Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Precopulatory Adaptations
- Part II Copulatory Adaptations
- 8 Sexual Fantasies
- 9 Copulatory Thrusting
- 10 Female Provision of Oral Sex
- 11 The Adaptive Value of Women’s Orgasm
- 12 Copulatory Urgency: An Evolutionary Perspective of Women’s Sexual Desire
- Part III Postcopulatory Adaptations
- Index
- References
11 - The Adaptive Value of Women’s Orgasm
from Part II - Copulatory Adaptations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Precopulatory Adaptations
- Part II Copulatory Adaptations
- 8 Sexual Fantasies
- 9 Copulatory Thrusting
- 10 Female Provision of Oral Sex
- 11 The Adaptive Value of Women’s Orgasm
- 12 Copulatory Urgency: An Evolutionary Perspective of Women’s Sexual Desire
- Part III Postcopulatory Adaptations
- Index
- References
Summary
Female sexual experience has received more attention from the scientific community in recent decades, but there is still debate surrounding its importance from an evolutionary perspective. Specifically, researchers have debated whether female orgasm is an adaptation reflecting special design or a functionless byproduct of strong selection for male orgasm that arises in women because of early shared ontogeny with men. Scholars who endorse a byproduct explanation of women’s orgasm argue that it is unlikely the female orgasm was designed by sexual selection because, unlike male orgasm, women’s orgasm is not necessary for conception. Supporters of the byproduct position further contend that an adaptive explanation of women’s orgasm is unlikely because orgasm is more difficult to induce in women compared to men and because women’s orgasm is more likely to occur during masturbation or oral sex than it is during vaginal intercourse. In other words, proponents of the byproduct explanation for female orgasm liken female orgasm to male nipples: something that offers no adaptive function and is vestigial, but that arises because selection for that trait is so strong in the opposite-sex that the shared early stages of development lead to it appearing in both sexes. However, there is considerable evidence that female orgasm is far from vestigial and may have increased the reproductive success of ancestral women. Researchers who support the adaptation explanation of women’s orgasm dispute the byproduct hypothesis by pointing to evidence that female orgasm increases women’s fitness through one or more mechanisms. Female orgasm reinforces and rewards women’s sexual behaviors, thereby encouraging women to engage in behaviors that can result in conception. Also, evidence suggests that women’s orgasm may reinforce or increase pair-bonding among couples, act as a mate- or sire-selection mechanism, and increase the odds of conception. This chapter reviews the literature on women’s orgasm and concludes that a byproduct account is an inadequate explanation of the current findings, although additional research into the evolved functions of women’s orgasm is nonetheless warranted.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Alcock, J. (1980). Beyond the sociobiology of sexuality: Predictive hypotheses. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(2), 181–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angier, N. (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Apperloo, M. J., A., Van Der Stege, J. G., Hoek, A., & Weijmar Schultz, W. C. M. (2003). In the mood for sex: The value of androgens. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 29, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462.Google Scholar
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bancroft, J., Sanders, D., Davidson, D., & Warner, P. (1983). Mood, sexuality, hormones, and the menstrual cycle. III. Sexuality and the role of androgens. Psychosomatic Medicine, 45, 509–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnett, M. D., Moore, J. M., Woolford, B. A., & Riggs, S. A. (2018). Interest in partner orgasm: Sex differences and relationships with attachment strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 194–200.Google Scholar
Bartz, J. A., Zaki, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011). Social effects of oxytocin in humans: Context and person matter. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 301–309.Google Scholar
Beach, F. A. (1974). Human sexuality and evolution. In Reproductive behavior (pp. 333–365). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Berman, J. R. (2005). Physiology of female sexual function and dysfunction. International Journal of Impotence Research, 17, S44–S51.Google Scholar
Bogaert, A. F., & Fisher, W. A. (1995). Predictors of university men’s number of sexual partners. Journal of Sex Research, 32(2), 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus (Vol. 1). New York, NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Buemann, B., & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. (2020). Oxytocin may have a therapeutical potential against cardiovascular disease: Possible pharmaceutical and behavioral approaches. Medical Hypotheses, 138, 109597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burri, A., & Ogata, S. (2018). Stability of genetic and environmental influences on female sexual functioning. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15(4), 550–557.Google Scholar
Burri, A., Spector, T., & Rahman, Q. (2013). A discordant monozygotic twin approach to testing environmental influences on sexual dysfunction in women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(6), 961–972.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (1988). From vigilance to violence: Tactics of mate retention in American undergraduates. Ethology and Sociobiology, 9(5), 291–317.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Susceptibility to infidelity in the first year of marriage. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(2), 193–221.Google Scholar
Campagne, D. M. (2006). Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress? Human Reproduction, 21(7), 1651–1658.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2008). Attachment, aggression and affiliation: The role of oxytocin in female social behavior. Biological Psychology, 77, 1–10.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. (2010). Oxytocin and human social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 281–295.Google Scholar
Carmichael, M. S., Humbert, R., Dixen, J., Palmisano, G., Greenleaf, W., & Davidson, J. M. (1987). Plasma oxytocin increases in the human sexual response. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 64, 27–31.Google Scholar
Carmichael, M. S., Warburton, V. L., Dixen, J., & Davidson, J. M. (1994). Relationships among cardiovascular, muscular, and oxytocin responses during human sexual activity. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23, 59–79.Google Scholar
Carter, C. S. (1992). Oxytocin and sexual behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 16(2), 131–144.Google Scholar
Clark, R. D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 2(1), 39–55.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. L., & Belsky, J. (2008). Avoidant romantic attachment and female orgasm: Testing an emotion-regulation hypothesis. Attachment and Human Development, 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
Cooper, E. B., Fenigstein, A., & Fauber, R. L. (2014). The faking orgasm scale for women: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 423–435.Google Scholar
Costa, R. M., & Brody, S. (2007). Women’s relationship quality is associated with specifically penile–vaginal intercourse orgasm and frequency. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33(4), 319–327.Google Scholar
Dabbs, J. M. Jr., & Mohammed, S. (1992). Male and female salivary testosterone concentrations before and after sexual activity. Physiology and Behavior, 52, 195–197.Google Scholar
Darling, C. A., & Davidson, J. K. (1986). Enhancing relationships: Understanding the feminine mystique of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 12, 182–196.Google Scholar
Davenport, W. H. (1977). Sex in cross-cultural perspective. In Beach, F. A. (Ed.), Human sexuality (pp. 115–163). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. K., & Darling, C. A. (1988). The sexually experienced woman: Multiple sex partners and sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 141–154.Google Scholar
Davis, S. R., Davison, S. L., Donath, S., & Bell, R. J. (2005). Circulating androgen levels and self-reported sexual function in women. JAMA, 294(1), 91–96.Google Scholar
Dawood, K., Kirk, K. M., Bailey, J. M., Andrews, P. W., & Martin, N. G. (2005). Genetic and environmental influences on the frequency of orgasm in women. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 8, 27–33.Google Scholar
De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., … & Feith, S. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328(5984), 1408–1411.Google Scholar
Ditzen, B., Schaer, M., Gabriel, B., Bodenmann, G., Ehlert, U., & Heinrichs, M. (2009). Intranasal oxytocin increases positive communication and reduces cortisol levels during couple conflict. Biological Psychiatry, 65(9), 728–731.Google Scholar
Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin improves “mind-reading” in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), 731–733.Google Scholar
Dunn, K. M., Cherkas, L. F., & Spector, T. D. (2005). Genetic influences on variation in female orgasmic function: A twin study. Biology Letters, 1, 260–263.Google Scholar
Eisenbach, M. (1995). Sperm changes enabling fertilization in mammals. Current Opinion in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity, 2(6), 468–475.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, R. M., & Bailey, D. H. (2013). Human female orgasm as evolved signal: A test of two hypotheses. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1545–1554.Google Scholar
England, P., Shafer, E. F., & Fogarty, A. C. (2008). Hooking up and forming romantic relationships on today’s college campuses. The Gendered Society Reader, 3, 531–593.Google Scholar
Eschler, L. (2004). The physiology of the female orgasm as a proximate echanism. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 6(2–3), 171–194.Google Scholar
Exton, M. S., Bindert, A., Krüger, T., Scheller, F., Hartmann, U., & Schedlowski, M. (1999). Cardiovascular and endocrine alterations after masturbation-induced orgasm in women. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 280–289.Google Scholar
Fahrbach, S. E., Morrell, J. I., & Pfaff, D. W. (1984). Oxytocin induction of short-latency maternal behavior in nulliparous, estrogen-primed female rats. Hormones and Behavior, 18(3), 267–286.Google Scholar
Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Smith, M. L., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., … & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49(2), 215–222.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. N., Young, L. J., & Insel, T. R. (2002). The neuroendocrine basis of social recognition. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 23, 200–224.Google Scholar
Fink, B., & Penton-Voak, I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 154–158.Google Scholar
Fox, C. A., & Fox, B. (1971). A comparative study of coital physiology, with special reference to the sexual climax. Reproduction, 24(3), 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Reproduction, 22(2), 243–251.Google Scholar
Frederick, D. A., John, H. K. S., Garcia, J. R., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Differences in orgasm frequency among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual men and women in a U.S. national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 273–288.Google Scholar
Gallup, G., Ampel, B., Wedberg, N., & Pogosjan, A. (2014). Do orgasms give women feedback about mate choice? Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 958–978.Google Scholar
Gallup, G. G. Jr., Platek, S. M., Ampel, B. C., & Towne, J. P. (2020). Sex differences in the sedative properties of heterosexual intercourse. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, P. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15(3), 203–207.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(2), 69–88.Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2002). Changes in women’s sexual interests and their partner’s mate-retention tactics across the menstrual cycle: Evidence for shifting conflicts of interest. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1494), 975–982.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 272(1576), 2023–2027.Google Scholar
Gebhard, P. H. (1966). Factors in marital orgasm. Journal of Social Issues, 22(2), 88–95.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, J. R., Kortekaas, R., Kuipers, R., Nieuwenburg, A., Pruim, J., Reinders, A. A. T. S., & Holstege, G. (2006). Regional cerebral blood flow changes associated with clitorally induced orgasm in healthy women. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(11), 3305–3316.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, J. R., Reinders, A. A. T. S., Paans, A. M. J., Renken, R., & Kortekaas, R. (2009). Men versus women on sexual brain function: Prominent differences during tactile genital stimulation, but not during orgasm. Human Brain Mapping, 30(10), 3089–3101.Google Scholar
Georgiadis, J. R., Reinders, A. A., van der Graaf, F. H., Paans, A. M., & Kortekaas, R. (2007). Brain activation during human male ejaculation revisited. Neuroreport, 18, 553–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, D. L., Gillath, O., & Haj-Mohamadi, P. (2017). Development and validation of the Pretending Orgasm Reasons Measure. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1973–1991.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15.Google Scholar
Grafenberg, E. (1950). The role of the urethra in female orgasm. International Journal of Sexology, 3(2), 146.Google Scholar
Grammer, K., Fink, B., Møller, A. P., & Thornhill, R. (2003). Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews, 78(3), 385–407.Google Scholar
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108(3), 233.Google Scholar
Grebe, N. M., Thompson, M. E., & Gangestad, S. W. (2016). Hormonal predictors of women’s extra-pair vs. in-pair sexual attraction in natural cycles: Implications for extended sexuality. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 211–219.Google Scholar
Grzybowska, M. E., & Wydra, D. G. (2019). Is voluntary pelvic floor muscles contraction important for sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders? Neurourology and Urodynamics, 38(7), 2001–2009.Google Scholar
Hammock, E. A., & Young, L. J. (2006). Oxytocin, vasopressin and pair bonding: Implications for autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361(1476), 2187–2198.Google Scholar
Harris, J. M., Cherkas, L. F., Kato, B. S., Heiman, J. R., & Spector, T. D. (2008). Normal variations in personality are associated with coital orgasmic infrequency in heterosexual women: A population-based study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5, 1177–1183.Google Scholar
Harris, E. A., Hornsey, M. J., Larsen, H. F., & Barlow, F. K. (2019). Beliefs about gender predict faking orgasm in heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2419–2433.Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49(4), 509–518.Google Scholar
Havlicek, J., Roberts, S. C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1(3), 256–259.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 1389–1398.Google Scholar
Henshaw, J. (1968). A theory for the occurrence of antlers in females of the genus Rangifer. Deer, 1(6), 222–226.Google Scholar
Herbenick, D., Fu, T., Arter, J., Sanders, S. A., & Dodge, B. (2018). Women’s experiences with genital touching, sexual pleasure, and orgasm: Results from a U.S. probability sample of women ages 18 to 94. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 44(2), 201–212.Google Scholar
Herberich, E., Hothorn, T., Nettle, D., & Pollet, T. (2010). A re-evaluation of the statistical model in Pollet and Nettle 2009. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 150–151.Google Scholar
Hite, S. (1976). The Hite Report: A nationwide survey of female sexuality. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hosken, D. J. (2008). Clitoral variation says nothing about female orgasm. Evolution & Development, 10(4), 393–395.Google Scholar
Insel, T. R., & Young, L. J. (2001). The neurobiology of attachment. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 129–136.Google Scholar
Jayasena, C. N., Alkaabi, F. M., Liebers, C. S., Handley, T., Franks, S., & Dhillo, W. S. (2019). A systematic review of randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy and safety of testosterone therapy for female sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women. Clinical Endocrinology, 90(3), 391–414.Google Scholar
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B., & Grammer, K. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 251–267.Google Scholar
Jonason, P. K. (2019). Reasons to pretend to orgasm and the mating psychology of those who endorse them. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 90–94.Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., … & O’Shea, K. J. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29(6), 996–1005.Google Scholar
Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Smith, M. L., … & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48(3), 283–290.Google Scholar
Kaighobadi, F., Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (2012). Do women pretend orgasm to retain a mate? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1121–1125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, J. F., Elliott, S. S., & Gunberg, E. (1982). Premarital sexual intercourse among single college students: A discriminant analysis. Sex Roles, 8, 21–32.Google Scholar
Khajehei, M., & Behroozpour, E. (2018). Endorphins, oxytocin, sexuality and romantic relationships: An understudied area. World Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7(2), 17–23.Google Scholar
King, R., Belsky, J., Mah, K., & Binik, Y. (2011). Are there different types of female orgasm? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 865–875.Google Scholar
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1998). Sexual behavior in the human female. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, C., & Hellhammer, D. (2000). Salivary cortisol. In Fink, G. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of stress (pp. 379–383). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klapilová, K., Brody, S., Krejčová, L., Husárová, B., & Binter, J. (2015). Sexual satisfaction, sexual compatibility, and relationship adjustment in couples: The role of sexual behaviors, orgasm, and men’s discernment of women’s intercourse orgasm. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(3), 667–675.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B. R., Beyer-Flores, C., & Whipple, B. (2006). The science of orgasm. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B. R., Bianca, R., Sansone, G., Gómez, L. E., Cueva-Rolón, R., Beyer, C., & Whipple, B. (1996). Brain-mediated responses to vaginocervical stimulation in spinal cord-transected rats: Role of the vagus nerves. Brain Research, 708, 128–134.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B. R., & Sansone, G. (2003). Neural pathways mediating vaginal function: The vagus nerves and spinal cord oxytocin. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 241–250.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B. R., & Whipple, B. (2005). Functional MRI of the brain during orgasm in women. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16, 62–86.Google Scholar
Komisaruk, B. R., Whipple, B., Crawford, A., Liu, W. C., Kalnin, A., & Mosier, K. (2004). Brain activation during vaginocervical self-stimulation and orgasm in women with complete spinal cord injury: fMRI evidence of mediation by the vagus nerves. Brain Research, 1024, 77–88.Google Scholar
Kontula, O., & Miettinen, A. (2016). Determinants of female sexual orgasms. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 6(1), 31624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuder, A. K., Wassermann, L., Wollseifer, M., Ditzen, B., Eckstein, M., Stoffel-Wagner, B., & Scheele, D. (2019). Oxytocin enhances the pain-relieving effects of social support in romantic couples. Human Brain Mapping, 40(1), 242–251.Google Scholar
Krüger, T. H. C., Hartmann, U., & Schedlowski, M. (2005). Prolactinergic and dopaminergic mechanisms underlying sexual arousal and orgasm in humans. World Journal of Urology, 23, 130–138.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (2000). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, N. D., Willoughby, B. J., Busby, D. M., Yorgason, J. B., & Holmes, E. K. (2018). The significance of the female orgasm: A nationally representative, dyadic study of newlyweds’ orgasm experience. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15(8), 1140–1148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, R. J. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(5), 405–411.Google Scholar
Levin, R. J. (2011). Can the controversy about the putative role of the human female orgasm in sperm transport be settled with our current physiological knowledge of coitus? Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(6), 1566–1578.Google Scholar
Levin, R. J. (2016). Simultaneous penile-vaginal induced orgasms – do they facilitate conception? Clinical Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, 2(5), 1–2.Google Scholar
Lim, M. M., & Young, L. J. (2006). Neuropeptidergic regulation of affiliative behavior and social bonding in animals. Hormones & Behavior, 50, 506–517.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: Data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 274(1629), 3113–3117.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Burriss, R. P. (2007). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 51(5), 633–639.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76(3), 209–216.Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1496), 1095–1100.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mah, K., & Binik, Y. M. (2005). Are orgasms in the mind or the body? Psychosocial versus physiological correlates of orgasmic pleasure and satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcinkowska, U. M., Galbarczyk, A., & Jasienska, G. (2018). La donna è mobile? Lack of cyclical shifts in facial symmetry, and facial and body masculinity preferences – a hormone based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, K. P., Janssen, E., & Milhausen, R. R. (2011). Infidelity in heterosexual couples: Demographic, interpersonal, and personality-related predictors of extradyadic sex. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 971–982.Google Scholar
Marshall, D. S. (1971). Sexual behavior on Mangaia. In Marshall, D. S. & Suggs, R. C. (Eds.), Human sexual behavior (pp. 103–162). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Matteo, S., & Rissman, E. F. (1984). Increased sexual activity during the midcycle portion of the human menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 18(3), 249–255.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. G., Welling, L. L. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Development and initial psychometric assessment of the Reasons for Pretending Orgasm Inventory. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 129–139.Google Scholar
McKibbin, W. F., Bates, V. M., Shackelford, T. K., Hafen, C. A., & LaMunyon, C. W. (2010). Risk of sperm competition moderates the relationship between men’s satisfaction with their partner and men’s interest in their partner’s copulatory orgasm. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 961–966.Google Scholar
Meston, C. M., Levin, R. J., Sipski, M. L., Hull, E. M., & Heiman, J. R. (2004). Women’s orgasm. Annual Review of Sex Research, 15(1), 173–257.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. The American Naturalist, 149(5), 916–932.Google Scholar
Møller, A. P., & Pomiankowski, A. (1993). Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Genetica, 89(1–3), 267.Google Scholar
Moreira, E. D., Brock, G., Glasser, D. B., Nicolosi, A., Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., … & GSSAB Investigators’ Group (2005). Help-seeking behavior for sexual problems: The global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 59, 6–16.Google Scholar
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Shippee, S. K. (2010). Men’s and women’s reports of pretending orgasm. Journal of Sex Research, 47(6), 552–567.Google Scholar
Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M. (2015). Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 772–789.Google Scholar
Onaka, T. (2004). Neural pathways controlling central and peripheral oxytocin release during stress. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 16(4), 308–312.Google Scholar
Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515.Google Scholar
Ortigue, S., Grafton, S. T., & Bianchi-Demicheli, F. (2007). Correlation between insula activation and self-reported quality of orgasm in women. NeuroImage, 37(2), 551–560.Google Scholar
Pavličev, M., & Wagner, G. (2016). The evolutionary origin of female orgasm. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 326, 326–337.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399(6738), 741–742.Google Scholar
Perusse, D. (1993). Cultural and reproductive success in modern societies: Testing the relationship at the proximate and ultimate levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 267–322.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2008). Does attractiveness in men provide clues to semen quality? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(2), 572–579.Google Scholar
Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2009). Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PLoS One, 4(1), e4138.Google Scholar
Pfaus, J. G., Kippin, T. E., Coria-Avila, G. A., Gelez, H., Afonso, V. M., Ismail, N., & Parada, M. (2012). Who, what, where, when (and maybe even why)? How the experience of sexual reward connects sexual desire, preference, and performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(1), 31–62.Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G., & Haselton, M. G. (2006). Male sexual attractiveness predicts differential ovulatory shifts in female extra-pair attraction and male mate retention. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 247–258.Google Scholar
Pillsworth, E. G., Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2004). Ovulatory shifts in female sexual desire. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
Pollet, T. V., & Nettle, D. (2009). Partner wealth predicts self-reported orgasm frequency in a sample of Chinese women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 146–151.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A. (2006). And hast thou slain the Jabberwock? Response to Wallen. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 637–639.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A. (2007). Of bugs and boojums: Female orgasm as a facultative adaptation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 337–339.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., & Dawood, K. (2006). The evolution of female orgasm: Adaptation or byproduct? Twin Research and Human Genetics, 9, 467–472.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., Dawood, K., & Welling, L. L. M. (2012). Why women have orgasms: An evolutionary analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1127–1143.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 283–296.Google Scholar
Puts, D. A., Welling, L. L. M., Burriss, R. P., & Dawood, K. (2012). Men’s masculinity and attractiveness predict their female partners’ reported orgasm frequency and timing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Radke, S., & de Bruijn, E. R. (2015). Does oxytocin affect mind-reading? A replication study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 60, 75–81.Google Scholar
Rayner, J. (2001). On the origin and evolution of flapping flight aerodynamics in birds. In Gauthier, J. & Gall, L. F. (Eds.), New perspectives on the origin and early evolution of birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom (pp. 362–381). New Haven, CT: Peabody Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Reed, C. (2010). A phenomenological approach to the thoughts, contexts, themes, and benefits of mental orgasms in women (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.huaryu.kl.oakland.edu/docview/520367402?accountid=12924Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 57, 199–226.Google Scholar
Rice, W. R., & Chippindale, A. K. (2001). Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 14, 685–693.Google Scholar
Richters, J., de Visser, R., Rissel, C., & Smith, A. (2006). Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 217–226.Google Scholar
Riem, M. M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Huffmeijer, R., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2013). Does intranasal oxytocin promote prosocial behavior to an excluded fellow player? A randomized-controlled trial with Cyberball. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(8), 1418–1425.Google Scholar
Riem, M. M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Voorthuis, A., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2014). Oxytocin effects on mind-reading are moderated by experiences of maternal love withdrawal: An fMRI study. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 51, 105–112.Google Scholar
Roberts, C., Kippax, S., Waldby, C., & Crawford, J. (1995). Faking it: The story of “Ohh!” Women’s Studies International Forum, 18(5), 523–532.Google Scholar
Santoro, N., Torrens, J., Crawford, S., Allsworth, J. E., Finkelstein, J. S., Gold, E. B., … & Weiss, G. (2005). Correlates of circulating androgens in mid-life women: The study of women’s health across the nation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 90(8), 4836–4845.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., Bennett, K. L., … & Brainerd, E. G. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Are men really more “oriented” toward short-term mating than women? A critical review of theory and research. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 3(3), 211–239.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, I., Zagoory-Sharon, O., Leckman, J. F., & Feldman, R. (2012). Oxytocin during the initial stages of romantic attachment: Relations to couples’ interactive reciprocity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(8), 1277–1285.Google Scholar
Schober, J. M., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & Ransley, P. G. (2004). Self-assessment of genital anatomy, sexual sensitivity and function in women: Implications for genitoplasty. BJU International, 94, 589–594.Google Scholar
Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V., LeBlanc, G., Bleske, A., Euler, H., & Hoier, S. (2000). Female coital orgasm and male attractiveness. Human Nature, 11, 299–306.Google Scholar
Sherlock, J. M., Sidari, M. J., Harris, E. A., Barlow, F. K., & Zietsch, B. P. (2016). Testing the mate-choice hypothesis of the female orgasm: Disentangling traits and behaviours. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology, 6(1), 31562.Google Scholar
Shirazi, T., Renfro, K. J., Lloyd, E., & Wallen, K. (2018). Women’s experience of orgasm during intercourse: Question semantics affect women’s reports and men’s estimates of orgasm occurrence. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 605–613.Google Scholar
Singh, D., Meyer, W., Zambarano, R. J., & Hurlbert, D. F. (1998). Frequency and timing of coital orgasm in women desirous of becoming pregnant. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(1), 15–29.Google Scholar
Soler, C., Kekäläinen, J., Núñez, M., Sancho, M., Álvarez, J. G., Núñez, J., … & Gutiérrez, R. (2014). Male facial attractiveness and masculinity may provide sex- and culture-independent cues to semen quality. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 27(9), 1930–1938.Google Scholar
Soler, C., Nunez, M., Gutierrez, R., Nunez, J., Medina, P., Sancho, M., … & Nunez, A. (2003). Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(3), 199–207.Google Scholar
Somboonporn, W., Bell, R. J., & Davis, S. R. (2005). Testosterone for peri and postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, 1465–1858.Google Scholar
Spengler, F. B., Schultz, J., Scheele, D., Essel, M., Maier, W., Heinrichs, M., & Hurlemann, R. (2017). Kinetics and dose dependency of intranasal oxytocin effects on amygdala reactivity. Biological Psychiatry, 82(12), 885–894.Google Scholar
Tavris, C., & Sadd, S. (1977). The Redbook report on female sexuality. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1994). Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science, 5(5), 297–302.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1996). Human female copulatory orgasm: A human adaptation or phylogenetic holdover. Animal Behaviour, 52(4), 853–855.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. (2008). The evolutionary biology of human female sexuality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., & Comer, R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Animal Behaviour, 50(6), 1601–1615.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Tuiten, A., Van Honk, J., Koppeschaar, H., Bernaards, C., Thijssen, J., & Verbaten, R. (2000). Time course of effects of testosterone administration on sexual arousal in women. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57(2),149–153.Google Scholar
van Anders, S. M., Brotto, L., Farrell, J., & Yule, M. (2009). Associations between physiological and subjective sexual response, sexual desire, and salivary steroid hormones in healthy premenopausal women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 6, 739–751.Google Scholar
van Anders, S. M., & Dunn, E. J. (2009). Are gonadal steroids linked with orgasm perceptions and sexual assertiveness in women and men? Hormones and Behavior, 56, 206–213.Google Scholar
van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., Schmidt, N., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Associations between testosterone secretion and sexual activity in women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 477–482.Google Scholar
Viviani, D., Charlet, A., van den Burg, E., Robinet, C., Hurni, N., Abatis, M., … & Stoop, R. (2011). Oxytocin selectively gates fear responses through distinct outputs from the central amygdala. Science, 333(6038), 104–107.Google Scholar
Wåhlin-Jacobsen, S., Kristensen, E., Tønnes Pedersen, A., Laessøe, N. C., Cohen, A. S., Hougaard, D. M., Lundqvist, M., & Giraldi, A. (2017). Androgens and psychosocial factors related to sexual dysfunctions in premenopausal women. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 14(3), 366–379.Google Scholar
Wallen, K. (2006). Commentary on Puts’ (2006) review of The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 633–636.Google Scholar
Wallen, K., & Lloyd, E. (2008). Clitoral variability compared with penile variability supports nonadaptation of female orgasm. Evolution & Development, 10, 1–2.Google Scholar
Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 23, 131–139.Google Scholar
Welling, L. L. M. (2014). Female orgasm. In Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. & Shackelford, T. K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human sexual psychology and behavior (pp. 223–242). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Conway, C. A., Law Smith, M. J., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R., Sharp, M. A., & Al-Dujaili, E. A. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and Behavior, 52, 156–161.Google Scholar
Wheatley, J. R., & Puts, D. A. (2015). Evolutionary science of female orgasm. In Shackelford, T. K. & Hansen, R. (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 123–148). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Wierman, M. E., Arlt, W., Basson, R., Davis, S. R., Miller, K. K., Murad, M. H., Rosner, W., & Santoro, N. (2014). Androgen therapy in women: A reappraisal: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 99(10), 3489–3510.Google Scholar
Wildt, L., Kissler, S., Licht, P., and Becker, W. (1998). Sperm transport in the human female genital tract and its modulation by oxytocin as assessed by hysterosalpingoscintigraphy, hysterotonography, electrohysterography and Doppler sonography. Human Reproduction Update, 4, 655–666.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Windle, R. J., Shanks, N., Lightman, S. L., & Ingram, C. D. (1997). Central oxytocin administration reduces stress-induced corticosterone release and anxiety behavior in rats. Endocrinology, 138(7), 2829–2834.Google Scholar
Wongsomboon, V., Burleson, M. H., & Webster, G. D. (2020). Women’s orgasm and sexual satisfaction in committed sex and casual sex: Relationship between sociosexuality and sexual outcomes in different sexual contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 57(3), 285–295.Google Scholar
Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1048–1054.Google Scholar
Younis, I., Mostaf, H., Salem, R., & Hamed, O. (2018). Fake it: Women pretending orgasms. Human Andrology, 8(3), 76–81.Google Scholar
Zervomanolakis, I., Ott, H. W., Hadziomerovic, D., Mattle, V., Seeber, B. E., Virgolini, I., … & Wildt, L. (2007). Physiology of upward transport in the human female genital tract. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1101(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Zervomanolakis, I., Ott, H. W., Müller, J., Seeber, B. E., Friess, S. C., Mattle, V., … & Wildt, L. (2009). Uterine mechanisms of ipsilateral directed spermatozoa transport: Evidence for a contribution of the utero-ovarian countercurrent system. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 144, S45–S49.Google Scholar
Zietsch, B. P., & Santtila, P. (2011). Genetic analysis of orgasmic function in twins and siblings does not support the by-product theory of female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 82, 1097–1101.Google Scholar
Zietsch, B. P., & Santtila, P. (2013). No direct relationship between human female orgasm rate and number of offspring. Animal Behaviour, 86(2), 253–255.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by