Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T11:05:47.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Gender and Prosocial Development

from Part II - Antecedents and Mechanisms of Prosociality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2023

By
Jolien Van der Graaff
Edited by
Tina Malti  and
Maayan Davidov
Tina Malti
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Maayan Davidov
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access

Summary

This chapter focuses on the role of gender in the development of empathy and prosocial behavior in adolescence. Although it is a commonly held belief and a well-replicated research finding that females report higher empathy and prosocial behavior than do males, much is still unclear about the nature and meaning of this gender difference. After discussing definitions of the constructs, theoretical perspectives on biological, cognitive, and social contributions to gender differences in prosocial development are summarized. Then empirical evidence on gender differences in empathy and in prosocial behavior in adolescence are reviewed, with a particular focus on results of (1) longitudinal studies, (2) studies that take the multidimensionality of empathy and prosocial behavior into account, and (3) multimethod studies. Finally, implications and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

genderempathyperspective takingsympathyprosocial behavioradolescencebiological developmentcognitive developmentsocial development
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Prosociality
Development, Mechanisms, Promotion
 , pp. 320 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allemand, M., Steiger, A. E., & Fend, H. A. (2015). Empathy development in adolescence predicts social competencies in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 83(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12098Google Scholar
Allen, J. S., Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Bruss, J., & Zhang, W. (2003). Sexual dimorphism and asymmetries in the gray–white composition of the human cerebrum. Neuroimage, 18(4), 880–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00034-XGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. C., & Belmonte, M. K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749), 819–823. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1115455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354Google Scholar
Blankenstein, N. E., Telzer, E. H., Do, K. T., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2019). Behavioral and neural pathways supporting the development of prosocial and risk-taking behavior across adolescence. Child Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13292Google Scholar
Bryant, B. K. (1982). An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53(2), 413. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128984Google Scholar
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.106.4.676Google Scholar
Caprara, G. V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Zuffianò, A., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents’ prosocial behaviors: Direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2211–2229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0293-1Google Scholar
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00524.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlo, G., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nielson, M. G. (2015). Longitudinal bidirectional relations between adolescents’ sympathy and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1771–1777. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000056Google Scholar
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440Google Scholar
Chapman, E., Baron-Cohen, S., Auyeung, B., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy: Evidence from the empathy quotient (EQ) and the “reading the mind in the eyes” test. Social Neuroscience 1, 135–148. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1080/17470910600992239Google Scholar
Cheng, Y., Chou, K. H., Decety, J., Chen, I. Y., Hung, D., Tzeng, O. L., & Lin, C. P. (2009). Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: A voxel-based morphometric investigation. Neuroscience, 158(2), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.026Google Scholar
Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001Google Scholar
Colom, R., & Lynn, R. (2004). Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence on 12–18 year olds. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00053-9Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. L. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90006-CGoogle Scholar
de Waal, F. B. (2007). The “Russian doll” model of empathy and imitation. In Braten, S. (Ed.), On being moved: From mirror neurons to empathy (pp. 35–48). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Eickhoff, S., Kellermann, T., Falkenberg, D. I., Schneider, F., & Habel, U. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of empathic abilities: Neural correlates and gender differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.10.006Google Scholar
Dreher, J. C., Dunne, S., Pazderska, A., Frodl, T., Nolan, J. J., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2016). Testosterone causes both prosocial and antisocial status-enhancing behaviors in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(41), 11633–11638. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608085113Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (2009). Alice H. Eagly: Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions. American Psychologist, 64(8), 642–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017804Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.xGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., vol. 3, pp. 701–778). Wiley.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Schaller, M., & Miller, P. A. (1989). Sympathy and personal distress: Development, gender differences, and interrelations of indexes. New Directions for Child Development, 44, 107–126. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1002/cd.23219894408Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2015). Prosocial development. In Lerner, R. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 1–47). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fabes, R. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1998). Meta-analyses of age and sex differences in children’s and adolescents’ prosocial behavior. www.public.asu.edu/~sparky00/fabes/meta.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fukushima, H., & Hiraki, K. (2006). Perceiving an opponent’s loss: Gender-related differences in the medial-frontal negativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(2), 149–157. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1093/scan/nsl020Google Scholar
Groen, Y., Wijers, A. A., Tucha, O., & Althaus, M. (2013). Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoking pictures? Neuropsychologia, 51(1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.012Google Scholar
Hay, D. F., & Cook, K. V. (2007). The transformation of prosocial behavior from infancy to childhood. In Brownell, C. A. & Kopp, C. B. (Eds.), Socioemotional development in the toddler years: Transitions and transformations (pp. 100–131). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In Brooks-Gunn, J. & Petersen, A. C. (Eds.), Girls at puberty (pp. 201–228). Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Hine, B., & Leman, P. J. (2013). The developing relationship between gender and pro-social behaviour. In Leman, P. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (Eds.), Gender and development (pp. 78–108). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.4.712Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581Google Scholar
Karniol, R., Gabay, R., Ochion, Y., & Harari, Y. (1998). Is gender or gender-role orientation a better predictor of empathy in adolescence? Sex Roles, 39(1–2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018825732154Google Scholar
Klein, K. J. K., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276007Google Scholar
Knafo, A., Zahn-Waxler, C., van Hulle, C., Robinson, J. A. L., & Rhee, S. H. (2008). The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8(6), 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014179Google Scholar
Knafo-Noam, A., Uzefovsky, F., Israel, S., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2015). The prosocial personality and its facets: Genetic and environmental architecture of mother-reported behavior of 7-year-old twins. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00112Google Scholar
Kral, T. R. A., Solis, E., Mumford, J. A., Schuyler, B. S., Flook, L., Rifken, K., Patsenko, E. G., & Davidson, R. J. (2017). Neural correlates of empathic accuracy in adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(11), 1701–1710. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx099Google Scholar
Lam, C. B., Solmeyer, A. R., & McHale, S. M. (2012). Sibling relationships and empathy across the transition to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(12), 1657–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9781-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C., Eisenberg, N., Zuffianò, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). The development of prosociality from adolescence to early adulthood: The role of effortful control. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12001Google Scholar
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. (2004). Children’s search for gender cues: Cognitive perspectives on gender development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(2), 67–70. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00276.xGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Patterns of gender development. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 353–381. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Pfeifer, J. H., Colich, N. L., & Dapretto, M. (2013). Associations among pubertal development, empathic ability, and neural responses while witnessing peer rejection in adolescence. Child Development, 84(4), 1338–1354. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1509087540?accountid=14338Google Scholar
Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Frías, M. D., & Tur, A. M. (2009). Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001499Google Scholar
Meyer, M. L., Masten, C. L., Ma, Y., Wang, C., Shi, Z., Eisenberger, N. I., & Han, S. (2013). Empathy for the social suffering of friends and strangers recruits distinct patterns of brain activation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 446–454.Google Scholar
Michalska, K. J., Kinzler, K. D., & Decety, J. (2013). Age-related sex differences in explicit measures of empathy do not predict brain responses across childhood and adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2012.08.001Google Scholar
Mills, K. L., Lalonde, F., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N., & Blakemore, S. J. (2014). Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss113Google Scholar
Nantel-Vivier, A., Kokko, K., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C., Gerbino, M. G., Paciello, M., Côté, S., Pihl, R. O., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Prosocial development from childhood to adolescence: A multi-informant perspective with Canadian and Italian longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 50(5), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02039.xGoogle Scholar
Nielson, M. G., Padilla-Walker, L., & Holmes, E. K. (2017). How do men and women help? Validation of a multidimensional measure of prosocial behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.02.006Google Scholar
Nielson, M. G., Xiao, S. X., & Padilla‐Walker, L. (2020). Gender similarity in growth patterns of support toward friends during young adulthood. Social Development, 29(2), 635–650. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1111/sode.12419Google Scholar
Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. M. (1998). The importance of sex-of-stimulus object: Age trends and sex differences in empathic responsiveness. Social Development, 7(3), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00073Google Scholar
Overgaauw, S., Rieffe, C., Broekhof, E., Crone, E. A., & Güroglu, B. (2017). Assessing empathy across childhood and adolescence: Validation of The Empathy Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (EmQue-CA). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00870Google Scholar
Padilla-Walker, L. M., Carlo, G., & Memmott-Elison, M. K. (2018). Longitudinal change in adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 28(3), 698–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12362Google Scholar
Padilla‐Walker, L. M., Dyer, W. J., Yorgason, J. B., Fraser, A. M., & Coyne, S. M. (2013). Adolescents’ prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers: A person‐centered approach. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(1), 135–150.Google Scholar
Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others. Infant Behavior and Development, 34(3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007Google Scholar
Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Piefke, M. (2008). Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy. NeuroImage, 42(1), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.180Google Scholar
Schwenck, C., Göhle, B., Hauf, J., Warnke, A., Freitag, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2014). Cognitive and emotional empathy in typically developing children: The influence of age, gender, and intelligence. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.808994Google Scholar
Selman, R. L. (1981). The development of interpersonal competence: The role of understanding in conduct. Developmental Review, 1(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(81)90034-4Google Scholar
Silberman, M. A., & Snarey, J. (1993). Gender differences in moral development during early adolescence: The contribution of sex-related variations in maturation. Current Psychology, 12(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686821Google Scholar
Skoe, E. E., Cumberland, A., Eisenberg, N., Hansen, K., & Perry, J. (2002). The influences of sex and gender-role identity on moral cognition and prosocial personality traits. Sex Roles, 46(9–10), 295–309.Google Scholar
Stuijfzand, S., de Wied, M., Kempes, M., van de Graaff, J., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. (2016). Gender differences in empathic sadness towards persons of the same- versus other-sex during adolescence. Sex Roles, 75(9–10), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0649-3Google Scholar
Taylor, L. K., Merrilees, C. E., Baird, R., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., & Cummings, E. M. (2018). Impact of political conflict on trajectories of adolescent prosocial behavior: Implications for civic engagement. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1785–1794. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000552Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., de Wied, M., Hawk, S., van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50(3), 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034325CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, J., Meeus, W., de Wied, M., van Boxtel, A., van Lier, P., & Branje, S. (2016). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia moderates the relation between parent-adolescent relationship quality and adolescents’ social adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(2), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-9989-7Google Scholar
van Honk, J., Schutter, D. J., Bos, P. A., Kruijt, A. W., Lentjes, E. G., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(8), 3448–3452. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011891108Google Scholar
van Tilburg, M. A. L., Unterberg, M. L., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (2002). Crying during adolescence: The role of gender, menarche, and empathy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166334Google Scholar
Volbrecht, M. M., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Aksan, N., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2007). Examining the familial link between positive affect and empathy development in the second year. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.168.2.105-130Google Scholar
Xiao, S. X., Hashi, E. C., Korous, K. M., & Eisenberg, N. (2019). Gender differences across multiple types of prosocial behavior in adolescence: A meta-analysis of the prosocial tendency measure-revised (PTM-R). Journal of Adolescence, 77, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.09.003Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×