Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Literature and Plants
- The Cambridge Handbook of Literature and Plants
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Historical Periods
- Part II Anglophone Literary Forms
- Chapter 7 Useful Books
- Chapter 8 Shakespeare’s Plants Then and Now
- Chapter 9 Metaphysical Subjects and Cavalier Objects in Seventeenth-Century Plant Lyrics
- Chapter 10 Speculative Fiction and the Contemporary Novel
- Chapter 11 Aftermath
- Part III Global Regions
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 9 - Metaphysical Subjects and Cavalier Objects in Seventeenth-Century Plant Lyrics
from Part II - Anglophone Literary Forms
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2025
- The Cambridge Handbook of Literature and Plants
- The Cambridge Handbook of Literature and Plants
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Historical Periods
- Part II Anglophone Literary Forms
- Chapter 7 Useful Books
- Chapter 8 Shakespeare’s Plants Then and Now
- Chapter 9 Metaphysical Subjects and Cavalier Objects in Seventeenth-Century Plant Lyrics
- Chapter 10 Speculative Fiction and the Contemporary Novel
- Chapter 11 Aftermath
- Part III Global Regions
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Seventeenth-century Cavalier poetry (by Jonson, Waller, Lovelace, Suckling, and Herrick) tends to focus on what the poet predictably wants from the material world, often based on analogies between plants and the desired objects, which are often young women. Metaphysical poetry of the same period (by King, Herbert, Donne, Whitney, Wroth, and Vaughan) focuses instead, often by a plant metaphor, on what the poet is, fears to be, and wishes to be. For the Cavalier poets, plants are primarily objects of sensual appetite: focal points of the male gaze, fruit for erotic cravings, and instruments of the carpe diem tradition. For the Metaphysical poets of the same period, plants are usually metaphors for the speakers’ own subjectivity, and instruments of the project of the nosce te ipsum tradition: knowing oneself matters more than seducing others. Other poets (Fane, Marvell, Traherne, and Lanyer) actively resist that binary distinction. Great House poems and feminist perspectives illuminate the social stakes in the opposing poetic tendencies.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Literature and Plants , pp. 166 - 192Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025