Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:02:30.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Consumer Prediction

Forecasted Utility, Psychological Distance, and Their Intersection

from Part I - Individual Consumer Decision Making and Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

By
Carey K. Morewedge  and
Hal E. Hershfield
Edited by
Michael I. Norton ,
Derek D. Rucker  and
Cait Lamberton
Michael I. Norton
Affiliation:
Harvard Business School, Harvard University
Derek D. Rucker
Affiliation:
Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
Cait Lamberton
Affiliation:
Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Psychology , pp. 65 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I., & Dunn, E. W. (2009). From wealth to well-being? Money matters, but less than people think. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4, 523–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 2–18.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E.S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.Google Scholar
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610–622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, D. M. & Rips, L. J. (2010). Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 49–69.Google Scholar
Bartels, D.M. & Urminsky, O. (2011). On intertemporal selfishness: The perceived instability of identity underlies impatient consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 182–198.Google Scholar
Baucells, M. & Sarin, R. K. (2013) Determinants of experienced utility: Laws and implications. Decision Analysis, 10, 135–151.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670–676.Google Scholar
Bhargava, S., Kassam, K. S., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). A reassessment of the defense of parenthood. Psychological Science, 25, 299–302.Google Scholar
Botti, S. (2004). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: when people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 312.Google Scholar
Boven, L. V., Loewenstein, G., Welch, E., & Dunning, D. (2012). The illusion of courage in self-predictions: Mispredicting one’s own behavior in embarrassing situations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. D., Hershfield, H. E., Kouri, N. A., & Bryant, R. A. (Under review). Old man you’re a lot like me: Similarity between current and future self mediates the relationship between episodic future thinking and temporal discounting.Google Scholar
Bruni, L., & Sugden, R. (2007). The road not taken: How psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back. Economic Journal, 117, 146–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, C. J., & Hershfield, H. E. (2012). You owe it to yourself: Boosting retirement saving with a responsibility-based appeal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 429–432.Google Scholar
Buechel, E. C., Zhang, J., Morewedge, C. K., & Vosgerau, J. (2014). More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: Why affective forecasters overweight probability specifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 20–36.Google Scholar
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., & Peetz, J. (2010). The planning fallacy: Cognitive, motivational, and social origins. In Zanna, M. P. & Olson, J. M. (eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 43, pp. 1–62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buehler, R., Griffin, D., Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366–81.Google Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. (2011). A Long Bright Future. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Caruso, E. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2008). A wrinkle in time: Asymmetric valuation of past and future events. Psychological Science, 19, 796–801.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. R., Windschitl, P. D., & Suls, J. (2003). Egocentrism, event frequency, and comparative optimism: When what happens frequently is “more likely to happen to me.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1343–1356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Houwer, J., Custers, R., & De Clercq, A. (2006). Do smokers have a negative implicit attitude toward smoking? Cognition and Emotion, 20, 1274–1284.Google Scholar
Diehl, K., & Poynor, C. (2010). Great expectations?! Assortment size, expectations, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 312–322.Google Scholar
Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319, 1687–168.Google Scholar
Dunn, E. W., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2011). If money doesn’t make you happy, then you probably aren’t spending it right. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 115–125.Google Scholar
Ersner-Hershfield, H., Garton, M.T., Ballard, K., Samanez-Larkin, G.R., & Knutson, B. (2009). Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 280–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiedler, K., Jung, J., Wänke, M., Alexopoulos, T. (2012). On the Relations between Distinct Aspects of Psychological Distance: An Ecological Basis of Construal-Level Theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1014–1021.Google Scholar
Frederick, S., Novemsky, N., Wang, J., Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. (2009). Opportunity cost neglect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993). Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 45–55.Google Scholar
Fujita, K., & Roberts, J. C. (2010). Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1049–1054.Google Scholar
Fujita, K., Henderson, M., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278–282.Google Scholar
Garbinsky, E. N., Morewedge, C. K., & Shiv, B. (2014a). Interference of the end: Why recency bias in memory determines when a food is consumed again. Psychological Science, 25, 1466–1474.Google Scholar
Garbinsky, E. N., Morewedge, C. K., & Shiv, B. (2014b). Does liking or wanting determine repeat consumption delay? Appetite, 72, 59–65.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., Morewedge, C. K., Risen, J. L., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). Looking forward to looking backward: The misprediction of regret. Psychological Science 15, 346–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317, 1351–1354.Google Scholar
Greene, J. (2013). Moral Tribes: Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Haran, U., Moore, D. A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2010). A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 467–476.Google Scholar
Henderson, M. D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Transcending the “here”: The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 845–856.Google Scholar
Hershfield, H. E. (2011). Future self-continuity: How conceptions of the future self transform intertemporal choice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 30–43.Google Scholar
Hershfield, H. E., Goldstein, D. G., Sharpe, W. F., Fox, J., Yeykelvis, L., Carstensen, L. L., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, S23–S27.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K., & Hastie, R. (2006). Decision and experience: Why don’t we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 31–37.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K., Hastie, R., & Chen, J. (2008). Hedonomics: Bridging decision research with happiness research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 224–243.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K. & Zhang, J. (2004). Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 680–695.Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K., Zhang, J., Cai, C. F., & Zhang, S. (2013). Overearning. Psychological Science, 24, 852–859.Google Scholar
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iyengar, S. S., Wells, R. E., & Schwartz, B. (2006). Doing better but feeling worse: Looking for the “best” job undermines satisfaction. Psychological Science, 17, 143–150.Google Scholar
Jones, B., & Rachlin, H. (2006). Social discounting. Psychological Science, 17, 283–286.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwartz, N. (eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 3–26). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological science, 4, 401–405.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science, 39, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Varey, C. A. (1990). Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1101–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375–405.Google Scholar
Keren, G., & Roelofsma, P. (1995). Immediacy and certainty in intertemporal choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivetz, R., Urminsky, O., & Zheng, Y. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 39–58.Google Scholar
Kruger, J., & Burrus, J. (2004). Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 332–40.Google Scholar
Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. V., & McMorrow, S. (2013). Insurance and Behavioral Economics: Improving Decisions in the Most Misunderstood Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ledgerwood, A., Wakslak, C. J., and Wang, M. A. (2010) Differential information use for near and distant decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 638–642.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and purse strings: Carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341.Google Scholar
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.Google Scholar
Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 364–369.Google Scholar
Liberman, N. & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal distance on level of construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18Google Scholar
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Halamish, V. (in preparation). A Proximity x Value Theory of Utility and Motivation. Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256–1269.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the valuation of delayed consumption. Economic Journal, 97, 666–684.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In Davidson, R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 619–642). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. F., & Prelec, D. (1993). Preferences for sequences of outcomes. Psychological Review, 100, 91–108.Google Scholar
MacInnis, D. J., Patrick, V., and Park, C. W. (2006). Looking through the crystal ball: Affective forecasting and misforecasting in consumer behavior. Review of Marketing Research, 2, 43–80.Google Scholar
Maglio, S. & Hershfield, H.E. (2014). When Does the Future Start? Paper presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Annual Conference, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Mathieu, M.T. & Gosling, S.D. (2012). The accuracy or inaccuracy of affective forecasts depends on how accuracy is indexed: A meta-analysis of past studies. Psychological Science, 23, 161–162.Google Scholar
Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. H. (2004). Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 405–415.Google Scholar
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–507.Google Scholar
Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review, 115, 502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morewedge, C. K. (In press). Utility: Anticipated, experienced, and remembered. In Keren, G. and Wu, G. (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., & Buechel, E. C. (2013). Motivated underpinnings of the impact bias in affective forecasts. Emotion, 13, 1023–1029.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2005). The least likely of times: How remembering the past biases forecasts of the future. Psychological Science, 16, 626–630.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Gilbert, D. T., Myrseth, K. O. R., Kassam, K. S., & Wilson, T. D. (2010). Consuming experiences: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 986–992.Google Scholar
Morewedge, C. K., Kassam, K. S., Hsee, C. K., & Caruso, E. M. (2009). Duration sensitivity depends on stimulus familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 177–186.Google Scholar
Newtson, D., Engquist, G. A., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 847–862.Google Scholar
North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 982–997.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, S., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). Predicting the near and distant future. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 152–161.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo (1906). Manuale di economia politica, con una introduzione alla scienza sociale. Milan: Societa Editrice Libraria.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1971). Personal identity. Philosophical Review, 80, 3–27.Google Scholar
Peetz, J., & Buehler, R. (2009). Is there a budget fallacy? The role of savings goals in the prediction of personal spending. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1579–1591Google Scholar
Peetz, J., & Buehler, R. (2012). When distance pays off: The role of construal level in spending predictions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 395–398.Google Scholar
Price, P. C., Pentecost, H. C., & Voth, R. D. (2002). Perceived event frequency and the optimistic bias: Evidence for a two-process model of personal risk judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 242–252.Google Scholar
Pronin, E., Olivola, C. Y., & Kennedy, K. A. (2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 224–236.Google Scholar
Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D., & Wilson, T. (2013). The end of history illusion. Science, 339, 96–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 549–555.Google Scholar
Sagi, A., & Friedland, N. (2007). The cost of richness: the effect of the size and diversity of decision sets on post-decision regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 515–524.Google Scholar
Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 364–376.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155–161.Google Scholar
Sayette, M. A., Loewenstein, G., Griffin, K. M., & Black, J. J. (2008). Exploring the cold-to-hot empathy gap in smokers. Psychological Science, 19, 926–932.Google Scholar
Schelling, T.C. (1984). Self-command in practice, in policy, and in theory of rational choice. American Economic Review, 74, 1–11.Google Scholar
Shepperd, J. A., & McNulty, J. K. (2002). The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychological Science, 13, 85–88.Google Scholar
Shiv, B., & Huber, J. (2000). The impact of anticipating satisfaction on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 202–216.Google Scholar
Simon, J. L. (1995). Interpersonal allocation continuous with intertemporal allocation: Binding commitments, pledges, bequests. Rationality and Society, 7, 367–392.Google Scholar
Simonson, I. (1992). The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 105–118.Google Scholar
Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2011). The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 299–313.Google Scholar
Sussman, A. B., & Alter, A. L. (2012). The exception is the rule: Underestimating and overspending on exceptional expenses. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 800–814.Google Scholar
Tam, L. & Dholakia, U. M. (2011). Delay and duration effects of time frames on personal savings estimates and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 114, 142–152.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. & Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406.Google Scholar
Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 473–482.Google Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., Jia, J. S., & Norton, M. I. (2012). The preference for potential. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 567–583.Google Scholar
Trope, Y. & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal Level Theory of Psychological Distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.Google Scholar
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 83–95.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Griffin, D. (1991). Endowment and contrast in judgments of wellbeing. In Strack, F., Argyle, M., & Schwartz, N. (eds.), Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 101–118). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., Kane, J., McGraw, A. P., & Dale, J. (2010). Feeling close: Emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 872–885.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159–1168.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., Welch, E., & Dunning, D. (2012). The illusion of courage in self-predictions: Mispredicting one’s own behavior in embarrassing situations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25, 1–12.Google Scholar
Van Boven, L., White, K., & Huber, M. (2009). Immediacy bias in emotion perception: Current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 368–382.Google Scholar
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wakslak, C. J. (2012) The experience of cognitive dissonance in important and trivial domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1361–1364.Google Scholar
Wakslak, C. J., & Trope, Y. (2009). Cognitive consequences of affirming the self: The relationship between self-affirmation and object construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 927–932.Google Scholar
Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Aloni, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641–653.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Novemsky, N., & Dhar, R. (2009). Anticipation adaptation to products. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 149–159.Google Scholar
Weber, E. U., Johnson, E. J., Milch, K. F., Chang, H., Brodscholl, J. C., & Goldstein, D. G. (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice a query-theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516–523.Google Scholar
Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., Arndt, J., & Routledge, C. (2006). Nostalgia: Content, triggers, functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 975–993.Google Scholar
Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19, 302–308.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2001). From chump to champ: People’s appraisals of their earlier and current selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 572–584.Google Scholar
Wittmann, M., & Paulus, M. P. (2008). Decision making, impulsivity and time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 7–12.Google Scholar
Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 543–556.Google Scholar
Zauberman, G. & Lynch, J.G. (2005). Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 134, 23–37.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Wang, J., (2009). Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 497–507.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×