Language Aptitudes in L2 Acquisition

doi:10.1017/9781108333603.017

16 - Language Aptitudes in L2 Acquisition

from Part IV - Individual Differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2019

Gisela Granena

Edited by

John W. Schwieter and

Alessandro Benati

Show author details

John W. Schwieter: Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati: Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Some adults learn a second language (L2) more rapidly and/or to a higher level of proficiency than others. One of the factors that can explain such individual differences (IDs) in rate of acquisition and/or ultimate attainment is language aptitude, defined as a combination of cognitive and perceptual abilities that are advantageous in second language acquisition (SLA; Carroll, 1981; Doughty et al., 2010). This chapter provides a state-of-the-field overview of language aptitude research in SLA. A blend of theory and empirical work on this area, the chapter offers an approach to understanding and measuring aptitude components and functions in L2 learning. Starting with a review of the past and present of the construct, with a special emphasis on recent advances, the chapter moves on to a discussion of its predictive validity in naturalistic and instructed SLA and ends with a look into the future by analysing the implications of aptitude research for L2 instruction.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 390 - 408

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.Google Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.Google Scholar

Arroyo, D., & Yilmaz, Y. (in press). The role of language analytic ability in the effectiveness of different feedback timing conditions. In Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the Interaction Approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366–377.Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar

Bley-Vroman, R. (2009). The evolving context of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 175–198.Google Scholar

Block, J. H. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Bracht, G. H. (1970). Experimental factors related to aptitude-treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, 40, 627–645.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (ed.), Training research and education (pp. 87–136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1966). A parametric study of language training in the Peace Corps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research in foreign language aptitude. In Diller, K. (ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In Parry, T. S. & Stansfield, C. W. (eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 11–29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (2002). Manual for the MLAT. Second Language Testing. North Bethesda, MD: Second Language Testing, Inc.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L., & Snow, R. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar

De Graaff, R. (1997). The Esperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–276.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age-effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413–438.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. M. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62, 189–200.Google Scholar

Doughty, C. J.., Campbell, S. G., Bunting, M. F., Mislevy, M. A., Bowles, A. R., & Koeth, J. T. (2010). Predicting near-native L2 ability. In Prior, Matthew T., Watanabe, Yukiko, & Lee, Sang-Ki (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum: Exploring SLA perspectives, positions, and practices. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar

Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.Google Scholar

Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445–474.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goo, J. (2016). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity: A replication. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. O., & Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 279–302). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2012). Age differences and cognitive aptitudes for implicit and explicit learning in ultimate L2 attainment. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013a). Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 105–129). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013b). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63, 665–703.Google Scholar

Granena, G., & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29, 311–343.Google Scholar

Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.Google Scholar

Harley, B., & Hart, D. (2002). Age, aptitude, and second language learning on a bilingual exchange. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 302–330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hoyer, W. J., & Lincourt, A. E. (1998). Ageing and the development of learning. In Stadler, M. A. & Frensch, P. A. (eds.), Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 445–470). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational Constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Ioup, G., Boustagui, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.Google Scholar

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513–541.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Shah, P. (2011). Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10081–10086.Google Scholar

Janacsek, K., Fiser, J., & Nemeth, D. (2012). The best time to acquire new skills: Age related differences in implicit sequence learning across the human lifespan. Developmental Science, 15, 496–505.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116, 321–340.Google Scholar

Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654.Google Scholar

Linck, J., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., Smith, B., Bunting. M. & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63, 530–566.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the critical period hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 43, 287–317.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1, 7–44.Google Scholar

Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. (2009). The handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181–209). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Markessinis, J. (1968). Summary of Dr. John B. Carroll’s “The Foreign Language Attainments of Language Majors in the Senior Year”. Washington, D.C.: Peace Corps.Google Scholar

Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. & Bourne, L. Jr. (eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Novoa, L. K., Fein, D., & Obler, L. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In Obler, L. K. & Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 294–302). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: Individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 888–896.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P. (2008). Implicit learning of natural language syntax. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P., & Williams, J. N. (2006). Dissociating implicit and explicit learning of natural language syntax. In Sun, R. & Miyake, N. (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2594). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P. & Williams, J. N. (2009). Implicit learning of word order. In Taatgen, N. A. & van Rijn, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 425–430). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Révész, A. (2012), Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93–132.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1995). Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283–331.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory during adult incidental second language learning: A replication and extension of Reber, Walkenfeld, and Hernstadt (1991). In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2007). Aptitudes, abilities, contexts and practice. In DeKeyser, R. M. (ed.), Practice in second language learning: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 256–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sáfár, A., & Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 46, 113–136.Google Scholar

Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27–52.Google Scholar

Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996). Word segmentation: The role of distributional cues. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 606–621.Google Scholar

Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences, and instructional design. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and instructed second language learning (pp. 319–353). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2015). Foreign language aptitude and its relationship with grammar: A critical overview. Applied Linguistics, 36, 367–384.Google Scholar

Skinner, E. I., & Fernandes, M. A. (2007). Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2163–2179.Google Scholar

Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Patton, J. (1995). Prediction of performance in first-year foreign language courses: Connections between native and foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 638–655.Google Scholar

Speciale, G., Ellis, N., & Bywater, T. (2004). Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 293–321.Google Scholar

Tagarelli, K., Borges-Mota, M., & Rebuschat, P. (2011). The role of working memory in implicit and explicit language learning. In Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., & Shipley, T. (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2061–2066). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In Mackey, A. (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 144–171). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vatz, K., Tare, M., Jackson, S. R., & Doughty, C. J. (2013). Aptitude-treatment interaction studies in second language acquisition: Findings and methodology. In Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 271–290). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 1–48.Google Scholar

Williams, J. N. (2005). Learning without awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 269–304.Google Scholar

Woltz, D. J. (2003). Implicit cognitive processes as aptitudes for learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 95–104.Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Y. (2013). Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34, 344–368.Google Scholar

Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 356, 1363–1374.Google Scholar