Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:00:24.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Ways of Approaching Gesture Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2024

Edited by
Alan Cienki
Alan Cienki
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Gesture Studies , pp. 131 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andresen, J. T. (2014). Linguistics and evolution: A developmental approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, A. (2015). The use of signing space in a shared sign language of Australia. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton; Lancaster, UK: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Coates, L., & Roe, L. (1995). Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729521401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1975). Aspects of sign language and its structure. In Kavanagh, J. F. & Cutting, J. E. (Eds.), The role of speech in language (pp. 171–203). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. (1976). Two faces of sign: Iconic and abstract. In Harnard, S. R., Steklis, H. D., & Lancaster, J. (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech (pp. 514–538). New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays in body motion communication. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1946). Some thoughts on “yep” and “nope”. American Speech, 21, 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyes-Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R. (Eds.). (2001). The hands are the head of the mouth: The mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg, Germany: Signum.Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. (1922). The Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian, with an English translation by H. E. Butler. London, UK: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2010). Some simple evo devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., & Yanakido, H. (Eds.), The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives (pp. 45–62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condon, W. S. (1976). An analysis of behavioral organization. Sign Language Studies 13, 285–318. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1988.0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith, S., & Sehyr Sevickova, Z. (2015). Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language and Linguistics, 18(2), 167–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.18.2.01corCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, K., Quinto-Pozos, D., Sevickova, Z., & Schembri, A. (2012). Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation processes in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Langauge and Communication, 32, 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2012.09.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. & Sallandre, M.-A. (2007). Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language: Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In Pizzuto, E., Pietandrea, P., & Simone, R. (Eds.), Verbal and signed languages: Comparing structures, concepts and methodologies (pp. 13–33). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. In two volumes. London, UK: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davis, J. E. (2010). Hand talk: Sign language among American Indian nations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Jorio, A. (2000). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity. A translation of La Mimica Degli Antichi Investigata Nel Gestire Napoletano by Andrea De Jorio (1832) and with an introduction and notes by Adam Kendon. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dor, D. (2015). The instruction of imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture (2nd ed.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original publication 1941).Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. (Ed.) (2003). Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, L. & Halvorsen, R. P. (2017). Depicting and describing meanings with iconic sign in Norwegian Sign Language. Gesture, 16(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.00001.ferCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, L. & Hodge, G. (2018). Language as description, indication and depiction. Frontiers of Psychology, 9, Article 716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, S. & Gough, B. (1978). Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 18, 17–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26203255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, S. (2016). Modally hybrid grammar? Celestial pointing for time-of-day reference in Nheengatú. Language, 92(1), 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, L. (Ed.). (1977). On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public places. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, E46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15001247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gullberg, M. (2011). Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In Pederson, E. & Bohnemeyer, J. (Eds.), Event representations in language and cognition (pp. 166–188). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (1980). The language makers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbitts, B. J. (1992). “Coming to our senses”: Communication and legal expression in performance cultures. Emory Law Journal, 41(4), 873–960.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. (1976). In search of Jove’s Brow. American Speech, 53(4), 233–313.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. (1987). Refurbishing our foundations. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022128CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, J. (1975). Encoding information in sign language. In Kavanagh, J. & Cutting, J. (Eds.), The role of speech in language (pp. 229–240). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. & Schembri, A. (1999). On defining Lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 115–118. https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.2.2.03johCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T., Vermeerbergen, M., Schembri, A., & Leeson, L. (2007). Real data are messy: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Australian Sign Language (Auslan), Vlaamse Gebarantaal (VGT), and Irish Sign Language (ISL). In Perniss, P., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (Eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure (pp. 163–208). Berlin, Germant: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, G. (2015). Bird minds: Cognition and behaviour of Australian native birds. Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example. In Siegman, A. & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 170–210). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1978). Differential perception and attentional frame in face-to-face interaction: Two problems for investigation. Semiotica, 24, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1978.24.3-4.305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Key, M. R. (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1984). Knowledge of sign language in an Australian Aboriginal Community. Journal of Anthropological Research, 40, 556–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.40.4.3629797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1988). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1991). Some considerations for a theory of language origins. Man (N.S.), 26, 602–619. https://doi.org/10.2307/2803829Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1994) Do gestures communicate? A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1995a). Andrea De Jorio – The first ethnographer of gesture? Visual Anthropology, 7, 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.1995.9966661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1995b). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2002). Some uses of the head shake. Gesture, 2(2), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.03kenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2008). Some reflections on the relationship between “gesture” and “sign”. Gesture, 8, 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05kenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2009). Manual actions, speech and the nature of language. In Gambarara, D. & Givigliano, A. (Eds.), Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia (pp. 19–33). Rome, Italy: Aracne Editrice.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2011). “Gesture first” or “speech first” in language origins? In Napoli, D. J. & Mathur, G. (Eds.), Deaf around the world (pp. 251–267). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2012). Language and kinesic complexity. Reflections on “Dedicated gestures and the emergence of sign language” by W. Sandler. Gesture, 12(3), 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2014a) Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of “language”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 369(1651), Article 20139203. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (2014b). The poly-modalic nature of utterance and its relevance for inquiry into language origins. In Dor, D., Lewis, J., & Knight, C. (Eds.), The social origins of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (pp. 67–76).Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2016). Reflections on the “gesture first” hypothesis of language origins. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1117-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2017a). Pragmatic functions of gesture: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01kenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2017b). Language as semiotically heterogeneous systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2020). Sign language in Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. & Sigman, S. J. (1996). Ray L. Birdwhistell 1918–1994. Semiotica, 112(3/4), 231–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1996.112.3-4.231Google Scholar
Kendon, A. & Versante, L. (2003). Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan”. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 109–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Frölich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human computer interaction. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 1371, pp. 23–35). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Laban, R. & Lawrence, F. C. (1947). Effort. London, UK: Macdonald and Evans.Google Scholar
Lascarides, A. & Stone, M. (2009). Discourse coherence and gesture interpretation. Gesture, 9, 147–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.2.01lasCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (1967). The social history of the Natural History of an Interview: A multidisciplinary investigation of social communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 20, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818709389274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, M. (2011). Barak Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11(3), 241–270. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.3.01lemCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepic, R. & Occhino, C. (2018). A construction morphology approach to sign language analysis. In Booij, G. (Ed.), The construction of words (pp. 141–172). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. A. (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 57–107). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Meggitt, M. (1954). Sign language among the Walbiri of central Australia. Oceania, 25, 2–16. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40328952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, M. & Philpott, S. B. (1975). The sign language of sawmill workers in British Columbia. Sign Language Studies, 9, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1975.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. (2015). Whistled languages: A worldwide inquiry on human whistled speech. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D., Peter, C., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the palm-up-open-hand: A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., David, M., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. (2004). The conventionalization of the ring gesture in German discourse. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 216–224). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Poggi, I. (1983). La mano a borsa: analisi semantica di un gesto emblematico olofrastico. In Attili, G. & Ricci-Bitti, E. P. E. (Eds.), Communicare senza parole (pp. 219–238). Rome, Italy: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintillian see Butler, H. E. (1922).Google Scholar
Rimé, B. & Schiaratura, L. (1991). Gesture and speech. In Feldman, R. S. & Rimè, B. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 239–281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, W. E. (1897). Ethnological studies among the North-West-Central Queensland Aborigines. Brisbane, Australia: Edmund Gregory, Government Printer.Google Scholar
Scheflen, A. E. (1965). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry: Journal of Interpersonal Relations, 27, 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1964.11023403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, A., Jones, C., & Burnham, D. (2005). Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10, 272–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni029CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seyfeddinipur, M. (2004). Meta-discursive gestures from Iran: Some uses of the “pistol hand”. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 205–216). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Singleton, J., Goldin-Meadow, S., & McNeill, D. (1995). The cataclysmic break between gesticulation and sign: Evidence against a unified continuum of gestural communication. In Emmorey, K. & Reilly, J. (Eds.), Language, gesture and space (pp. 287–311). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf (=Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8). Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C., Casterline, Dorothy C., & Croneberg, C. G. (1965). A dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet College Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (2008). Depicting by gesture. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Turner, J. (2014). Philology: The forgotten origins of the modern humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1878). Researches into the early history of mankind and the development of civilization. Boston, MA: Estes & Lauriat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umiker-Sebeok, J. & Sebeok, T. A. (Eds.). (1987). Monastic sign languages. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., and Crasborn, O. (Eds.) (2007). Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, L. M., Jr. (1960). The sign language: An analysis. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1973). The language of gestures (J. S. Thayer, C. M. Greenleaf, & M. D. Silberman, Trans.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Alibali, M. W., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 468–523. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1138–1144. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, S., Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., Ishizuka, T., & Fujii, M. (2007). Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of manner and path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish. Cognition, 102(1), 16–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s Gestures from 18 to 30 Months. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Lund University, Lund. Retrieved from https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/f3e27d0e-a023-475a-af6d-c23c3e9c19f1.Google Scholar
Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Morgenstern, A., & Boutet, D. (2016). A child’s multimodal negations from 1 to 4: The interplay between modalities. In Larrivée, P. & Lee, C. (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives (pp. 95–123). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, S., & Liberman, M. (2001). A formal framework for linguistic annotation. Speech Communication 33(1/2), 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & van Heuven, V. (2001). Speak and unSpeak with PRAAT. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341–347.Google Scholar
Bohle, U. (2013). Approaching notation, coding, and analysis from a conversational analysis point of view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 992–1007). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Boutet, D. (2015). Conditions formelles d’une analyse de la négation gestuelle [Formal conditions of an analysis of gestural negation]. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 6(717), 116–129.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2013a). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2013b). Transcription systems for gestures, speech, prosody, postures, gaze. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1037–1058). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic Annotation System for Gestures (LASG). In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1098–1125). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.2.01breGoogle Scholar
Brugman, H., Wittenburg, P., Levinson, S. C., & Kita, S. (2002). Multimodal annotations in gesture and sign language studies. Paper presented at The 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.Google Scholar
Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2008). Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 706–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cienki, A. (2015). Spoken language usage events. Language and Cognition, 7(04), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.). (2018). Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colletta, J.-M. (2009). Comparative analysis of children’s narratives at different ages: A multimodal approach. Gesture, 9(1), 61–96. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.9.1.03colCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colletta, J.-M., Kunene, R. N., Venouil, A., Kaufmann, V., & Simon, J.-P. (2008). Multi-track annotation of child language and gestures. Paper presented at the International LREC Workshop on Multimodal Corpora, Marrakesh, Morocco.Google Scholar
Condon, W. S., & Ogston, W. D. (1967). A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 5 (3), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(67)90004-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congdon, E. L., Novack, M. A., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2018). Gesture in experimental studies: How videotape technology can advance psychological theory. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116654548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Beugher, S., Brône, G., & Goedemé, T. (2018). A semi-automatic annotation tool for unobtrusive gesture analysis. Language Resources and Evaluation, 52(2), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-017-9404-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284–311). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debras, C., & Cienki, A. (2012). Some uses of head tilts and shoulder shrugs during human interaction, and their relation to stancetaking. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Conference on Social Computing, 932–937. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, A. (2018). Sprache in der multimodalen Interaktion. [Language in multimodal interaction.] In Deppermann, A. & Reineke, S. (Eds.), Sprache im kommunikativen, interaktiven und kulturellen Kontext [Language in the communicative, interactive, and cultural context] (pp. 51–85). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. (1996). Grammatical form and “thinking-for-speaking” in Mandarin Chinese and English: An analysis based on speech-accompanying gestures. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. (2003). Gesture in language: Issues for sign language research. In Emmorey, K. (Ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in signed languages (pp. 259–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. (2005). Gesture in signing: A case study in Taiwan Sign Language. Language and Linguistics, 6(2), 279–318.Google Scholar
Enfield, N., Kita, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1722–1741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferré, G. (2011). Functions of three open-palm hand gestures. Multimodal Communication, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2012-0002Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Wagner Cook, S. (2012). Gesture in thought. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 1–36). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimminger, A., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2019). Multimodale Kommunikation in frühen Buchlesesituationen und ihr Zusammenhang mit dem späteren Wortschatz. [Multimodal communication in early book reading situations and its relationship with later vocabulary.] Sprache · Stimme · Gehör [Speech · Voice · Hearing], 43(02), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0851-9063Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2010). Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in second language acquisition and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309337639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2011). Thinking, speaking and gesturing about motion in more than one language. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 143–169). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., De Bot, K., & Volterra, V. (2008). Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development. Gesture, 8(2), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.2.03gulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilliard, C., & Cook, S. W. (2017). A technique for continuous measurement of body movement from video. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0685-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ide, N. (2017). Introduction: The handbook of linguistic annotation. In Ide, N. & Pustejovsky, J. (Eds.), Handbook of linguistic annotation (pp. 1–18). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarmołowicz, E., Karpiński, M., Malisz, Z., & Szczyszek, M. (2007). Gesture, prosody and lexicon in task-oriented dialogues: multimedia corpus recording and labelling. In Esposito, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Keller, E., & Marinaro, M. (Eds.), Verbal and nonverbal communication behaviours (pp. 99–110). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpiński, M., Jarmołowicz-Nowikow, E., & Malisz, Z. (2008). Aspects of gestural and prosodic structure of multimodal utterances in Polish task-oriented dialogues. Speech and Language Technology, 11, 113–122.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In Seigman, A. & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–216). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. H., Ha, Y. S., Bien, Z., & Park, K. H. (2012). Gesture encoding and reproduction for human‐robot interaction in text‐to‐gesture systems. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 39(6), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/01439911211268705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, M. (2001). Anvil: A generic annotation tool for multimodal dialogue. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech), 1367–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kipp, M., Neff, M., & Albrecht, I. (2007). An annotation scheme for conversational gestures: How to economically capture timing and form. Language Resources and Evaluation – Special Issue on Multimodal Corpora, 41, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-007-9053-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, S. (2017). Computational gesture research: Studying the functions of gesture in human-agent interaction. In Church, R. B., Alibali, M. W. & Kelly, S. D. (Eds.), Why gesture: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating (pp. 267–284), Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, S., & Wachsmuth, I. (2004). Synthesizing multimodal utterances for conversational agents. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 15(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/cav.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutalidis, S., Kern, F., Németh, A., Mertens, U., Abramov, O., Kopp, S., & Rohlfing, K. J. (2019). Multimodal marking of information structure in 4-year-old German children. Paper presented at the 2020 Gesture and Speech in Interaction, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–283). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2010). Beschreiben, suchen und auffordern: Varianten einer rekurrenten Geste [Describing, searching, and requesting: Variations of a recurrent gesture.] Sprache und Literatur [Language and Literature], 41(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1163/25890859-041-01-90000006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES–ELAN system. Behavioral Research Methods, 41(3), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.841CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2015). The revised NEUROGES–ELAN system: An objective and reliable interdisciplinary analysis tool for nonverbal behavior and gesture. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 973–993. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0622-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Madeo, R. C., Lima, C. A., & Peres, S. M. (2017). Studies in automated hand gesture analysis: an overview of functional types and gesture phases. Language Resources and Evaluation, 51(2), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-016-9373-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martell, C. (2005). FORM: An experiment in the annotation of the kinematics of gesture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2018). Gestures as image schemas and force gestalts: A dynamic systems approach augmented with motion-capture data analyses. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(1), 20180002. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2014). Conventions for multimodal transcription. Retrieved from https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar
Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oben, B., & Brône, G. (2015). What you see is what you do: On the relationship between gaze and gesture in multimodal alignment. Language and Cognition, 7(4), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2015.22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oloff, F. (2010). Ankommen und Hinzukommen. Zur Struktur der Ankunft von Gästen. [Arriving and joining. On the structure of guests’ arrival]. In Schmitt, R. (Ed.), Koordination. Analysen zur multimodalen Interaktion [Coordination: Analyses of multimodal interaction] (pp. 171–228). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.Google Scholar
Pouw, W., Trujillo, J. P., & Dixon, J. A. (2019). The quantification of gesture–speech synchrony: A tutorial and validation of multimodal data acquisition using device-based and video-based motion tracking. Behavior Research Methods, 52(2), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01271-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripperda, J., Drijvers, L., & Holler, J. (2020). Speeding up the detection of non-iconic and iconic gestures (SPUDNIG): A toolkit for the automatic detection of hand movements and gestures in video data. Behavior Research Methods, 52(4), 1783–1794. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01350-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruth-Hirrel, L., & Wilcox, S. (2018). Speech-gesture constructions in cognitive grammar: The case of beats and points. Cognitive Linguistics, 29(3), 453–493. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T. (2004). EXMARaLDA: Ein System zur computergestützten Diskurstranskription. [EXMARaLDA: A system for computer-aided discourse transcription.] In Mehler, A. & Lobin, H. (Eds.), Automatische Textanalyse. Systeme und Methoden zur Annotation und Analyse natürlichsprachlicher Texte [Automatic text analysis: Systems and methods for annotation and analysis of natural language texts] (pp. 203–218). Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R. (2005). Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking [On the multimodal structure of turn-taking]. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Research: Online Journal of Verbal Interaction], 6, 17–61.Google Scholar
Seeling, T., Fricke, E., Lynn, U., Schöller, D., & Bullinger, A. C. (2016). Natürliche User Interfaces durch den Einbezug von Nutzern gestalten: Implikationen für ein Entwickler-Gestenmanual. [Designing natural user interfaces through user involvement: Implications for a gesture-developer manual] Paper presented at the Useware Conference, Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
Seyfeddinipur, M. (2006). Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Ren, A. (2018). The prosodic characteristics of non-referential co-speech gestures in a sample of academic-lecture-style speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. 1514. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, I., Taylor, G., Williams, G., & Bregler, C. (2010). Hands by hand: Crowd-sourced motion tracking for gesture annotation. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition-Workshops, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Steen, F. F., Hougaard, A., Joo, J., Olza, I., Cánovas, C. P., Pleshakova, A., … Woźny, J. (2018). Toward an infrastructure for data-driven multimodal communication research. Linguistics Vanguard, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stukenbrock, A. (2009). Herausforderungen der multimodalen Transkription: Methodische und theoretische Überlegungen aus der wissenschaftlichen Praxis. [Challenges in multimodal transcription: Methodological and theoretical considerations from scientific practice] In Birkner, K. & Stukenbrock, A. (Eds.), Die Arbeit mit Transkripten in Fortbildung, Lehre und Forschung [Working with transcripts in further training, teaching and research] (pp. 144–168). Mannheim, Germany: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Theofilis, K., Nehaniv, C., & Dautenhahn, K. (2014). Adaptive gesture extraction and imitation for human-robot interaction. Paper presented at the 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Trujillo, J. P., Vaitonyte, J., Simanova, I., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Toward the markerless and automatic analysis of kinematic features: A toolkit for gesture and movement research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1086-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turchyn, S., Moreno, I. O., Cánovas, C. P., Steen, F. F., Turner, M., Valenzuela, J., & Ray, S. (2018). Gesture annotation with a visual search engine for multimodal communication research. Paper presented at the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. New Orleans, LA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, P., Brugman, H., Russal, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Google Scholar
Zima, E. (2014). Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V (motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. [Are there multimodal constructions? A study on [V (motion) in circles] and [all the way from X PREP Y]] Gesprächsforschung – Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Research: Online Journal of Verbal Interaction], 15, 1–48.Google Scholar
Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 20161006. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Retrieved from http://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=1700528&fileOId=1700711Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartenieff, I., & Lewis, D. (1980). Body movement. Coping with the environment. New York, NY: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Bohle, U. (2007). Das Wort ergreifen – Das Wort übergeben. Explorative Studie zur Rolle redebegleitender Gesten in der Organisation des Sprecherwechsels [Taking the floor – handing over the floor. Exploratory study on the role of gestures accompanying speech in the organization of speaker turns]. Berlin, Germany: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar
Boutet, D. (2001). Approche morpho-dynamique du sens dans la gestuelle conversationnelle [Morpho-dynamic approach to meaning in conversational gestures]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Université de Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests [Physiological structuring of gestures: Model and tests]. Lidil, 42, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.4000/lidil.3070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2016). Grammatical aspect and gesture in French: A kinesiological approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 20(3), 132–151. Retrieved from https://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/14745/13784Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2018). Looking ahead: Kinesiological analysis. In Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.), Aspectuality across languages. Event construal in speech and gesture (pp. 143–160). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2013a). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2013b). Transcription systems for gestures, speech, prosody, postures, and gaze. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S., (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1037–1059). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J. (2021). Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica, 184(1/4), 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.022 Retrieved from www.janabressem.de/Downloads/Bressem-Ladewig%202011-gesture%20phases.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic Annotation System for Gestures (LASG). In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1098–1124). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., Ladewig, S. H., & Müller, C. (2018). Ways of expressing action in multimodal narrations: The semiotic complexity of character viewpoint depictions. In Hübl, A. & Steinbach, M. (Eds.), Linguistic foundations of narration in spoken and sign languages (pp. 223–250). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2017). The “Negative-Assessment-Construction”: A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J., Stein, N., & Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.27.2.01breGoogle Scholar
Bressem, J. & Wegener, C. (2021). Handling talk: A cross-linguistic perspective on discursive functions of gestures in German and Savosavo, Gesture, 20(2), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.19041.breCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, K. (1933). Ausdruckstheorie. Das System an der Geschichte aufgezeigt [Theory of expression: The system explained by its history]. Jena, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor and talk. In Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 197–211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor & Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2013). Cognitive linguistics. spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 182–201). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2017). Ten lectures on spoken language and gesture from the perspective of cognitive linguistics: Issues of dynamicity and multimodality. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.). (2018). Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008a). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008b). Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483–501). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2014). Ways of viewing metaphor in gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. (Vol. 2, pp. 1766–1781). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2013). Gesture as precursor to speech in evolution. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 466–480). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, E., & Jensen, T. W. (2014). Living bodies: Co-enacting experience. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook of multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2016–2025). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (2012). Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2008a). Cinema 1. The movement image. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. (2008b). Cinema 2. The time image. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Duncan, S. D. (2002). Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, 2(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dunCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. D. (2006). Co-expressivity of speech and gesture: Manner of motion in Spanish, English, and Chinese. In Proceedings of the 27th Berkeley Linguistics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 353–370). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v27i1.3181Google Scholar
Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter. (Original work published 1941)Google Scholar
Eisenstein, S. M. (1998). The montage of film attractions. In Taylor, R. (Ed.), The Eisenstein reader (pp. 35–52). London, UK: British Film Institute. (Original work published 1924)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Fricke, E. (2007). Origo, Geste und Raum. Lokaldeixis im Deutschen [Origo, gesture and space. Local deixis in German]. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, E. (2014). Deixis, gesture, and embodiment from a linguistic point of view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook of multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1803–1823). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T. (2017). Intercorporeality and interaffectivity. In Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (1998). Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
Horst, D., Boll, F., Schmitt, C., & Müller, C. (2014). Gesture as interactive expressive movement: Inter-affectivity in face-to-face communication. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 2112–2125). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Jensen, T. W., & Greve, L. (2019). Ecological cognition and metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 1–16. http://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappelhoff, H. (2013). Ausdrucksbewegung und Zuschauerempfinden. Eisensteins Konzept des Bewegungsbildes [Expressive movement and audience perception. Eisenstein’s concept of the movement image]. In Curtis, R., Koch, G., & Siegel, M. (Eds.), Synchronisierung der Künste [Synchronization of the arts] (pp. 73–84). Munich, Germany: Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappelhoff, H. (2014). Artificial emotions: Melodramatic practices of shared interiority. In Campe, R. & Weber, J. (Eds.), Rethinking emotion: Interiority and exteriority in pre-modern and contemporary thought (pp. 264–288). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappelhoff, H., & Müller, C. (2011). Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 121–153. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.02kapCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Ritchie Key, M. (Ed.), Nonverbal communication and language (pp. 207–227). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1981). Geography of gesture. Semiotica, 37(1/2), 129–163.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1992). The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 323–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A. (2015). Gesture and sign: Utterance uses of visible bodily action. In Allen, K. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp. 33–46). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, A. (2013). Laban based analysis and notation of body movement. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 941–957). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics, 35, 379–415. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.2.379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. (2003). Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). Berlin; Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, S. C., Fuchs, T., Summa, M., & Müller, C. (2012). Body memory, metaphor and movement. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2014). The cyclic gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1605–1618). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ladewig, S. H. (2020). Integrating gestures: The dimension of multimodality in cognitive grammar. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar. A basic introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. (Original work published 1964)Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, M. (1977). Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In Friedman, L. A. (Ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language (pp. 57–107). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
Meyer, C., Streeck, J., & Jordan, J. S. (Eds.). (2017). Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2007). Methodology for multimodality: One way of working with speech and gesture data. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittelberg, I., Coulson, S. & Spivey, M. J. (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 225–248) Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2014). Gestures and iconicity. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1712–1731). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2017). Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2019a). Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica, 228, 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2019b). Visuo-kinetic signs are inherently metonymic: How embodied metonymy motivates form, function and schematic patterns in gesture. Frontiers of Psychology, 10, article 254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mondada, L. (2013a). Conversation analysis: Talk and bodily resources for the organization of social interaction. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 218–226). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2013b). Multimodal interaction. In Müller, C., Cienki., A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 577–588). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Morris, D., Collett, P., Marsh, P., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (1979). Gestures: Their origins and distribution. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (1998a). Iconicity and gesture. In Santi, S. (Ed.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction [Orality and gestures: Multimodal communication, interaction] (pp. 321–328). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (1998b). Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte, Theorie, Sprachvergleich [Co-speech gestures: Cultural history, theory, cross-linguistic comparison]. Berlin, Germany: Berlin Verlag Arno Spitz.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2007). Gestures in human and nonhuman primates: Why we need a comparative view. In Liebal, K., Müller, C., & Pika, S. (Eds.), Gestural communication in human and nonhuman primates (pp. 233–256). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2008). Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2009). Gesture and language. In Malmkjaer, K. (Ed.), Routledge’s linguistics encyclopedia (pp. 214–217). Abington, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2010). Mimesis und Gestik [Mimesis and gesture]. In Koch, G., Voss, C., & Vöhler, M. (Eds.), Die Mimesis und ihre Künste [Mimesis and its arts] (pp. 149–187). Munich, Germany: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2013). Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 202–217). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2014a). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2014b). Ring-gestures across cultures and times: Dimensions of variation. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1511–1522). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2015). Using gestures with speech: Variable cognitive-semantic and pragmatic relations. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University, 6(717), 452–466. Retrieved from www.vestnik-mslu.ru/Vest-2015/Vest15-717z.pdfGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2016). From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures. In Zlatev, J., Sonesson, G., & Konderak, P. (Eds.), Meaning, mind and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics (pp. 211–226). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2017a). How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16(2), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2017b). Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in discourse. In Hampe, B. (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied cognition in discourse (pp. 297–316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2019a). Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, article 1651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01651Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2019b). Metaphorizing as embodied interactivity: What gesturing and film viewing can tell us about an ecological view on metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 34 (1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., Bressem, J., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Towards a grammar of gesture: A form-based view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 707–733). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Kappelhoff, H. (2018). Cinematic metaphor: Experience – affectivity – temporality. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Ladewig, S. H. (2013). Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In Borkent, M., Dancygier, B., & Hinnell, J. (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 295–324). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, C., Ladewig, S. H., & Bressem, J. (2013). Gestures and speech from a linguistic perspective: A new field and its history. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 55–81). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C., & Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 6, 85–120. https://doi.org/10.3726/81610_85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nùnez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistics comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., & Kita, S. (1999). Expressing manner and path in English and Turkish: Differences in speech, gesture, and conceptualization. In Hahn, M. & Stoness, S. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 507–512). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R., & Ishizuka, T. (2008). Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology, 44(4), 1040–1054. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parrill, F., Bergen, B. K., & Lichtenstein, P. V. (2013). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, F., Lavanty, B., Bennett, A., Klco, A., & Demir-Lira, O. E. (2018). The relationship between character viewpoint gesture and narrative structure in children. Language and Cognition, 10(3), 408–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.4.2.05parCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plessner, H. (1982). Die Deutung des mimischen Ausdrucks: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Bewußtsein des anderen Ichs [The interpretation of facial expression: A contribution to the understanding of the consciousness of the other self] [in cooperation with Buytendijk, Frederik J. J.]. In Dux, G., Marquard, O., & Ströker, E. (Eds.), Helmuth Plessner. Gesammelte Schriften [Helmuth Plessner: Collected Writings] (Vol. 7: Ausdruck und menschliche Natur [Vol. 7. Expression and human nature], pp. 67–129). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1925)Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, R. (2005). Zur multimodalen Struktur von turn-taking [The multimodal structure of turn-taking]. Gesprächsforschung – Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion [Conversation Studies – Online Journal on Verbal Interaction], 6, 17–61.Google Scholar
Schoonjans, S. (2018). Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen [Modal particles as multimodal constructions: A corpus-based analysis of the co-occurrence of modal particles and gestures in German]. Berlin, Germany: DeGruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherzer, J. (1973). Verbal and nonverbal deixis: The pointed lip gesture among the San Blas Cuna. Language in Society, 2(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500000087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought to language” to “thinking and speaking”. In Levinson, S. C. & Gumperz, J. J. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stec, K., & Sweetser, E. (2016). Maintaining multiple viewpoints with gaze. In Dancygier, B., Wei-Iun, L., & Verhagen, A. (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 237–257). Berlin, Gemany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers, No. 8. Buffalo, NY: Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo. Republished (2005) in The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, J., & Hartge, U. (1992). Previews: Gestures at the transition place. In Auer, P. & di Luzio, A. (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 135–158). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Taub, S. F. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teßendorf, S. (2013). Pragmatic and metaphoric: Combining functional with cognitive approaches in the analysis of the “brushing aside gesture”. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1540–1557). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wilcox, S. (2009). Symbol and symptom: Routes from gesture to signed language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.04wilCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S., & Occhino, C. (2016). Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(3), 371–404. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S., Shaffer, B., Jarque, M. J., Segimon, J. M., Pizzuto, E., & Rossini, P. (2000). The emergence of grammar from gesture: A cross-linguistic study of modal verbs in three signed languages. Paper presented at the Seventh Conference on Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research (TISLR), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Wundt, W. (1973). The language of gestures. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2014a). Human uniqueness, bodily mimesis and the evolution of language. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 27, 197–219.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. (2014b). Image schemas, mimetic schemas and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2014-0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie [Theory of language]. Jena, Germany: Fischer.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1973). Recherche pour une formation auditive et inductive de professeurs de langues vivantes à une méthode de correction phonétique de type perceptif [Research for the auditory and inductive training for modern language teachers in a perceptual method of phonetic correction]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) Paris, France, Université de Paris III.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1979). L’index signifiant [The signifying index finger], Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, 35, 91–109.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1980). Etude des expressions mimiques conventionnelles françaises dans le cadre d’une communication non verbale [Study of conventional French facial expressions in the context of nonverbal communication]. Semiotica, 29(3/4), 245–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1981). Etude des expressions mimiques conventionnelles françaises dans le cadre d’une communication non verbale testées sur des Hongrois [Study of conventional French facial expressions in the context of nonverbal communication using Hungarian test subjects]. Semiotica, 35(1/2), 125–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1984). Contribution à une analyse sémiologique de la mimique faciale et gestuelle française dans ces rapports avec la communication verbale (1. Experimentation; 2. Taxonomie; 3. Synthèse; 4. Annexe illustrative) [Contribution to a semiological analysis of French facial and gestural expression in their relation to verbal communication (1. Experimentation; 2. Taxonomy; 3. Synthesis; 4. Appendix of illustrations)]. Lille: Université de Lille III. (1983: Habilitation thesis, Université de Paris III).Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1985a). La mimique faciale et gestuelle française du refus: motivation [The French facial and gestural expression of refusal: Motivation]. Geste et Image, 4, 11–37.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1985b). Espace-Temps: Expression gestuelle du temps [Space-Time: Gestural expression of time]. Semiotica, 55(1/2), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1987). Geste et motivation [Gesture and motivation]. Semiotica, 65(1/2), 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1989). Parallélisme phono-gestuel [Phono-gestural parallelism]. In Graines de parole. Puissance du verbe et traditions orales. Textes offerts à Geneviève Calame-Griaule, réunis par l’équipe du CNRS “Langage et Culture en Afrique de l’Ouest” [Seeds of speech. Power of the word and oral traditions. Texts offered to Geneviève Calame-Griaule, compiled by the CNRS team “Language and Culture in West Africa’]”, pp. 403–417. Paris, France: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1994). Gestures. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (Eds.) The encyclopedia of language & linguistics (Vol. 3, pp. 1431–1434). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, and (1998) in Mey, J. L. (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics (pp. 326–330). Oxford, UK: Elsevier, Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1997). Multicanalité de la communication et multifonctionnalité du geste [The multichannel character of communication and multifunctionality of gesture]. In Polyphonie pour Iván Fónagy, pp. 61–71. Paris, France: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1998). Geste et images [Gesture and images], Semiotica, 118(1/2), 105–120. Retrieved from www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/118/1-2/article-p105.xml?language=enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2000). Les gestes qui parlent: Sémiologie du geste dans l’expression orale [The gestures that speak: Semiology of gesture in oral expression]. Directed by Pierre Samson, produced by ENS Fontenay/St Cloud. Série Mots et politique n°5. Recorded and published online, January 1, 2000. www.canal-u.tv/intervenants/calbris-genevieve–028605403Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2001). Principes méthodologiques pour une analyse du geste accompagnant la parole [Methodological principles for analyzing co-speech gesture]. Mots, 67, 129–148. Retrieved from www.persee.fr/doc/mots_0243-6450_2001_num_67_1_2509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2002a). L’espace symbolique révélé par la gestuelle coverbale d’un homme politique [The symbolic space revealed by the coverbal gestures of a politician]. Mots, 68, 45–58. Retrieved from http://mots.revues.org/index6563.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2002b). Sémantisme des connecteurs: nuancement du verbal par le gestuel [The semantism of connectors: the nuancing of the verbal by the gestural]. LIDIL, 26, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2003a). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46. Retrieved from https://benjamins.com/catalog/gest.3.1.03calCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (2003b). Multireferentiality of coverbal gestures. In Rector, M., Poggi, I., & Trigo, N. (Eds.), Gestures: Meaning and use (pp. 203–207). Porto, Portugal: Universidad Fernando Pessoa.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2003c). L’expression gestuelle de la pensée d’un homme politique [The gestural expression of a politician’s intellect]. Paris, France: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2004). Déixis représentative [Representational deixis]. In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures, Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998 (pp. 146–156). Berlin, Germany: Weidler.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2008a). Le geste coverbal, un signe analogique [Coverbal gesture, an analogical sign]. In D. Boutet & C. Cuxac (Eds.), Le signifiant gestuel: langues des signes et gestualité co-verbale, Cahiers de Linguistique Analogique, 5, 35–80.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2008b). La tête de Nicolas Sarkozy ou les fonctions des gestes de la tête durant l’énonciation [Nicolas Sarkozy’s head or the functions of head gestures during utterance]. Mots. Les langages du politique, 86, 99–118. Retrieved from https://journals.openedition.org/mots/14002Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1975) ariefle: Approche Rythmique Intonative et Expressive du Français Langue Etrangère [A rhythmic, intonational, and expressive approach to French as a foreign language] (1 booklet, 1 magnetic tape, and 24 slides). Paris, France: CLE.Google Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1980). Oh là là! Expression intonative et mimique [Oh my! Intonational and facial expression] (drawings by Lapointe C.) (teacher’s book, student’s book, 2 magnetic tapes, and 2 slide films). Paris, France: CLE International.Google Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1986). Des gestes et des mots pour le dire [Gestures and words to say it] (drawings by Zaü). Paris, France: CLE International.Google Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1992). La mauvaise langue: Du geste à l’expression imagée, au jeu de mots et au théâtre [Bad-mouthing: From gesture to metaphoric expression, wordplay and theatre] (Video production by Didi R.). Besançon, France: Media de l’U. de Franche Comté.Google Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (2011). Clés pour l’oral: Gestes et paroles dans l’argumentation conversationnelle [Keys to speaking: Gestures and words in conversational argumentation] (teaching kit, DVD, student’s manual, teacher’s booklet). Paris, France: Hachette.Google Scholar
Condon, W. S. (1976). An analysis of behavioral organization. Sign Language Studies, 13, 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Chanay, H. (2005). Review of L’expression gestuelle de la pensée d’un homme politique [The gestural expression of a politician’s thoughts] by G. Calbris (2003c). Marges Linguistiques, 9, 28–34. Retrieved from www.revue-texto.net/Parutions/Marges/00_ml092005.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1961). Le signe conventionnel motivé [The motivated conventional sign]. La linguistique, 7, 55–84.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (1983). La vive voix: Essais de psycho-phonétique [The living voice: Essays on psychophonetics]. Paris, France: Payot.Google Scholar
Fónagy, I. (2001). Languages within language. An evolutive approach. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fónagy, I., & Bérard, E. (1972). “Il est huit heures”: contribution à l’analyse sémantique de la vive voix [“It’s eight o’clock”: A contribution to the semantic analysis of the living voice], Phonetica, 26, 157–192. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). The social nature of embodied cognition: A view from the world of metaphor. Intellectica. Revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive, 56(2011/2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.3406/intel.2011.1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. (Ed.), Style and language (pp. 350–377). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(875), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jousse, M. (1936). Le mimisme humain et l’anthropologie du langage [Human mimicry and the anthropology of language]. Revue Anthropologique, 46(7–9), 201–215.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, D., Quek, F., McCullough, K-E., Duncan, S., Furuyama, N., Bryll, R., … Ansari, R. (2001). Catchments, prosody and discourse. Gesture, 1(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherer, K. (1980). The functions of nonverbal signs in conversation. In St. Clair, R. N. & Gilles, H. (Eds.), The social and psychological contexts of language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1977). Le concept de “syntaxe mixte”, recherches autour d’une hypothèse [The concept of “mixed syntax”, research studies based on a hypothesis], Études de Linguistique Appliquée (ELA), 27, 114–123.Google Scholar

References

Bressem, J. (2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 1079–1098). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014a). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1592–1604). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of recurrent gestures of German. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A. (2013). Cognitive linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 182–201). Berlin, the Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (2003). Pointing and place. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fedorova, O. V. (2018). O russkoj zhestikuljacii s lingvisticheskoj tochki zrenija (k vykhodu monografii E. A. Grishinoj) [Russian gestures from a linguistic perspective (dedicated to the publication of Elena A. Grishina’s monograph)]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Issues in Linguistics], 5, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0373658X0001400-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grishina, E. A. (2017). Russkaja zhestikuljacija s lingvisticheskoj tochki zrenija: Korpusnye issledovania [Russian gesticulation from a linguistic point of view: Corpus studies]. Moscow, Russia: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2011). Thinking, speaking and gesturing about motion in more than one language. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), Thinking and speaking in two languages (pp. 143–169). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassemer, J., & McCleary, L. (2018). The multidimensionality of pointing. Gesture, 17(3), 417–463. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.17018.hasCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iosad, P., Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Piperski, A., & Sitchinava, D. (2018). Depth, brilliance, clarity: Andrey Anatolyevich Zaliznyak (1935–2017). Linguistic Typology, 22(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2018-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, D., Chandrasekaran, B., & Tranel, D. (2007). A case of impaired verbalization but preserved gesticulation of motion events. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(1), 70–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290600926667CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, A., & Versante, L. (2003). Pointing by hand in “Neapolitan”. In Kita, S. (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 109–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00505-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehr, D. (2007). Aspects of rhythm in gesture and speech. Gesture, 7(2), 179–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.7.2.04loeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., Cassell, J., & Levy, E. T. (1993). Abstract deixis. Semiotica, 95(1/2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1993.95.1-2.5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D., & Levy, E. T. (1993). Cohesion and gesture. Discourse Processes, 16, 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539309544845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In Evans, V. & Chilton, P. (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family? In Müller, C. & Posner, R. (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 233–256). Berlin, Germany: Weidler Verlag.Google Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R., & Brown, A. (2005). How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures? Insights from crosslinguistic variations and similarities. Gesture, 5(1/2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.5.1.15ozyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prozorova, E. V. (2009). Markery lokal’noj struktury diskursa v russkom zhestovom jazyke [Markers of local discourse structure in Russian Sign Language]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lomonosov Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Rakhilina, E. V., Bychkova, P. A., & Zhukova, S. Ju. (2021). Rechevye akty kak lingvisticheskaja kategorija. Diskursivnye formuly [Speech acts as a linguistic category: Discursive formulas]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija [Issues in Linguistics], 2, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savchuk, S., & Makhova, A. (2021). Multimodal Russian Corpus and its use in emotional studies. Russian Journal of Communication, 13(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2021.1887991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelma, J. H., & Cameron, L. J. (2007). Intonation units in spoken interaction: Developing transcription skills. Text and Talk, 27(3), 361–393. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemann, J. M., & Knapp, M. L. (1975). Turn-taking in conversations. Journal of Communication, 25(2), 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., & Matlock, T. (2013). Using space to talk and gesture about numbers: Evidence from the TV News Archive. Gesture, 13(3), 377–408. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.06winCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt [The Old Novgorod dialect]. Moscow, Russia: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. (2010). Trudy po akcentologii. Tom I. [Works on accentology. Volume 1]. Moscow, Russia: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, A. A. (2011). Trudy po akcentologii. T. II: Drevnerusskij i starovelikorusskij akcentologicheskij slovar’-ukazatel’ (XIV–XVII vv) [Works on accentology. Volume 2: Old Russian and Old Great Russian accentual dictionary-catalogue (14th–17th C.)]. Moscow, Russia: Languages of Slavic Culture.Google Scholar
Zima, E., & Bergs, A. (2017). Special issue: Towards a multimodal construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/lingvan/3/s1/htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aldrete, G. S. (1999). Gestures and acclamations in Ancient Rome. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bébian, R.-A. A. (1826). Mimographie, ou Essai d’écriture mimique propre à régulariser le langage des sourds-muets [Mimography, or An attempt at mimic writing suitable for regularizing the language of deaf-mutes]. Paris, France: Imprimerie de Regnoux.Google Scholar
Bottineau, D. (2012). Parole, corporéité, individu et société – l’embodiment dans les linguistiques cognitives [Speech, corporality, the individual, and society – embodiment in cognitive linguistics]. Texto!, 17(1 & 2), 1–30. www.revue-texto.net/index.php?id=2973Google Scholar
Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: Modèle et tests [Physiological structuring of gestures: Model and tests] . Lidil, 42, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.4000/lidil.3070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutet, D. (2018). Pour une approche kinésiologique de la gestualité [Towards a kinesiological approach to gestures] [Unpublished habilitation thesis]. University of Rouen Normandy, France. Retrieved from https://theses.hal.science/tel-02357282/Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Jégo, J.-F., & Meyrueis, V. (2018). POLIMOD Pipeline: Documentation. Motion capture, visualization & data analysis for gesture studies. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal–01950466/Google Scholar
Boutet, D., & Morgenstern, A. (2020). Prélude et Ode à une approche kinésiologique de la gestualité [Prelude and Ode to a kinesiological approach to gestures]. TIPA. Travaux Interdisciplinaires du Laboratoire Parole et Langage d’Aix-en-Provence, 36. https://doi.org/10.4000/tipa.3892Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2018a). Looking ahead: Kinesiological analysis. In Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.), Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture (pp. 143–159). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/hcp.62.c5Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2018b). Speakers’ gestural expression of event construal: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. In Cienki, A. & Iriskhanova, O. K. (Eds.), Aspectuality across languages: Event construal in speech and gesture (pp. 107–142). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. https://benjamins.com/catalog/hcp.62.c5Google Scholar
Brentari, D. (1998). A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Browman, C. P., Goldstein, L., Kelso, J. A. S., Rubin, P., & Saltzman, E. (1984). Articulatory synthesis from underlying dynamics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(S1), S22–S23. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2021330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulwer, J. (1644). Chirologia: Or the naturall language of the hand. Composed of the speaking motions, and discoursing gestures thereof. Whereunto is added Chironomia: Or, the art of manuall rhetoricke. Consisting of the naturall expressions, digested by art in the hand, as the chiefest instrument of eloquence. London, UK: Thomas Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Calbris, G., & Montredon, J. (1986). Des gestes et des mots pour le dire [Gestures and words to say it]. Paris, France: Clé International.Google Scholar
Caradec, F. (2005). Dictionnaire des gestes: Attitudes et mouvements expressifs en usage dans le monde entier [Dictionary of gestures: Attitudes and expressive movements in use around the world]. Paris, France: Fayard.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. (2021). From the finger lift to the palm-up open hand when presenting a point: A methodological exploration of forms and functions. Languages and Modalities, 1, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.1.68914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Codman, E. A. (1934). The shoulder: Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. Boston, MA: Thomas Todd Co.Google Scholar
Cuxac, C. (2000). La langue des signes française (LSF): Les voies de l’iconicité [French Sign Language (LSF): The paths of iconicity]. Paris, France: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1998). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1872)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debras, C. (2017). The shrug. Gesture, 16(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.1.01debCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumas, R., Chèze, L., & Verriest, J.-P. (2007). Adjustments to McConville et al. and Young et al. Body segment inertial parameters. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.02.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efron, D. (1972). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton. (Original work published 1942)Google Scholar
Events and Gestures (n.d.). The project “Verbal and co-verbal means of event construal across languages.” Retrieved from http://scodis.com/our-projects/events-and-gestures/Google Scholar
Garnier, F. (1989). Le langage de l’image au Moyen Age II: Grammaire des gestes [The language of images in the Middle Ages II: A grammar of gestures] (Vol. 2). Paris, France: Le Léopard d’or.Google Scholar
Gosselin, L. (2005). Temporalité et modalité [Temporality and modality]. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: De Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
Guignard, J.-B. (2008). Le corps et l’idée ou les simulacres d’incarnation: Le cas de la linguistique cognitive [The body and the idea or simulacra of incarnation: The case of cognitive linguistics]. HAL. http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs–00401736Google Scholar
Hoiting, N., & Slobin, D. I. (2002). Transcription as a tool for understanding: The Berkeley Transcription System for sign language research (BTS). In Morgan, G. & Woll, B. (Eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition (pp. 55–75). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1931). Méditations Cartésiennes: Introduction à la Phénoménologie [Cartesian meditations: Introduction to phenomenology]. Paris, France: Vrin.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E., & Liddell, S. K. (2010). Toward a phonetic representation of signs: Sequentiality and contrast. Sign Language Studies, 11(2), 241–274. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2010.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. E., & Liddell, S. K. (2011). Toward a phonetic representation of hand configuration: The fingers. Sign Language Studies, 12(1), 5–45. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2011.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1768/1991). On the first ground of the distinction of regions in space. In van Cleve, J. & Frederick, R. E. (Eds.), The philosophy of right and left (pp. 27–33). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Spring Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Kapandji, I. A. (1997). Physiologie articulaire. 1, Membre supérieur [Joint physiology. 1, The upper limb]. Paris, France: Maloine.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. An analysis of an example. In Siegman, A. W., & Pope, B. (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177–210). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). Berlin, Germany: Spring.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L., & Garrett, M. F. (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConaill, M. A. (1946). Studies in the mechanics of synovial joints: Fundamental principles and diadochal movements. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 21(6), 190–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConaill, M. A. (1948). The movements of bones and joints. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume, 30 -B(2), 322–326.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1972). Phénoménologie de la perception [The phenomenology of perception]. Paris, France: Gallimard. (Original work published 1945)Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A., Chevrefils, L., Blondel, M., Vincent, C. Thomas, C., Jégo, J.-F., & Boutet, D. (2021). “Of thee I sing”: An opening to Dominique Boutet’s kinesiological approach to gesture. Languages and Modalities, 1, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.3897/lamo.1.68148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C. (2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., & Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body - language - communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1687–1702). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2018). How recurrent gestures mean. Gesture, 16(2), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prillwitz, S., Leven, R., Zienert, H., Hanke, T., & Henning, J. (1989). Hamburg notation system for sign languages: An introductory guide. Hamburg, Germany: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Quintilian, , & Cousin, J. (2003). Institution oratoire. Tome VI, Livre X et XI [Oratory institution. Volume VI, Book X and XI]. Paris, France: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Radden Keefe, B. (2021). The illustrated afterlife of Terence’s comedies (800–1200). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richir, M. (2005). Symétrie chirale et constitution de l’espace [Chiral symmetry and the constitution of space]. In Siksou, M. (Ed.), Symétries: Symétries et symmetries du vivant [Symmetries: Symmetries and symmetries of life] (pp. 21–27). Paris, France: Hermès. Lavoisier.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. (1989). Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spicer, J. (1991). The Renaissance elbow. In Bremmer, J. & Roodenburg, H. (Eds.), A cultural history of gesture from antiquity to the present day (pp. 84–128). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. C. (2005). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(1), 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001 (Original work published 1960 in Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8, Department of Anthropology and Linguistics, University at Buffalo, NY).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, V. (1995). Lessons in SignWriting: Textbook. La Jolla, CA: Deaf Action Committee. https://www.signwriting.org/lessons/lessons.htmlGoogle Scholar

References

Ahmad, N., Ghazilla, R.A.R., Khairi, N.M., & Kasi, V. (2013). Reviews on various Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) sensor applications. International Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 1(2), 256–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alviar, C., Dale, R., & Galati, A. (2019). Complex communication dynamics: Exploring the structure of an academic talk. Cognitive Science, 43(3), e12718. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12718CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barré, A., & Armand, S. (2014). Biomechanical ToolKit: Open-source framework to visualize and process biomechanical data. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 114, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.01.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecks, C., & Grass, A. (2018). Efficient point-based pattern search in 3D motion capture databases. 2018 IEEE 6th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud), 230–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, K., & Kopp, S. (2012). Gestural alignment in natural dialogue. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 34(34), 1326–1331.Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Jégo, J. F., & Meyrueis, V. (2018). POLIMOD Pipeline: Documentation. Motion capture, visualization & data analysis for gesture studies. https://hal.science/hal-01950466v1Google Scholar
Boutet, D., Morgenstern, A., & Cienki, A. (2016). Grammatical aspect and gesture in French: A kinesiological approach. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 20(3), 132–151. http://journals.rudn.ru/linguistics/article/view/14745Google Scholar
Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., & Sheikh, Y. (2017). Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 7291–7299. http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2017/html/Cao_Realtime_Multi-Person_2D_CVPR_2017_paper.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, M., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Synchronization of speech and gesture: Evidence for interaction in action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1726–1741. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danner, S. G., Barbosa, A. V., & Goldstein, L. (2018). Quantitative analysis of multimodal speech data. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driskell, J. E., & Radtke, P. H. (2003). The effect of gesture on speech production and comprehension. Human Factors, 45(3), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.3.445.27258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esposito, A., & Esposito, A. M. (2011). On speech and gestures synchrony. In Esposito, A., Vinciarelli, A., Vicsi, K., Pelachaud, C., & Nijholt, A. (Eds.), Analysis of verbal and nonverbal communication and enactment: The processing issues (pp. 252–272). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25775-9_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteve-Gibert, N., & Guellaï, B. (2018). Prosody in the auditory and visual domains: A developmental perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 338. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujiwara, K., & Daibo, I. (2016). Evaluating interpersonal synchrony: Wavelet transform toward an unstructured conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00516CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furtado, J. S., Liu, H. H. T., Lai, G., Lacheray, H., & Desouza-Coelho, J. (2019). Comparative analysis of OptiTrack motion capture systems. In Janabi-Sharifi, F. & Melek, W. (Eds.), Advances in motion sensing and control for robotic applications (pp. 15–31). Toronto, Canada: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17369-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., & Kita, S. (2009). Attention to speech-accompanying gestures: Eye movements and information uptake. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(4), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0073-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassemer, J., & Winter, B. (2016). Producing and perceiving gestures conveying height or shape. Gesture, 15(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.15.3.07hasCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassemer, J., & Winter, B. (2018). Decoding gestural iconicity. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 3034–3049. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holler, J., & Levinson, S. C. (2019). Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(8), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holler, J., Shovelton, H., & Beattie, G. (2009). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute to the communication of semantic information in a face-to-face context? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-008-0063-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holler, J., & Wilkin, K. (2011). An experimental investigation of how addressee feedback affects co-speech gestures accompanying speakers’ responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3522–3536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ienaga, N., Scotney, B. W., Saito, H., Cravotta, A., & Busà, M. G. (2018). Natural gesture extraction based on hand trajectory. Proceedings of the 20th Irish Machine Vision and Image Processing conference, 81–88.Google Scholar
Insafutdinov, E., Pishchulin, L., Andres, B., Andriluka, M., & Schiele, B. (2016). DeeperCut: A deeper, stronger, and faster multi-person pose estimation model. In Leibe, B., Matas, J., Sebe, N., & Welling, M. (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2016 (pp. 34–50). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jégo, J. F., Meyrueis, V., & Boutet, D. (2019, October). A workflow for real-time visualization and data analysis of gesture using motion capture. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing, 1–6. https://hal.science/hal-02474193/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juszczyk, K., & Ciecierski, K. (2016). Kinemo Software: Towards automated gesture annotation with MS Kinect. In Brill, M., Gudberg, G. K., & Schwab, F. (Eds.), Research network on methodology for the analysis of social interaction: Proceedings of the ninth meeting of MASI (pp. 10–11). Würzburg, Germany: Universität Würzburg.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. & Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0052986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krivokapic, J., Tiede, M. K., Tyrone, M. E., & Goldenberg, D. (2016). Speech and manual gesture coordination in a pointing task. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, 1240–1244. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loehr, D. P. (2004). Gesture and Intonation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation.) University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Loehr, D. P. (2012). Temporal, structural, and pragmatic synchrony between intonation and gesture. Laboratory Phonology, 3(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2012-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (2000). Language and gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manera, V., Becchio, C., Schouten, B., Bara, B. G., & Verfaillie, K. (2011). Communicative interactions improve visual detection of biological motion. PLOS ONE, 6(1), e14594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014594CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathis, A., Mamidanna, P., Cury, K. M., Abe, T., Murthy, V. N., Mathis, M. W., & Bethge, M. (2018). DeepLabCut: Markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nature Neuroscience, 21(9), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0209-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittelberg, I. (2018). Enacted schematicity: Image schemas and force dynamics operating in gestural (inter-)action. TriCoLore (C3GI/ISD/SCORE), 6. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2347/3-Mittelberg.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mittelberg, I. (2019). Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica, 2019(228), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakano, N., Sakura, T., Ueda, K., Omura, L., Kimura, A., Iino, Y., … & Yoshioka, S. (2020). Evaluation of 3D markerless motion capture accuracy using OpenPose with multiple video cameras. BioRxiv, 842492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nath, T., Mathis, A., Chen, A. C., Patel, A., Bethge, M., & Mathis, M. W. (2019). Using DeepLabCut for 3D markerless pose estimation across species and behaviors. Nature Protocols, 14(7), 2152–2176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0176-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nirme, J., Haake, M., Gulz, A., & Gullberg, M. (2020). Motion capture-based animated characters for the study of speech–gesture integration. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1339–1354. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01319-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okruszek, Ł. , & Chrustowicz, M. (2019). Social perception and interaction database: A novel tool to study social cognitive processes with point-light displays. BioRxiv, 729996. https://doi.org/10.1101/729996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, X., & Hamilton, A. F. de C. (2018). Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12290CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, A., & Dale, R. (2013). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0249-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peeters, D., Hagoort, P., & Özyürek, A. (2015). Electrophysiological evidence for the role of shared space in online comprehension of spatial demonstratives. Cognition, 136, 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouw, W., & Dixon, J. A. (2019). Entrainment and modulation of gesture–speech synchrony under delayed auditory feedback. Cognitive Science, 43(3), e12721. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cogs.12721CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouw, W., & Dixon, J. A. (2020). Gesture networks: Introducing dynamic time warping and network analysis for the kinematic study of gesture ensembles. Discourse Processes, 57(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1678967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouw, W., Trujillo, J. P., & Dixon, J. A. (2020). The quantification of gesture–speech synchrony: A tutorial and validation of multimodal data acquisition using device-based and video-based motion tracking. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 723–740. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01271-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouw, W., Wassenburg, S. I., Hostetter, A. B., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2020). Does gesture strengthen sensorimotor knowledge of objects? The case of the size-weight illusion. Psychological Research, 84, 966–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1128-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, A., Clift, L. G., & Clark, A. F. (2019). Comparing gestural interfaces using Kinect and OpenPose. EG UK Computer Graphics & Visual Computing, 2. https://doi.org/10.2312/cgvc.20191264Google Scholar
Ripperda, J., Drijvers, L., & Holler, J. (2020). Speeding up the detection of non-iconic and iconic gestures (SPUDNIG): A toolkit for the automatic detection of hand movements and gestures in video data. Behavior Research Methods, 52, 1783–1794. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01350-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robert-Lachaine, X., Mecheri, H., Muller, A., Larue, C., & Plamondon, A. (2020). Validation of a low-cost inertial motion capture system for whole-body motion analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 99, 109520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, V., Amaral, J., Fitzpatrick, P., Schmidt, R. C., Duncan, A. W., & Richardson, M. J. (2017). Can low-cost motion-tracking systems substitute a Polhemus system when researching social motor coordination in children? Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0733-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00075506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüller, D., Beecks, C., Hassani, M., Hinnel, J., Brenger, B., Seidl, T., & Mittelberg, I. (2017). Automated pattern analysis in gesture research: Similarity measuring in 3D motion capture models of communicative action. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11(2), 39–52.Google Scholar
Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sers, R., Forrester, S., Moss, E., Ward, S., Ma, J., & Zecca, M. (2020). Validity of the Perception Neuron inertial motion capture system for upper body motion analysis. Measurement, 149, 107024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.) (2012). The handbook of conversation analysis. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, J. P., Simanova, I., Bekkering, H., & Özyürek, A. (2018). Communicative intent modulates production and comprehension of actions and gestures: A Kinect study. Cognition, 180, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trujillo, J. P., Simanova, I., Bekkering, H., & Özyürek, A. (2020). The communicative advantage: How kinematic signaling supports semantic comprehension. Psychological Research, 84, 1897–1911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01198-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trujillo, J. P., Vaitonyte, J., Simanova, I., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Toward the markerless and automatic analysis of kinematic features: A toolkit for gesture and movement research. Behavior Research Methods, 51(2), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1086-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valenti, S. S., & Good, J. M. M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0302_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigliensoni, G., & Wanderley, M. M. (2012). A quantitative comparison of position trackers for the development of a touch-less musical interface. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1178445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P., Malisz, Z., & Kopp, S. (2014). Gesture and speech in interaction: An overview. Speech Communication, 57, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasenmüller, O., & Stricker, D. (2017). Comparison of Kinect V1 and V2 depth images in terms of accuracy and precision. In Chen, C.-S., Lu, J., & Ma, K.-K. (Eds.), Computer Vision – ACCV 2016 Workshops (pp. 34–45). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54427-4_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weichert, F., Bachmann, D., Rudak, B., & Fisseler, D. (2013). Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors, 13(5), 6380–6393. https://doi.org/10.3390/s130506380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×