Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section I Segmental Production
- Section II Prosodic Production
- Section III Measuring Speech
- Section IV Audition and Perception
- Section V Applications of Phonetics
- Index
- References
Section V - Applications of Phonetics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Section I Segmental Production
- Section II Prosodic Production
- Section III Measuring Speech
- Section IV Audition and Perception
- Section V Applications of Phonetics
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics , pp. 501 - 706Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
20.7 References
Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 245–66.Google Scholar
Arai, T. (2002). An effective method for education in acoustics and speech science: Integrating textbooks, computer simulation and physical models. Paper presented at the Proc. Forum Acusticum Sevilla.Google Scholar
Arai, T. (2012). Education in acoustics and speech science using vocal-tract models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(3), 2444–54. doi:10.1121/1.3677245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arai, T. (2013). Learning acoustic phonetics by listening, seeing, and touching. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 025017. doi:10.1121/1.4799629.Google Scholar
Armstrong, L. E. & Ward, I. C. (1931). A Handbook of English Intonation. Oxford: W. Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
Ashby, M. & Przedlacka, J. (2013). Towards a history of teaching, learning and assessment in phonetics. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar
Ashby, M., Maidment, J. & Abberton, A. (1996). Analytic listening: A new approach to ear-training. In V. Hazan, S. Rosen & M. Holland, eds., Speech Hearing and Language: Work In Progress 1996 (vol. 9), UCL Department of Phonetics and Linguistics. www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/shl9/ashby/ma.htm, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Ashby, M., Yanagisawa, K., Kim, Y., Maidment, J. & Przedlacka, J. (2009). Achieving interactivity in online learning of phonetic skills. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
Ashby, P. (2016). Interacting with phonetics: A synopsis. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 20(3), 121–3.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S. & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell-Berti, F. (2017). Teaching phonetics and speech science: What’s changed and what hasn’t. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2616–2616.Google Scholar
Benjamin, A. S. & Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 228–47.Google Scholar
Bent, T. (2017). Teaching phonetics in an active-learning classroom: The role of teaching assistants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2617–2617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bent, T. & Garl, E. (2013). Spectrogram puzzles: A tool for teaching acoustic phonetics. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 025008. doi:10.1121/1.4799246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th ed. Buckingham: Society for Research Into Higher Education.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2002). The functional irrhythmicality of spontaneous speech: A discourse view of speech rhythms. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2(1), 1–24. Available from http://apples.jyu.fi.Google Scholar
Child Speech Disorder Research Network. (2017). Good Practice Guidelines for Transcription of Children’s Speech Samples in Clinical Practice and Research. www.nbt.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/BSLTRU_Good%20practice%20guidelines_Transcription_2Ed_2017.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.Google Scholar
Clark, R., Nguyen, F. & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
Clarke, W. D. (1996). A study of lecture and computer‐based teaching of articulatory and acoustic aspects of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(4), 2550–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coey, C., Esling, J. H. & Moisik, S. R. (2014). iPA Phonetics [app for iPhone]. Version 1.0, Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Collins, B. S., Mees, I. M. & Carley, P. (2019). Practical Phonetics and Phonology: A Resource Book for Students, 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cotton, D. R. E., Miller, W. & Kneale, P. (2018). The Cinderella of academia: Is higher education pedagogic research undervalued in UK research assessment?. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1625–36.Google Scholar
Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17, December, 4–5. http://neillthew.typepad.com/files/threshold-concepts-1.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Entwistle, N. J. & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–28.Google Scholar
Farmer, A. (1997). Spectrography. In Ball, M. J. & Code, C., eds., Instrumental Clinical Phonetics. Chichester, UK: Whurr Publishers, pp. 22–63.Google Scholar
Finan, D. S. (2008). Speech science education: Roll over Beethoven. Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorder, 18, 22–30.Google Scholar
Grabe, E., Nolan, F. & Farrar, K. J. (1998). IViE-A comparative transcription system for intonational variation in English. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 30th November – 4th December 1998, Sydney, Australia. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/df0e/b538a639bb83ae99932f1655856d4453a873.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Grasso, M. (2017). Reflecting upon students’ problems in phonemic dictation. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2017, University College London, pp. 54–7.Google Scholar
Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies. In Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G. & Ritchie, S. M., eds., Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, vol. 30. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
HEA (2011). The United Kingdom Professional Standards Framework. www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/uk_professional_standards_framework.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Heselwood, B. (2013). Phonetic Transcription in Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J. & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning: What we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, S. J. & Heselwood, B. C. (2002). Learning and teaching phonetic transcription for clinical purposes. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16(5), 371–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huckvale, M. (2017). SFS/RTPITCH version 1.3. www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/sfs/rtpitch/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (IPA). (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, A. (2002). Pedagogic research at Brookes: Achievements, opportunities and questions. Teaching Forum, 50 (Autumn), 3–6.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1909). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Journal of the International Phonetics Association (no date). Illustrations of the IPA www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/illustrations-of-the-ipa-free-content.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A. (2010a). Transcribing nonsense words: The effect of numbers of voices and repetitions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24(6), 473–84.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A. (2010b). Sounds for study: Speech and language therapy students’ use and perception of exercise podcasts for phonetics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(3), 269–76.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A. (2011). Towards a cognitive model of phonetic transcription. Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2011, University College London.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A. (2012). Phonetics: A Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, R.-A. & Maguire, E. (2011). The relationship between short-term memory and the phonetic transcription accuracy of speech and language therapy students. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2011, University College London, pp. 21–4.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A. & Whitworth, N. (2014). Introduction. In Whitworth, N. & Knight, R.-A., eds., Methods in Teaching Clinical Phonetics & Linguistics. Guildford: J&R Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A., Bandali, C., Woodhead, C. & Vansadia, P. (2018). Clinicians’ views of the training, use and maintenance of phonetic transcription in speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53, 776–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, R.-A., Boguka, O., Gruenstern, H. & Marlin, C. (in prep). Effects of orthography on phonemic transcription of English.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2014). A Course in Phonetics, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. Improving Student Learning Diversity and Inclusivity, 4, 53–64.Google Scholar
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F & Davies, P. (2006). Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. In Meyer, J. H. F & Land, R., eds., Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 195–207.Google Scholar
Lawson, E., Stuart-Smith, J., Scobbie, J. M. & Nakai, S. (2015). Seeing Speech: An Articulatory Web Resource for the Study of Phonetics. University of Glasgow. http://seeingspeech.ac.uk, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, B. (2011). Prizes, pedagogic research and teaching professors: Lowering the status of teaching and learning through bifurcation. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie Beck, J. (2003). Is it possible to predict students’ ability to develop skills in practical phonetics? In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2833–6.Google Scholar
Maidment, J. (2000–2012). PLATO. http://blogjam.name/plato/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Maidment, J. (2001–2016). Online Intonation (Oi!). http://blogjam.name/oi/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Maidment, J. (2012). Newton. http://blogjam.name/newton/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar
Mompeán, J. A., Ashby, M. & Fraser, H. (2011). Phonetics teaching and learning: An overview of recent trends and directions. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.Google Scholar
Mwangi, W. & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 173–99.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Oller, K. & Eilers, R. E. (1975). Phonetic expectation and transcription validity. Phonetica, 31(3–4), 288–304.Google Scholar
Raimy, E. and Cairns, C. (2015). The Segment in Phonetics and Phonology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez Verdugo, D. (2006). A study of intonation awareness and learning in non-native speakers of English. Language Awareness, 15(3), 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raphael, L. J., Borden, G. J. & Harris, K. S. (2007). Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Rato, A. (2014). Effects of perceptual training on the identification of English vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech – Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 529–46.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roediger, III, Putnam, H. L., A. L. and Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 355–67.Google Scholar
Seikel, J. A., Drumright, D. G., Whites, M. M. & Seikel, P. J. (1995). A ‘hands-on’ approach to speech science. Computers & Education, 24(2), 107–16.Google Scholar
Seikel, J. A., Drumright, D. G. & King, D. W. (2015). Anatomy & Physiology for Speech, Language, and Hearing. Toronto: Nelson Education.Google Scholar
Sell, D. (2005). Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: A review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 103–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Setter, J. & Sebina, B. (2017). English lexical stress, prominence and rhythm. In Kang, O., Thomson, R. I. & Murphy, J. M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary English Pronunciation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 137–53.Google Scholar
Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P. et al. (1992). ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 12–16 October 1992, Banff, Canada, pp. 867–70.Google Scholar
Soames, L. (1891). An Introduction to Phonetics (English, French, and German). London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
Starr-Marshall, T. (2018). Slow-motion video for learning and teaching phonetic transcription. In 17th International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association Congress, University of Malta.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (2016). Building on Success and Learning From Experience: An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework, London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, HM Government.Google Scholar
Thalmann, M., Souza, A. S. & Oberauer, K. (2018). How does chunking help working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 37–55.Google Scholar
Titterington, J. & Bates, S. (2018). Practice makes perfect? The pedagogic value of online independent phonetic transcription practice for speech and language therapy students. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(3), 249–66.Google Scholar
Walden, P. R. & Bell-Berti, F. (2013). Effect of reflective practice on student recall of acoustics for speech science. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34(4), 248–55.Google Scholar
Wells-Jensen, S. (2005). The Braille international phonetic alphabet and other options: The blind student in the phonetics classroom. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 221–30.Google Scholar
Whitworth, N. (2014). Acoustic phonetics. In Whitworth, N. & Knight, R.-A., eds., Methods in Teaching Clinical Phonetics & Linguistics. Guildford: J&R Press, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar
Windsor, F. (2011). The broad or narrow way? Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Winter 2011, 14–16.Google Scholar
Wlodkowski, R. J. & Ginsberg, M. B. (2017). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
21.7 References
Aliaga-García, C. & Mora, J. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In New Sounds 2007: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.424.6702&rep=rep1&type=pdf, last accessed 21 September 2020.Google Scholar
Aoyama, K., Guion, S. Flege, J. E., Yamada, T. & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2008). The first years in an L2-speaking environment: A comparison of Japanese children and adults learning American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 6–190.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on crosslanguage speech perception. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium MD: York Press, pp. 167–200.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar
Binasfour, H., Setter, J. & Aslan, E. (2017). Enhancing L2 learners’ perception and production of the Arabic emphatic sounds. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 16–20.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1994). Pronunciation for Advanced Learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D. (1997). The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
British Council. (2018). The Future Demand for English in Europe: 2025 and Beyond. www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/future_demand_for_english_in_europe_2025_and_beyond_british_council_2018.pdf, last accessed 23 September 2020.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J. & Johnson, K., eds. (1979). The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching, vol. 308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 3(3), 229–42.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for Listening: Teaching the Stream of Speech, Birmingham: Speechinaction.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M. & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, M. (2007). Theory and practice of teaching discourse intonation. ELT Journal, 61(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. (2018). The Effect of Explicit Instruction and Auditory/Audiovisual Training on Chinese Learners’ Perception of English Intonation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Chung, H. (2017). Review of the lingua franca core for English pronunciation teaching in Korea. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 35–8.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1968). Equality of educational opportunity. Integrated Education, 6(5), 19–28.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.Google Scholar
Demenko, G., Wagner, A. (2007), Prosody annotation for unit selection text-to-speech synthesis. Archives of Acoustics, 32(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
Demenko, G., Wagner, A. & Cylwik, N. (2010). The use of speech technology in foreign language pronunciation training. Archives of Acoustics, 35(3), 309–29.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–97.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. (2013). Misunderstandings in English as a Lingua Franca: An Analysis of EFL Interactions in South-East Asia. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117–35.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J., eds. (2005). English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–30.Google Scholar
Edulearn (nd). English Pronunciation in a Global World. www.futurelearn.com/courses/english-pronunciation, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 37–64.Google Scholar
Engwall, O. & Bälter, O. (2007). Pronunciation feedback from real and virtual language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. & Kayes, G. (2016). This Is A Voice: 99 Exercises to Train, Project and Harness the Power of Your Voice. London: Wellcome Collection.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 229–73.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., 1999. Age of learning and second-language speech. In Birdsong, D. P., ed., Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 101–32.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–44. http://jimflege.com/files/final_compact2.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S. & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–70.Google Scholar
Garibaldi, C. L. & Bohn, O. S. (2015). Phonetic similarity predicts ultimate attainment quite well: The case of Danish /i, y, u/ and /d, t/ for native speakers of English and of Spanish. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0245.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Grenon, I. & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 155–66.Google Scholar
Hancock, M. (2017a). English Pronunciation in Use: Intermediate, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M. & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–78.Google Scholar
Hewings, M. (2017). English Pronunciation in Use: Advanced, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. & Lee, H. Y. (2015). The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0466.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. H., eds. (1987). Interlanguage Phonology. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Pinet, M. & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–60.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2011). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, 18th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, T., ed. (2016). Pronunciation in the Classroom: The Overlooked Essential, Anapolis Junction, MD: TESOL Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, D. (2018). Mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The iPhone pronunciation app project. IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Journal, 58, 38–52.Google Scholar
Lengeris, A. & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–68.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E. & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macmillan Education ELT. (2011). Introduction to teaching pronunciation workshop – Adrian Underhill (COMPLETE). www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kAPHyHd7Lo&t=21s, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Marks, J. (2017). English Pronunciation in Use: Elementary, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R. & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–40.Google Scholar
Mohibul Hasan, S. M. (2017). LSC instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. M & Baker, A. A. (2015). History of ESL pronunciation teaching. In Reed, M. & Levis, J., eds., The Handbook of English Pronunciation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 36–65.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. G., Derwing, T. M., Cucchiarini, C., Hardison, D. M., Mixdorff, H., Thomson, R. I. et al. (2018). Directions for the future of technology in pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 182–207.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39(2), 158–77.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D., ed., Linguistic Controversies: Essays in Linguistic Theory and Practice in Honour of F. R. Palmer. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.Google Scholar
Setter, J. (2005). Communicative patterns of intonation in L2 English teaching and learning. In Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J., eds., English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 367–89.Google Scholar
Setter, J. (2019). Your Voice Speaks Volumes: It’s Not What You Say, but How You Say It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R., Holmes-Elliott, S., Pettinato, M. & Knight, R. A. (2014). Cross-accent intelligibility of speech in noise: Long-term familiarity and short-term familiarization. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 590–608.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. (1968). Contrastive analysis and lapsed time. In Alatis, J. E., ed., Contrastive Linguistics and Its Pedagogical Implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar
Swan, M. & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Doel, R. 2008. The blind spots of Jenkins’s Lingua Franca. In Waniek-Klimczak, E., ed., Issues in Accents of English. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 140–9.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (2010). Teaching the Pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–58.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–43.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (2006). English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, J. W. (2014). The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels/e/-/æ/by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. HKBU Institutional Repository. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/hkbu_staff_publication/6234/, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar
Wright, T. (2002). Doing language awareness: Issues for language study in language teacher education. In Trappes-Lomax, H. & Ferguson, G., eds., Language in Language Teacher Education. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Zoghbor, W. S. (2018). Teaching English pronunciation to multi-dialect first language learners: The revival of the lingua franca core (LFC). System, 78, 1–14.Google Scholar
22.7 References
Adank, P. M., Smits, R. & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3099–107. doi.org/10.1121/1.1795335.Google Scholar
Ash, S. (1992). Controlling for dialect in contextless vowel identification: Revisiting the Peterson-Barney experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(4), 2386. doi.org/10.1121/1.403331.Google Scholar
Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437–56. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000400.Google Scholar
Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177–89. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001.Google Scholar
Baker, A., Archangeli, D. & Mielke, J. (2011). Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change, 23(3), 347–74. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394511000135.Google Scholar
Baranowski, M. (2013). Sociophonetics. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R. & Lucas, C., eds., Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 403–24.Google Scholar
Beckner, C., Rácz, P., Hay, J., Brandstetter, J. & Bartneck, C. (2016). Participants conform to humans but not to humanoid robots in an English past tense formation task. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(2), 158–79. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15584682.Google Scholar
Blackwood Ximenes, A., Shaw, J. A. & Carignan, C. (2017). A comparison of acoustic and articulatory methods for analyzing vowel differences across dialects: Data from American and Australian English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(1), 363–77. doi.org/10.1121/1.4991346.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.33, www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bowie, D. (2000). Perception and production in processes of merger. Proceedings of the Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium, 26(1), 137–43. scholarsarchive.byu.edu/dlls/vol26/iss1/18.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82(1), 32–64. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–2007-002.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech, 86(1), 52–68. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–1277510.Google Scholar
Clark, L. (2009). Variation, Change and the Usage-Based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Clark, L. (2014). Phonological repetition effects in natural conversation: Evidence from TH-fronting in Fife. In Lawson, R., ed., Sociolinguistics in Scotland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–76.Google Scholar
Clopper, C. G., Pierrehumbert, J. B. & Tamati, T. N. (2010). Lexical neighborhoods and phonological confusability in cross-dialect word recognition in noise. Laboratory Phonology, 1(1), 65–92. doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corneau, C. (2000). An EPG study of palatalization in French: cross-dialect and inter-subject variation. Language Variation and Change, 12(1), 25–49.Google Scholar
Costa, P. & Mattingly, I. G. (1981). Production and perception of phonetic contrast during phonetic change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 191–6. doi.org/10.1121/1.386167.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society, 9(1), 1–12. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. (2014). Social context, style, and identity in sociolinguistics. In Holmes, J. & Hazen, K., eds., Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 290–303.Google Scholar
De Decker, P. (2010). Sounds shifty: Gender and age differences in perceptual categorization during a phonetic change in progress. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 15(2), 50–60.Google Scholar
De Decker, P. & Mackenzie, S. (2017). Tracking the phonological status of /l/ in Newfoundland English: Experiments in articulation and acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(350), 350–62. doi.org/10.1121/1.4991349.Google Scholar
De Decker, P. & Nycz, J. (2012). Are tense [æ]s really tense? The mapping between articulation and acoustics. Lingua, 122(7), 810–21. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.003.Google Scholar
De Decker, P. & Nycz, J. (2013). The technology of conducting sociolinguistic interviews. In Mallinson, C., Childs, B. & Van Herk, G., eds., Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 118–26.Google Scholar
DiPaolo, M. & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2011). Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, A. (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(2), 241–56. doi.org/10.1111/josl.12115.Google Scholar
D’Onofrio, A. (2016). Social Meaning in Linguistic Perception. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Docherty, G., Langstrof, C. & Foulkes, P. (2013). Listener evaluation of sociophonetic variability: Probing constraints and capabilities. Linguistics, 51(2), 355–80. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013–0014.Google Scholar
Docherty, G., Foulkes, P., Gonzalez, S. & Mitchell, N. (2018). Missed connections at the junction of sociolinguistics and speech processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 759–74. doi.org/10.1111/tops.12375.Google Scholar
Drager, K. (2010). Sensitivity to grammatical and sociophonetic variability in perception. Laboratory Phonology, 1(1), 93–120. doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.006.Google Scholar
Drager, K. (2011). Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech, 54(1), 99–121. doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388017.Google Scholar
Drager, K. (2018). Experimental Research Methods in Sociolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Drager, K., Hay, J. & Walker, A. (2010). Pronounced rivalries: Attitudes and speech perception. Te Reo, 53, 27–53.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–76. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2008.00374.x.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611–145828.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. & Labov, W. (2017). Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(4), 467–96. doi.org/10.1111/josl.12244.Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F. & Konopcznski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(5), 1276–93. doi.org/10.1037/0096–1523.32.5.1276.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 409–38. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. & Watt, D. (1999). Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences 99, San Francisco, pp. 1625–8.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., Scobbie, J. M. & Watt, D. J. L. (2010). Sociophonetics. In Hardcastle, W., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F., eds., Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 703–54.Google Scholar
Fridland, V. & Kendall, T. (2012). Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of US English. Lingua, 122(7), 779–93. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.007.Google Scholar
German, J. S., Carlson, K & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2013). Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3/4), 228–48. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.001.Google Scholar
Gooskens, C., Heeringa, W. & Beijering, K. (2008). Phonetic and lexical predictors of intelligibility. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2(1–2), 63–81. doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000317.Google Scholar
Gordon, E., Campbell, L., Hay, J., Maclagan, M., Sudbury, A. & Trudgill, P. (2004). New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gratton, C. (2017). Non-binary identity construction and intraspeaker variation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Austin, TX, 7 January.Google Scholar
Guy, G. R. (1991). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change, 3(2), 223–39. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000533.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, L. (2013). ‘Flip-flop’ and mergers-in-progress. English Language and Linguistics, 17(2), 359–90. doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000063.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, L. & Fix, S. (2012). Perceptual coding reliability of (L)-vocalization in casual speech data. Lingua, 122(7), 794–809. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.005.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, L. & Plichta, B. (2013). Technological challenges in sociolinguistic data collection. In Mallinson, C., Childs, B. & Van Herk, G., eds., Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 127–30.Google Scholar
Hardeman Guthrie, K. (2016). Gender and second language style: American learner perceptions of Mandarin sajiao. Asia Pacific Language Variation, 2(2), 157–87. doi.org/10.1075/aplv.2.2.03har.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 30(1/2), 63–78. doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300006666.Google Scholar
Hay, J. & Drager, K. (2007). Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 89–103. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120633.Google Scholar
Hay, J. & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–92. doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.027.Google Scholar
Hay, J. & Foulkes, P. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language, 92(2), 298–330. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0036.Google Scholar
Hay, J., Warren, P. & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–84. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K. A., Jany, C. & Silva, W. (2017). Introduction: Documenting variation in endangered languages. Language Documentation & Conservation, 13, 1–5. hdl.handle.net/10125/24746.Google Scholar
Holliday, N. (2016). Identity performance among Black/biracial men through intonation: Examining pitch accent and peak delay. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 22(2), 71–80.Google Scholar
Holliday, N. (2017). ‘My presiden(t) and firs(t) lady were Black’: Style, context, and coronal stop deletion in the speech of Barack and Michelle Obama. American Speech, 92(4), 459–86. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–6903954.Google Scholar
Holmquist, J. C. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a Spanish village. Language in Society, 14(2), 192–203. doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001112X.Google Scholar
Huettig, F., Rommers, J. & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–71. doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, E. & Fox, R. A. (2012). The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), 1413–33. doi.org/10.1121/1.3676603.Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1983). Sound change in perception and production. Language, 59(1), 18–34. doi.org/10.2307/414059.Google Scholar
Janson, T. & Schulman, R. (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 321–36. doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007763.Google Scholar
Kendall, T. (2013). Speech Rate, Pause, and Sociolinguistic Variation: Studies in Corpus Sociophonetics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kettig, T. & Winter, B. (2017). Producing and perceiving the Canadian Vowel Shift: Evidence from a Montreal community. Language Variation and Change, 29(1), 79–100. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000023.Google Scholar
Khattab, G. (2013). Phonetic convergence and divergence strategies in English–Arabic bilingual children. Linguistics, 51(2), 439–72. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013–0017.Google Scholar
Kiesling, S. F. (2009). Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In Jaffe, A., ed., Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–94.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Drager, K. (2017). Sociophonetic realizations guide subsequent lexical access. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2017, pp. 621–25. doi.org/10.21437/INTERSPEECH.2017–1742.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Drager, K. (2018). Rapid influence of word-talker associations on lexical access. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 775–86. doi.org/10.1111/tops.12351.Google Scholar
Kirtley, M. J. (2015). Language, Identity, and Non-Binary Gender in Hawaiʻi. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, D. F., Weatherholtz, K. & Jaeger, T. F. (2018). Sociolinguistic perception as inference under uncertainty, Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 818–34. doi.org/10.1111/tops.12331.Google Scholar
Koops, C., Gentry, E. & Pantos, A. (2008). The effect of perceived speaker age on the perception of PIN and PEN vowels in Houston, Texas. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 93–101.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19(3), 273–309. doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45(4), 715–62. doi.org/10.2307/412333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2006) [1966]. The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Report on National Science Foundation Contract NSF-GS-3287.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S. & Boberg, C. (2006). Atlas of North American English: Phonology and Phonetics. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T. & Nagy, N. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 431–63. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2011.00504.x.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Rosenfelder, I. & Fruehwald, J. (2013). One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language, 89(1), 30–65. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0015.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 98–104. doi.org/10.1121/1.1908694.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. doi.org/10.1037/h0044430.Google Scholar
Lawson, E., Scobbie, J. M. & Stuart-Smith, J. (2011). The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 256–68. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2011.00464.x.Google Scholar
Leemann, A. (2017). Analyzing geospatial variation in articulation rate using crowdsourced speech data. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 4(2), 76–96. doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2016.11.Google Scholar
Leemann, A., Kolly, M. J. & Britain, D. (2016). English Dialects, iPhone app. Accessed 28 June 2017 from itunes.apple.com/us/app/english-dialects/id882340404?mt=8.Google Scholar
Lev-Ari, S. & Peperkamp, S. (2014). An experimental study of the role of social factors in language change: The case of loanword adaptations. Laboratory Phonology, 5(3), 379–401. doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014–0013.Google Scholar
Levon, E. (2007). Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society, 36, 533–54. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070431.Google Scholar
Levon, E. (2014). Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society, 43(5), 539–66. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000554.Google Scholar
Llamas, C. & Watt, D. (2014). Scottish, English, British? Innovations in attitude measurement. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(11), 610–17. doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12109.Google Scholar
Llamas, C., Watt, D. & Johnson, D. E. (2009). Linguistic accommodation and the salience of national identity markers in a border town. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 381–407. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09341962.Google Scholar
Llompart, M. & Simonet, M. (2018). Unstressed vowel reduction across Majorcan Catalan dialects: Production and spoken word recognition. Language and Speech, 61(3), 430–65. doi.org/10.1177/0023830917736019.Google Scholar
Maegaard, M. (2010). Linguistic practice and stereotypes among Copenhagen adolescents. In Quist, P. & Svendsen, B. A., eds., Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
Mallinson, C., Childs, B. & Van Herk, G. (2013). Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCloy, D. (2016). phonR: Tools for phoneticians and phonologists, R-package version 1.0–7.Google Scholar
McGowan, K. (2011). The Role of Socioindexical Expectation in Speech Perception. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
McGowan, K. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 1–20. doi.org/10.1177/0023830914565191.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, N. (2008). Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meyerhoff, M. (2017). Writing a linguistic symphony: Analyzing variation while doing language documentation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 62(4), 525–49. doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.28.Google Scholar
Mielke, J. (2015). An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 2858–69. doi.org/10.1121/1.4919346.Google Scholar
Mielke, J., Carignan, C. & Thomas, E. R. (2017). The articulatory dynamics of pre-velar and pre-nasal /æ/-raising in English: An ultrasound study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(1), 332–49. doi.org/10.1121/1.4991348.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1978). Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Trudgill, P., ed., Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar
Mougeon, R. & Nadasdi, T. (1998). Sociolinguistic discontinuity in minority language communities. Language 74(1), 40–55. doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0077.Google Scholar
Munson, B. (2011). The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), 2631–4. doi.org/10.1121/1.3641410.Google Scholar
Nagy, N. (2017). Documenting variation in (endangered) heritage languages: How and why? Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication, 13, 33–64. hdl.handle.net/10125/24748.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–85. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001005.Google Scholar
Nycz, J. (2015). Second dialect acquisition: A sociophonetic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(11), 469–82. doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12163.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. S. (2012). Reflections on phonetic convergence: Speech perception does not mirror speech production. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(12), 753–67. doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.367.Google Scholar
Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J. S. & Kristiansen, T. (2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society, 43(1), 1–31. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000857.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2006). The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics, 34(6), 516–30. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.06.003.Google Scholar
Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E. et al. (2007). Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech, 2nd release, Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University. www.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu/.Google Scholar
Podesva, R. J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(4), 478–504. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2007.00334.x.Google Scholar
Podesva, R. J. (2011). Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(3), 233–64. doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405161.Google Scholar
Purnell, T., Idsardi, W. & Baugh, J. (1999). Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 10–30. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001002.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. R. & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee- and topic- influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E., eds., Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–76.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511–31.Google Scholar
Scanlon, M. & Wassink, A. B. (2010). African American English in urban Seattle: Accommodation and intraspeaker variation in the Pacific Northwest. American Speech, 85(2), 205–24. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–2010-011.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, N. (2004). Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(2), 163–95. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2004.00257.x.Google Scholar
Schüppert, A., Hilton, N. H. & Gooskens, C. (2015). Swedish is beautiful, Danish is ugly? Investigating the link between language attitudes and spoken word recognition. Linguistics, 53(2), 375–403. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015–0003.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. M., Lawson, E. & Stuart-Smith, J. (2012). Back to front: A socially-stratified ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish English /u/. Rivista di Linguistica/Italian Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 103–48.Google Scholar
Sonderegger, M., Bane, M. & Graff, P. (2017). The medium-term dynamics of accents, on reality television. Language, 93(3), 598–640. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0038.Google Scholar
Sóskuthy, M. (2017). Generalised Additive Mixed Models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: A practical introduction. arxiv.org/abs/1703.05339.Google Scholar
Staum Casasanto, L., Jasmin, K. & Casasanto, D. (2010). Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R., eds., Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 127–32.Google Scholar
Strand, E. & Johnson, K. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In Gibbon, D., ed. Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 14–26.Google Scholar
Sumner, M. & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501. doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001.Google Scholar
Szakay, A. (2012). Voice quality as a marker of ethnicity in New Zealand: From acoustics to perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(3), 382–97. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2012.00537.x.Google Scholar
Szakay, A., Babel, M. & King, J. (2016). Social categories are shared across bilinguals’ lexicons. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 92–109. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.005.Google Scholar
Tamminga, M. (2014). Persistence in the Production of Linguistic Variation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Tamminga, M. (2017). Matched guise effects can be robust to speech style. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Express Letters, 142(1), EL18–EL23. doi.org/10.1121/1.4990399.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. (1997). A rural/metropolitan split in the speech of Texas Anglos. Language Variation and Change, 9(3), 309–32. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001940.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. (2000). Spectral differences in /ai/ offsets conditioned by voicing of the following consonant. Journal of Phonetics, 28(1), 1–25. doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0103.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. (2002). Instrumental phonetics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N., eds., The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 168–200.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite, ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Hofwegen, J. (2017). Everyday Styles: Investigating the Full Scope of Variation in the Life of an Individual Speaker. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Vaux, B. & Golder, S. (2003). The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.Google Scholar
Walker, A. & Campbell-Kibler, K. (2015). Repeat after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(546), 1–18. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546.Google Scholar
Walker, A. & Hay, J. (2011). Congruence between ‘word age’ and ‘voice age’ facilitates lexical access. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 219–37. doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.007.Google Scholar
Walker, A., Hay, J., Drager, K. & Sanchez, K. (2017). Divergence in speech perception. Linguistics, 56(1), 257–78. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017–0036.Google Scholar
Warren, P. (2014). Sociophonetic and prosodic influences on judgments of sentence types. In Hay, J. & Parnell, E., eds., Proceedings of the 15th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Christchurch: ASSTA, pp. 185–8.Google Scholar
Wassink, A. B. (2015). Sociolinguistic patterns in Seattle English. Language Variation and Change, 27(1), 31–58. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000234.Google Scholar
Watson, K. & Clark, L. (2015). Exploring listeners’ real-time reactions to regional accents. Language Awareness, 24(1), 38–59. doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.882346.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1954). Is a structural dialectology possible? Word, 10(2–3), 388–400. doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659535.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wieling, M., Tomaschek, F., Arnold, D., Tiede, M., Bröker, F., Thiele, S. et al. (2016). Investigating dialectal differences using articulography. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 122–43. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.004.Google Scholar
Willis, C. (1972). Perception of vowel phonemes in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, and Buffalo, New York: An application of synthetic vowel categorization tests to dialectology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 15(2), 246–55. dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1502.246.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1969). A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro English. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M. & Thomas, E. R. (2009). African American English Speakers and Their Participation in Local Sound Changes: A Comparative Study. Publication of the American Dialect Society (PADS) 94(1). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi.org/10.1215/-94–1-1.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M., Takano, S., Granadillo, T. & Hall-Lew, L. (2011). The sociophonetics of prosodic contours on NEG in three language communities: Teasing apart sociolinguistic and phonetic influences on speech. In Preston, D. & Niedzielski, N., eds., Sociophonetic Reader. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 133–76.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431–66. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050153.Google Scholar
Zimman, L. (2017). Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society, 46(3), 339–70. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000070.Google Scholar
23.7 References
Adriaans, F. & Kager, R. (2010). Adding generalization to statistical learning: the induction of phonotactics from continuous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 311–31.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (1997). A Constraint-Based Account of Syllable Onsets: Evidence from Developing Systems. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Baum, S. R. & McNutt, J. C. (1990). An acoustic analysis of frontal misarticulation of /s/ in children. Journal of Phonetics, 18(1), 51–63.Google Scholar
Becker, M. & Tessier, A.-M. (2011). Trajectories of faithfulness in child-specific phonology. Phonology, 28(2), 163–96.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. H., Bacsfalvi, P., Gick, B., Radanov, B. & Williams, R. (2005). Exploring the use of electropalatography and ultrasound in speech habilitation. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology/Revue d’orthophonie et d’audiologie, 29(4), 169–82.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. H. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1996). Underspecification and markedness in normal and disordered phonological development. In Johnson, C. E. & Gilbert, J. H. V., eds., Children’s Language: Volume 9. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
Bosma, J. F. (1975). Anatomic and physiologic development of the speech apparatus. In Tower, D. B., ed., The Nervous System, vol. 3. New York: Raven Press, pp. 469–81.Google Scholar
Crelin, E. S. (1987). The Human Vocal Tract: Anatomy, Function, Development, and Evolution. New York: Vantage Press.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K., eds., From Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 171–84.Google Scholar
Deville, G. (1891). Notes sur le développement du langage II. Revue de Linguistique et de Philologie Comparée, 24, 10–42, 128–43, 242–57, 300–20.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. (1996). Context effects in the acquisition of fricatives. In Bernhardt, B. H., Gilbert, J. & Ingram, D., eds., Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 136–48.Google Scholar
Dinnsen, D. A. & Gierut, J. A., eds. (2008). Optimality Theory, Phonological Acquisition and Disorders, London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Fourakis, M., Beckman, M. E. & Fox, R. A. (1999). Characterizing knowledge deficits in phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(1),169–86.Google Scholar
Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K. & Benito-Garcia, C. R. (1984). The acquisition of voicing contrasts in Spanish and English learning infants and children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language, 11, 313–36.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 66(6.2), 103–14.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Fricatives in child language acquisition. In Honsa, V. & Hardman-de-Bautista, M. J., eds., Papers on Linguistics and Child Language, vol. 6. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 93–115.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51, 419–39.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. (1994). On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Fikkert, P. & Levelt, C. (2008). How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children’s developing grammars. In Avery, P., Dresher, B. E. & Rice, K., eds., Contrast in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231–68.Google Scholar
Fletcher, P. (1992). Language development from two to three. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6(4), 329–30.Google Scholar
Fletcher, S. G. (1973). Maturation of the speech mechanism. Folia Phoniatrica, 25, 161–72.Google Scholar
Fletcher, S. G. (1989). Palatometric specification of stop, affricate, and sibilant sounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32, 736–48.Google Scholar
Forrest, K., Weismer, G., Hodge, M., Dinnsen, D. A. & Elbert, M. (1990). Statistical analysis of word-initial /k/ and /t/ produced by normal and phonologically disordered children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 4(4), 327–40.Google Scholar
Freitas, M. J. (2003). The acquisition of onset clusters in European Portuguese. Probus, 15, 27–46.Google Scholar
Gibbon, F. E. (1999). Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/ phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(2), 382.Google Scholar
Gibbon, F. E., Hardcastle, B. & Dent, H. (1995). A study of obstruent sounds in school-age children with speech disorders using electropalatography. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 30(2), 213–25.Google Scholar
Gick, B., Allen, B., Roewer-Després, F. & Stavness, I. (2017). Speaking tongues are actively braced. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(3), 494–506.Google Scholar
Gnanadesikan, A. E. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W., eds., Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar
Goad, H. (1997). Consonant harmony in child language: An optimality-theoretic account. In Hannahs, S. J. & Young-Sholten, M., eds., Focus on Phonological Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113–42.Google Scholar
Goad, H. (2001). Assimilation phenomena and initial constraint ranking in early grammars. In Do, A. H.-J., Domínguez, L. & Johansen, A., eds., Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 307–18.Google Scholar
Goad, H. & Rose, Y. (2004). Input elaboration, head faithfulness and evidence for representation in the acquisition of left-edge clusters in West Germanic. In Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W., eds., Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–57.Google Scholar
Green, J. R., Moore, C. A., Higashikawa, M. & Steeve, R. W. (2000). The physiologic development of speech motor control: Lip and jaw coordination. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 239–55.Google Scholar
Gulian, M. & Levelt, C. (2009). An acoustic analysis of child language productions with reduced clusters. In Chandlee, J., Franchini, M., Lord, S. & Rheiner, M., eds., BUCLD Online Proceedings Supplement. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Gulian, M. & Levelt, C. (2011). Temporal measures of reduced/sC/-clusters in toddler speech: Evidence for a detailed lexical specification. In Online Proceedings ICPhS XVII Hong Kong. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Gulian/Gulian.pdf.Google Scholar
Hale, M. & Reiss, C. (1998). Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(4), 656–83.Google Scholar
Hall, P. K., Jordan, L. S. & Robin, D. A. (1993). Developmental Apraxia of Speech: Theory and Clinical Practice. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, W. J., Morgan Barry, R. A. & Clark, C. J. (1987). An instrumental phonetic study of lingual activity in articulation-disordered children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(2), 171–84.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. & Wilson, C. (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(3), 379–440.Google Scholar
Hewlett, N. (1988). Acoustic properties of /k/ and /t/ in normal and phonologically disordered speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2(1), 29–45.Google Scholar
Howard, S. J. (1998). Phonetic Constraints on Phonological Systems: Combining Perceptual and Instrumental Analysis in the Investigation of Speech Disorders. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language, 1, 49–64.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (1989). First Language Acquisition: Method, Description, and Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. (2004). The representation of voice and contrasts in children’s early phonological systems. Folia Linguistica, 38(1–2), 145–55.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. & Rose, Y. (2003). Velar fronting revisited. In Beachley, B., Brown, A. & Conlin, F., eds., Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 334–45.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. & Rose, Y. (2007). Positional neutralization: A case study from child language. Language, 83(4), 707–36.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C., eds., Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
Kewley-Port, D. & Preston, M. S. (1974). Early apical stop production: A voice onset time analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 2(3), 195–210.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P. K., Ramírez, R. R., Bosseler, A., Lin, J.-F. L. & Imada, T. (2014). Infants’ brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(31), 11238–45.Google Scholar
Levelt, C. & van Oostendorp, M. (2007). Feature co-occurrence constraints in L1 acquisition. In Los, B. & van Koppen, M., eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 2007, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 162–72.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. A., Freebairn, L. A., Hansen, A. J., Iyengar, S. K. & Taylor, H. G. (2004). School-age follow-up of children with childhood apraxia of speech. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(2), 122–40.Google Scholar
Li, F. (2012). Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: A cross-language acoustic study. Child Development, 83(4), 1303–15.Google Scholar
Li, F., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2009). Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 37(1), 111–24.Google Scholar
Li, F., Munson, B., Edwards, J., Yoneyama, K. & Hall, K. (2011). Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: Implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(2), 999–1011.Google Scholar
Lin, S. & Demuth, K. (2015). Children’s acquisition of English onset and coda /l/: Articulatory evidence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(1), 13.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. & Mielke, J. (2008). Discovering place and manner features: What can be learned from acoustic and articulatory data. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14(1), 19.Google Scholar
Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 7, 41–74.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G., Dugas, C., Liske, D. & Eickmeier, B. (1987). Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitts’ Task: implications for control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(4), 629–47.Google Scholar
MacNeilage, P. F. & Davis, B. L. (1990). Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In Jeannerod, M., ed., Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 453–76.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2020). The TalkBank Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk – Electronic Edition. Part 1: The CHAT Transcription Format, Retrieved from https://talkbank.org/manuals/CHAT.pdf.Google Scholar
Majorano, M., Vihman, M. M. & DePaolis, R. A. (2013). The relationship between infants’ production experience and their processing of speech. Language Learning and Development, 10(2), 179–204.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. & Chiat, S. (2003). A foot domain account of prosodically-conditioned substitutions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(8), 645–57.Google Scholar
McAllister Byun, T. (2009). The Articulatory Basis of Positional Asymmetries in Phonological Acquisition (Ph.D. Dissertation), Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
McAllister Byun, T. (2012). Positional velar fronting: An updated articulatory account. Journal of Child Language, 39(5), 1043–76.Google Scholar
McAllister Byun, T. & Tessier, A.-M. (2016). Motor influences on grammar in an emergentist model of phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(9), 431–52.Google Scholar
McAllister Byun, T., Inkelas, S. & Rose, Y. (2016). The A-map Model: Articulatory reliability in child-specific phonology. Language, 92(1), 141–78.Google Scholar
McCune, L. & Vihman, M. M. (2001). Early phonetic and lexical development: A productivity approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(3), 670–84.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. & Crowe, K. (2018). Children’s consonant acquisition in 27 languages: A cross-linguistic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(4), 1546–71.Google Scholar
McLeod, S., van Doorn, J. & Reed, V. A. (1998). Homonyms in children’s productions of consonant clusters. In Ziegler, W. & Deger, K., eds., Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Whurr Publishers, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., McAllister, L. & McCormack, J. (2013). Speech sound disorders in a community study of preschool children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(3), 503.Google Scholar
Morrisette, M. L., Dinnsen, D. A. & Gierut, J. A. (2003). Markedness and context effects in the acquisition of place features. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48(3/4), 329–55.Google Scholar
Munson, B., Edwards, J., Schellinger, S., Beckman, M. E. & Meyer, M. K. (2010). Deconstructing phonetic transcription: Language-specificity, covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of vox humana. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24, 245–60.Google Scholar
Munson, B., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2011). Phonological representations in language acquisition: climbing the ladder of abstraction. In Cohn, A. C., Fougeron, C. & Huffman, M. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford University Press, pp. 288–309.Google Scholar
Nam, H., Goldstein, L. M., Giulivi, S., Levitt, A. G. & Whalen, D. H. (2013). Computational simulation of CV combination preferences in babbling. Journal of Phonetics, 41(2), 63–77.Google Scholar
Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition, 6(3), 201–53.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 115–54.Google Scholar
Priestly, T. M. S. (1977). One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language, 4, 45–65.Google Scholar
Pye, C., Ingram, D. & List, H. (1987). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. In Nelson, K. E. & van Kleeckl, A., eds., Children’s Language, vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar
Richtsmeier, P. T. (2010). Child phoneme errors are not substitutions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 33(1).Google Scholar
Rose, Y. (2000). Headedness and Prosodic Licensing in the L1 Acquisition of Phonology. PhD dissertation, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. (2003). Place specification and segmental distribution in the acquisition of word-final consonant syllabification. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48(3/4), 409–35.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. (2014). The emergence of first language phonology: Perception, articulation and representation. In Costa, J., Fiéis, A., Freitas, M. J., Lobo, M. & Santos, A. L., eds., New Directions in the Acquisition of Romance Languages: Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn V. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. (2017). Child phonology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. http://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-150.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. & Inkelas, S. (2011). The interpretation of phonological patterns in first language acquisition. In Ewen, C. J., Hume, E., van Oostendorp, M. & Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2414–38.Google Scholar
Rose, Y. & MacWhinney, B. (2014). The PhonBank Project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In Durand, J., Gut, U. & Kristoffersen, G., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 380–401.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. M., Gibbon, F. E., Hardcastle, W. J. & Fletcher, P. (1996). Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. In Broe, M. B. & Pierrehumbert, J. B., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L. (1979). A phonetic analysis of consonantal devoicing in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 6(1), 19–28.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1973). The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stoehr, A., Benders, T., Hell, J. G. V. & Fikkert, P. (2018). Heritage language exposure impacts voice onset time of Dutch–German simultaneous bilingual preschoolers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 598–617.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (1996). On the acquisition of velars in English. In Bernhardt, B. H., Gilbert, J. & Ingram, D., eds., Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–71.Google Scholar
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Stemberger, J. P. (1994). Consonant harmony and underspecification in child phonology. In Yavas, M., ed., First and Second Language Phonology. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar
Stone, M. (2005). A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(6–7), 455–501.Google Scholar
Stone, M., Faber, A., Raphael, L. J. & Shawker, T. H. (1992). Cross-sectional tongue shape and linguopalatal contact patterns in [s], [ʃ], and [l]. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 253–70.Google Scholar
Velleman, S. L. (1996). Metathesis highlights feature-by-position constraints. In Bernhardt, B. H., Gilbert, J. & Ingram, D., eds., Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 173–86.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. (2014). Phonological Development: The First Two Years, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M. & Croft, W. (2007). Phonological development: toward a ‘radical’ templatic phonology. Linguistics, 45(4), 683–725.Google Scholar
Vorperian, H. K., Kent, R. D., Gentry, L. R. & Yandell, B. S. (1999). Magnetic resonance imaging procedures to study the concurrent anatomic development of vocal tract structures: Preliminary results. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 49(3), 197–206.Google Scholar
Vorperian, H. K., Kent, R. D., Lindstrom, M. J., Kalina, C. M., Gentry, L. R. & Yandell, B. S. (2005). Development of vocal tract during early childhood: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(1), 338–50.Google Scholar
Warner, N., Jongman, A., Sereno, J., Kemps, R. (2004). Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 251–76.Google Scholar
Weismer, G., Dinnsen, D. & Elbert, M. (1981). A study of the voicing distinction associated with omitted, word-final stops. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 46(3), 320–8.Google Scholar
Werker, J. F. & Curtin, S. (2005). PRIMIR: A developmental framework of infant speech processing. Language Learning and Development, 1(2), 197–234.Google Scholar
Yu, A. C. L. (2007). Understanding near mergers: The case of morphological tone in Cantonese. Phonology, 24(01), 187–14.Google Scholar
Zharkova, N., Hewlett, N. & Hardcastle, W. J. (2011). Coarticulation as an indicator of speech motor control development in children: an ultrasound study. Motor Control, 15(1), 118–40.Google Scholar
24.7 References
Armstrong, S. & Ainley, M. (2012). South Tyneside Assessment of Phonology – 2, St Mabyn: Stass Publications.Google Scholar
American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) (2007). Technical Report: Childhood Apraxia of Speech. www.asha.org/policy/TR2007-00278/www.rcslt.org/-/media/Project/RCSLT/curriculum-guidance-2018.pdf, last accessed 25 September 2020.Google Scholar
American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) (2016). Standards and Implementation Procedures for the Certificate of Clinical Competence in Speech-Language Pathology. www.asha.org/Certification/2014-Speech-Language-Pathology-Certification-Standards/, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
Balata, P. M. M, da Silva, H. J., de Moraes, K. J. R., de Araújo Pernambuco, L. & de Moraes, S. R. A. (2013). Use of surface electromyography in phonation studies: An integrative review. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 17(3), 329–39.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. (2008). Transcribing disordered speech: By target or by production? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22(10–11), 864–70.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. (2016). Principles of Clinical Phonology: Theoretical Approaches, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. (2017). Transcribing rhotics in normal and disordered speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(10), 806–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1326169.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. & Gibbon, F. E., eds. (2013). Handbook of Vowels and Vowel Disorders, Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. & Kent, R. D. (1987). Editorial. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. & Müller, N. (2002). The use of the terms phonetics and phonology in the transcription of disordered speech. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 95–108.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. & Müller, N. (2005). Phonetics for Communication Disorders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. & Müller, N. (2007). Non-pulmonic egressive speech sounds in disordered speech: A brief review. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21, 869–74.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Esling, J. and Dickson, C. (2018). Revisions to the VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 28(2), 165–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100317000159.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Howard, S. J. & Miller, K. (2018). Revisions to the extIPA chart. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 48(2), 155–64.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Müller, N. & Rutter, B. (2010). Phonology for Communication Disorders. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Howard, S., Müller, N. & Granese, A. (2013). Data processing: Transcriptional and impressionistic methods. In Müller & Ball, eds., pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Müller, N., Klopfenstein, M. & Rutter, B. (2010). My client is using non-English sounds! A tutorial in advanced phonetic transcription part II: Vowels and diacritics. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 37, 103–10.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Müller, N., Rutter, B. & Klopfenstein, M. (2009). My client is using non-English sounds! A tutorial in advanced phonetic transcription part I: Consonants. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 36, 133–41.Google Scholar
Banjara, H., Mungutwar, V., Singh, D. & Gupta, A. (2014). Objective and subjective evaluation of larynx in smokers and nonsmokers: A comparative study. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 66(Suppl1), S99-S109.Google Scholar
Bauman-Waengler, J. (2012). Articulatory and Phonological Impairments: A Clinical Focus, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Bowen, C. (2015). Children’s Speech Sound Disorders, 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). NIOSH Hearing Loss Simulator. [Computer program] Version 3.0.1215.1 www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/works/coversheet1820.html, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
Chapman, K. L. & Willadsen, E. (2011). The development of speech in children with cleft palate. In Howard, S. & Lohmander, A., eds., Cleft Palate Speech: Assessment and Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 23–40.Google Scholar
Ciocca, V. & Whitehill, T. L. (2013). The acoustic measurement of vowels. In Ball & Gibbon, eds., pp. 113–37.Google Scholar
Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. & Zharkova, N. (2016). Insights from ultrasound: Enhancing our understanding of clinical phonetics. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(3–5), 171–3.Google Scholar
CompleteSpeech. (2016). SmartPalate system. http://completespeech.com/smartpalate/, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
Constantinescu, G., Theodoros, D., Russell, T., Ward, E., Wilson, S. & Wootton, R. (2011). Treating disordered speech and voice in Parkinson’s disease online: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46, 1–16.Google Scholar
Diehl, J. J. & Paul, R. (2013). Acoustic and perceptual measurements of prosody production on the profiling elements of prosodic systems in children by children with autism spectrum disorders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(1), 135–61.Google Scholar
Dodd, B. (2005). Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Children with Speech Disorder, 2nd ed. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Dodd, B., Crosbie, S., Zhu, H., Holm, A. & Ozanne, A. (2002). Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP). London: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Dodd, B., Holm, A., Crosbie, S. & McIntosh, B. (2010). Core vocabulary intervention. In Williams, A. L., McLeod, S. & McCauley, R. J., eds., Interventions for Speech Sound Disorders in Children. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes, pp. 117–36.Google Scholar
Duckworth, M., Allen, G., Hardcastle, W. & Ball, M. J. (1990). Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet for the transcription of atypical speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 4, 273–80.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. R. (2013). Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, Differential Diagnosis and Management, 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, L. S., Hammes Ganguly, D., Johnson, K. C., Martinez, A. S. & Wang, N.-Y. (2015). Speech recognition skills of children with cochlear implants. In Huntley Bahr, R. & Silliman, E. R., eds., Routledge Handbook of Communication Disorders. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 134–44.Google Scholar
Elsendoorn, B. A. G., Gerrits, E. & Peeters, W. J. M. (1999). Durations and formant frequencies of diphthongs by hearing and deaf speakers. In Maasen, B. & Groenen, P., eds., Pathologies of Speech and Language: Advances in Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Whurr, pp. 169–77.Google Scholar
Enderby, P. & Palmer, R. (2008). Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment (FDA-2), 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-ED.Google Scholar
Etz, T., Reetz, H. & Wegener, C. (2012). A classification model for infant cries with hearing impairment and unilateral cleft lip and palate. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 64(5), 254–61.Google Scholar
Francisco, D. T. & Wertzner, H. F. (2017). Differences between the production of [s] and [ʃ] in the speech of adults, typically developing children, and children with speech sound disorders: An ultrasound study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(5), 375–90.Google Scholar
Frisch, S. A., Maxfield, N. & Belmont, A. (2016). Anticipatory coarticulation and stability of speech in typically fluent speakers and people who stutter. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(3–5), 277–91.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C. & Romani, C. (2015). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia, 71, 64–83.Google Scholar
Gates, R., Arick Forrest, L. & Obert, K. (2013). The Owner’s Manual to the Voice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ghio, A., Pouchoulin, G., Teston, B., Pinto, S., Fredouille, C., De Looze, C. et al. (2012). How to manage sound, physiological and clinical data of 2500 dysphonic and dysarthric speakers? Speech Communication, 54(5), 664–79.Google Scholar
Gibbon, F. E. & Lee, A. (2011). Articulation: Instruments for research and clinical practice. In Howard, S. & Lohmander, A., eds., Cleft Palate Speech: Assessment and Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 221–38.Google Scholar
Gibbon, F. E. & Lee, A. (2017). Electropalatographic (EPG) evidence of covert contrasts in disordered speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(1), 4–20.Google Scholar
Gibbon, F. E. & Wood, S. E. (2010). Visual feedback therapy with electropalatography. In Williams, A. L., McLeod, S. & McCauley, R. J., eds., Interventions for Speech Sound Disorders in Children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, pp. 509–36.Google Scholar
Gillam, S. L. & Gillam, R. B. (2016). An introduction to the discipline of communication sciences and disorders. In Gillam, R. B. & Marquardt, T. P., eds., Communication Sciences and Disorders. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Guitar, B. (2014). Stuttering: An Integrated Approach to Its Nature and Treatment, 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., de Riesthal, M., Abou-Khalil, R. & Roth, H. L. (2012). Towards a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, S1502–17.Google Scholar
Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., Richardson, J. D. & Wambaugh, J. L. (2017). Perceptually salient sound distortions and apraxia of speech: A performance continuum. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 631–40.Google Scholar
Harding, A. & Grunwell, P. (1998). Active versus passive cleft-type speech characteristics. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 33(3), 329–52.Google Scholar
Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC). (2013). Standards of Proficiency: Speech and Language Therapists. London: Health & Care Professions Council.Google Scholar
Hertrich, I. & Ackermann, H. (2013). Neurophonetics. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4, 191–200.Google Scholar
Heselwood, B. (2013). Phonetic Transcription in Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hong, K. H., Yang, W. S., Park, M. J., Oh, J. S. & Han, B. H. (2017). Changes in oral vowel sounds and hyoid bone movement after thyroidectomy. Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 10(2), 168–73.Google Scholar
Howard, S. (2011). Phonetic transcription for speech related to cleft palate. In Howard, S. & Lohmander, A., eds., Cleft Palate Speech: Assessment and Intervention. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 127–44.Google Scholar
Howard, S. (2013). A phonetic investigation of single word versus connected speech production in children with persisting speech difficulties relating to cleft palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 50(2), 207–23.Google Scholar
Howard, S. & Heselwood, B. (2002). Learning and teaching phonetic transcription for clinical purposes. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16(5), 371–401.Google Scholar
Howard, S. & Heselwood, B. (2011). Instrumental and perceptual phonetic analyses: The case for two-tier transcriptions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 940–8.Google Scholar
Howard, S. & Heselwood, B. (2013). The contribution of phonetics to the study of vowel development and disorders. In Ball & Gibbon, eds., pp. 61–112.Google Scholar
International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association (ICPLA). (1994). The extIPA chart. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 24, 85–8.Google Scholar
Jacks, A., Marquardt, T. P. & Davis, B. L. (2013). Vowel production in childhood and acquired apraxia of speech. In Ball & Gibbon, eds., pp. 326–46.Google Scholar
Katz, W. F., McNeil, M. R. & Garst, D. M. (2010). Treating apraxia of speech (AOS) with EMA-supplied visual augmented feedback. Aphasiology, 24(6–8), 826–37.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. (2011). The birth and growth of a scientific journal. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 917–21.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Vorperian, H. K. (2013). Speech impairment in Down syndrome: A review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 178–210.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A., Setter, J. E. & Cornelius, P. (2014). Articulatory phonetics. In Whitworth & Knight, eds., pp. 23–45.Google Scholar
Knight, R.-A., Bandali, C., Woodhead, C. & Vansadia, P. (2018). Clinician’s views of the training, use and maintenance of phonetic transcription in speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 53(4), 776–87.Google Scholar
Konstantopoulos, K., Christou, Y.-P., Vogazianos, P., Zamba-Papanicolaou, E. & Kleopa, K. A. (2017). A quantitative method for the assessment of dysarthrophonia in myasthenia gravis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 377, 42–6.Google Scholar
Kuruvilla, M. S., Green, J. R., Yunusova, Y. & Hanford, K. (2012). Spatiotemporal coupling of the tongue in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55, 1897–909.Google Scholar
Lee, A., Gibbon, F. E. & O’Donovan, C. (2013). Tongue-palate contact of perceptually acceptable alveolar stops. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(4), 312–21.Google Scholar
Lee, A., Zharkova, N. & Gibbon, F. E. (2013). Vowel imaging. In Ball & Gibbon, eds., pp. 138–59.Google Scholar
Lickley, R. J. (2015). Fluency and disfluency. In Redford, M. A., ed., The Handbook of Speech Production. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 445–74.Google Scholar
Mathieson, L. (2001). Greene & Mathieson’s The Voice and Its Disorders, 6th ed. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. (2011). Speech-language pathologists’ knowledge of tongue/palate contact for consonants. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 1004–13.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. & Baker, E. (2017). Children’s Speech: An Evidence-Based Approach to Assessment and Intervention. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
McLeod, S. & Singh, S. (2008). Speech Sounds: A Pictorial Guide to Typical and Atypical Speech. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.Google Scholar
Mildner, V. (2013). Experimental and quasi-experimental research in clinical linguistics and phonetics. In Müller & Ball, eds., pp. 28–47.Google Scholar
Müller, N. & Ball, M. J., eds. (2013). Research Methods in Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics: A Practical Guide. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. & Dodd, B. (2005). Hearing impairment. In Dodd, B., ed., Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Children with Speech Disorder, 2nd ed. London: Whurr, pp. 244–57.Google Scholar
Nakai, S., Beavan, D., Lawson, E., Laplâtre, G., Scobbie, J. M. & Stuart-Smith, J. (2018). Viewing speech in action: Speech articulation videos in the public domain that demonstrate the sounds of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 212–20.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, S. V. & Vishal, K. (2017). Spectral measures of hoarseness in persons with hyperfunctional voice disorder. Journal of Voice, 31(1), 57–61.Google Scholar
National Center for Voice and Speech. (2015). Check Your Meds: Do They Affect Your Voice? www.ncvs.org/rx.html, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
Nordberg, A., Miniscalco, C. & Lohmander, A. (2014). Consonant production and overall speech characteristics in school-aged children with cerebral palsy and speech impairment. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(4), 386–95.Google Scholar
Osberger, M. & McGarr, N. (1982). Speech production characteristics of the hearing impaired. In Lass, N., ed., Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Science and Research. New York: Academic Press, pp. 222–83.Google Scholar
Parker, A. (1999). PETAL: Phonological Transcription and Evaluation of Audio-Visual Language. Bicester: Winslow Press.Google Scholar
Peppé, S. & McCann, J. (2003). Assessing intonation and prosody in children with atypical language development: The PEPS-C test and the revised version. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17(4/5), 345–54.Google Scholar
Peterson-Falzone, S. J., Hardin-Jones, M. A. & Karnell, M. P. (2010). Cleft Palate Speech, 4th ed. Missouri, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
Pinto, S., Chan, A., Guimarães, I., Rothe-Neves, R. & Sadat, J. (2017). A cross-linguistic perspective to the study of dysarthria in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Phonetics, 64, 156–67.Google Scholar
Preston, J. L., McCabe, P., Rivera-Campos, A., Whittle, J. L., Landry, E. & Maas, E. (2014). Ultrasound visual feedback treatment and practice variability for residual speech sound errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 2102–15.Google Scholar
Rahilly, J. (2011). Transcribing speech: Practicalities, philosophies and prophesies. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 934–9.Google Scholar
Rahilly, J. (2013a). Data processing: Imaging of speech data. In Müller & Ball, eds., pp. 218–52.Google Scholar
Rahilly, J. (2013b). Vowel disorders in hearing impairment. In Ball & Gibbon, eds., pp. 364–85.Google Scholar
Ramírez, D. A. M., Jiménez, V. M. V., López, X. L. & Ysunza, P. A. (2018). Acoustic analysis of voice and electroglottography in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Journal of Voice, 32(3), 281–4.Google Scholar
Robb, M. P., Lynn, W. L. & O’Beirne, G. A. (2013). An exploration of dichotic listening among adults who stutter. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(9), 681–93.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. C., Mahurin, S. L. & Justus, B. (2011). Predicting difficulties in learning phonetic transcription: Phonemic awareness screening for beginning speech-language pathology students. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 38, 87–95.Google Scholar
Rose Medical Solutions Ltd. (2016). icSpeech Games. [Computer program] Version 1.6.4. www.rose-medical.com/speech-therapy-games.html, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists (RCSLT). (2011). RCSLT Policy Statement: Developmental Verbal Dyspraxia. London: Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists.Google Scholar
Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists (RCSLT). (2018). RCSLT Curriculum Guidance for the Pre-Registration Education Of Speech And Language Therapists. www.rcslt.org/-/media/Project/RCSLT/curriculum-guidance-2018.pdf, last accessed 25 September 2018.Google Scholar
Rutter, B., Klopfenstein, M., Ball, M. J. & Müller, N. (2010). My client is using non-English sounds! A tutorial in advanced phonetic transcription part III: Prosody and unattested sounds. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 37, 111–22.Google Scholar
Rutter, B., Ball, M. J. & Kroll, T. (2014). Interactional phonetics. In Ball, M. J., Müller, N. and Nelson, R. L., eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 311–28.Google Scholar
Schölderle, T., Staiger, A., Lampe, R., Strecker, K. & Ziegler, W. (2016). Dysarthria in adults with cerebral palsy: clinical presentation and impacts on communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 216–29.Google Scholar
Sell, D. (2005). Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: A review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 103–21.Google Scholar
Sell, D., Harding, A. & Grunwell, P. (1999). GOS.SP.ASS’98: An assessment for speech disorders associated with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (revised). International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 34, 17–33.Google Scholar
Shellikeri, S., Green, J. R., Kulkarni, M., Wong, P., Martino, R., Zinman, L. et al. (2016). Speech movement measures as markers of bulbar disease in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 887–99.Google Scholar
Shprintzen, R. J. (2015). Speech and language disorders in children with craniofacial malformations. In Huntley Bahr, R. & Silliman, E. R., eds., Routledge Handbook of Communication Disorders. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D. & Kent, R. D. (2013). Clinical Phonetics, 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Lewis, B. A., Tomblin, J. B., McSweeny, J. L., Karlsson, H. B. & Sheer, A. R. (2005). Towards diagnostic and phenotype markers for genetically transmitted speech delay. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(4), 834–52.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Fourakis, M., Hall, S. D., Karlsson, H. B., Lohmeier, H. L., McSweeny, J. L. et al. (2010). Extensions to the Speech Disorders Classification System (SDCS). Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24(10), 795–824.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., Lohmeier, H. L., Strand, E. A. & Jakielski, K. J. (2012). Encoding, memory, and transcoding deficits in childhood apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 26(5), 445–82.Google Scholar
Somanath, K. & Mau, T. (2016). A measure of the auditory-perceptual quality of strain from electroglottographic analysis of continuous dysphonic speech: Application to adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Journal of Voice, 30(6), 770.e9-21.Google Scholar
Souza, P. E., Wright, R. A., Blackburn, M. C., Tatman, R. & Gallun, F. J. (2015). Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 520–34.Google Scholar
Stackhouse, J. & Wells, B. (1997). Children’s Speech and Literacy Difficulties I: A Psycholinguistic Framework. London: Whurr.Google Scholar
St. Louis, K. O. & Schulte, K. (2011). Defining cluttering: The lowest common denominator. In Ward, D. & Scaler Scott, K., eds., Cluttering: A Handbook of Research, Intervention and Education. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 233–54.Google Scholar
Starr-Marshall, T., Martin, S. & Knight, R.-A. (2013). Clinical phonetics. In Jones, M. J. & Knight, R.-A., eds., Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 170–82.Google Scholar
Stojanovik, V. (2011). Prosodic deficits in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24(2), 145–55.Google Scholar
Stojanovik, V. & Setter, J. (2011). Speech Prosody in Atypical Populations. Guildford: J&R Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, A., Frazier, C. L., Kalinowski, J. & Vos, P. W. (2008). The effect of frequency altered feedback on stuttering duration and type. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, 889–97.Google Scholar
Tanner, D. & Culbertson, W. (1999). Quick Assessment for Dysarthria. Oceanside, CA: Academic Communication Associates.Google Scholar
Theodoros, D. (2011). Telerehabilitation and the assessment of motor speech disorders. In Lowit, A. & Kent, R. D., eds., Assessment of Motor Speech Disorders. Abingdon: Plural, pp. 175–92.Google Scholar
Timmins, C. (2017). Online video assessment of clinical phonetic transcription skills in speech and language pathology. In Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2017 (PTLC2017), London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Timmins, C., Hardcastle, W. J., Wood, S. & Cleland, J. (2011). An EPG analysis of /t/ in young people with Down’s syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 1022–7.Google Scholar
Titterington, J. & Bates, S. (2018). Practice makes perfect? The pedagogic value of online independent phonetic transcription practice for speech and language therapy students. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(3), 249–66.Google Scholar
Turgeon, C., Prémont, A., Trudeau-Fisette, P. & Ménard, L. (2015). Exploring consequences of short- and long-term deafness on speech production: A lip-tube perturbation study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29(5), 378–400.Google Scholar
UK and Ireland Child Speech Disorder Research Network. (2017). Good Practice Guidelines for Transcription of Children’s Speech Samples in Clinical Practice and Research. www.nbt.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/BSLTRU_Good%20practice%20guidelines_Transcription_2Ed_2017.pdf, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). World Population Ageing 2015 (ST/ESA/SER.A/390).Google Scholar
University of Sheffield. (2012). Learning the International Phonetic Alphabet. http://learnipa.group.shef.ac.uk/, last accessed 24 September 2020.Google Scholar
Vlot, C., Ogawa, M., Hosokawa, K., Iwahashi, T., Kato, C. & Inohara, H. (2017). Investigation of the immediate effects of humming on vocal fold vibration irregularity using electroglottography and high-speed laryngoscopy in patients with organic voice disorders. Journal of Voice, 31(1), 48–56.Google Scholar
Walsh, B. & Smith, A. (2013). Oral electromyography activation patterns for speech are similar in pre-schoolers who do and do not stutter. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1441–54.Google Scholar
Ward, D. (2017). Stuttering and Cluttering: Frameworks for Understanding and Treatment, 2nd ed. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wells, B. & Stackhouse, J. (2016). Children’s Intonation: A Framework for Practice and Research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Whitworth, N. & Knight, R.-A., eds. (2014). Methods in Teaching Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics. Guildford: J&R Press.Google Scholar
Wiklund, M. (2016). Interactional challenges in conversations with autistic preadolescents: The role of prosody and non-verbal communication in other-initiated repairs. Journal of Pragmatics, 94, 76–97.Google Scholar
Willey, J. M., Lim, Y. S. & Kwiatowski, T. (2018). Modeling integration: Co-teaching basic and clinical sciences medicine in the classroom. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 739–51.Google Scholar
Windsor, F. (2011). The broad or narrow way? Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Winter 2011, 14–16.Google Scholar
Zharkova, N., Gibbon, F. E. & Lee, A. (2017). Using ultrasound tongue imaging to identify covert contrasts in children’s speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
25.7 References
Aitken, C. & Taroni, F. (2004). Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alzqhoul, E. A. S., Nair, B. B. T. & Guillemin, B. J. (2015). Impact of dynamic rate coding aspects of mobile phone networks on forensic voice comparison. Science and Justice, 55(5), 363–74.Google Scholar
Atkinson, N. (2015). Variable Factors Affecting Voice Identification in Forensic Contexts, York, UK: University of York.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J., Howard, S. J. & Miller, K. (2018). Revisions to the extIPA chart. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 48, 155–64.Google Scholar
Berger, C. E. H., Buckleton, J., Champod, C., Evett, I. W. & Jackson, G. (2011). Evidence evaluation: A response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T. Science & Justice: Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 51(2), 43–9.Google Scholar
Blatchford, H. & Foulkes, P. (2006). Identification of voices in shouting. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13(2), 241–54.Google Scholar
Braun, A. (1994). The effect of cigarette smoking on vocal parameters. In Proceedings of the ESCA Workshop on Automatic Speaker Recognition, Identification, and Verification, Martigny, Switzerland, pp. 161–4.Google Scholar
Braun, A. (2016). The Speaker Identification Ability of Blind and Sighted Listeners: An Empirical Investigation. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Broeders, A. P. A. (1996). Earwitness identification: Common ground, disputed territory and uncharted areas. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Broeders, A. P. A. (1999). Some observations on the use of probability scales in forensic identification. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 6(2), 228–41.Google Scholar
Broeders, A. P. A. & van Amelsvoort, A. G. (1999). Lineup construction for forensic earwitness identification: A practical approach. In Ohala, J. J., Hasegawa, Y., Ohala, M., Granville, D. & Bailey, A. C., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco pp. 1373–6.Google Scholar
Broeders, A. & Rietveld, A. (1995). Speaker identification by earwitnesses. In Braun, A. & Köster, J.-P., eds., Studies in Forensic Phonetics, vol. 64. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 24–40.Google Scholar
Bull, R. & Clifford, B. R. (1984). Earwitness testimony: Psychological perspectives. In Wells, G. L. & Loftus, E. F., eds., Analysing Witness Testimony. London: Blackstone, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar
Bull, R. & Clifford, B. R. (1999). Earwitness testimony. In Heaton-Armstrong, A., Shepherd, E. & Wolchover, D., eds., Analysing Witness Testimony: A Guide for Legal Practitioners and Other Professionals. London: Blackstone, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2007). Current methods in forensic speaker identification: Results of a collaborative exercise. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14(2) 223–43.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2010). The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the determination of speaker origin. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(1), 67–93.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T., van Rossum, M. & Vermeulen, J. (2014). Whose voice is that? Challenges in forensic phonetics. In Caspers, J., Chen, Y., Heeren, W., Pacilly, J., Schiller, N. O & van Zanten, E., eds., Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental Linguistics and Phonetics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 14–27.Google Scholar
Champod, C. & Evett, I. W. (2000). Commentary on A. P. A. Broeders (1999) ‘Some observations on the use of probability scales in forensic identification.’ International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 7(2), 228–41.Google Scholar
Cook, S. & Wilding, J. (1997). Earwitness testimony: Never mind the variety, hear the length. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(2), 95–111.Google Scholar
de Jong, G., McDougall, K. & Nolan, F. (2007). Sound change and speaker identity: An acoustic study. In Müller, C., ed., Speaker Classification II: Selected Projects. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 130–41.Google Scholar
de Jong-Lendle, G., McDougall, K. & Hudson, T. (2015). Voice lineups: A practical guide. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015, Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. Paper number 0598, 0591–0595.Google Scholar
Deffenbacher, K. A., Cross, J. F., Handkins, R. E., Chance, J. E., Goldstein, A. G., Hammersley, R. et al. (1989). Relevance of voice identification research to criteria for evaluating reliability of an identification. The Journal of Psychology, 123(2), 109–19.Google Scholar
Dehak, N., Kenny, P., Dehak, R., Dumouchel, P. & Ouellet, P. (2011). Front-end factor analysis for speaker verification. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 19(4), 788–98.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. (1990). It’s getting rather serious … early speaker identification. In Kniffka, H., ed., Texte zu Theorie und Praxis Forensischer Linguistik, reprint 2010 ed. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 515–21.Google Scholar
Ellis, S. (1994). The Yorkshire Ripper enquiry: Part I. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 1(2), 197–206.Google Scholar
Fecher, N. & Watt, D. (2011). Speaking under cover. In Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, pp. 663–6.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & Barron, A. (2000). Telephone speaker recognition amongst members of a close social network. Forensic Linguistics, 7(2), 180–98.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & French, P. (2012). Forensic speaker comparison: A linguistic–acoustic perspective. In Tiersma, P., & Solan, L., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 557–72.Google Scholar
Fraser, H. (2014).Transcription of indistinct forensic recordings: Problems and solutions from the perspective of phonetic science. In Coulthard, M. & Sousa-Silva, R., eds., Language and law = Linguagem e direito, vol. 1(2). Porto: Universidade do Porto, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Fraser, H., Stevenson, B. & Marks, T. (2011). Interpretation of a crisis call: Persistence of a primed perception of a disputed utterance. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(2), 261–92.Google Scholar
French, J. P. (1990). Analytic procedure for the determination of disputed utterances. In Kniffka, H., ed., Texte zu Theorie und Praxis forensischer Linguistik. Tubingen: Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 201–13.Google Scholar
French, J. P. (2017). A developmental history of forensic speaker comparison in the UK. English Phonetics, 21, 271–86.Google Scholar
French, P. & Harrison, P. (2007). Position Statement concerning use of impressionistic likelihood terms in forensic speaker comparison cases, with a foreword by Peter French & Philip Harrison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 14(1), 137–44.Google Scholar
French, P. & Stevens, L. (2013). Forensic speech science. In Jones, M. J. & Knight, R.-A., eds., The Bloomsbury Companion to Phonetics. London: A&C Black, pp. 183–97.Google Scholar
French, P., Nolan, F., Foulkes, P., Harrison, P. & McDougall, K. (2010). The UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison; a rejoinder to Rose and Morrison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17(1), 143–52.Google Scholar
Furui, S. (1981). Cepstral analysis technique for automatic speaker verification. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 29(2), 254–72.Google Scholar
Gold, E. A. (2014). Calculating Likelihood Ratios for Forensic Speaker Comparisons Using Phonetic and Linguistic Parameters. PhD thesis, University of York. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/6166/, last accessed 25 September 2020.Google Scholar
Gold, E. & French, P. (2011). International practices in forensic speaker comparison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(2), 293–307.Google Scholar
Gold, E. & French, P. (2019). International practices in forensic speaker comparisons: Second survey. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 26(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Gold, E. & Hughes, V. (2014). Issues and opportunities: The application of the numerical likelihood ratio framework to forensic speaker comparison. Science and Justice, 54(4), 292–9.Google Scholar
Gold, E., French, P. & Harrison, P. (2013). Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 339–49.Google Scholar
Goldman, J.-P., Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J., Hove, I., Almajai, I., Dellwo, V. et al. (2014). A crowdsourcing smartphone application for Swiss German: Putting language documentation in the hands of the users. In International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 3444–7.Google Scholar
González-Rodríguez, J., Gil, J., Pérez, R. & Franco-Pedroso, J. (2014). What are we missing with i-vectors? A perceptual analysis of i-vector-based falsely accepted trials. In Proceedings of the Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 33–40.Google Scholar
Hammersley, R. & Read, J. D. (1985). The effect of participation in a conversation on recognition and identification of the speakers’ voices. Law and Human Behavior, 9(1), 71–81.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. H. L. & Hasan, T. (2015). Speaker recognition by machines and humans: A tutorial review. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32(6), 74–99.Google Scholar
Hollien, H. (1996). Consideration of guidelines for earwitness lineups. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 14–23.Google Scholar
Hollien, H., de Jong, G., Martin, C. A., Schwartz, R. & Liljegren, K. (2001). Effects of ethanol intoxication on speech suprasegmentals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(6), 3198–206.Google Scholar
Home Office. (2003). UK Home Office Circular 057/2003 from the Crime Reduction and Community Safety Group, Police Leadership and Powers Unit.Google Scholar
Hudson, T., de Jong, G., McDougall, K., Harrison, P. & Nolan, F. (2007). f0 statistics for 100 young male speakers of Standard Southern British English. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 1809–12.Google Scholar
Hughes, V., Foulkes, P. & Wood, S. (2016). Formant dynamics and durations of ‘um’ improve the performance of automatic speaker recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Australasian Conference on Speech Science and Technology (ASSTA), University of Western Sydney, Australia, pp. 249–52.Google Scholar
Hughes, V., Wood, S. & Foulkes, P. (2016). Strength of forensic voice comparison evidence from the acoustics of filled pauses. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 23(1), 99–132.Google Scholar
Innes, B. (2011). R v David Bain – a unique case in New Zealand legal and linguistic history. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(1), 145–55.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. (2007a). Forensic reference data on articulation rate in German. Science and Justice, 47(2), 50–67.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. (2007b). Speaker classification in forensic phonetics and acoustics. In Müller, C., ed., Speaker Classification I. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 180–204.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. (2008). Forensic phonetics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), 671–711.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. (2018). Forensic voice comparison. In Visconti, J., ed., Handbook of Communication in the Legal Sphere. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 219–55.Google Scholar
Jessen, M., Köster, O. & Gfroerer, S. (2005). Influence of vocal effort on average and variability of fundamental frequency. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 12(2), 174–213.Google Scholar
Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E. & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2(1), 42–52.Google Scholar
Kerstholt, J. H., Jansen, N. J. M., Van Amelsvoort, A. G. & Broeders, A. P. A. (2004). Earwitnesses: Effects of speech duration, retention interval and acoustic environment. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 327–36.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, Y. & Ishihara, S. (2010). f0 can tell us more: Speaker classification using the long-term distribution. In Proceedings of 13th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 50–3.Google Scholar
Köster, O., Hess, M. M., Schiller, N. O. & Künzel, H. J. (1998). The correlation between auditory speech sensitivity and speaker recognition ability. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 5, 22–32.Google Scholar
Künzel, H. J. (1989). How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight? Phonetica, 46(1–3), 117–25.Google Scholar
Künzel, H. J. (1990). Phonetische Untersuchungen zur Sprecher-Erkennung durch linguistisch naive Personen. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Künzel, H. J. (2001). Beware of the ‘telephone effect’: The influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 8(1), 80–99.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Ladefoged, J. (1980). The ability of listeners to identify voices. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 49, 43–50.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, S., Nolan, F. & McDougall, K. (2008). Acoustic and perceptual effects of telephone transmission on vowel quality. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 15(2), 161–92.Google Scholar
Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J. & Dellwo, V. (2014). Speaker-individuality in suprasegmental temporal features: Implications for forensic voice comparison. Forensic Science International, 238(Supplement C), 59–67.Google Scholar
Lindh, J. & Eriksson, A. (2007). Robustness of long time measures of fundamental frequency. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (INTERSPEECH), Antwerp, Belgium, pp. 2025–8.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. & McNally, R. (2003). ‘Science,’ ‘common sense,’ and DNA evidence: A legal controversy about the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
McDougall, K. (2006). Dynamic features of speech and the characterization of speakers: Towards a new approach using formant frequencies. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13(1), 89–126.Google Scholar
McDougall, K. (2013). Assessing perceived voice similarity using multidimensional scaling for the construction of voice parades. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 20(2), 163–72.Google Scholar
McDougall, K. & Duckworth, M. (2017). Profiling fluency: An analysis of individual variation in disfluencies in adult males. Speech Communication, 95, 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2017.10.001.Google Scholar
McDougall, K., Nolan, F. & Hudson, T. (2015). Telephone transmission and earwitnesses: Performance on voice parades controlled for voice similarity. Phonetica, 72, 257–72.Google Scholar
McGehee, F. (1937). The reliability of the identification of the human voice. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 249–71.Google Scholar
McGorrery, P. G. & McMahon, M. (2017). A fair ‘hearing’: Earwitness identifications and voice identification parades. The International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 21(3), 262–86.Google Scholar
McLaren, M., Lei, Y. & Ferrer, L. (2015). Advances in deep neural network approaches to speaker recognition. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4814–18.Google Scholar
Moos, A. (2012). Long-term formant distribution as a measure of speaker characteristics in read and spontaneous speech. The Phonetician, 101/102, 7–24.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S. (2009). Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2387–97.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S. & Enzinger, E. (2016). What should a forensic practitioner’s likelihood ratio be? Science & Justice: Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 56(5), 374–9.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S., Lindh, J. & Curran, J. M. (2014). Likelihood ratio calculation for a disputed-utterance analysis with limited available data. Speech Communication, 58(Supplement C), 81–90.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S., Sahito, F. H., Jardine, G., Djokic, D., Clavet, S., Berghs, S. et al. (2016). INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies. Forensic Science International, 263(Supplement C), 92–100.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1994). Auditory and acoustic analysis in speaker recognition. In Gibbons, J. P., ed., Language and the Law; London: Routledge, pp. 326–45.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (2001). Speaker identification evidence: Its forms, limitations, and roles. In Proceedings of the Conference ‘Law and Language: Prospect and Retrospect,’ Levi, Finnish Lapland.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (2002a). Intonation in speaker identification: An experiment on pitch alignment features. Forensic Linguistics, 9(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (2002b). The ‘telephone effect’ on formants: A response. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(1), 74–82.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (2003). A recent voice parade. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 10(2), 277–91.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. & Grabe, E. (1996). Preparing a voice lineup. Forensic Linguistics, 3(1), 74–94.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. & Grigoras, C. (2005). A case for formant analysis in forensic speaker identification. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 12(2), 143–73.Google Scholar
Nolan, F., McDougall, K. & Hudson, T. (2011). Some acoustic correlates of perceived (dis)similarity between same-accent voices. In Lee, W.-S. & Zee, E., eds., Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong, pp. 1506–9.Google Scholar
Orchard, T. L. & Yarmey, A. D. (1995). The effects of whispers, voice-sample duration, and voice distinctiveness on criminal speaker identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(3), 249–60.Google Scholar
Ormerod, D. (2001). Sounds familiar? Voice identification evidence. Criminal Law Review, 595–622.Google Scholar
Paliwal, K. K. (1984). Effectiveness of different vowel sounds in automatic speaker identification. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 17–21.Google Scholar
Perfect, T. J., Hunt, L. J. & Harris, C. M. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in voice recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(8), 973–80.Google Scholar
Rabiner, L. & Juang, B.-H. (1993). Fundamentals of Speech Recognition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. A., Quatieri, T. F. & Dunn, R. B. (2000). Speaker verification using Adapted Gaussian mixture models. Digital Signal Processing, 10, 93–112.Google Scholar
Robson, J. (2017). A fair hearing? The use of voice identification parades in criminal investigations in England and Wales. Criminal Law Review, (1), 36–50.Google Scholar
Rose, P. & Morrison, G. S. (2009). A response to the UK Position Statement on forensic speaker comparison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 16(1), 139–63.Google Scholar
San Segundo, E. & Mompean, J. A. (2017). A simplified vocal profile analysis protocol for the assessment of voice quality and speaker similarity. Journal of Voice: Official Journal of the Voice Foundation, 31(5), 644.e11–644.e27.Google Scholar
Schilling, N. & Marsters, A. (2015). Unmasking identity: Speaker profiling for forensic linguistic purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 195–214.Google Scholar
Snyder, D., Garcia-Romero, D., Sell, G., Povey, D. & Khudanpur, S. (2018). X-Vectors: Robust DNN embeddings for speaker recognition. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 5329–33.Google Scholar
Solan, L. W. & Tiersma, P. M. (2003). Hearing voices: Speaker identification in court. Hastings Law Journal, 54, 373–435.Google Scholar
van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38(3), 253–65.Google Scholar
Vanags, T., Carroll, M. & Perfect, T. J. (2005). Verbal overshadowing: A sound theory in voice recognition? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(9), 1127–44.Google Scholar
Watt, D. (2010). The identification of the individual through speech. In Llamas, C. & Watt, D. D., eds., Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 76–85.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A. D. (2007). The psychology of speaker identification and earwitness memory. In Lindsay, R. C. L., Ross, D. F., Read, J. D. & Toglia, M. P., eds., The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology. Volume II Memory for People. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 101–36.Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Morrison, G. S. & Thiruvaran, T. (2011). Forensic voice comparison using Chinese /iau/. In Lee, W.-S. & Zee, E., eds., Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Hong Kong, China: City University of Hong Kong, pp. 2280–3.Google Scholar
Zhang, C., Morrison, G. S., Enzinger, E. & Ochoa, F. (2013). Effects of telephone transmission on the performance of formant-trajectory-based forensic voice comparison: Female voices. Speech Communication, 55(6), 796–813.Google Scholar
26.7 References
Auer, P., Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Müller, F. (1999). Language in Time: The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D. (2012). Of ens ’n’ ands: Observations on the phonetic make-up of a coordinator and its uses in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 55(1), 35–56.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E. & Selting, M. (2010). Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. (2013). Signaling Trouble: On the Linguistic Design of Other-Initiation of Repair in English Conversation. PhD dissertation, Groningen University.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (1993). English Speech Rhythm: Form and Function in Everyday Verbal Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2001). Interactional prosody: High onsets in reason-for-the-call turns. Language In Society, 30(1), 29–53.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012a). Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In Peräkylä, A. & Sorjonen, M.-L., eds., Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 113–46.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012b). On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection. Text and Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 32(4), 453–75.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. Gesprächsforschung, 12(12), 1–51.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E. (2004). Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ono, T. (2007). ‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17(4), 513–52.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, , eds. (1996). Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (2017). Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curl, T. S. (2003). The phonetics of repetition in other-initiated repair sequences. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp. 1843–16.Google Scholar
Curl, T. S. (2005). Practices in other-initiated repair resolution: The phonetic differentiation of ‘repetitions’.Discourse Processes, 39(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
de Vos, C., Torreira, F. & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Turn-timing in signed conversations: Coordinating stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 268.Google Scholar
Drew, P. & Holt, E. (1998). Figures of speech: Figurative expressions and the management of topic transition in conversation. Language in Society, 27(4), 495–522.Google Scholar
Floyd, S., Manrique, E., Rossi, G. & Torreira, F. (2016). Timing of visual bodily behavior in repair sequences: Evidence from three languages. Discourse Processes, 53(3), 175–204.Google Scholar
Freese, J. & Maynard, D. W. (1998). Prosodic features of bad news and good news in conversation. Language in Society, 27(02), 195–219.Google Scholar
French, P. & Local, J. (1983). Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7(1), 17–38.Google Scholar
Girard-Groeber, S. (2015). The management of turn transition in signed interaction through the lens of overlaps. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 741.Google Scholar
Golato, A. (2012). German oh: Marking an emotional change of state. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(3), 245–68.Google Scholar
Gorisch, J., Wells, B. & Brown, G. J. (2012). Pitch contour matching and interactional alignment across turns: An acoustic investigation. Language and Speech, 55(1), 57–76.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S., Cross, I. & Ogden, R. (2013). Communicative interaction in spontaneous music and speech. In Orwin, M., Howes, C. & Kempson, R., eds., Language, Music and Interaction. London: College Publications, pp. 285–329.Google Scholar
Heldner, M. & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–68.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2015). Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 88–104.Google Scholar
Hoey, E. M. (2014). Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(2), 175–200.Google Scholar
Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A. & Ruusuvuori, J. (2013). Turn-opening smiles: Facial expression constructing emotional transition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 21–42.Google Scholar
Kaukomaa, T., Peräkylä, A. & Ruusuvuori, J. (2014). Foreshadowing a problem: Turn-opening frowns in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 132–47.Google Scholar
Keevallik, L. (2014). Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 103–20.Google Scholar
Kendrick, K. H. & Torreira, F. (2015). The timing and construction of preference : A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52, 255–89.Google Scholar
Koivisto, A. (2012). Discourse patterns for turn-final conjunctions. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1254–72.Google Scholar
Krahmer, E. & Swerts, M. (2009). Audiovisual prosody. Introduction to the Special IssueLanguage and Speech, 52(2–3), 129–33.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnall & T. Stivers, eds., The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 101–30.Google Scholar
Local, J. K. (1996). Some aspects of news receipts in everyday conversation. In Couper-Kuhlen & Selting, pp. 177–230.Google Scholar
Local, J. K. (2004). Getting back to prior talk: and-uh(m) as a back-connecting device. In Couper-Kuhlen & Ford, pp. 377–400.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Kelly, J. (1986). Projection and silences: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 185–204.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Walker, G. (2004). Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(8), 1375–403.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Walker, G. (2005). Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organization and phonological structures of spontaneous speech. Phonetica, 62(2–4), 120–30.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Walker, G. (2008). Stance and affect in conversation: On the interplay of sequential and phonetic resources. Text & Talk – An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies, 28(6), 723–47.Google Scholar
Local, J. & Walker, G. (2012). How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 42(03), 255–80.Google Scholar
Local, J. K., Wells, W. H. G. & Sebba, M. (1985). Phonology for conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 9(2–3), 309–30.Google Scholar
Local, J. K., Kelly, J. & Wells, W. H. G. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22(2), 411–37.Google Scholar
Manrique, E. (2016). Other-initiated repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open Linguistics, 2(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W. & Freese, J. (2012). Good news, bad news, and affect: Practical and temporal ‘emotion work’ in everyday life. In Peräkylä, A. & Sorjonen, M.-L., eds., Emotion in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–112.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2007). Multimodal resources for turn-taking: Pointing and the emergence of possible next speakers. Discourse Studies, 9(2), 194–225.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2001). Turn transition, creak and glottal stop in Finnish talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1), 139–52.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2004). Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish. In Couper-Kuhlen & Ford, pp. 29–62.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–75.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2010). Prosodic constructions in making complaints. In Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E. & Selting, M., eds., Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 81–104.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), 299–320.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. (2017). An Introduction to English Phonetics 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, R. & Hawkins, S. (2015). Entrainment as a basis for co-ordinated actions in speech. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences XXVIII, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Persson, R. (2013). Intonation and sequential organization: Formulations in French talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 19–38.Google Scholar
Persson, R. (2017). Fill-in-the-blank questions in interaction: Incomplete utterances as a resource for doing inquiries. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(3), 227–48.Google Scholar
Pillet-Shore, D. (2012). Greeting: Displaying stance through prosodic recipient design. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4), 375–98.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds., Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–101.Google Scholar
Reber, E. (2012). Affectivity in Interaction. Sound Objects in English.Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Riou, M. (2017). The prosody of topic transition in interaction: Pitch register variations. Language and Speech, 60(4), 658–78.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. & Thompson, S. A., eds., Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–133.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(01), 1–63.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: Volume 1: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scobbie, J. M., Schaeffler, S. & Mennen, I. (2011). Audible aspects of speech preparation. In Proceedings of the International Congress on the Phonetic Sciences XVII, Hong Kong, pp. 1782–5.Google Scholar
Selting, M. (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair initiation. In Couper-Kuhlen & Selting, pp. 231–70.Google Scholar
Sicoli, M. A., Stivers, T., Enfield, N. & Levinson, S. C. (2014). Marked initial pitch in questions signals marked communicative function. Language and Speech, 58(2), 204–23.Google Scholar
Sikveland, R. O. & Ogden, R. (2012). Holding gestures across turns: Moments to generate shared understanding. Gesture, 12(2), 167–200.Google Scholar
Stevanovic, M., Himberg, T., Niinisalo, M., Kahri, M., Peräkylä, A., Sams, M. et al. (2017). Sequentiality, mutual visibility, and behavioral matching: Body sway and pitch register during joint decision making. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Stivers, T. (2015). Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(March), 1–19.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T. et al. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10587–92.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2006). Prosodic Orientation in English Conversation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2010). Speech rhythm across turn transitions in cross-cultural talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1037–59.Google Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. & Persson, R. (2016). How speakers of different languages extend their turns: Word linking and glottalization in French and German. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 49(2), 128–47.Google Scholar
Torreira, F. & Valtersson, E. (2015). Phonetic and visual cues to questionhood in French conversation. Phonetica, 72(1), 20–42.Google Scholar
Torreira, F., Bögels, S. & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Breathing for answering: The time course of response planning in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(March), 1–11.Google Scholar
Walker, G. (2004). On some interactional and phonetic properties of increments to turns in talk-in-interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen & Ford, pp. 147–69.Google Scholar
Walker, G. (2007). On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2217–43.Google Scholar
Walker, G. (2012). Coordination and interpretation of vocal and visible resources: ‘Trail-off’ conjunctions. Language and Speech, 55(1), 141–63.Google Scholar
Wells, W. H. G. & Peppé, S. (1996). Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In Couper-Kuhlen & Selting, pp. 101–30.Google Scholar
Wells, W. H. G. & Macfarlane, S. (1998). Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41 (Pt 3–4), 265–94.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–82.Google Scholar
Wootton, A. J. (1989). Remarks on the methodology of conversation analysis. In Roger, D. & Bull, P., eds., Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 238–58.Google Scholar
Wright, M. (2011). On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(02), 207–29.Google Scholar
Zellers, M. (2013). Prosodic variation for topic shift and other functions in local contrasts in conversation. Phonetica, 69, 231–53.Google Scholar
Zellers, M. & Ogden, R. (2013). Exploring interactional features with prosodic patterns. Language and Speech, 57(3), 285–309.Google Scholar
27.7 References
Allen, B., Pulleyblank, D. & Ajíbóyè, Ọ. (2013). Articulatory mapping of Yoruba vowels: An ultrasound study. Phonology, 30(2), 183–210.Google Scholar
Anderson, V. B. (2008). Static palatography for language fieldwork. Language Documentation and Conservation, 2(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (1994). Grounded Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2012). Segment-to-tone association. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, eds., pp. 265–74.Google Scholar
Baltazani, M., Kainada, E., Revithiadou, A. & Topintzi, N. (2016). Vocoid-driven processes: Palatalization and glide hardening in Greek and its dialects. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 23.Google Scholar
Bateman, N. (2011). On the typology of palatalization. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(8), 588–602.Google Scholar
Beddor, P., Ohala, J. & Solé, M.-J. (2007). Experimental Approaches to Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, R., McGuire, G., Ní Choisáin, M. & Padgett, J. (2014). An Ultrasound Study of Connemara Irish Palatalization and Velarization. MS, Yale University, UC-Santa Cruz, and UC-Dublin.Google Scholar
Bird, S. & Miyashita, M. (2018). Teaching phonetics in the context of Indigenous language revitalization. In 2nd International Symposium on Applied Phonetics, Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5 (9/10), 341–5.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. (2012). Modeling phonological category learning. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 207–18.Google Scholar
Botma, B. & Shiraishi, H. (2014). Nivkh palatalisation: Articulatory causes and perceptual effects. Phonology, 31(2), 181–207.Google Scholar
Bowern, C. (2008). Linguistic Fieldwork: A Practical Guide. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1986). Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 219–52.Google Scholar
Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1991). Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. E., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–76.Google Scholar
Browman, C. & Goldstein, L. (1994). ‘Targetless’ schwa: An articulatory analysis. In Docherty, G. J. & Ladd, D. R., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology II Gesture, Segment, Prosody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–67.Google Scholar
Bulgantamir, S. (2015). Acoustic analysis on the palatalized vowels of Modern Mongolian. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(6), 107–10.Google Scholar
Casserly, E. D. (2012). Gestures in optimality theory and the laryngeal phonology of Faroese. Lingua, 122(1), 41–65.Google Scholar
Chelliah, S. L. & de Reuse, W. J. (2010). Phonetic and phonological fieldwork. In Chelliah, S. L. & de Reuse, W. J., Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 251–78.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, J. W., Yallop, C. & Fletcher, J. (2007). An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology, 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. & Hume, E. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith, J., ed., Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 245–306.Google Scholar
Cohn, A. C., Fougeron, C. & Huffman, M. K., eds. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Côté, M.-H. (2012). The role of the syllable in the organization and realization of sound systems. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 232–431.Google Scholar
Davenport, M. & Hannahs, S. J. (2010). Introducing Phonetics and Phonology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. & Roon, K. (2008). Durational correlates for differentiating consonant sequences in Russian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 38(2), 137–65.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. (2007). The relationship between the perception of non-native phonotactics and loanword adaptation. Phonology, 24(2), 261–86.Google Scholar
De Decker, P. M. & Nycz, J. R. (2012). Are tense [æ]s really tense? The mapping between articulation and acoustics. Lingua, 122(7), 810–21.Google Scholar
Ferrari-Disner, S. (1983). Vowel Quality, the Relation Between Universal and Language-Specific Factors. UCLA Working Paper 58.Google Scholar
Ferrari-Disner, S. (1984). Insights on vowel spacing. In Maddieson, I., ed., Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–55.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, C. (2017). The Sounds of Indigenous Language Revitalization. Plenary talk, Annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Flemming, E. & Cho, H. (2017). The phonetic specification of contour tones: Evidence from the Mandarin rising tone. Phonology, 34(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
François, A. (2010). Phonotactics and the prestopped velar lateral of Hiw: Resolving the ambiguity of a complex segment. Phonology, 27(3), 393–434.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. (1975). The interface between phonetics and phonology. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Leeds.Google Scholar
Gafos, A. & Goldstein, L. (2012). Articulatory representation and organization. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 220–31.Google Scholar
Gallagher, G. (2010). Perceptual distinctness and long-distance laryngeal restrictions. Phonology, 27(3), 435–80.Google Scholar
Gallagher, G. (2012). Perceptual similarity in non-local laryngeal restrictions. Lingua, 122(2), 112–24.Google Scholar
Gallagher, G. (2013). Speaker awareness of non-local ejective phonotactics in Cochabamba Quechua. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(4), 1067–99.Google Scholar
Gick, B., Pulleyblank, D., Campbell, F. & Mutaka, N. (2006). Low vowels and transparency in Kinande vowel harmony. Phonology, 23(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2003). Collecting phonetic data on endangered languages. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, pp. 207–10.Google Scholar
Grice, M., Ridouane, R. & Roettger, T. B. (2015). Tonal association in Tashlhiyt Berber: Evidence from polar questions and contrastive statements. Phonology, 32(2), 241–66.Google Scholar
Hale, M. & Reiss, C. (2008). The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamann, S. (2011). The phonetics-phonology interface. In Kula, N. C., Botma, B. & Nasukawa, K., eds., Continuum Companion to Phonology. London: Continuum, pp. 202–24.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. & Steriade, D. (2004). Introduction: The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In Hayes, Kirchner & Steriade, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Hayes, B., Kirchner, R. & Steriade, D., eds. (2004). Phonetically Based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hermes, A., Mücke, D. & Grice, M. (2013). Gestural coordination of Italian word-initial clusters: The case of ‘impure s’. Phonology, 30(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K. A. (2005). A phonetic analysis of Manange segmental and suprasegmental properties. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 21(8), 1–36.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, K. A. (2007). Phonology and fieldwork in Nepal: Problems and potentials. In Austin, P., Bond, O. & Nathan, D., eds., Proceedings of the Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory. London: SOAS, pp. 33–44.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. & Ladd, D. R. (2008). Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation and Conservation, 2(2), 244–74.Google Scholar
Holt, L. L. (2012). How perceptual and cognitive constraints affect learning of speech categories. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 348–58.Google Scholar
Hume, E. & Johnson, K., eds. (2001). The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Iosad, P. (2017). The phonologisation of redundancy: Length and quality in Welsh vowels. Phonology, 34(1), 121–62.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1929). Remarques sur l’évolution phonologique du russe comparée à celle des autres langues slaves. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, 2. Reprinted 1962 in Selected Writings, vol. 1: Phonological Studies, 7–116. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, C., G. M. & Halle, M. (1952). Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: the Distinctive Features and Their Correlates. Technical Report 13. Massachusetts: Acoustics Laboratory, MIT.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W., eds., Talker Variability in Speech Processing. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 145–65.Google Scholar
Jongman, A., Fourakis, M. & Sereno, J. (1989). The acoustic vowel space of modern Greek and German. Language and Speech, 32, 321–48.Google Scholar
Kaun, A. (2004). The typology of rounding harmony. In Hayes, Kirchner & Steriade, pp. 87–116.Google Scholar
Keating, P. A. (1988). The phonology-phonetics interface. In Newmeyer, F. J., ed., Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 281–302.Google Scholar
Kedrova, G. Y., Anisimov, N. V., Zaharov, L. M. & Pirogov, Y. A. (2008). Magnetic resonance investigation of palatalized stop consonants and spirants in Russian. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Acoustics, Paris, France, pp. 2345–50.Google Scholar
Keyser, S. J. & Stevens, K. N. (1994). Feature geometry and the vocal tract. Phonology, 11(2), 207–36.Google Scholar
Kim, K. & Kochetov, A. (2011). Phonology and phonetics of epenthetic vowels in loanwords: Experimental evidence from Korean. Lingua, 121(3), 511–32.Google Scholar
Kingston, J. (2007). The phonetics–phonology interface. In de Lacy, P., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 435–56.Google Scholar
Kirchner, R. (2012). Modeling exemplar-based phonologization. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 332–46.Google Scholar
Kochetov, A. & So, C. K. (2007). Place assimilation and phonetic grounding: A cross-linguistic perceptual study. Phonology, 24(3), 397–432.Google Scholar
Krämer, M. & Urek, O. (2016). Perspectives on palatalization. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 1(1), 31.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, B. (2007). Fieldwork on Konda, a Dravidian language. In A. Aikhenvald, ed., Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (Focus on Linguistic Fieldwork) 60(1), pp. 56–66.Google Scholar
Kulikov, V. (2013). Voicing contrast in consonant clusters: Evidence against sonorant transparency to voice assimilation in Russian. Phonology, 30(3), 423–52.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (2003). Phonetic Data Analysis: An Introduction to Fieldwork and Instrumental Techniques. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (2001). Phonetic fieldwork. In Newman, P. & Ratliff, M., eds., Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar
Mielke, J., Baker, A. & Archangeli, D. (2016). Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/. Language, 92(1), 101–40.Google Scholar
Mielke, J. (2012). The nature of distinctive features and the issue of natural classes. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 185–95.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L. (2010). Tongue body and tongue root shape differences in N|uu clicks correlate with phonotactic patterns. In Fuchs, S., Toda, M. & Zygis, M., eds., Turbulent Sounds: An Interdisciplinary Guide. Germany: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 245–80.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L. (2011). The representation of clicks. In Oostendorp, M. van, Ewen, C. J., Hume, E. & Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, vol. 1. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 416–39.Google Scholar
Miller, A. L. (2016). Posterior lingual gestures and tongue shape in Mangetti Dune !Xung clicks. Journal of Phonetics, 55, 119–48.Google Scholar
Miller, A., Brugman, J., Sands, B., Namaseb, L., Exter, M. & Collins, C. (2009). Differences in airstream and posterior place of articulation among N|uu clicks. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 39(2), 129–61.Google Scholar
Munson, B., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2012). Phonological representations in language acquisition: Climbing the ladder of abstraction. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 288–309.Google Scholar
Newlin-Łukowicz, L. (2012). Polish stress: Looking for phonetic evidence of a bidirectional system. Phonology, 29(2), 271–329.Google Scholar
Ní Chasaide, A. & Fealy, G. (1991). Articulatory and acoustic measurements of coarticulation in Irish (Gaelic) stops. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Science, Aix-en-Provence, France, 5, pp. 30–3.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1994). Phonetic correlates of syllable affiliation. In Keating, P. A., ed., Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 160–7.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P., eds., Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–57.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (2009). Tonal alignment patterns in Catalan nuclear falls. Lingua, 119, 865–80.Google Scholar
Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pycha, A. (2010). A test case for the phonetics–phonology interface: Gemination restrictions in Hungarian. Phonology, 27(1), 119–52.Google Scholar
Recasens, D. (1999). Lingual coarticulation. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Hewett, N., eds., Coarticulation: Theory, Data, and Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–104.Google Scholar
Rice, K. (2011). Documentary linguistics and community relations. Language Documentation and Conservation, 5, 187–207.Google Scholar
Ridouane, R. (2008). Syllables without vowels: Phonetic and phonological evidence from Tashlhiyt Berber. Phonology 25(2), 321–59.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S., Goodchild, S. & Dohle, E. (2016). Language landscape: Supporting community-led language documentation. In Ferreira, V. & Bouda, P., Language Documentation and Conservation in Europe. Hawai’i, HI: University of Hawai’i Press, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar
Romero, J. & Riera, M. (2015). The Phonetics–Phonology Interface: Representations and Methodologies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sagey, E. (1986). The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-Linear Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. A. & Davidson, L. (2012). Perceptual similarity in input–output mappings: A computational/experimental study of non-native speech production. Lingua, 121(8), 1344–58.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. A., Gafos, A. I., Hoole, P. & Zeroual, C. (2009). Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: Evidence from patterns of temporal stability in articulation. Phonology, 26(1), 187–215.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. A., Gafos, A. I., Hoole, P. & Zeroual, C. (2011). Dynamic invariance in the phonetic expression of syllable structure: A case study of Moroccan Arabic consonant clusters. Phonology, 28(3), 455–90.Google Scholar
Sidharta (Sie Ing Djiang). (1976). The Consonantal and Vowel Systems of Malay and Huayu: A Contrastive Analysis. Singapore: Chinese Language Centre, Nanyang University.Google Scholar
Silva, D. J. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23(2), 287–308.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2006). A Critical Introduction to Phonology: Of Sound, Mind, and Body. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Solé, M.-J., Beddor, P. S. & Ohala, M. (2007). Experimental Approaches to Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stausland Johnsen, S. (2012). From perception to phonology: The emergence of perceptually motivated constraint rankings. Lingua, 122(2), 125–43.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. N. (1989). On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 17(3), 3–45.Google Scholar
Sugahara, M. & Turk, A. (2009). Durational correlates of English sublexical constituent structure. Phonology, 26(3), 477–524.Google Scholar
Svantesson, J.-O. & House, D. (2006). Tone production, tone perception and Kammu tonogenesis. Phonology, 23(2), 309–33.Google Scholar
Tucker, B. V. & Warner, N. (2010). What it means to be phonetic or phonological: The case of Romanian devoiced nasals. Phonology, 27(2), 289–324.Google Scholar
Turk, A. (1994). Articulatory phonetic clues to syllable affiliation: Gestural characteristics of bilabial stops. In Keating, P. A., ed., Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–35.Google Scholar
Turk, A. (2012). Prosodic structure and its phonetic implementation: Temporal aspects. In Cohn, Fougeron & Huffman, pp. 242–53.Google Scholar
Walker, R., Byrd, D. & Mpiranya, F. (2008). An articulatory view of Kinyarwanda coronal harmony. Phonology, 25(3), 499–535.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1970). Reading and Writing Ogbia. Rivers Readers Project, Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan.Google Scholar
Williamson, K. (1972). Assimilation in Ogbia. Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Ibadan, Research Notes 5. 1–5.Google Scholar
Yamada, R. (2007). Collaborative linguistic fieldwork: Practical application of the empowerment model. Language Documentation and Conservation, 1(2), 257–82.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. (2004). The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. In Hayes, Kirchner & Steriade, pp. 157–90.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. & Yuwen, L. (2010). Testing the role of phonetic knowledge in Mandarin tone sandhi. Phonology, 27(1), 153–201.Google Scholar
Zuraw, K. (2007). The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Language, 83(2), 277–316.Google Scholar