Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:55:28.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

40 - Decision-Making in Alternative Dispute Resolution

from Part V - Other Legal Decision-Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2024

By
Erik J. Girvan ,
Jennifer Wenska Reynolds  and
Michael Moffitt
Edited by
Monica K. Miller ,
Logan A. Yelderman ,
Matthew T. Huss  and
Jason A. Cantone
Monica K. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Logan A. Yelderman
Affiliation:
Prairie View A & M University, Texas
Matthew T. Huss
Affiliation:
Creighton University, Omaha
Jason A. Cantone
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Get access

Summary

Although civil trials provide for the lawful resolution of many kinds of disputes, the vast majority of civil matters are resolved through other processes: Negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. This chapter provides an overview of the main psychological and structural factors that influence disputants’ decisions to select and use these primary alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes. Further, the chapter discusses the psychology of decision-making in the context of alternative dispute resolution, including identifying what constitutes successful outcomes and how biases and other tendencies can prevent parties from realizing these outcomes. Finally, the chapter addresses research on the ways in which non-parties such as mediators, facilitators, arbitrators, and judges can improve (or diminish) the likelihood that parties’ voices will be heard, that parties will be satisfied with the process, and that the selected process will result in substantively satisfactory outcomes. Major research gaps and policy implications are identified and discussed.

Keywords

negotiationmediationarbitrationdecision-makingpsychologylaw
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Legal Decision-Making , pp. 617 - 633
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Arbitration Association. (2021). ADR Rules. American Arbitration Association. www.adr.org/Rules.Google Scholar
Arad, S., & Carnevale, P. J. (1994). Partisanship effects in judgments of fairness and trust in third parties in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38(3), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002794038003004.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Mnookin, R., Ross, L., Tversky, A., & Wilson, R. (Eds.). (1995). Barriers to conflict resolution. W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, O., Bloom, D., & Dahl, G. (2013, February). Lawyers as agents of the devil in a prisoner’s dilemma game: Evidence from long run play. (NBER Working Paper No. w18834). https://doi.org/10.3386/w18834.Google Scholar
Berman, G. (1995). Facilitated negotiation: An effective ADR technique. Dispute Resolution Journal, 50(2), 18–29.Google Scholar
Best, A., & Andreasen, A. R. (1977). Consumer response to unsatisfactory purchases: Survey of perceiving defects, voicing complaints, and obtaining redress. Law & Society Review, 11(4), 701–744. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053179.Google Scholar
Beverland, M. B., Chung, E., & Kates, S. M. (2009). Exploring consumers’ conflict styles: Grudges and forgiveness following marketer failure. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 438–443.Google Scholar
Brett, J., & Thompson, L. (2016). Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.003.Google Scholar
Bush, R., & Folger, J. (1994). The promise of mediation: Responding to conflict through empowerment and recognition. Wiley.Google Scholar
Bush, R., & Folger, J. (2004). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cheung, S. O. (1999). Critical factors affecting the use of alternative dispute resolution processes in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00027-1.Google Scholar
Cheung, S. O., Li, K., & Chow, O. Y. (2020). Reactive devaluation as a psychological impediment to construction dispute negotiation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4), 04020025–1. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000787.Google Scholar
Cobb, S. (2013). Speaking of violence: The politics and poetics of narrative in conflict resolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199826209.001.0001.Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.945Google Scholar
Cole, S. (2001). Uniform arbitration: “One size fits all” does not fit. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 16(3), 759–789.Google Scholar
Cominelli, L., & Lucchiari, C. (2017). Italian mediators in action: The impact of style and attitude. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21206.Google Scholar
Conklin, C. N. (2016). Beyond the FAA: Arbitration procedure, practice, and policy in historical perspective. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 16(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
de Dreu, C. K., Koole, S. L., & Steinel, W. (2000). Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 975–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.975.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1995). William James: The first peace psychologist. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 1(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac0101_5.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T., & Lanvers, C. (2009). What is the settlement rate and why should we care? Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 6(1), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01139.x.Google Scholar
Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021, H.R. 4445, 117th Cong. (2022). www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/4445.Google Scholar
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fiss, O. (1984). Against settlement. Yale Law Journal, 93(6), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.2307/796205.Google Scholar
Frenkel, D. & Stark, J. (2015). Improving lawyers’ judgment: Is mediation training de-biasing? Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 21, 1–58.Google Scholar
Friend, W., & Malhotra, D. (2019). Psychological barriers to resolving intergroup conflict: An extensive review and consolidation of the literature. Negotiation Journal, 35(4), 407–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12299.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. (1984). Value creation by business lawyers: Legal skills and asset pricing. Yale Law Journal, 94(2), 239–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/796226.Google Scholar
Golann, D. (2013). Sharing a mediator’s powers: Effective advocacy in settlement. American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2004). Let’s arbitrate a deal. Dispute Resolution Magazine, 11(27), 27–28.Google Scholar
Goldfien, J. H., & Robbennolt, J. K. (2007). What if the lawyers have their way? An empirical assessment of conflict strategies and attitudes toward mediation styles. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 22(2), 277–319. https://doi.org/1811/77125.Google Scholar
Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x.Google Scholar
Guthrie, C. (2003). Panacea or Pandora’s box? The costs of options in negotiation. Iowa Law Review, 88(3), 601–653.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. (2009). Consumer decision making in low‐income families: The case of conflict avoidance. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 8(5), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.285.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280.Google Scholar
Harth, N. S., & Shnabel, N. (2015). Third-party intervention in intergroup reconciliation: The role of neutrality and common identity with the other conflict party. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18(5), 676–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215583151.Google Scholar
Hastorf, A. H., & Cantril, H. (1954). They saw a game; a case study. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(1), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057880.Google Scholar
Hollander-Blumoff, R. (2010). Just negotiation. Washington University Law Review, 88, 381–431.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. (1997/1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 110(5), 991–1009.Google Scholar
Holt, J. L., & DeVore, C. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002.Google Scholar
Islami, H. (2016). Marital conflicts resolution styles. CBU International Conference Proceedings, 4, 569–572. https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v4.815.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Conflict resolution and peer mediation programs in elementary and secondary schools: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 459–506. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004459.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., Evans, D., & Rachlinski, J. (2012). “They saw a protest”: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64(4), 851–906.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90015-Y.Google Scholar
Lande, J. (2009). A recent innovation, “cooperative” negotiation can promote early and efficient settlement through joint case management. Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation, 27(7), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/alt.20288.Google Scholar
Leung, K. (1988). Some determinants of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002188019001009.Google Scholar
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231.Google Scholar
Maoz, I., Ward, A., Katz, M., & Ross, L. (2002). Reactive devaluation of an “Israeli” vs. “Palestinian” peace proposal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(4), 515–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046004003.Google Scholar
Melnikoff, D. E., & Strohminger, N. (2020). The automatic influence of advocacy on lawyers and novices. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(12), 1258–1264. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00943-3.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2001). Aha? Is creativity possible in legal problem solving and teachable in legal education? Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 6, 97–144.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (2002). The lawyer as consensus builder: Ethics for a new practice. Tennessee Law Review, 70(1), 63–119.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. (1993). Why negotiations fail: An exploration of barriers to the resolution of conflict. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 8(2), 235–249.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. & Gilson, R. (1994). Disputing through agents: Cooperation and conflict between lawyers in litigation. Columbia Law Review, 94(2), 509–566. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123202.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R. & Kornhauser, L. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88(5), 950–997. https://doi.org/10.2307/795824.Google Scholar
Mnookin, R., Peppet, S., & Tulumello, D. (2000). Beyond winning: Negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (1997). Casting light on the black box of mediation: Should mediators make their conduct more transparent? Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 13(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2005). Schmediation and the dimensions of definition. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 10(69), 69–102.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2010). Islands, vitamins, salt, germs: Four visions of the future of ADR in law schools (and a data-driven snapshot of the field today). Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 25(1), 25–85.Google Scholar
Moffitt, M. (2019). Settlement malpractice. University of Chicago Law Review, 86(7), 1825–1900.Google Scholar
Mosten, F. (2008). Collaborative law practice: An unbundled approach to informed client decision making. Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2008(1), 163–190.Google Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.Google Scholar
Nicotera, A. M. (2021). Nursing and conflict communication: A review. Nursing Communication, 1(1), 60–79.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, L. (2016). Mediation as regulation: Expanding state governance over private disputes. Utah Law Review, 2016(2), 361–415.Google Scholar
Poppe, E. S. T. (2019). Why consumer defendants lump it. Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy, 14(2), 149–190.Google Scholar
Pruitt, D. & Kim, S. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/2559855.Google Scholar
Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203786482.Google Scholar
Reynolds, J. (2012). Games, dystopia, and ADR. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 27(3), 477–538.Google Scholar
Riedy, M., & Greenwald, N. (2015). Mediating discovery disputes: When “meet and confer” alone is not enough. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17, 307–322.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. (2008). Attorneys, apologies, and settlement negotiation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 13(2), 349–397.Google Scholar
Robbennolt, J. K. (2014). Litigation and settlement. In Zamir, E. & Teichman, D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law (pp. 623–642). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, H. (1980). Settled out of court: The social process of insurance claims adjustment (2nd ed.). Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
Ross, L. (1995). Reactive devaluation in negotiation and conflict resolution. In Arrow, K., Mnookin, R., Ross, L., Tversky, A., & Wilson, R. (Eds.), Barriers to conflict resolution (pp. 27–42). W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Saucier, D. A., Miller, S. S., Martens, A. L., O’Dea, C. J., & Jones, T. L. (2018). Individual differences explain regional differences in honor-related outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.046.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1999). The intersection of therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and alternative dispute resolution. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(4), 1084–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037//1076-8971.5.4.1084.Google Scholar
Shapiro, D. L. & Rosen, B. (1994). An investigation of managerial interventions in employee disputes. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 7(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621059.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. (2014). The psychology of procedural preference: How litigants evaluate legal procedures ex ante. Iowa Law Review, 99, 638–710.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. (2016). How litigants evaluate the characteristics of legal procedures: A multi-court empirical study. University of California at Davis Law Review, 49(3), 792–841.Google Scholar
Shestowsky, D. (2017). When ignorance is not bliss: An empirical study of litigants’ awareness of court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution programs. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 22, 189–239.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. Handbook of Social Psychology, 2(3), 883–947.Google Scholar
Sovern, J., Greenberg, E., Kirgis, P., & Liu, Y. (2015). “Whimsy little contracts” with unexpected consequences: An empirical analysis of consumer understanding of arbitration agreements. Maryland Law Review, 75(1), 1–133.Google Scholar
Sternlight, J. (2005). Creeping mandatory arbitration: Is it just? Stanford Law Review, 57(5), 1631–1675.Google Scholar
Stone, D., Heen, S., & Patton, B. (2010). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most (2nd ed.). Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Szalai, I. S. (2013). Outsourcing justice: The rise of modern arbitration law in America. Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tehrani, H. D., & Yamini, S. (2020). Personality traits and conflict resolution styles: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109794.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J.W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1978). Comparison of four instruments measuring conflict behavior. Psychological Reports, 42(3), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1978.42.3c.1139.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. (1995). “They saw a negotiation”: Partisanship and involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(5), 839–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.5.839.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. L., Wang, J., & Gunia, B. C. (2010). Negotiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100458.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions, and consequences. International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(2), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022872.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., & Lind, E. (2001). Procedural justice. In Sanders, J. & Hamilton, V. (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 65, 69–70). Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-351ss4.49.3.577.Google Scholar
Voss, C. (2016). Never split the difference: Negotiating as if your life depended on it. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. (2001). Making deals in court-connected mediation: What’s justice got to do with it? Washington University Law Quarterly, 79(3), 787–861.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. (2004). Stepping back through the looking glass: Real conversations with real disputants about institutionalized mediation and its value. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 19(2), 573–578.Google Scholar
Welsh, N. (2017). Do you believe in magic?: Self-determination and procedural justice meet inequality in court-connected mediation. SMU Law Review, 70(3), 721–762.Google Scholar
Wissler, R. (1997). The effects of mandatory mediation: Empirical research on the experience of small claims and common pleas courts. Willamette Law Review, 33(3), 565–604.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×