Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:51:28.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17 - Germanic Infinitives

from Part III - Syntax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2020

By
Susi Wurmbrand  and
Christos Christopoulos
Edited by
Michael T. Putnam  and
B. Richard Page
Michael T. Putnam
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
B. Richard Page
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Summary

Infinitival constructions have been central in Germanic for several reasons and they have been at the core of theory-building syntactic research. This paper presents an overview of two research areas— exceptional case marking (ECM) and restructuring. While in-depth discussions of these rich topics are not possible, we aim to highlight some of the major discoveries and remaining puzzles. The first part of the chapter discusses the distinction between control and ECM and provides an overview of the distribution of ECM in six Germanic languages (English, Icelandic, Swedish, Norwegian, Dutch, and German). The second part of the paper summarizes phenomena falling under the rubric of restructuring. Although the literature on restructuring has focused predominantly on German and Dutch, phenomena showing sensitivity to restructuring have also been observed in the Mainland Scandinavian languages. Finally, in the last part we combine the observations regarding ECM and restructuring and suggest a possible connection.

Keywords

infinitivesGermanicECMrestructuringsyntactic domainsIPPinfinitive splittinglong passiveparasitic morphology
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics , pp. 389 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bader, M. and Schmid, T. 2009. “Minimality in verb-cluster formation,” Lingua 119.10: 1458–1481.Google Scholar
Baltin, M. and Barrett, L. 2002. The Null Content of Null Case. Ms., New York University.Google Scholar
Basilico, D. 2003. “The topic of small clauses,” Linguistic Inquiry 34.1: 1–35.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den and Broekhuis, H. 1992. “Verb projection raising in het Nederlands,” Spektator 21: 21–34.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den and Edmondson, J. A. 1983. “The verbal complex in continental West Germanic.” In Werner, A. (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 155–216.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den and Rutten, J. 1989. “On verb raising, extraposition and free word order in Dutch.” In Jaspers, D., Klooster, W., Putseys, Y., and Seuren, P. (eds.), Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon: Studies in Honour of Wim de Geest. Dordrecht: Foris: 41–56.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. D. and Wurmbrand, S. 2005. “The domain of agreement,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23. 4: 809–865.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. D. and Wurmbrand, S. 2008. “Case in GB / Minimalism.” In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A. (eds.), Handbook of Case. Oxford University Press: 44–58.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. 1996. “Selection and the categorial status of Infinitival Complements,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 269–304.Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž. 1997. The Syntax of Nonfinite Complementation: An Economy Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. 1972. Theory of Complementation in English. Doctoral dissertation, Cambridge, MA:MIT.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H. 1992. Chain-Government: Issues in Dutch Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H. and Corver, N. 2015. Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and Verb Phrases, Vol. 2. Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C. 2004. “A challenge to Null Case theory,” Linguistic Inquiry 35. 1: 141–149.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1980. “On binding,” Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. 1993. “Principles and parameters theory.” In Jacobs, J., von Stechow, A., Sternefeld, W., and Vennemann, T. (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter: 506–569.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. and Lasnik, H. 1995. “Principles and parameters theory.” In Chomsky, N. (ed.), The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 13–127.Google Scholar
Christensen, K. R. 2007. “The infinitive marker across Scandinavian,” Nordlyd 34.1.Google Scholar
Dikken, M. den and Hoekstra, E. 1997. “Parasitic participles,” Linguistics 35: 1057–1089.Google Scholar
Evers, A. 1975. The Transformational Cycle of Dutch and German. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, W., Romijn, K., Geerts, G., De Rooij, J., and Van den Toorn, M. C. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 1986. Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 2002. “Expletives and agreement in Scandinavian passives,” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4.2: 85–128.Google Scholar
Horn, S. W. 2008. Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics of Accusative-Quotative Constructions in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. 2003. “On control.” In Hendrick, R. (ed.), Minimalist Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell: 6–81.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. and Vikner, S. 1994. “The position of the verb in Scandinavian infinitives: In V˚ or C˚ but not in I˚,” Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 53: 61–84.Google Scholar
Landau, I. 2000. Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions. Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Lødrup, H. 2002. “Infinitival complements in Norwegian and the form–function relation.” In Butt, M. and King, T. Holloway (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG02 Conference. Stanford, CA: CSLI Online.Google Scholar
Lødrup, H. 2008. “Raising to object in Norwegian and the derived object constraint,” Studia Linguistica 62.2: 155–181.Google Scholar
Lødrup, H. 2014. “Long passives in Norwegian: Evidence for complex predicates,” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37.3: 367–391.Google Scholar
Martin, R. A. 1996. A Minimalist Theory of PRO and Control. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.Google Scholar
Martin, R. A. 2001. “Null case and the distribution of PRO,” Linguistic Inquiry 32.1: 141–166.Google Scholar
Müller, G. 2016. “Rethinking restructuring.” Ms., Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. 1992. “Zero syntax II: An essay on infinitives.” Ms., Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. 1986. “The structure of infinitive clauses in Danish and Swedish,” Scandinavian Syntax: 123–137.Google Scholar
Postal, P. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English and Its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rutten, J. 1991. Infinitival Complements and Auxiliaries. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, H. Á. 1991. “Icelandic case-marked PRO and the licensing of lexical arguments,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 327–364.Google Scholar
Stowell, T. 1982. “The tense of infinitives,” Linguistic Inquiry 13:561–570.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1993. “On the structure of infinitival complements.” In Thráinsson, H., Epstein, S. D., and Kuno, S. (eds.), Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Linguistics: 181–213.Google Scholar
Urk, C. van 2013. “Visser’s Generalization: The syntax of control and the passive,” Linguistic Inquiry 44.1: 168–178.Google Scholar
Wiklund, A.-L. 2001. “Dressing up for vocabulary insertion: The parasitic supine,” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19.1: 199–228.Google Scholar
Wiklund, A.-L. 2005. The Syntax of Tenselessness: On Copying Constructions in Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Wiklund, A.-L. 2007. The Syntax of Tenselessness: Tense / Mood / Aspect-Agreeing Infinitivals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2006. “Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring.” In Everaert, M. and van Riemsdijk, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. V. Oxford: Blackwell: 227–341.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2007. “How complex are complex predicates?” Syntax 10:243–288.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2012. “Parasitic participles in Germanic: Evidence for the theory of verb clusters,” Taal en Tongval 64. 1: 129–156.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2014a. “Restructuring across the world.” In Veselovská, L. and Janebová, M. (eds.), Complex Visibles Out There. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2014: Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Olomouc: Palacký University: 275–294.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2014b. “Restructuring across the world – Data summary.” http://wurmbrand.uconn.edu/Papers/RATW-data.pdf.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2014c. “Tense and aspect in English infinitives,” Linguistic Inquiry 45.3: 403–447.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2015a. “Complex predicate formation via voice incorporation.” In Nash, L. and Samvelian, P. (eds.), Approaches to Complex Predicates. Leiden: Brill: 248–290.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2015b. “Restructuring cross-linguistically.” In Bui, T. and Özyıldız, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 45. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA: 227–240.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2016. “Restructuring as the Regulator of Clause Size.” Invited plenary talk at the workshop Shrinking trees, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2017a. Discoveries and Puzzles in Syntax: ECM and Restructuring. Lecture series given at the Institute of Linguistics, Cognition and Culture (NYI), St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2017b. “Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring.” In Everaert, M. and van Riemsdijk, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2018. “The cost of raising quantifiers,” Glossa 3. 1: 19.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. and Shimamura, K. 2017. “The features of the voice domain: Actives, passives, and restructuring.” In D’Alessandro, R., Franco, I., and Gallego, Á. (eds.), The Verbal Domain. Oxford University Press: 179–204.Google Scholar
Yoon, J. H. 2007. “Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese,” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25.3: 615–653.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. J-W. 1995. “A note on verb clusters in the Stellingwerf dialect.” In den Dikken, M. and Hengeveld, K. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 215–226.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. J-W. 1996. “Verb clusters in continental West Germanic dialects.” In Black, J. and Motapanyane, V. (eds.), Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 229–258.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×