Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Identity
- The Cambridge Handbook of Identity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Identity: With or Without You?
- Part I The Origin and Development of the Concept of Identity
- 2 Decentering Histories of Identity
- 3 Challenges in Research on Self-Identity
- 4 The Mystery of Identity: Fundamental Questions, Elusive Answers
- Part II New Perspectives and Challenges
- Part III Methodological Approaches
- Part IV Current Domains
- Part V Where Is Identity?
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
3 - Challenges in Research on Self-Identity
from Part I - The Origin and Development of the Concept of Identity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Identity
- The Cambridge Handbook of Identity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Identity: With or Without You?
- Part I The Origin and Development of the Concept of Identity
- 2 Decentering Histories of Identity
- 3 Challenges in Research on Self-Identity
- 4 The Mystery of Identity: Fundamental Questions, Elusive Answers
- Part II New Perspectives and Challenges
- Part III Methodological Approaches
- Part IV Current Domains
- Part V Where Is Identity?
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Our focus is on three key aspects of self-identity, continuity, uniqueness, and agency. They have been researched from a diverse range of theoretical and methodological perspectives. Our aim is to articulate the different ways in which these intangible qualities have been translated into objects of research and knowledge, and the assumptions that researchers make in the service of that translation. Our broader aim is to use studies taken from the wide-ranging literature to show the correspondence between theoretical assumptions and the rationale for asking certain kinds of questions; between assumptions made about the ontology of each phenomenon and the methodology used to render it researchable. For example, questions about why we think we are stable or how we balance needs for uniqueness and sameness presuppose that stability is merely a perception, or that we are biological or cognitive beings. Furthermore, different epistemological assumptions determine what kind of object is researched: a measurable “psychological object,” a discursive practice, or an experience. They determine whether it is located within the person, in narratives or interactions, or beyond the discourse. Showing how assumptions are realized brings into sharp relief the important subjective element in researching self-identity which is manifested in the choices and the decisions we make. In conclusion, we outline two key challenges for identity researchers: one is to make explicit the assumptions and decisions that drive the research, and the second is to consider whose interests are addressed; the researcher’s conceptual or participants’ practical concerns.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Identity , pp. 57 - 76Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Antaki, C. & Crompton, R. J. (2015). Conversational practices promoting a discourse of agency for adults with intellectual disabilities. Discourse & Society, 26(6), 645–661.Google Scholar
Archer, W. & Parry, R. (2019). Blame attributions and mitigated confessions: The discursive construction of guilty admissions in celebrity TV confessionals. Discourse & Communication, 13(6), 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhaus, P. (2018). Reclaiming agency in resident–staff interaction: A case study from a Japanese eldercare facility. Discourse Studies, 20(2), 205–220.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (2010). Blank check for biography? Openness and ingenuity in the management of the “who-am-I” question. In Schiffrin, D., De Fina, A., & Nylund, A. (Eds.), Telling Stories: Language, Narrative, and Social Life (pp. 109–121). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (2011). Who am I? Narration and its contribution to self and identity. Theory & Psychology, 21(1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D. (2011). Discourse and identity construction. In Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K., & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds.), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research (pp. 177–199). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. & Pickett, C. L. (2014). The social self and group identification. In Tyler, T. R., Kramer, R. M., & John, O. P. (Eds.), The Social Self: Cognitive, Interpersonal and Intergroup Perspectives (pp. 71–87). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Brooks, S. (2009). Radio food disorder: The conversational constitution of eating disorders in radio phone‐ins. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19(5), 360–373.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 141–156.Google Scholar
Crocetti, E., Moscatelli, S., Van der Graaff, J., Rubini, M., Meeus, W., & Branje, S. (2016). The interplay of self‐certainty and prosocial development in the transition from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 30(6), 594–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocetti, E., Rubini, M., & Meeus, W. (2008). Capturing the dynamics of identity formation in various ethnic groups: Development and validation of a three-dimensional model. Journal of Adolescence, 31(2), 207–222.Google Scholar
Damen, T. G. E., van Baaren, R. B., Brass, M., Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2015). Put your plan into action: The influence of action plans on agency and responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 850–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Guo, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2016). The autobiographical author through time: Examining the degree of stability and change in redemptive and contaminated personal narratives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 428–436.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 391–394.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 425–435.Google Scholar
English, T., & Chen, S. (2011). Self-concept consistency and culture: The differential impact of two forms of consistency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 838–849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromkin, H. L. (1970). Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(3), 521–529.Google Scholar
Hall, D. L., Blanton, H., & Prentice, D. A. (2015). Being much better and no worse than others: Deviance regulation, self-guides, and the motive to be distinct. Self and Identity, 14(2), 214–232.Google Scholar
Koenig, C. J. (2011). Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions. Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1105–1114.Google Scholar
Lodi-Smith, J., Spain, S. M., Cologgi, K., & Roberts, B. W. (2017). Development of identity clarity and content in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(5), 755–768.Google Scholar
Lynn, M. & Harris, J. (1997). The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psychology & Marketing, 14(6), 601–616.3.0.CO;2-B>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, M. & Snyder, C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 395–410). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nikander, P. (2009). Doing change and continuity: Age identity and the micro–macro divide. Ageing and Society, 29(6), 863–881.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (n.d.). Uniqueness, last accessed October 4, 2020 at www-oed-com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/view/Entry/214714?redirectedFrom=uniqueness+#eid.Google Scholar
Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In Leary, M. R. & Tangney, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Self and Identity, 2nd Ed. (pp. 69–104). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. H., Wood, D., & Furr, R. M. (2018). Assessment of similarity and self–other agreement in dyadic relationships: A guide to best practices. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(1), 112–134.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968), Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. J., Klimstra, T. A., Luyckx, K., Hale III, W. W., Frijns, T., Oosterwegel, A., van Lier, P. A. C., Koot, H. M., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Daily dynamics of personal identity and self‐concept clarity. European Journal of Personality, 25(5), 373–385.Google Scholar
Sengsavang, S., Pratt, M. W., Alisat, S., & Sadler, P. (2018). The life story from age 26 to 32: Rank‐order stability and mean‐level change. Journal of Personality, 86(5), 788–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Şimşek, Ö. F. & Yalınçetin, B. (2010). I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 576–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotter, E. B., Duffy, C. W., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). Balancing the need to be “me” with the need to be “we”: Applying optimal distinctiveness theory to the understanding of multiple motives within romantic relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 71–81.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R. & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.Google Scholar
Snyder, C. R. & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Pursuit of Human Difference. New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. (2012). “One participant said …”: The implications of quotations from biographical talk. Qualitative Research, 12(4), 388–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. (2015). Discursive and psychosocial? Theorising a complex contemporary subject. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(1), 8–21.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. & Littleton, K. (2006). Biographies in talk: A narrative-discursive research approach. Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(1), 22–38.Google Scholar
van Doeselaar, L., Klimstra, T., Denissen, J. J. A., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2019). Distinctiveness as a marker of identity formation. Journal of Research in Psychology, 78, 153–164.Google Scholar
Ward, C. L. P. & Wilson, A. E. (2015). Implicit theories of change and stability moderate effects of subjective distance on the remembered self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(9),1167–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. M. & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480–492.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2015). Tears, bubbles and disappointment – New approaches for the analysis of affective-discursive practices: A commentary on “researching the psychosocial.” Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(1), 83–90.Google Scholar
Widdicombe, S. & Wooffitt, R. (1995). The Language of Youth Subcultures: Social Identity in Action. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by