Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-6rxlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T01:38:22.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Modalities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2025

Richard Bellamy
Affiliation:
University College London
Jeff King
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Recommended Reading

Barry, B. (1995). Justice as Impartiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, N. (1999). Random Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenawalt, K. (1992). Law and Objectivity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, E. (1992). The Changing Faces of First Amendment Neutrality: R.A.V. v St Paul, Rust v Sullivan, and the Problem of Content-Based Underinclusion. Supreme Court Review, 1992, pp. 2977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2007). Objectivity and the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2017). Liberalism with Excellence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2021). Freedom of Expression as Self-Restraint, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendus, S. (2002). Impartiality in Moral and Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1956). On Liberty. Edited by Shields, Currin. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill. Originally published in 1859.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and Partiality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1995). Poetic Justice, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Quong, J. (2011). Liberalism without Perfection, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Barnett, R. (2003). Constitutional Legitimacy. Columbia Law Review, 103 (1), 111148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brilmayer, L. (1989). Consent, Contract, and Territory. Minnesota Law Review, 74 (1), 135.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2010). Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilley, B. (2006). The Meaning and Measure of State Legitimacy: Results for 72 Countries. European Journal of Political Research, 45 (3), 499525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, R. (2003). Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. I. (2003b). Is the Constitution a Contract for Legitimacy? Review of Constitutional Studies, 8 (2), 101128.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective or Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermeule, A. (2022). Common Good Constitutionalism, Boston: Polity.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Edited by Roth, G. and Wittich, C.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zurn, C. (2010). The Logic of Legitimacy: Bootstrapping Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy. Legal Theory, 16 (3), 191227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Allan, T. R. S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2016). Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, J. (1992). On Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourke, R. & Skinner, Q., eds. (2016). Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, P. C. (1997). Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law: The Theory and Practice of Weimar Constitutionalism, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. L. (2012). Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy and Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. (1999). The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, G. (2009). Sovereignty: The Origin and Future of a Political and Legal Concept, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, H. (2019). Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. (2016). Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. (2001). Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pavel, C. (2015). Divided Sovereignty: International Institutions and the Limits of State Authority, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawlings, R., Leyland, P., & Young, A. L., eds. (2013). Sovereignty and the Law: Domestic, European, and International Experiences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N., ed. (2003). Sovereignty in Transition, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Arato, A. (2017). The Adventures of the Constituent Power: Beyond Revolutions? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böckenförde, E.-W. (2017). The Constituent Power of the People: A Liminal Concept of Constitutional Law. In his Constitutional and Political Theory. Edited by Künkler, M. and Stein, T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, J. (1576). Les six livres de la république. Paris: Jacques du Puis.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2012). Constitutionalism in an old key: legality and constituent power. Global Constitutionalism, 1 (2), pp. 229260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. (2003). The Idea of Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 6.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. & Walker, N. (2007). The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Napoleon, I. (1910). The Corsican: A Diary of Napoleon’s Life in His Own Words [1804] Johnston, R. M. ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Translated by M. Boscagli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2019). How to think beyond sovereignty: one Sieyès and constituent power. European Journal of Political Theory, 18 (1), 4767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinelli, L. (2020). Constituent Power: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieyès, E.-J. (2003 [1789]). What is the Third Estate? In Political Writings. Translated by M. Sonenscher. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 92162.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ankersmit, F. (2002). Political Representation, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito Vieira, M. & Runciman, D. (2008). Representation, London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Disch, L., de Sande, M., Urbinati, U., eds. (2019). The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation, Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2019). The Digital Party: Political Organization and Online Democracy, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A., Jay, J., Madison, J. (1987 [1787]). The Federalist. A Commentary on The Constitution of the United States, Edited Earl, E. M., New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1992). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (1999 [1945]). General Theory of Law and State, Translated by A. Wedberg, Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2013 [1929]). The Essence and Value of Democracy, Edited by Urbinati, N. and Accetti, C. Invernizzi, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review, 97 (4), 515528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (2004). Representation and Democracy: Uneasy Alliance. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27 (2004), 335342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotke, D. (1997). Representation is Democracy. Constellations, 4 (1), 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sintomer, Y. (2013). The Meanings of Political Representation: Uses and Misuses of a Notion. Raisons Politiques, 50 (2), 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2006). Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy, London and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. (2014). Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and The People, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, N. & Warren, M. (2008). The concept of Representation in Contemporary Political Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ackerman, B. (1991). We the People: Foundations, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arato, A. (2016). Post Sovereign Constitution Making: Learning and Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J., Mansbridge, J. & Warren, M., eds. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contiades, X. & Fotiadou, A. eds. (2017). Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. (2019). Democracy and constitutional reform: Deliberative versus populist constitutionalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45 (9–10), 11161131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg, Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (2001). Constitutional democracy: A paradoxical union of contradictory principles? Political Theory, 29 (6), 766781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. (2020). Democracy without Shortcuts: A Participatory Conception of Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, R., Kong, H., Orr, G., & King, J., eds. (2018). The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, C. H. (2013). Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, M. (2007). Family disputes: Diversity in defining and measuring deliberation. Swiss Political Science Review, 13 (4), 527557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, C. S. (1997). The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. Expanded Edition, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reuchamps, M. & Suiter, J., eds. (2016). Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999). Law and Disagreement, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zurn, C. F. (2007). Deliberative Democracy and the Institution of Judicial Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Applbaum, A. I. (1999). Ethics for Adversaries, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A., ed. (1966). Political Opposition in Western Democracies, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fontana, D. (2009). Government in Opposition. Yale Law Journal, 119 (3), 548623.Google Scholar
Jennings, I. W. (1969). Parliament. 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. (1997). Opposition in the British Political System. Government and Opposition, 32 (4), 487510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (1976). Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 1 (1), 1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinig, J. (2014). On Loyalty and Loyalties: The Contours of a Problematic Virtue, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laski, H. (1944). The Parliamentary and Presidential Systems. Public Administration Review, 4 (4), 347359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, D. J. & Pildes, R. H. (2006). Separation of Parties, Not Powers. Harvard Law Review, 119 (8), 23112386.Google Scholar
Punnett, R. M. (1973). Front-Bench Opposition: The Role of the Leader of the Opposition, the Shadow Cabinet and Shadow Government in British Politics. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
UK Parliament, (1940). House of Commons, Hansard.Google Scholar
UK Parliament, (1975). Ministerial and Other Salaries Act.Google Scholar
UK Parliament, (2000). Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016). Political Political Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G. (2016). Loyal Opposition and the Political Constitution. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37 (2), 357382.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Ackerman, B. (2000). The New Separation of Powers. Harvard Law Review, 113 (3), 633729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. (2018). The Principles of Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonham v College of Physicians (1610) 8 Co Rep 107.Google Scholar
Gordon, S. (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2003[1788]). The Federalist: With Letters of Brutus. Edited by Ball, Terence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1973). Law, Legislation, and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H. (1940). Constitutionalism Ancient and Modern, Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . (1989 [1748]). The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by Cohler, A., Miller, B. C., and Stone, H. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012). On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poguntke, T. & Webb, P., eds. (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. (2012 [1967]). Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (2016). Political Political Theory: Essays on Institutions, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Anderson, E. (2017). Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why we Don’t Talk about It), Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, P. (1997). Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law. Public Law, 467487.Google Scholar
Fleming, J. ed. (2011). Getting to the Rule of Law: NOMOS L, New York: New York University Press, pp. 64104.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1969). The Morality of Law, rev. edn, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krygier, M. (2017). Tempering Power. In Adams, M. et al., eds, Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Ideas and Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, F. (2016). A Republic of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, J. & Loughlin, M. eds. (2021). The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postema, G. (2022). Law’s Rule: The Nature, Value, and Viability of the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1979b). The Rule of Law and its Virtue. In Raz, J. (Ed), The Authority of Law: Essays in Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 210229.Google Scholar
Sempill, J. (2018a). Ruler’s Sword, Citizen’s Shield: The Rule of Law and the Constitution of Power. Journal of Law & Politics, 31 (3), 333415.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. (2004). On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2008–2009). The Concept and the Rule of Law. Georgia Law Review, 43 (1), 161.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Avril, P. (1997). Les conventions de la constitution, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blick, A. (2015). Constitutional Reform. In B. Galligan, & S. Brenton, eds., Constitutional Conventions in Westminster Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryce, J. (1915). The American Commonwealth, reprint Indiana: Indianapolis: Liberty Fund 1995.Google Scholar
Cooray, L. J. M. (1979). Conventions. The Australian Constitution and the Future, Sydney: Legal Books.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V. (1915). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution, 8th edn., London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Heard, A. (1989). Recognizing the Variety Among Constitutional Conventions. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 22 (1), 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luce, R. & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and Decisions, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1986). Constitutional Conventions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Asad, T. (2012). Thinking about Religious Belief and Politics. In Orsi, R., ed., Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3657.Google Scholar
Bhargava, R., ed. (1998). Secularism and its Critics, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, C. & Sager, L. (2007). Religious Freedom and the Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, A. (2010). Religion and State in the United States: A Defense of Two-Way Protection. In Rosenblum, N., ed., Obligations of Citizenship and the Demands of Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 127164.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, 2010, Constitutional Theocracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2008). Critical Republicanism. The Hijab Controversy and Political Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborde, C. (2017a). Liberalism’s Religion, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, B. (2013). Why Tolerate Religion?, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maclure, J., Taylor, C. (2011). Secularism and Freedom of Conscience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2017). A Secular Age, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bellamy, R. (2007). Political Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, R. (2014). The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Conventions: Political Constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 25 (4), 10191042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, A. (1986). The Least Dangerous Branch, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Espionosa, M. J. & Landau, D. (2017). Colombian Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2013). Latin American Constitutionalism, 1810–2010, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jestaedt, M. et al. (2020). The German Federal Constitutional Court, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. (2013 [1929]). The Essence and Value of Democracy. Edited by Urbinati, N. and Invernizzi-Accetti, C.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Möllers, C. (2011). Multi-Level Democracy. Ratio Juris, 24 (3), 247367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, C. S. (1996). The Constitution of Deliberative Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (2018). The Counter-Majoritan Thesis. In Jacobson, G., Schor, M., eds., Comparative Constitutional Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 189207.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (1999). The Dignity of Legislation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. (2006). The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, 115 (6), 13461406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Balkin, J. M. (2016). The Framework Model and Constitutional Interpretation. In Dyzenhaus, D. and Thorburn, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobbit, P. (1991). Constitutional Interpretation, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996). Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, R. (1987). A Constructivist Coherence Theory of Constitutional Interpretation. Harvard Law Review, 100 (6), 11891286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, J. (2006). Interpreting Constitutions, A Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A. (2002). Original Intention, Enacted Text, and Constitutional Interpretation. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 47 (1), 255298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1999). On the Authority and Interpretation of Constitutions: Some Preliminaries. In Alexander, L., ed., Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 152193.Google Scholar
Roznai, Y. (2017). Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, A. (2009). Comparativism in Constitutional Interpretation. New Zealand Law Review, 2009 (1), 4568.Google Scholar
Waluchow, W. & Kyritsis, D. (2023). Constitutionalism. In Zalta, E., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/constitutionalism/; see Section 7, ‘Constitutional Interpretation’Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Alexy, R. (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barak, A. (2012). Proportionality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981). Is there a Right to Pornography? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 177212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huscroft, G., Miller, B. W., & Webber, G. eds., (2014). Proportionality and the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, V. & Tushnet, M. (2017). Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, M. & Meister, M., (2012). The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumm, M. (2010). The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review. Law and Ethics of Human Rights, 4(2), 142175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G. (2015). Rescuing Proportionality. In Cruft, R., Liao, S., Renzo, M., eds., Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Letsas, G. (2018). Proportionality as Fittingness. Current Legal Problems, 71(1), 5386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lever, A. (2020). A Sense of Proportion: Some Thoughts on Equality, Security and Justice. Res Publica, 26(4), 357371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möller, Kai. (2012). The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1995). Personal Rights and Public Space. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 24(2), 83107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T. (2010). Proportionality in Perspective. New Zealand Law Review, 2010 (2), 369391.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A. (2016). Reclaiming Proportionality. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22(2), 2431.Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis, S. (2009). Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(3), 468493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbina, F. (2017). A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Bedau, H. A., ed. (1991). Civil Disobedience in Focus, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brownlee, K. (2012). Conscience and Conviction: The Case for Civil Disobedience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çıdam, Ç., Scheuerman, W. E., Delmas, C. et al. (2020). Theorizing the politics of protest: Contemporary debates on civil disobedience. Contemporary Political Theory. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00392-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, C. (2018). A Duty to Resist: When Disobedience Should Be Uncivil, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1978 [1977]). Taking Rights Seriously, 5th edn, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1985). Civil disobedience: Litmus test for the democratic constitutional state. Translated by J. Torpey. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 30, 95116.Google Scholar
Milligan, T. (2013). Civil disobedience: Protest, Justification and the Law, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999a [1971]). A Theory of Justice, rev. edn, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. (1979). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (2018). Civil Disobedience, Cambridge, UK, Medford, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schwartzberg, M., ed. (2020). NOMOS LXII: Protest and Dissent, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. (2013). Civil Disobedience and Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. (1970). Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Zinn, H. (2002 [1968]). Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies of Law and Order, Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Albert, R. (2010). Constitutional Handcuffs. Arizona State Law Review, 42 (3), 664716.Google Scholar
Albert, R. (2014). The Structure of Constitutional Amendment Rules. Wake Forest L. R., 49, 913.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2002). Ulysses Unbound, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eule, J. N. (1987). Temporal Limits on the Legislative Mandate: Entrenchment and Retroactivity. Law and Social Enquiry, 12 (2–3), 381459.Google Scholar
Levinson, D. J. (2011). Parchment and Politics: The Positive Puzzle of Constitutional Commitment. Harvard Law Review, 124 (3), 657746.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1987). Constitutional Conventions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, E. & Vermeule, A. (2002). Legislative Entrenchment: A Reappraisal. Yale Law Journal, 111 (7), 11651706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartzberg, M. (2014). Counting the Many: The Origins and Limits of the Supermajority Rule, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Recommended Reading

Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacre: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by D. Heller-Roazen. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (1997). Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen, Hermann Heller, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2006a). The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, L. (2010). The Banality of Emergency. In Sarat, A., ed., Sovereignty, Emergency, Legality. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 136164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J. & Pasquino, P. (2004). The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2 (2), 210239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, O. & Ni Aolain, F. (2006). Law in Times of Crisis: Emergency Powers in Theory and Practice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honig, B. (2009). Emergency Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hussain, N. (2003). The Jurisprudence of Emergency: Colonialism and The Rule of Law, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostal, R. (2005). A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lazar, N. (2009). States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1980 [1689]). Second Treatise of Government. Edited by Macpherson, C. B.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli. (1965 [1517]). Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius. In Machiavelli: The Chief Works and Others. Volume 1. Translated by A. Gilbert. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 175532.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (2008). The Emergency Paradigm and the New Terrorism: What If the End of Terrorism Was Not in Sight? In Baume, S., Fontana, B., eds., Les usages de la s’eparation des pouvoirs, Paris: Michel Houdiard, pp. 136171 (also available from: http://as.nyu.edu/docs/IO/2792/emerg.pdf).Google Scholar
Montesquieu. (1989 [1748]). The Spirit of the Laws. Edited by Cohler, A., Miller, B. C., & Stone, H. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarry, E. (2011). Thinking in an Emergency, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company Inc.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2008). Legal and Extralegal Emergencies, In Whittington, K. E., Kelemen, R. D., Caldeira, G. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164188.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, W. E. (2006). Survey Article: Emergency Powers and the Rule of Law After 9/11 The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (1), 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2005 [1922]). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Theory of Sovereignty. Translated by G. Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2010). Oxford Handbook of Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2012). Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. & Rawlings, R. (2021). Law and Administration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D., eds. (2004). The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, S. & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die, New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2018). The Fifth Risk: Undoing Democracy, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17 (3), 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2018). Regulatory Policy Review, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations, 2nd edn, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Adler, M. (2019). Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, M. & Posner, E. (2006). New Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemerinsky, E. (2019). Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, 6th edn, New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Fallon, R. (2019). The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, S. (1998). Normative Ethics, Boulder, Co: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Masur, J. & Posner, E. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Judicial Role. University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (4), 935986.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. (2018). The Cost-Benefit Revolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Recommended Reading

Arato, A. (2000a). Civil Society, Constitution, and Legitimacy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, A. M. (2017). Beyond Origins: Rethinking Founding in a Time of Constitutional Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calloway, C. G. (1995). The American Revolution in Indian Country: Crisis and Diversity in Native American Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanon, F. (2018). Alienation and Freedom. Edited by Khalfa, Jean and Young, Robert J. C.. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. (1996a). The Age of Revolution, 1789–1848, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
James, C. L. R. (2001). The Black Jacobins, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kouvelakis, S. (2003). Philosophy and Revolution: From Kant to Marx, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Losurdo, D. (2020). War and Revolution: Rethinking the Twentieth Century. Translated by Gregory Elliott. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, R. (2006). Reform or Revolution and Other Writings, Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Nabulsi, K. (1999). Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance, and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, A. (2009). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Translated by Maurizia Boscagli, 2nd edn, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sultany, N. (2017a). Law and Revolution: Legitimacy and Constitutionalism After the Arab Spring, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takriti, A. R. (2013). Monsoon Revolution: Republicans, Sultans, and Empires in Oman, 1965–1976, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotsky, L. (2017). The History of the Russian Revolution, London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Modalities
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868143.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Modalities
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868143.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Modalities
  • Edited by Richard Bellamy, University College London, Jeff King, University College London
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
  • Online publication: 27 March 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868143.012
Available formats
×