Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:16:01.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Overview of Chapters on Syntax

from Part I - Korean Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2022

By
James Hye Suk Yoon
Edited by
Sungdai Cho  and
John Whitman
Sungdai Cho
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, State University of New York
John Whitman
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Chapter 3 presents an overview of issues in Korean syntax. The specific chapters on syntax address topics that have received attention in both traditional and contemporary investigations of Korean (morpho) syntax, such as anaphora (Han) and nominalizations (Yoon), as well as some that have not previously been investigated in depth, such as Sino-Korean person-denoting nominals (Kim and Sells). The chapter on Right Dislocation (Ko) deals with a construction that received relatively little discussion in traditional or early generative analyses but has emerged as a central testing ground for contemporary debates on movement, ellipsis, and related issues. Finally, Kwon’s contribution deals with real-time processing of syntactic dependencies, which traditionally falls within the field of psycholinguistics. While the papers by Ko, Han, and Kwon are surveys, those by Kim and Sells, and Yoon are not, although the latter tries to situate the proposed analysis against the backdrop of longstanding debates in the analysis of lexical nominalizations in generative grammar. Overall, the collection of papers strikes a balance between familiar topics and newer, lesser-known, topics.

Keywords

syntaxanaphoranominalizationsSino-Korean person-denoting nominalsRight Dislocationsyntactic dependencieslexical nominalizations
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Korean Linguistics , pp. 63 - 81
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity. Linguistik Actuell 42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Grimshaw, Jane. 2008. Verbs, nouns and affixation. In Florian Schäfer, ed., Working Papers of the SFB 732 Incremental Specification in Context, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, and Schäfer, Florian. 2010. On the syntax of episodic vs. dispositional -er nominals. In Alexiadou, Artemis and Rathert, Monika, eds., The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
An, Duk-Ho. 2014. Genitive case in Korean and its implications for noun phrase structure. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 23: 361–92.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Busa, Federica. 1996. Compositionality and the semantics of nominals. Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In Jacobs, Roderick and Rosenbaum, Peter, eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn, pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1980. On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna-Marie, and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fu, Jingqi, Roeper, Thomas, and Borer, Hagit. 2001. The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do so. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 549–82.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Lidz, Jeffrey, and Musolino, Julien. 2007. V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifier scope. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1–47.Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Storoshenko, Dennis Ryan, Leung, Betty Hei Man, and Kim, Kyeong-min. 2015. The time course of long-distance anaphor processing in Korean. Korean Linguistics 17: 1–32.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2009. Compounding in distributed morphology. In Lieber, Rochelle and Stekauer, Peter, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–44.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2004. Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Eunah, Kim, Myeong Hyeon, and Yoon, James H.. 2015. An experimental investigation of online and offline binding properties of Korean reflexives. In Giriko, Mikio, Kanzaki, Kyoko, Nagaya, Naonori, and Takemura, Akiko, eds., Japanese-Korean Linguistics 22: 99–112. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji-Hye, and Yoon, James Hye Suk. 2008. An experimental syntactic study of binding of multiple anaphors in Korean. Journal of Cognitive Science 9: 1–30.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji-Hye, and Yoon, James H.. 2009. Long-distance bound local anaphors in Korean – An empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin. Lingua 119: 733–55.Google Scholar
Kim, Kyeong-min, and Han, Chung-hye. 2016. Inter-speaker variation in Korean pronouns. In Grosz, Patrick and Grosz, Pritty Patel, eds., The Impact of Pronominal Form on Interpretation, Studies in Generative Grammar series. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 347–72.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-Jin, and Choi, Kwang-Il. 2007. Caykwitaymyengsa-uy tauyseng hayso kwaceng: Ankwu wuntong pwunsek (Ambiguity resolution processes of reflexives: Eye-tracking data). The Korean Journal of Experimental Psychology 19: 263–77.Google Scholar
Ko, Heejeong. 2014. Remarks on right dislocation construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses. Language Research 50: 275–310.Google Scholar
Ko, Heejeong. 2017. Right dislocation: Copies vs. fragments. In Halpert, Claire, Kotek, Hadas, and van Urk, Coppe, eds., MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 80: 253–26. Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung. 2008. Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean: Evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP, and eye-tracking experiments. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung, and Sturt, Patrick. 2013. Null pronominal (pro) resolution in Korean, a discourse-oriented language. Language and Cognitive Processes 28: 377–87.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung, and Sturt, Patrick. 2014. The use of control information in dependency formation: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language 73: 59–80.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung, Kluender, Robert, Polinsky, Maria, and Kutas, Marta. In preparation. The processing of syntactic vs. anaphoric referential dependencies in Korean: Evidence from reading times and ERPs. The Routledge Handbook of Asian Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Chung-Hoon. 2009. The structure of Korean afterthought constructions [written in Korean]. Emwunyenkwu 142: 31–54.Google Scholar
Lee, Jeong-Shik. 2009. A verb-initial single clause analysis of right-dislocated constructions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 57: 127–57.Google Scholar
Lee, Wooseung. 2009. The role of case-marked noun phrase in clause structure building. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. English Nouns: The Ecology of Nominalizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liversedge, Simon P., and Van Gompel, Roger P. G.. Manuscript. Resolving anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2008. Current challenges to the lexicalist hypothesis: An overview and a critique. In Lewis, William D., Karimi, Simin, Harley, Heidi, and Farrar, Scott O., eds., Time and Again: Theoretical Perspectives in Formal Linguistics in honor of D. Terence Langendoen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–117.Google Scholar
Ono, Naoyuki. 2013. Two modes of argument selection in nominals. In Frellesvig, Bjarke and Sells, Peter, eds., Japanese/Korean Linguistics 20. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 413–28.Google Scholar
Ono, Naoyuki. 2016. Agent nominals. In Kageyama, Taro and Kishimoto, Hideki, eds., Handbook of Japanese Lexicon and Word-formation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 599–629.Google Scholar
Park, Chongwon. 2013. Nominal and clausal grounding of Korean verbal nouns. Linguistics 51: 1361–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Myung-Kwan, and Kim, Sun-Woong. 2009. The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and delete. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 17: 25–53.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sato, Yosuke. 2010. Complex phrase structures within morphological words: Evidence from English and Indonesian. Lingua 120: 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 445–79.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 1994. Sub-phrasal syntax in Korean. Language Research 30: 351–86.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter. 2004. Words versus phrases in syntactic theory. Studies in Modern Grammar 38: 1–26.Google Scholar
Shi, Chung-Kon. 1998. Kwuke-uy Tane Hyengseng Wenli [Principles of Word Formation in Korean]. Seoul: Hankwukmwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Shi, Chung-Kon. 2015. Word formation. In Brown, Lucien and Yeon, Jaehoon, eds., Handbook of Korean Linguistics. London: Wiley, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth, and Manzini, M. Rita. 1987. Parameters and learnability in binding theory. In Roeper, Thomas and Williams, Edwin, eds., Parameter Setting. Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 4. Springer: Dordrecht, pp. 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James. 1996a. Nominal gerund phrases in English as phrasal zero derivations. Linguistics 43: 329–56.Google Scholar
Yoon, James. 1996b. A syntactic account of category-changing phrasal morphology: Nominalizations in Korean and English. In Ahn, Heedon et al., eds., Morphosyntax in Generative Grammar. Seoul: Hanshin, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Yoon, James, and Park, Chongwon. 2003. Process nominals and morphological complexity. Japanese-Korean Linguistics 13. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jeong-Me. 1989. Long-distance anaphors in Korean and their cross-linguistic implications. In Wiltshire, Caroline, Graczyk, Randolph, and Music, Bradley, eds., Papers from the 25th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 479–95.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×