare. Where deaths can be attributed to the anaesthetic, they may arise from equipment malfunction or human error, rather than the anaesthetic itself (Arnstein, 1997).

Concern does attach, however, to the effects of anaesthesia upon cognitive function. The increasing trend towards day-case surgery means that patients are admitted to hospital, anaesthetized and subjected to a surgical procedure or investigation and then discharged a few hours later. The critical issue is whether patients' cognitive functioning has recovered sufficiently at the time of discharge for them to be regarded as ‘street-fit’. As many patients do not heed advice to be cautious in their post-anaesthetic activities, there is clearly a practical imperative to establish the degree and duration of impairment after anaesthesia.

The typical methodology of studies of recovery

Most clinical studies estimate the ‘average’ recovery profile of an anaesthetic agent (in other words, the group mean response to the anaesthetic) rather than whether an individual patient has recovered their normal level of functioning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ancelin, M.-L., Roquefeuil, G., Ledésert, B.et al. (2001). Exposure to anaesthetic agents, cognitive functioning and depressive symptomatology in the elderly. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 360–6.Google Scholar
Arnstein, F. (1997). Catalogue of human error. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 79, 645–56.Google Scholar
Caldas, J. C. S., Pais-Rebeiro, J. L. & Carneiro, R. (2004). General anesthesis, surgery and hospitalisation in children and their effects upon cognitive, academic, emotional and sociobehavioral development. Pediatric Anesthesia, 14, 910–15.Google Scholar
Collie, A., Darby, D.G., Falleti, M.G., Silbert, B.S. & Maruff, P. (2002). Determining the extent of cognitive change after coronary surgery: a review of statistical procedures. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 73, 2005–11.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J.B., Houx, P.J. & Jolles, J. (1999). Cognition after major surgery in the elderly: test performance and complaints. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 82, 867–74.Google Scholar
Dodds, C. & Allison, J. (1998). Post-operative cognitive deficit in the elderly surgical patient. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 81, 449–62.Google Scholar
Ghoneim, M.M. (Ed.). (2001). Awareness during anaesthesia. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Grant, S.A., Murdoch, J., Millar, K. & Kenny, G.N.C. (2000). Blood propofol concentration and psychomotor effects on skills associated with driving. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2000, 85, 396–400.Google Scholar
Hickey, S., Asbury, A.J. & Millar, K. (1991). Psychomotor recovery after outpatient anaesthesia: individual impairment may be masked by group analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 66, 345–52.Google Scholar
Kotiniemi, L.H., Ryhänen, P.T. & Moilanen, I.K. (1996). Behavioural changes following routine ENT operations in two-to-ten-year-old children. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 6, 45–9.Google Scholar
Kneebone, A.C., Andrew, M.J., Baker, R.A. & Knight, J.L. (1998). Neuropsychologic changes after coronary artery bypass grafting: use of reliable change indices. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 65, 1320–5.Google Scholar
Millar, K., Asbury, A.J., Bowman, A. T., Hosey, M. T., Musiello, T. & Wellbury, R. R. (2006). Effects of brief sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia upon children's postoperative cognition and behaviour. Anaesthesia, 61, 541–7.Google Scholar
Millar, K., Asbury, A.J. & Murray, G.D. (2001). Pre-existing cognitive impairment as a factor influencing outcome after cardiac surgery and anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 86, 63–7.Google Scholar
Moller, J.T., Cluitmans, P., Rasmussen, L.S.et al. (1998). Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly: ISPOCD1 study. Lancet, 351, 857–61.Google Scholar
Pollard, B.J., Bryan, A., Bennet, D.et al. (1994). Recovery after oral surgery with halothane, enflurane, isoflurane or propofol anaethesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 72, 559–66.Google Scholar
Rankin, K.P., Kochamba, G.S., Boone, K.B., Petitti, D.B. & Buckwalter, J.G. (2003). Presurgical cognitive deficits in patients receiving coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 913–24.Google Scholar
Schröter, J., Motsch, J., Hufnagel, A.R., Bach, A. & Martin, E. (1996). Recovery of psychomotor function following general anaesthesia in children: a comparison of propofol and thiopentone/halothane. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 6, 317–24.Google Scholar
Thapar, P., Zacny, J.P., Choi, M. & Apfelbaum, J.L. (1995). Objective and subjective impairment of often-used sedative/analgesic combinations in ambulatory surgery, using alcohol as a benchmark. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 80, 1092–8.Google Scholar
Wang, M. (2001). The psychological consequences of explicit and implicit memories of events during surgery. In Ghoneim, M.M. (Ed.). Awareness during anaesthesia (pp. 145–53). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×