Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology Volume 1
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Theory in Environmental Sociology
- Part II The Economy and Environmental Sociology
- Part III Culture and Environmental Sociology
- Part IV Politics, Power, State
- Part V Social Justice
- 24 Expanding Critical and Radical Approaches to Environmental Justice
- 25 Development Strategies and Environmental Inequalities in Brazil
- 26 Rural Estrangement: Roadblocks and Roundabouts to Justice
- 27 Environmental Justice and Capitalism
- 28 Ecological Economics and Environmental Sociology: A Social Power Structures Approach to Environmental Justice in Economic Systems
- Index
- References
28 - Ecological Economics and Environmental Sociology: A Social Power Structures Approach to Environmental Justice in Economic Systems
from Part V - Social Justice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology Volume 1
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Theory in Environmental Sociology
- Part II The Economy and Environmental Sociology
- Part III Culture and Environmental Sociology
- Part IV Politics, Power, State
- Part V Social Justice
- 24 Expanding Critical and Radical Approaches to Environmental Justice
- 25 Development Strategies and Environmental Inequalities in Brazil
- 26 Rural Estrangement: Roadblocks and Roundabouts to Justice
- 27 Environmental Justice and Capitalism
- 28 Ecological Economics and Environmental Sociology: A Social Power Structures Approach to Environmental Justice in Economic Systems
- Index
- References
Summary
Environmental Sociology has long questioned the orthodoxy of neoclassical capitalist markets structures portrayed by neoclassical economic theory. These concerns have broadly been echoed in the development of the heterodox economic subfield of ecological economics. Ecological economics seeks to create a theoretical paradigm which recognizes that economic activity is bounded by both natural and social structures. Despite these similarities, ecological economics has broadly struggled in embracing a broad notion of environmental justice, typically centering distributional justice while ignoring the role of power in generating and perpetuation environmental injustice. I argue that ecological economists can gain much from sociological theory, particularly the use of intersectionality, in their discussions of environmental justice. I also suggest that the existence of ecological economics provides a theoretical bridge for sociologists long exiled from the mathematical dogma of neoclassical economics.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Sociology , pp. 470 - 486Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alier, J. M., Munda, G., and O’Neill, J. 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26(3), 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anguelovski, I., and Alier, J. M., 2014. The “Environmentalism of the Poor” revisited: Territory and place in disconnected glocal struggles. Ecological Economics, 102, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, S. D., 2009. Description, prescription and the choice of discount rates. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 197–205.Google Scholar
Bina, O. and La Camera, F., 2011. Promise and shortcomings of a green turn in recent policy responses to the “double crisis.” Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2308–2316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breffle, W. S., Eiswerth, M. E., Muralidharan, D. and Thornton, J., 2015. Understanding how income influences willingness to pay for joint programs: A more equitable value measure for the less wealthy. Ecological Economics, 109, 17–25.Google Scholar
Chan, K. M., Satterfield, T., and Goldstein, J., 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological economics, 74, 8–18.Google Scholar
Cooper, A. J., 1988 [1892]. A Voice from the South. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K., 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E., 1992. Allocation, distribution, and scale: Towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecological economics, 6(3), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, H. E., 2006. Population, migration, and globalization. Ecological Economics, 59(2), 187–190.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E., 2009. From a failed growth economy to a steady-state economy. International Society of Ecological Economics Newsletter, October 2009, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E., and Cobb, J. B., 1994. For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, R. K., 2011. Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 230–243.Google Scholar
Frank, A. G., 1969. The Development of Underdevelopment (pp. 76–84). Boston, MA: New England Free Press.Google Scholar
Garnett, S., Sayer, J., and Du Toit, J., 2007. Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: A conceptual framework. Ecology and society, 12(1).Google Scholar
Hancock, A. M., 2007. Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics & Gender, 3(2), 248–254.Google Scholar
Handbury, J., Rahkovsky, I. M., and Schnell, M., 2015. What drives nutritional disparities? Retail access and food purchases across the socioeconomic spectrum. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2632216 or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2632216Google Scholar
Hite, D., 2008. The problem with environmental justice studies (And how hedonics can help). In Baranzini, A., Ramirez, J., Schaerer, C., and Thalmann, P. (eds), Hedonic Methods in Housing Markets (pp. 203–224). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Justus, J., Fuller, T. and Sarkar, S., 2008. Influence of representation targets on the total area of conservation‐area networks. Conservation Biology, 22(3), 673–682.Google Scholar
Kallis, G., Kerschner, C., and Alier, J.M, 2012. The economics of degrowth. Ecological Economics, 84(12), 172–180.Google Scholar
Lawn, P., 2010. Facilitating the transition to a steady-state economy: Some macroeconomic fundamentals. Ecological Economics, 69(5), 931–936.Google Scholar
Martinez, E., 1993. Beyond Black/White: The racisms of our time. Social Justice, 20(1/2) (51–52), 22–34.Google Scholar
Alier, J. M., 2012. Environmental justice and economic degrowth: An alliance between two movements. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 23(1), 51–73.Google Scholar
Matulis, B. S., 2014. The economic valuation of nature: A question of justice? Ecological Economics, 104, 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, M., 1997. From the ground up: Ecofeminism and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 20(2), 163–173.Google Scholar
Mellor, M., 1997. Women, nature and the social construction of “economic man.” Ecological Economics, 20(2), 129–140.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. A., 1997. Feminism, ecology and the philosophy of economics. Ecological Economics, 20(2), 155–162.Google Scholar
Nelson, J. A., 2009. Between a rock and a soft place: Ecological and feminist economics in policy debates. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norgaard, R. B., 1989. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics, 1(1), 37–57.Google Scholar
Norgaard, R. B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological economics, 69(6), 1219–1227.Google Scholar
Passmore, J., 1974. Attitudes to nature. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 8, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phaneuf, D. J., 2013. Heterogeneity in environmental demand. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 227–244.Google Scholar
Piketty, T., 2017. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. E., 1999. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Røpke, I., 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological economics, 55(2), 262–290.Google Scholar
Rosen, S., 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of political economy, 82(1), 34–55.Google Scholar
Shah, A., 2007. The dark side of indigeneity?: Indigenous people, rights and development in India. History Compass, 5(6), 1806–1832.Google Scholar
Spash, C. L., 2011. Social ecological economics: Understanding the past to see the future. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70, 340–375.Google Scholar
Spash, C. L., 2013. The shallow or the deep ecological economics movement? Ecological Economics, 93, 351–362.Google Scholar
Speth, J. G., 2012. American passage: Towards a new economy and a new politics. Ecological Economics, 84, 181–186.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. E., 2000. The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508–580.Google Scholar
Temper, L., and Martinez-Alier, J., 2013. The god of the mountain and Godavarman: Net Present Value, indigenous territorial rights and sacredness in a bauxite mining conflict in India. Ecological Economics, 96, 79–87.Google Scholar
Van den Bergh, J. C., 2011. Environment versus growth: A criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth.” Ecological economics, 70(5), 881–890.Google Scholar
Waring, M., and Steinem, G., 1988. If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Warsaw, P., 2017. Essays on the Economics of Food Access. PhD. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison. United States.Google Scholar
West, P., Igoe, J., and Brockington, D., 2006. Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 251–277.Google Scholar
Zander, K. K., Dunnett, D. R., Brown, C., Campion, O., and Garnett, S. T., 2013. Rewards for providing environmental services: Where indigenous Australians’ and western perspectives collide. Ecological Economics, 87, 145–154.Google Scholar