Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:31:02.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Human Rights

A Psychologist’s Path to “Do No Harm”

from Part II - The Intersection of Psychology and Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

By
Nora Sveaass  and
Linda M. Woolf
Edited by
Neal S. Rubin  and
Roseanne L. Flores
Neal S. Rubin
Affiliation:
Adler University
Roseanne L. Flores
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

Embedded in psychological ethics is the principle of nonmaleficence – psychologists should endeavor to “do no harm.” Consistent with fundamental human rights, psychologists aim to protect integrity and dignity; secure development and fulfillment of lives; and ensure the well-being of individuals, groups, and communities. Psychological science and practice contains knowledge and insights that can be used to promote these aims. Unfortunately, this knowledge too often has been used to obstruct human integrity, destroy mental capacity and psychological health, and diminish the well-being and security of both persons and peoples. This chapter focuses on ways in which psychologists and psychological knowledge in different ways and at different levels may become part of an abusive culture that both violates human rights and fosters social injustice. In this chapter, we discuss psychologists’ involvement in torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment across a range of settings. Through a case example, we highlight the interplay between direct and structural forms of violence and the path to harm created by ethical decision making devoid of human rights analyses. The need for a clear ethical and human rights–based approach in psychology is argued, including ways of dealing with violations and claiming accountability for crimes against humanity.

Keywords

EthicsTortureOppressionCruelinhumanor degrading treatment or punishment (CIDT)UNCAT (UN Convention Against Torture and Other CruelInhumanor Degrading Treatment or Punishment)AbusePsychologists’ involvementSocial justiceAccountabilityDiscriminationViolationsCIAEnhanced interrogation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Human Rights , pp. 135 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afkhami, M. (n.d.). Mahnaz Afkhani reflects on working toward peace. https://legacy.scu.edu/ethics/architects-of-peace/Afkhami/essay.html (accessed June 30, 2019).Google Scholar
Amnesty International. (1983). Uruguay: An Amnesty briefing. www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/AMR520341983ENGLISH.PDFGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International. (2002). Doctors and torture. www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/112000/act750012002en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2016). Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. New York, NY: Worth.Google Scholar
Berscheid, E., Boye, D., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1968). Retaliation as a means of restoring equity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 370–376.Google Scholar
Bloch, S., & Reddaway, P. (1985). Psychiatrists and dissenters in the Soviet Union. In Stover, E. & Nightingale, E. (Eds.), The breaking of bodies and minds: Torture, psychiatric abuse, and the health professions (pp. 132–164). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigham, C. (1923). A study of American intelligence. https://archive.org/stream/studyofamericani00briguoft/studyofamericani00briguoft_djvu.txtGoogle Scholar
Bruner, F. (1908). The hearing of primitive peoples. Archives of Psychology, 11, 1–113.Google Scholar
Cooper, S. (2013). South Africa’s shameful past and hopeful future: Interview with Saths Cooper. Monitor on Psychology, 44(4), 32.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Galton, D., & Galton, C. (1998). Francis Galton: And eugenics today. Journal of Medical Ethics, 24, 99–105.Google Scholar
Haritos-Fatouros, M. (1988) The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1107–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kordon, D., & Edelman, L. (1988). Psychological effects of political repression. In Kordon, D., Edelman, L., Lagos, D., Nicoletti, E., & Bozollo, R. (Eds.), Psychological effects of political repression. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana/Planeta.Google Scholar
Kordon, D., Edelman, L., Lagos, D., Nicoletti, E., Kersner, D., & Groshaus, M. (1992). Torture in Argentina. In Basoglu, M. (Ed.), Torture and its consequences (pp. 432–455). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lagouranis, T., & Mikaelian, A. (2007). Fear up harsh. New York, NY: NAL Caliber.Google Scholar
Landis, D., & Boucher, J. (1987). Themes and models of conflict. In Boucher, J., Landis, D., & Clark, K. A. (Eds.), Ethnic conflict: International perspectives (pp. 18–32). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Leonard, K., & Taylor, S. (1981). Effects of racial prejudice and race of target on aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 7, 205–214.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. (2004, November 30). Red Cross finds detainee abuse at Guantánamo. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2004/11/30/politics/red-cross-finds-detainee-abuse-in-guantanamo.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lindner, E. (2006). Making enemies: Humiliation and international conflict. New York, NY: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Lira, E., & Castillo, M. (1991). Psicología de la amenaza politíca y del miedo [The psychology of political threat and fear]. Santiago: ILAS.Google Scholar
Maercker, A., & Guski-Leinwand, S. (2018). Psychologists’ involvement in repressive “Stasi” secret police activities in former East Germany. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 7(2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, A. (2007). Science in Dachau’s shadow: Hebb, Beecher and the development of CIA psychological torture and modern medical ethics. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 43, 401–417.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Military Commissions Act of 2006. (2006). Public Law 109–366—Oct. 17, 2006. www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/PL-109-366.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). Belmont report. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont-report-508c_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Newman, L., & Erber, R. (2002). Understanding genocide: The social psychology of the Holocaust. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, L. (1992). The contribution of the double-bind theory to the understanding of oppression. In Nicholas, L. J. (Ed.), Psychology and oppression: Critiques and proposals (pp. 190–196). Johannesburg: Skotaville.Google Scholar
Nicholas, L. (2014). Psychological sequelae of political imprisonment during apartheid. South African Journal of Psychology, 44, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M., & McArthur, E. (2006). The distinction between torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Torture, 16(3), 147–151.Google ScholarPubMed
Nuremberg Code. (1949). Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nuremberg Principles. (1950). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=D4D734820B8BA553C12563CD0051C97AGoogle Scholar
Olson, B., & Soldz, S. (2007). Positive illusions and the necessity of a bright line forbidding psychologist involvement in detainee interrogations. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7, 145–154.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (Ed.) (1990). Moral exclusion [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 46 (1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (2001). Social injustice. In Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (Eds.), Peace, conflict and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 102–109). New York, NY: Prentice-Hall. http://u.osu.edu/christie/files/2014/10/Chapter-8-Social-Injustice-Opotow-1jaya7m.pdfGoogle Scholar
Opotow, S. (2002). The psychology of impunity and injustice: Implications for social reconciliation. In Bassiouni, M. C. (Ed.), Post conflict justice. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Press.Google Scholar
Opotow, S. (2018). Social justice theory and practice: Fostering inclusion in exclusionary contexts. In Hammack, P. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social psychology and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, O. (1990). Medical aspects of torture. Danish Medical Bulletin, 37, 1–88.Google Scholar
Rojas, P. (2000). Impunity: An impossible reparation. Nordic Journal of International Law, 69, 27–34.Google Scholar
Rummel, R. (2007). 20th century democide. www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTMGoogle Scholar
Senate Intelligence Committee. (2012). Study of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Detention and Interrogation Program. https://fas.org/irp/congress/2014_rpt/ssci-rdi.pdfGoogle Scholar
Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stover, E., & Nightingale, E. (1985). Introduction. In Stover, E. and Nightingale, E. (Eds.), The breaking of bodies and minds: Torture, psychiatric abuse, and the health professions (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Suedfeld, P. (1990). Psychologists as victims, administrators, and designers of torture. In Suedfeld, P. (Ed.), Psychology and torture (pp. 101–115). New York, NY: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2007). Torture: A crime against humanity. In Lothe, E. A., Daniel, M., Snipstad, M. B., & Sveaass, N. (Eds.), Strength in broken places (pp. 179–196). Oslo: Unipub.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2009). Destroying minds: Psychological pain and the crime of torture. New York City Law Review, 11, 303–332.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2013). Gross human rights violations and reparation under international law: Approaching rehabilitation as a form of reparation. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4, 17191.Google Scholar
Sveaass, N. (2017). The UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: The absolute prohibition and the obligation to prevent. In Bas¸og˘lu, M. (Ed.), Torture and its definition in international law: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 247–271). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1966a). The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspxGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1966b). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspxGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (1984). Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT). www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cat.aspxGoogle Scholar
UN Committee Against Torture. (2008). General comment No. 2 on article 2 of the UNCAT. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CAT%2fC%2fGC%2f2&Lang=enGoogle Scholar
UN Committee Against Torture. (2009). Concluding observations of the Committee Against Torture. Azerbaijan. CAT/C/AZE/CO/. Retrieved from www.atlas-of-torture.org/en/document/s1zm912lpvlcj1z3epyl23xr?page=1.Google Scholar
Vesti, P., & Lavik, N. J. (1991). Torture and the medical profession: A review. Journal of Medical Ethics, suppl., 4–8.Google Scholar
Wessells, M., Sveaass, N., Foster, D., & Dawes, A. (2017). Do no harm? How psychologists have supported torture and what to do about it. In Seedat, M., Suffla, S., & Christie, D. (Eds.), Enlarging the scope of peace psychology: African and world-regional contributions (pp. 269–294). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Woolf, L. M. (2019). Peace and Social Justice. In Njoku, M. G., Jason, L. A., & Johnson, R. B. (Eds.), Psychology of peace promotion: Global perspectives on personal peace, children and adolescents, and social justice (pp. 219–235). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Woolf, L., & Hulsizer, M. (2002/2003). Intra- and inter-religious hate and violence: A psychosocial model. Journal of Hate Studies, 2, 5–26.Google Scholar
Woolf, L., & Hulsizer, M. (2005). Psychosocial roots of genocide: Risk, prevention, and intervention. Journal of Genocide Research, 7, 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×