Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T03:32:33.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part V - Applications and Extensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2025

Edited by
Bertram Malle  and
Philip Robbins
Bertram Malle
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Philip Robbins
Affiliation:
University of Missouri
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Moral Psychology , pp. 521 - 620
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. In Reis, H. T. & Judd, C. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 195–255). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Alicke, M. D. (1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 368–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alicke, M. (2014). Evaluating blame hypotheses. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 201–271). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Armour, J. D. (2020). N*gga theory: Race, language, unequal justice, and the law. Los Angeles Review of Books.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilz, K. (2016). Testing the expressive theory of punishment. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(2), 358–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capra, D. J., & Richter, L. L. (2018). Character assassination: Amending federal rule of evidence 404(b) to protect criminal defendants. Columbia Law Review, 118(3), 769–832.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish?: Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 284–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F., Murray, D., Gordon-McKeon, S., Wharton, S., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Judgment before principle: Engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(8), 888–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darley, J. M., Sanderson, C. A., & LaMantia, P. S. (1996). Community standards for defining attempt: Inconsistencies with the Model Penal Code. American Behavioral Scientist, 39(4), 405–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeScioli, P., Christner, J., & Kurzban, R. (2011). The omission strategy. Psychological Science, 22(4), 442–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duff, R. A. (1993). Choice, character, and criminal liability. Law and Philosophy, 12(4), 345–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential social perception and attribution of intergroup violence: Testing the lower limits of stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 590–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durkheim, É. (1964). The division of labor in society. The Free Press. (Original work published 1893)Google Scholar
Eisenberg, T., & Hans, V. (2009). Taking a stand on taking the stand: The effect of a prior criminal record on the decision to testify and on trial outcomes. Cornell Law Review, 94(6), 1353–1390.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Y. (2018). The law of good people: Challenging states’ ability to regulate human behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, J. (2017). Locking up our own: Crime and punishment in Black America. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2001). Mass imprisonment: Social causes and consequences. SAGE Publications, Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giffin, C., & Lombrozo, T. (2016). Wrong or merely prohibited: Special treatment of strict liability in intuitive moral judgment. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 707–720.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ginther, M. R., Shen, F. X., Bonnie, R. J., Hoffman, M. B., Jones, O. D., Marois, R., & Simons, K. W. (2014). The language of mens rea. Vanderbilt Law Review, 67(5), Article 2.Google Scholar
Ginther, M. R., Shen, F. X., Bonnie, R. J., Hoffman, M. B., Jones, O. D., & Simons, K. W. (2018). Decoding guilty minds: How jurors attribute knowledge and guilt. Vanderbilt Law Review, 71(1), 241–284.Google Scholar
Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M., & DiTomasso, N. A. (2014). The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 526–545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, E. J., & Darley, J. M. (1998). Effects of necessary, sufficient, and indirect causation on judgments of criminal liability. Law and Human Behavior, 22(4), 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, E., & Dodge, M. (1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guglielmo, S. (2015). Moral judgment as information processing: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2017). Information-acquisition processes in moral judgments of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 957–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2019). Asymmetric morality: Blame is more differentiated and more extreme than praise. PLoS ONE, 14(3), Article e0213544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imwinkelried, E. J., Giannelli, P. C., Gilligan, F. A., Lederer, F. I., & Richter, L. (2016). Courtroom criminal evidence: Related procedures. LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Jones v. State, 913 So.2d 436 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, D. M. (2009). Culture, cognition, and consent: Who perceives what, and why, in acquaintance-rape cases. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 158(3), 729–813.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2008). Self-defensive cognition of self-defense. American Criminal Law Review, 45(1), 1–65.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., & Braman, D. (2008). Whose eyes are you going to believe: Scott v. Harris and the perils of cognitive illiberalism. Harvard Law Review, 122(3), 837–906.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., & Evans, D. (2012). “They saw a protest”: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64(4), 851–906.Google Scholar
Karakatsanis, A. (2019). Usual cruelty: The complicity of lawyers in the criminal injustice system. The New Press.Google Scholar
Kleinfeld, J. (2015). Reconstructivism: The place of criminal law in ethical life. Harvard Law Review, 129(6), 1485–1565.Google Scholar
Kneer, M., & Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2017). Mens rea ascription, expertise and outcome effects: Professional judges surveyed. Cognition, 169, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler-Hausmann, I. (2019). Misdemeanorland: Criminal courts and social control in an age of broken windows policing. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Bostock, S. (2000). The effects on juries of hearing about the defendant’s previous criminal record: A simulation study. Criminal Law Review, 734–755.Google Scholar
Malle, B. F., Guglielmo, S., & Monroe, A. E. (2014). A theory of blame. Psychological Inquiry, 25(2), 147–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F., & Nelson, S. E. (2003). Judging mens rea: The tension between folk concepts and legal concepts of intentionality. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21(5), 563–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLeod, A. M. (2015). Prison abolition and grounded justice. UCLA Law Review, 62, 1156–1239.Google Scholar
Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2017). Two paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(1), 123–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullen, E., & Nadler, J. (2008). Moral spillovers: The effect of moral violations on deviant behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1239–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, J. (2005). Flouting the law. Texas Law Review, 83, 1399–1441.Google Scholar
Nadler, J. (2012). Blaming as a social process: The influence of character and moral emotion on blame. Law & Contemporary Problems, 75(2), 1–31.Google Scholar
Nadler, J. (2017). Expressive law, social norms, and social groups. Law & Social Inquiry, 42(1), 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, J. (2020). Ordinary people and the rationalization of wrongdoing. Michigan Law Review, 118(6), 1205–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, J., & McDonnell, M.-H. (2012). Moral character, motive, and the psychology of blame. Cornell Law Review, 97, 255–304.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A. V., Meares, T. L., & Fagan, J. (2012). Why do criminals obey the law – the influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(2), 397–440.Google Scholar
Pillsbury, S. H. (2000). Judging evil: Rethinking the law of murder and manslaughter. NYU Press.Google Scholar
Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2012). Bringing character back: How the motivation to evaluate character influences judgments of moral blame. In Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 91–108). American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, R. A. (1985). An economic theory of the criminal law. Columbia Law Review, 85(6), 1193–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. E. (2003). The social and moral cost of mass incarceration in African American communities. Stanford Law Review, 56(5), 1271–1305.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. Westview Press.Google Scholar
Shavell, S. (1985). Criminal law and the optimal use of nonmonetary sanctions as a deterrent. Columbia Law Review, 85(6), 1232–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, F. X. (2011). How we still fail rape victims: Reflecting on responsibility and legal reform. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 22(1), 1–80.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. Z., Crockett, M. J., & Dolan, R. J. (2017). Inferences about moral character moderate the impact of consequences on blame and praise. Cognition, 167, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solan, L. M., & Darley, J. M. (2001). Causation, contribution, and legal liability: An empirical study. Law and Contemporary Problems, 64(4), 265–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sood, A. M. (2015). Cognitive cleansing: Experimental psychology and the exclusionary rule. Georgetown Law Journal, 103(6), 1543–1608.Google Scholar
Sood, A. M. (2019). Attempted justice: Misunderstanding and bias in psychological constructions of criminal attempt. Stanford Law Review, 71(3), 593–686.Google Scholar
Sood, A. M., & Darley, J. M. (2012). The plasticity of harm in the service of criminalization goals. California Law Review, 100(5), 1313–1358.Google Scholar
Spellman, B. A. (1997). Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126(4), 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State v. Garner, 331 N.C. 491, 509 (1992).Google Scholar
State v. Heard, 166 Wash. App. 1024 (2012).Google Scholar
State v. Lloyd, 354 N.C. 76, 90 (2001).Google Scholar
State v. McAbee, 120 N.C. App. 674, 680-681 (1995).Google Scholar
State v. Weldon, 314 N.C. 401, 404-407 (1985).Google Scholar
State v. Woodard, 210 N.C. App. 725, 728-729 (2011).Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L., & Diermeier, D. (2011). Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(6), 1249–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobia, K. (2018). How people judge what is reasonable. Alabama Law Review, 70, 293–359.Google Scholar
Tobia, K. (2022). Experimental jurisprudence. The University of Chicago Law Review, 89(3), 735–802.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (2014). Remodeling American sentencing: A ten-step blueprint for moving past mass incarceration. Criminology & Public Policy, 13(4), 503–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review, 31(2), 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Diermeier, D. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United States v. Benton, 852 F.2d 1456, 1467-1468 (6th Cir. 1988).Google Scholar
United States v. Smith, 789 F.3d 923, 929–30 (8th Cir. 2015).Google Scholar
Vidmar, N. (2001). Retribution and revenge. In Sanders, J. & Hamilton, V. L. (Eds.), Handbook of justice research in law (pp. 31–63). Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wissler, R. L., & Saks, M. J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yankah, E. N. (2003). Good guys and bad guys: Punishing character, equality and the irrelevance of moral character to criminal punishment. Cardozo Law Review, 25, 1019–1067.Google Scholar

References

Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018). The parties in our heads: Misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. Journal of Politics, 80(3), 964–981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1482–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, M., McCarty, N., Mansbridge, J., & Martin, C. J. (2015). Causes and consequences of polarization. In Mansbridge, J. & Martin, C. J. (Eds.), Political negotiation: A handbook (pp. 37–90). Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendersky, C. (2014). Resolving ideological conflicts by affirming opponents’ status: The Tea Party, Obamacare and the 2013 government shutdown. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, R., Laurin, K., & Chiang, M. (2022). Who would mourn democracy? Liberals might, but it depends on who’s in charge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(5), 779–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2024). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Review of Economics and Statistics, 106(2), 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, W. J., & Crockett, M. J. (2019). How effective is online outrage? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 79–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandt, M. J., Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., Karapirinler, B., Van Leeuwen, F., Bender, M., van Osch, Y., & Adams, B. (2021). The association between threat and politics depends on the type of threat, the political domain, and the country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(2), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clifford, S. (2020). Compassionate democrats and tough republicans: How ideology shapes partisan stereotypes. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1269–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1178–1198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole Wright, J., Cullum, J., & Schwab, N. (2008). The cognitive and affective dimensions of moral conviction: Implications for attitudinal and behavioral measures of interpersonal tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1461–1476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, J. T. (2017). Are conservatives more sensitive to threat than liberals? It depends on how we define threat and conservatism. Social Cognition, 35(4), 354–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. T., & Pilanski, J. M. (2014). Political intolerance, right and left. Political Psychology, 35(6), 841–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critcher, C. R., Inbar, Y., & Pizarro, D. A. (2012). How quick decisions illuminate moral character. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 769–771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehghani, M., Johnson, K., Hoover, J., Sagi, E., Garten, J., Parmar, N. J., Vaisey, S., Iliev, R., & Graham, J. (2016). Purity homophily in social networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(3), 366–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorison, C. A., Minson, J. A., & Rogers, T. (2019). Selective exposure partly relies on faulty affective forecasts. Cognition, 188, 98–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F., Love, A., Schellhaas, F. M. H., & Hewstone, M. (2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: Twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 606–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). (Mis) estimating affective polarization. Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1106–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dungan, J. A., Young, L., & Waytz, A. (2019). The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, Article 103848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epley, N., Caruso, E., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). When perspective taking increases taking: Reactive egoism in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5), 872–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, J. A. C. (2013). The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLoS ONE, 8(12), Article e82131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., Wehling, E., Chung, J. M., Saslow, L. R., & Paulin, I. M. (2020). Measuring moral politics: How strict and nurturant family values explain individual differences in conservatism, liberalism, and the political middle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 777–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2013). The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science, 24(1), 56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, M., & Willer, R. (2019). Moral reframing: A technique for effective and persuasive communication across political divides. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(12), Article e12501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1086–1111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, S. (1982). Economic self-interest and political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 26(3), 446–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernbach, P. M., & Van Boven, L. (2021). False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkel, E. J., Bail, C. A., Cikara, M., M., Ditto, P. H., Iyengar, S., Klar, S., Mason, L., McGrath, M.C., Nyhan, B., Rand, D. G., Skitka, L. J., Tucker, J., Van Bavel, J. J., Wang, C. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Political sectarianism in America. Science, 370(6516), 533–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frimer, J. A., Skitka, L. J., & Motyl, M. (2017a). Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another’s opinions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzach, Y., & Schul, Y. (2021). Partisan ideological attitudes: Liberals are tolerant; the intelligent are intolerant. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(6), 1551–1566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, A. S., & Rogers, T. (2009). Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. Journal of Politics, 71(1), 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, A., Abruzzo, J. M., Huang, Z., Schöne, J., Bailey, D., Willer, R., Halperin, E., & Gross, J. J. (2022). Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, K., MacCormack, J. K., Henry, T., Banks, E., Schein, C., Armstrong-Carter, E., Abrams, S., & Muscatell, K. A. (2022). The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(6), 1199–1222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2016). No absolutism here: Harm predicts moral judgment 30× better than disgust – Commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., Rosenberg, E., & Hom, H. (2003). Differentiating diversities: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Crabtree, C., & Smith, K. B. (2019). Ideology justifies morality: Political beliefs predict moral foundations. American Journal of Political Science, 63(4), 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatemi, P. K., Medland, S. E., Klemmensen, R., Oskarsson, S., Littvay, L., Dawes, C., Verhulst, B., Mcdermott, R., Nørgaard, A. S., Klofstad, C., Christensen, K., Johannesson, M., Magnusson, P. K. E., Eaves, L. J., & Martin, N. G. (2014). Genetic influences on political ideologies: Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations. Behavioral Genetics, 44(3), 282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, R., Blakey, W., Womick, J., Bail, C., Finkel, E. J., Han, H., Sarrouf, J., Schroeder, J., Sheeran, P., Van Bavel, J. V., Willer, R., & Gray, K. (2022). Interventions to reduce partisan animosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(9), 1194–1205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, S., Yudkin, D., Juan-Torres, M., & Dixon, T. (2019). Hidden Tribes: A study of America’s polarized landscape [Report]. More in Common. https://hiddentribes.us/media/qfpekz4g/hidden_tribes_report.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2020). Polarization in America: Two possible futures. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heltzel, G., & Laurin, K. (2021). Seek and ye shall be fine: Attitudes toward political-perspective seekers. Psychological Science, 32(11), 1782–1800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibbing, J. R., Smith, K. B., & Alford, J. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 297–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillman, J. G., Fowlie, D. I., & MacDonald, T. K. (2022). Social verification theory: A new way to conceptualize validation, dissonance, and belonging. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 27(3), 309–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussein, M. A., & Tormala, Z. L. (2021). Undermining your case to enhance your impact: A framework for understanding the effects of acts of receptiveness in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(3), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R., & Haidt, J. (2012). Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 537–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingraham, C. (2014, May 28). Congressional gridlock has doubled since the 1950s. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/05/28/congressional-gridlock-has-doubled-since-the-1950s/Google Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, R., Koleva, S., Graham, J., Ditto, P., & Haidt, J. (2012). Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological dispositions of self-identified libertarians. PLoS ONE, 7(8), Article e42366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2013). Surveying the moral landscape. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(3), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janoff-Bulman, R., & Carnes, N. C. (2016). Social justice and social order: Binding moralities across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE, 11(3), Article e0152479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, D. R. (2015). Declining trust in Congress: Effects of polarization and consequences for democracy. Forum (Germany), 13(3), 375–394.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological asymmetries and the essence of political psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, M., Fernando, J. W., & Begeny, C. T. (2022). Dietary behaviour as a form of collective action: A social identity model of vegan activism. Appetite, 168, Article 105730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalla, J. L., & Broockman, D. E. (2020). Reducing exclusionary attitudes through interpersonal conversation: Evidence from three field experiments. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 410–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmoe, N. P., & Mason, L. (2022). Radical American partisanship: Mapping violent hostility, its causes, and the consequences for democracy. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koleva, S. P., Graham, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H., & Haidt, J. (2012). Tracing the threads: How five moral concerns (especially purity) help explain culture war attitudes. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacheff, C., Schwartz, S., Inbar, Y., & Feinberg, M. (2018). The problem with morality: Impeding progress and increasing divides. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubin, E., Puryear, C., Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2021). Personal experiences bridge moral and political divides better than facts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(6), Article e2008389118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27(4), 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2020). Inaccurate group meta-perceptions drive negative out-group attributions in competitive contexts. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3), 279–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levendusky, M. S. (2018). Americans, not partisans: Can priming American national identity reduce affective polarization? Journal of Politics, 80(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B., & Ditto, P. H. (2012). What dilemma? Moral evaluation shapes factual belief. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(3), 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F., Voiklis, J., & Kim, B. (2018). Understanding contempt against the background of blame. In Mason, M. (Ed.), The moral psychology of contempt (pp. 79–105). Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.Google Scholar
Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 978–990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, J., Simonovits, G., & Levente, L. (2020). Democratic hypocrisy: Polarized citizens support democracy-eroding behavior when their own party is in power. APSA Preprints.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, A. C., Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010). Moral self‐licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, A. C., & Monin, B. (2011). The trouble with thinking: People want to have quick reactions to personal taboos. Emotion Review, 3(3), 318–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, J. A., & Dorison, C. A. (2022). Why is exposure to opposing views aversive? Reconciling three theoretical perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, Article 101435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore-Berg, S. L., Ankori-Karlinsky, L. O., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(26), 14864–14872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, G. S. (2011). Toward a model of morally motivated behavior: Investigating mediators of the moral conviction-action link [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Oishi, S., Trawalter, S., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motyl, M., Prims, J. P., & Iyer, R. (2020). How ambient cues facilitate political segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(5), 723–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neubaum, G., Cargnino, M., Winter, S., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2021). “You’re still worth it”: The moral and relational context of politically motivated unfriending decisions in online networks. PLoS ONE, 16(1), Article e0243049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pew Research Center. (2014, June 12). Political polarization in the American public [Report]. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/Google Scholar
Rhee, J. J., Schein, C., & Bastian, B. (2019). The what, how, and why of moralization: A review of current definitions, methods, and evidence in moralization research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(12), Article e12511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, P., & Shields, K. (2014). Explaining ideology: Two factors are better than one. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(3), 326–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodriguez, C. G., Moskowitz, J. P., Salem, R. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2017). Partisan selective exposure: The role of party, ideology and ideological extremity over time. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 254–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Z. K., & Keefer, L. A. (2017). A cleansing fire: Moral outrage alleviates guilt and buffers threats to one’s moral identity. Motivation and Emotion, 41(2), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P. (1999). The process of moralization. Psychological Science, 10(3), 218–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabucedo, J. M., Dono, M., Alzate, M., & Seoane, G. (2018). The importance of protesters’ morals: Moral obligation as a key variable to understand collective action. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassenrath, C., Hodges, S. D., & Pfattheicher, S. (2016). It’s all about the self: When perspective taking backfires. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 405–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saveski, M., Gillani, N., Yuan, A., Vijayaraghavan, P., & Roy, D. (2021). Perspective-taking to reduce affective polarization on social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05596.Google Scholar
Sawaoka, T., & Monin, B. (2018). The paradox of viral outrage. Psychological Science, 29(10), 1665–1678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1147–1163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, C., & Gray, K. (2017). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skitka, L. J., Hanson, B. E., Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2021). The psychology of moral conviction. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 347–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skitka, L. J., Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2015). Political orientation and moral conviction: A conservative advantage or an equal opportunity motivator of political engagement? In Forgas, J. P., Fiedler, K., & Crano, W. D. (Eds.), Social psychology and politics (pp. 57–74). Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1993). Providing public assistance: Cognitive and motivational processes underlying liberal and conservative policy preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1205–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. G., Krishna, A., & Al-Sinan, R. (2019). Beyond slacktivism: Examining the entanglement between social media engagement, empowerment, and participation in activism. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 13(3), 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spring, V. L., Cameron, C. D., & Cikara, M. (2018). The upside of outrage. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(12), 1067–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ståhl, T., Zaal, M. P., & Skitka, L. J. (2016). Moralized rationality: Relying on logic and evidence in the formation and evaluation of belief can be seen as a moral issue. PLoS ONE, 11(11), Article e0166332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, M. L., Whitehead, P. S., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Seli, P. (2020). Exposure to opposing reasons reduces negative impressions of ideological opponents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, Article 104030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, A. R., & Galinsky, A. D. (2014). Perspective‐taking as a strategy for improving intergroup relations: Evidence, mechanisms, and qualifications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, J. L., Steckler, C. M., & Heltzel, G. (2019). The physiological basis of psychological disgust and moral judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(1), 15–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ugarriza, J. E., & Nussio, E. (2017). The effect of perspective-giving on postconflict reconciliation. An experimental approach. Political Psychology, 38(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Bettache, K. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 735–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viciana, H., Hannikainen, I. R., & Gaitán Torres, A. (2019). The dual nature of partisan prejudice: Morality and identity in a multiparty system. PLoS ONE, 14(7), Article e0219509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelkel, J. G., Ren, D., & Brandt, M. J. (2021). Inclusion reduces political prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, Article 104149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voelkel, J. G., Chu, J., Stagnaro, M. N., Mernyk, J. S., Redekopp, C., Pink, S. L., Druckman, J. N., Rand, D. G., & Willer, R. (2023). Interventions reducing affective polarization do not necessarily improve anti-democratic attitudes. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1), 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vorauer, J. (2013). The case for and against perspective-taking. In Olson, J. M. & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 59–115). Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Y. A., & Todd, A. R. (2020). Evaluations of empathizers depend on the target of empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(5), 1005–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, S., Schroeder, J., & Risen, J. L. (2021). When “enemies” become close: Relationship formation among Palestinians and Jewish Israelis at a youth camp. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(1), 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, M., & Petty, R. E. (2021). Two-sided messages promote openness for morally based attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(8), 1151–1166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, J. H., Rojas, H., Wojcieszak, M., Aalberg, T., Coen, S., Curran, J., Hayashi, K., Iyengar, S., Jones, P. K., Mazzoleni, G., Papathanassopoulos, S., Rhee, J. W., Rowe, D., Soroka, S., & Tiffen, R. (2016). Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, M. (2021). The straw man effect: Partisan misrepresentation in natural language. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 1904–1927.Google Scholar
Yeomans, M., Minson, J., Collins, H., Chen, F., & Gino, F. (2020). Conversational receptiveness: Improving engagement with opposing views. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaal, M. P., Van Laar, C., Ståhl, T., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 670–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Abrams, S. (2022). Moralization of religiosity explains worldwide trends in religious belief [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. D. (1987). The biology of moral systems. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Andersen, M. (2019). Predictive coding in agency detection. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 9(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010). The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory, 5(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baldini, R. (2015). Harsh environments and “fast” human life histories: What does the theory say? bioRxiv, Article 014647. https://doi.org/10.1101/014647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2020). Deciding what to observe: Thoughts for a post-WEIRD generation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, H. C., Bolyanatz, A., Crittenden, A. N., Fessler, D. M., Fitzpatrick, S., Gurven, M., Henrich, J., Kanovsky, M., Kushnick, G., Pisor, A., Scelza, B. A., Stich, S., von Rueden, C., Zhao, W., & Laurence, S. (2016). Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4688–4693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, J. L., & Richert, R. A. (2003). Anthropomorphism or preparedness? Exploring children’s God concepts. Review of Religious Research, 44(3), 300–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N. (2016). The origins of fairness: How evolution explains our moral nature. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumard, N., & Boyer, P. (2013). Explaining moral religions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(6), 272–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumard, N., Hyafil, A., Morris, I., & Boyer, P. (2015). Increased affluence explains the emergence of ascetic wisdoms and moralizing religions. Current Biology, 25(1), 10–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beebe, J. R., & Duffy, L. (2020). The memorability of supernatural concepts: Effects of minimal counterintuitiveness, moral valence, and existential anxiety on recall. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 30(4), 322–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beheim, B., Atkinson, Q., Bulbulia, J., Gervais, W. M., Gray, R., Henrich, J., Lang, M., Monroe, M. W., Muthukrishna, M., Norenzayan, A., Purzycki, B. G., Shariff, A., Slingerland, E., Spicer, R., & Willard, A. K. (2019). Treatment of missing data determined conclusions regarding moralizing gods. Nature, 595(7866), E29–E34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendixen, T., Apicella, C. L., Atkinson, Q., Cohen, E., Henrich, J., McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Purzycki, B. G. (2024). Appealing to the minds of gods: Religious beliefs and appeals correspond to features of local social ecologies. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 14(2), 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendixen, T., Lightner, A., & Purzycki, B. G. (2023). The cultural evolution of religion and cooperation. In Tehrani, J., Kendal, J., & Kendal, R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cultural evolution. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.001.0001Google Scholar
Bendixen, T., & Purzycki, B. G. (2020). Peering into the minds of gods: What cross-cultural variation in gods’ concerns can tell us about the evolution of religion. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 5(2), 142–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bering, J. M. (2006). The folk psychology of souls. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(5), 453–462; discussion 462–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, P. (2012). Religion, morality, evolution. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boehm, C. (2008). A biocultural evolutionary exploration of supernatural sanctioning. In Bulbulia, J., Sosis, R., Harris, E., Genet, R., & Wyman, K. (Eds.), Evolution of religion: Studies, theories, and critiques (pp. 143–152). Collins Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. (2018). Minds make societies: How cognition explains the world humans create. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, A. B., Siegel, J. I., & Rozin, P. (2003). Faith versus practice: Different bases for religiosity judgments by Jews and protestants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, O. S. (2016). Morality as cooperation: A problem-centred approach. In Shackelford, T. K. & Hansen, R. D. (Eds.), The evolution of morality (pp. 27–51). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, O., Whitehouse, H., & Mullins, D. (2019). Is it good to cooperate? Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. Viking.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317(5843), 1344–1347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2017). Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 372(1727), Article 20160244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, A. M., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Cooperation and decision time. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1965). Theories of primitive religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). How do rituals affect cooperation? An experimental field study comparing nine ritual types. Human Nature, 24(2), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galen, L. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 876–906.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 140–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J. D. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin.Google Scholar
Guthrie, S. E. (1980). A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology, 21(2), 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, S. E. (1995). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1976). History and significance of the emic/etic distinction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 5, 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. S. (2019). What is religion? Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. (2005). God’s punishment and public goods. Human Nature, 16(4), 410–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. (2011). Why God is the best punisher. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. D. P. (2016). God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. D., Stopka, P., & Bell, J. (2002). Individual variation evades the prisoner’s dilemma. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1785)Google Scholar
Kavanagh, C. M., & Jong, J. (2020). Is Japan religious? Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture, 14(1), 152–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, J. (2018). Strengthening the supernatural punishment hypothesis through computer modeling. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(3), 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, M., Chvaja, R., Purzycki, B. G., Václavík, D., & Stanĕk, R. (2022). Advertising cooperative phenotype through costly signals facilitates collective action. Royal Society Open Science, 9(5), Article 202202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, M., Purzycki, B. G., Apicella, C. L., Atkinson, Q. D., Bolyanatz, A., Cohen, E., Handley, C., Kundtová Klocová, E., Lesorogol, C., Mathew, S., McNamara, R. A., Moya, C., Placek, C. D., Soler, M., Vardy, T., Weigel, J. L., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2019). Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 286(1898), Article 20190202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lightner, A., Bendixen, T., & Purzycki, B. G. (in press). Cross-cultural datasets systematically underestimate the presence of moralizing gods in small-scale societies. Evolution and Human Behavior.Google Scholar
Markov, A. V., & Markov, M. A. (2020). Runaway brain-culture coevolution as a reason for larger brains: Exploring the “cultural drive” hypothesis by computer modeling. Ecology and Evolution, 10(12), 6059–6077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134(3489), 1501–1506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McElreath, R., & Boyd, R. (2008). Mathematical models of social evolution: A guide for the perplexed. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2011). Wrath of god: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1713), 1858–1863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2014). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 447–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNamara, R. A., & Henrich, J. (2018). Jesus vs. the ancestors: How specific religious beliefs shape prosociality on Yasawa Island, Fiji. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016). Supernatural punishment, in-group biases, and material insecurity: Experiments and ethnography from Yasawa, Fiji. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 6(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Dunbar, R. (2006). A bias for social information in human cultural transmission. British Journal of Psychology, 97(3), 405–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthukrishna, M., Doebeli, M., Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2018). The cultural brain hypothesis: How culture drives brain expansion, sociality, and life history. PLOS Computational Biology, 14(11), Article e1006504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nettle, D., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2020). Life-history theory in psychology and evolutionary biology: One research programme or two? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1803), Article 20190490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016a). The cultural evolution of prosocial religions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016b). Parochial prosocial religions: Historical and contemporary evidence for a cultural evolutionary process. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, Article e29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 362(1480), 731–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peoples, H. C., Duda, P., & Marlowe, F. W. (2016). Hunter-gatherers and the origins of religion. Human Nature, 27(3), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., & Ingram, G. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisor, A., & Ross, C. T. (2024). Parochial altruism: What it is and why it varies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 45(1), pp. 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, E. A. (2017a). Discerning devotion: Testing the signaling theory of religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(1), 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, E. A. (2017b). Social support networks and religiosity in rural south India. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 0057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G. (2011). Tyvan cher eezi and the socioecological constraints of supernatural agents’ minds. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G. (2013). The minds of gods: A comparative study of supernatural agency. Cognition, 129(1), 163–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purzycki, B. G., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530(7590), 327–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purzycki, B. G., & Arakchaa, T. (2013). Ritual behavior and trust in the Tyva Republic. Current Anthropology, 54(3), 381–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., Bendixen, T., Lightner, A. D., & Sosis, R. (2022). Gods, games, and the socioecological landscape. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3, Article 100057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., Finkel, D. N., Shaver, J., Wales, N., Cohen, A. B., & Sosis, R. (2012). What does god know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and non-strategic information. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 846–869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purzycki, B. G., Henrich, J., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., & Norenzayan, A. (2018). The evolution of religion and morality: A synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(2), 101–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., & McKay, R. (2023). Morality, gods, and social complexity. In Purzycki, B. G. & Bendixen, T. (Eds.), The minds of gods: New horizons in the naturalistic study of religion (pp. 121–132). Bloomsbury Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., & McNamara, R. A. (2016). An ecological theory of gods’ minds. In De Cruz, H. & Nichols, R. (Eds.), Cognitive science of religion and its philosophical implications (pp. 143–167). Continuum.Google Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., Pisor, A., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., Henrich, J., McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., Willard, A. K., & Xygalatas, D. (2018). The cognitive and cultural foundations of moral behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(5), 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., Ross, C. T., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2018). Material security, life history, and moralistic religions: A cross-cultural examination. PLoS ONE, 13(3), Article e0193856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis, R. (2022). Religion evolving: The dynamics of culture, cognition, and ecology. Equinox.Google Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., & Watts, J. (2018). Reinvigorating the comparative, cooperative ethnographic sciences of religion. Free Inquiry, 38(3), 26–29.Google Scholar
Purzycki, B. G., Willard, A. K., Klocová, E. K., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q., Bolyanatz, A., Cohen, E., Handley, C., Henrich, J., Lang, M., Lesorogol, C., Mathew, S., McNamara, R. A., Moya, C., Norenzayan, A., Placek, C., Soler, M., Weigel, J., Xygalatas, D., & Ross, C. T. (2022). The moralization bias of gods’ minds: A cross-cultural test. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 12(1–2), 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Haque, O. S., Kane, R. J., Nowak, M. A., & Coakley, S. (2014). Religious motivations for cooperation: An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(1), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. (1979). Ecology, meaning, and religion. North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. (1994). On the evolution of morality and religion: A response to Lee Cronk. Zygon, 29(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddish, P., Bulbulia, J., & Fischer, R. (2014). Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 4(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1999). Complex societies. Human Nature, 10(3), 253–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schloss, J. P., & Murray, M. J. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of belief in supernatural punishment: A critical review. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 1(1), 46–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sear, R. (2020). Do human ‘life history strategies’ exist? Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(6), 513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, J. H., & Sosis, R. (2014). How does male ritual behavior vary across the lifespan? Human Nature, 25(1), 136–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, M., Kaptchuck, T. J., & Henrich, J. (2021). Small gods, rituals, and cooperation: The Mentawai crocodile spirit Sikaoinan. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Youssouf, M., Malik, Z. A., & Bussmann, R. W. (2017). Sacred groves: Myths, beliefs, and biodiversity conservation – A case study from Western Himalaya, India. International Journal of Ecology, Article 3828609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E. A. (2000). Three styles in the evolutionary analysis of human behavior. In Cronk, L., Chagnon, N., & Irons, W. (Eds.), Adaptation and human behavior: An anthropological perspective (pp. 27–46). Routledge.Google Scholar
Soler, M. (2012). Costly signaling, ritual and cooperation: Evidence from Candomblé, an Afro-Brazilian religion. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(4), 346–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosis, R. (2005). Does religion promote trust? The role of signaling, reputation, and punishment. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 1(7), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Sosis, R., & Bressler, E. R. (2003). Cooperation and commune longevity: A test of the costly signaling theory of religion. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(2), 211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosis, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2011). The behavioral ecology of religion: The benefits and costs of one evolutionary approach. Religion, 41(3), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosis, R., Kress, H. C., & Boster, J. S. (2007). Scars for war: Evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 234–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (2018). Cutting culture at the joints? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8(4), 447–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, T., & Halberstadt, J. (2019). The Mickey Mouse problem: Distinguishing religious and fictional counterintuitive agents. PLoS ONE, 14(8), Article e0220886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swan, T., & Halberstadt, J. (2020). The fitness relevance of counterintuitive agents. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 20(3–4), 188–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, G. E. (1960). The birth of the gods: The origin of primitive beliefs. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, J. H., & Vogel, C. (2008). Religion and trust: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(6), 832–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teehan, J. (2016). Religion and morality: The evolution of the cognitive nexus. In Liddle, J. R. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and religion (pp. 117–134). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillich, P. (1957). Dynamics of faith. Zondervan.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C., Aktipis, A., Balliet, D., & Cronk, L. (2020). Generosity among the Ik of Uganda. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 2, Article e23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P., Currie, T. E., Turner, E. A., & Gavrilets, S. (2013). War, space, and the evolution of old world complex societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(41), 16384–16389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tylor, E. B. (1920). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, language, art, and custom. Murray.Google Scholar
van Schaik, C. P., & Burkart, J. M. (2011). Social learning and evolution: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 1008–1016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Schaik, C. P., Isler, K., & Burkart, J. M. (2012). Explaining brain size variation: From social to cultural brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 277–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veissière, S. P., Constant, A., Ramstead, M. J., Friston, K. J., & Kirmayer, L. J. (2020). Thinking through other minds: A variational approach to cognition and culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 43, Article e90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.Google Scholar
Watts, J., Jackson, J. C., Arnison, C., Hamerslag, E. M., Shaver, J. H., & Purzycki, B. G. (2022). Building quantitative cross-cultural databases from ethnographic records: Promise, problems and principles. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(1), 62–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., Roepstorff, A., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1602–1605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Aldrich, D., & Kage, R. (2003). Mars and Venus at twilight: A critical investigation of moralism, age effects, and sex differences. Political Psychology, 24(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J., Mallon, R., & Weinberg, J. M. (2014). Accentuate the negative. In Knobe, J. & Nichols, S (Eds.), Experimental philosophy (Vol. 2, pp. 31–50). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andow, J. (2016). Qualitative tools and experimental philosophy. Philosophical Psychology, 29(8), 1128–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ansani, A., D’Errico, F., & Poggi, I. (2017). “It sounds wrong…” Does music affect moral judgement? In Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Borruso, G., Torre, C. M., Rocha, A. M. A. C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B. O., Stankova, E., & Cuzzocrea, A. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2017, 10409 (pp. 753–760). Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aramovich, N. P., Lytle, B. L., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Opposing torture: Moral conviction and resistance to majority influence. Social Influence, 7(1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. (2019). Nicomachean ethics (T. Irwin, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Arutyunova, K. R., Alexandrov, Y. I., & Hauser, M. D. (2016). Sociocultural influences on moral judgments: East–west, male–female, and young–old. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., Fruyt, F. D., Houwer, J. D., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., Fiedler, S., Funder, D. C., Klieg, R., Nosek, B. A., Perugini, M., Roberts, B. W., Schmitt, M., van Aken, M. A. G., Weber, H., & Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. (2008). Intuition, inference, and rational disagreement in ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(5), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, K., Huebner, B., & Hauser, M. (2010). Intuitive moral judgments are robust across variation in gender, education, politics and religion: A large-scale web-based study. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10(3–4), 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 536–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengson, J. (2013). Experimental attacks on intuitions and answers. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 86(3), 495–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berker, S. (2009). The normative insignificance of neuroscience. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 37(4), 293–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, M. (2015). The good life: Unifying the philosophy and psychology of well-being. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björklund, F. (2003). Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: Effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44(5), 459–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, P. (2010). How do morals change? Nature, 464(7288), 490–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, R. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In Sayre-McCord, G (Ed.), Essays on moral realism (pp. 181–228). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, A., & Powell, R. (2015). The limits of evolutionary explanations of morality and their implications for moral progress. Ethics, 126(1), 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. D., Payne, B. K., & Doris, J. M. (2013). Morality in high definition: Emotion differentiation calibrates the influence of incidental disgust on moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 719–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capraro, V., & Sippel, J. (2017). Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents. Cognitive Processing, 18(4), 399–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsmith, K. M. (2008). On justifying punishment: The discrepancy between words and actions. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, H. A., & Anderson, A. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 300–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chituc, V., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2020). Moral conformity and its philosophical lessons. Philosophical Psychology, 33(2), 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1994). Self-protection and the culture of honor: Explaining southern violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apesteguia, J., Heafner, J., & Keysar, B. (2014). Your morals depend on language. Sigman, M. (Ed.). PLoS ONE, 9(4), Article e94842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Côté, S., Piff, P. K., & Willer, R. (2013). For whom do the ends justify the means? Social class and utilitarian moral judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, O. S. (2016). Morality as cooperation: A problem-centred approach. In Shackelford, T. K. & Hansen, R. D. (Eds.), The evolution of morality (pp. 27–51). Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. (2020). Reflective equilibrium. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/reflective-equilibrium/Google Scholar
Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., & Railton, P. (1992). Toward fin de siecle ethics: Some trends. The Philosophical Review, 101(1), 115–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Brigard, F. (2010). If you like it, does it matter if it’s real? Philosophical Psychology, 23(1), 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demaree-Cotton, J. (2016). Do framing effects make moral intuitions unreliable? Philosophical Psychology, 29(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. (2010). Intuitions, counter-examples, and experimental philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(3), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J. M., & Plakias, A. (2008). How to argue about disagreement: Evaluative diversity and moral realism. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 303–231). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1991). Towards a phenomenology of ethical expertise. Human Studies, 14(4), 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, J. (2001). Uneasy virtue. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, J. (2013). Moral expertise: Judgement, practice, and analysis. Social Philosophy and Policy, 30(1–2), 280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, D. (2010). Not just a truthometer: Taking oneself seriously (but not too seriously) in cases of peer disagreement. Mind, 119(476), 953–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskine, K. J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FitzPatrick, W. (2016). Morality and evolutionary biology. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/morality-biology/Google Scholar
Flanagan, O. (1991). Varieties of moral personality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frances, B., & Matheson, J. (2019). Disagreement. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab.Google Scholar
Fraser, B., & Hauser, M. (2010). The argument from disagreement and the role of cross-cultural empirical data. Mind & Language, 25(5), 541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, W. J., Robinson, A. B., & Friedman, B. L. (1987). Sex differences in moral judgments? A test of Gilligan’s theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friesdorf, R., Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 696–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fumagalli, M., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Marceglia, S., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Zago, S., Lucchiari, C., Consonni, D., Nordio, F., Pravettoni, G., Cappa, S., & Prioriet, A. (2010). Gender-related differences in moral judgments. Cognitive Processing, 11(3), 219–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galotti, K. M. (1989). Gender differences in self-reported moral reasoning: A review and new evidence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18(5), 475–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2018). Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Emotion, 18(7), 989–1008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghelfi, E., Christopherson, C. D., Urry, H. L., Lenne, R. L., Legate, N., Fischer, M. A., Wagemans, F. M. A., Wiggins, B., Barrett, T., Bornstein, M., de Haan, B., Guberman, J., Issa, N., Kim, J., Na, E., O’Brien, J., Paulk, A., Peck, T., Sashihara, M., …, Sullivan, D. (2020). Reexamining the effect of gustatory disgust on moral judgment: A multilab direct replication of Eskine, Kacinik, and Prinz (2011). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gleichgerrcht, E., & Young, L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PLoS ONE, 8(4), Article e60418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J., Meindl, P., Beall, E., Johnson, K. M., & Zhang, L. (2016). Cultural differences in moral judgment and behavior, across and within societies. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 125–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D. (2008). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 3. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development (pp. 35–79). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gump, L. S., Baker, R. C., & Roll, S. (2000). Cultural and gender differences in moral judgment: A study of Mexican Americans and Anglo-Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(1), 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J., & Baron, J. (1996). Social roles and the moral judgement of acts and omissions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(2), 201–218.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haidt, J., Koller, S. K., & Dias, M. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, L., Johansson, P., & Strandberg, T. (2012). Lifting the veil of morality: Choice blindness and attitude reversals on a self-transforming survey. PLoS ONE, 7(9), Article e45457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, M., Cushman, F., Young, L., Kang-Xing Jin, R., & Mikhail, J. (2007). A dissociation between moral judgments and justifications. Mind & Language, 22(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haybron, D. M. (2010). The pursuit of unhappiness: The elusive psychology of well-being. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, Z., & Livengood, J. (2017). Ordering effects, updating effects, and the specter of global skepticism. Synthese, 194(4), 1189–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, T. (1998). Philosophical intuitions and psychological theory. Ethics, 108(2), 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huemer, M. (2005). Ethical intuitionism. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huemer, M. (2011). Epistemological egoism and agent-centered norms. In Dougherty, T. (Ed.), Evidentialism and its discontents (pp. 17–33). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (2007). A treatise of human nature (Norton, D. F. & Norton, M. J., Eds.) (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739)Google Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), Article e124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014). How to make more published research true. PLOS Medicine, 11(10), Article e1001747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1918). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Henry Holt and Company. (Original work published 1890a)Google Scholar
James, W. (1918). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). Henry Holt and Company. (Original work published 1890b)Google Scholar
Johnson, D. J., Wortman, J., Cheung, F., Hein, M., Lucas, R. E., Donnellan, M. B., Ebersole, C. R., & Narr, R. K. (2016). The effects of disgust on moral judgments: Testing moderators. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 640–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. (2006). Metaethics and the empirical sciences. Philosophical Explorations, 9(1), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahane, G. (2011). Evolutionary debunking arguments. Noûs, 45(1), 103–125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamm, F. M. (1993). Morality, mortality: Death and whom to save from it (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (Hansen, F., Ed.). directmedia. (Original work published 1785)Google Scholar
Kauppinen, A. (2007). The rise and fall of experimental philosophy. Philosophical Explorations, 10(2), 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M., Ngo, L., Chituc, V., Huettel, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2017). Moral conformity in online interactions: Rational justifications increase influence of peer opinions on moral judgments. Social Influence, 12(2–3), 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khader, S. J. (2011). Adaptive preferences and women’s empowerment. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiehl, K. A., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook on psychopathy and law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In Mischel, T. (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151–235). Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., & May, J. (2019). How to debunk moral beliefs. In Suikkanen, J. & Kauppinen, A. (Eds.), Methodology and moral philosophy (pp. 25–48). Routledge.Google Scholar
Landy, J. F., & Goodwin, G. P. (2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? A meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(4), 518–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanteri, A., Chelini, C., & Rizzello, S. (2008). An experimental investigation of emotions and reasoning in the trolley problem. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, C., Kohlberg, L., & Hewer, A. (1985). The current formulation of Kohlberg’s theory and a response to critics. Human Development, 28(2), 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E., Kelly, D., & Stich, S. P. (2005). Moral realism and cross-cultural normative diversity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E., & Mallon, R. (2010). Evolution of morality. In Doris, J. M. (Ed.), The moral psychology handbook (pp. 3–46). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, U., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Eds.). (2022). Free will: Philosophers and neuroscientists in conversation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margoni, F., Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2018). Moral judgment in old age: Evidence for an intent-to-outcome shift. Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. (2018). Regard for reason in the moral mind. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. (2019). Précis of Regard for reason in the moral mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42(e146), 1–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, K., Graves, R., Yin, S., Weese, T., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2021). Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis. Cognition, 212, Article 104703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, K., Yin, S., Weese, T., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2019). Do framing effects debunk moral beliefs? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 42(e162), 35–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNair, S., Okan, Y., Hadjichristidis, C., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2019). Age differences in moral judgment: Older adults are more deontological than younger adults. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. (2000). Virtue ethics and situationist personality psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(4), 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. (2013). Moral character: An empirical theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1959). Principia ethica. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1903)Google Scholar
Moran, J. M., Jolly, E., & Mitchell, J. P. (2012). Social-cognitive deficits in normal aging. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(16), 5553–5561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muda, R., Pieńkosz, D., Francis, K. B., & Białek, M. (2020). The moral foreign language effect is stable across presentation modalities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1930–1938.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nadelhoffer, T., & Feltz, A. (2008). The actor–observer bias and moral intuitions: Adding fuel to Sinnott-Armstrong’s fire. Neuroethics, 1(2), 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nado, J. (2014). Philosophical expertise. Philosophy Compass, 9(9), 631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S. (2014). Process debunking and ethics. Ethics, 124(4), 727–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastötter, B., Gleixner, S., Neuhauser, T., & Bäuml, K. T. (2013). To push or not to push? Affective influences on moral judgment depend on decision frame. Cognition, 126(3), 373–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulo, N. (2020). The unreliable intuitions objection against reflective equilibrium. The Journal of Ethics, 24(3), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 36(1), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petrinovich, L., & O’Neill, P. (1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(3), 145–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. W., Golding, G., Hunter, W., & Sampson, R. (1988). Sex differences in adult moral orientations. Journal of Personality, 56(2), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz, J., & Nichols, S. (2016). Diachronic identity and the moral self. In Kiverstein, J. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of the social mind (pp. 449–464). Routledge.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehren, P., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2021). Moral framing effects within subjects. Philosophical Psychology, 34(5), 611–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehren, P., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2022). How stable are moral judgments? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 14, 1377–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, J. B., Brand, M., & Kalbe, E. (2016). Empathy mediates the effects of age and sex on altruistic moral decision making. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, Article 67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, D. (2002). The right and the good (Stratton-Lake, P., Ed.). Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1930)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryberg, J. (2013). Moral intuitions and the expertise defence. Analysis, 73(1), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, H. (2018). Debunking arguments in ethics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, H. (2019). Butchering benevolence moral progress beyond the expanding circle. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 22(1), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 289–308). SAGE Publications Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in moral reasoning? Order effects on moral judgment in professional philosophers and non-philosophers. Mind & Language, 27(2), 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2015). Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection. Cognition, 141, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidel, A., & Prinz, J. (2013). Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains. Cognition, 127(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In Nussbaum, M. & Sen, A. (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defence. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. (2008). Defending ethical intuitionism. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 83–95). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 487–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, P. (2005). Ethics and intuitions. The Journal of Ethics, 9(3–4), 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, J. J., Garg, N., Govind, R., & Vitell, S. J. (2018). Anger strays, fear refrains: The differential effect of negative emotions on consumers’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(1), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2008a). Framing moral intuitions. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.), Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity (pp. 47–76). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.). (2008b). Moral psychology: Vol. 1. The evolution of morality: Adaptations and innateness. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.). (2008c). Moral psychology: Vol. 2. The cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.). (2008d). Moral psychology: Vol. 3. The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, brain disorders, and development. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (Ed.). (2014). Moral psychology: Vol. 4. Free will and moral responsibility. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Miller, C. B. (Eds.). (2017). Moral psychology: Vol. 5. Virtue and character. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, F., Parekh, S., Hooper, L., Loke, Y. K., Ford, J. K., Sutton, A. J., Hing, C., Kwok, C. S., Pang, C., & Harvey, I. (2010). Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases. Health Technology Assessment, 14(8), iii, ix–xi, 1–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorell, T. (2018). Experimental philosophy and the history of philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26(5), 829–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sripada, C. (2018). Addiction and fallibility. Journal of Philosophy, 115(11), 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, T. D., Carter, E. C., & Doucouliagos, H. (2018). What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1325–1346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Street, S. (2006). A Darwinian dilemma for realist theories of value. Philosophical Studies, 127(1), 109–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., Lewis, R. L., & Meyer, D. E. (2011). Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment. Cognition, 119(2), 295–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strohminger, N., & Nichols, S. (2014). The essential moral self. Cognition, 131(1), 159–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart, M. T., Colaço, D., & Machery, E. (2019). P-curving x-phi: Does experimental philosophy have evidential value? Analysis, 79(4), 669–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, J. S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2019). Clean hands: Philosophical lessons from scrupulosity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sytsma, J., & Livengood, J. (2015). The theory and practice of experimental philosophy. Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Tersman, F. (2022). Moral disagreement. In Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2022 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/disagreement-moral/Google Scholar
Tiberius, V. (2013). Well-being, wisdom, and thick theorizing: On the division of labor between moral philosophy and positive psychology. In Kirchin, S. (Ed.), Thick concepts (pp. 217–233). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiberius, V. (2015). Moral psychology: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tiberius, V. (2018). Well-being as value fulfillment: How we can help each other to live well. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobia, K. P., Chapman, G. B., & Stich, S. (2013). Cleanliness is next to morality, even for philosophers. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(11–12), 195–204.Google Scholar
Tropman, E. (2011). Non-inferential moral knowledge. Acta Analytica, 26(4), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vavova, K. (2015). Evolutionary debunking of moral realism: Evolutionary debunking of moral realism. Philosophy Compass, 10(2), 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J. M., Gonnerman, C., Buckner, C., & Alexander, J. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters? Philosophical Psychology, 23(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, T., & Haidt, J. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16(10), 780–784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiegmann, A., & Waldmann, M. R. (2014). Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: A causal model theory. Cognition, 131(1), 28–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, T. (2007). The philosophy of philosophy (The Blackwell/Brown Lectures in Philosophy 2). Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×