Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Frontispiece
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Values
- Part II Modalities
- Part III Institutions
- Part IV Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Part IV - Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2025
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Frontispiece
- Preface and Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Values
- Part II Modalities
- Part III Institutions
- Part IV Challenges for Constitutional Democracy
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Constitutional Theory , pp. 995 - 1088Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Recommended Reading
Christiano, T. (2010). The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (2003). How democratic is the American Constitution? Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. (2018). Constitutional Rights as Bribes. Connecticut Law Review, 50 (3), pp. 769–818.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. & Slagstad, R. (1988). Constitutionalism and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, C. (2000). Social rights under the Constitution. Government and the Decent life, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, R. (2010). The Legal Foundations of Inequality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, R., Domingo, P., Roux, T., eds. (2016). Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T., Huq, A. (2018). How to save a Constitutional Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Graber, M., Levinson, S., Tushnet, M., eds. (2018). Constitutional democracy in crisis?, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Landau, D. (2013). Abusive Constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Review, 47 (1), pp. 189–260.Google Scholar
Langford, M. (2009). Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelman, F. (1979). Welfare Rights in a Constitutional Democracy. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1979 (3), 659–693.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2008). Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, K., ed. (2019). The Future of Economic and Social Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recommended Reading
Alterio, A. M. (2019). Reactive vs structural approach: A public law response to populism. Global Constitutionalism, 8 (2), 270–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arato, A. (2019). Populism, Constitutional Courts, and Civil Society. In Landfried, C., ed., Judicial power: how constitutional courts affect political transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 318–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokker, P. (2018). Populist constitutionalism. In de la Torre, C., ed., Routledge handbook of global populism, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blokker, P. (2019a). Populism as a constitutional project. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2), 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugaric, B. & Tushnet, M. (2021). Populism and constitutionalism: an essay on definitions and their implications, Cardozo Law Review, 42 (6), pp. 2345–2393.Google Scholar
Corrias, L. (2016). Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity. European Constitutional Law Review, 12 (6), 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltwasser, C. R. (2013). Populism vs. Constitutionalism? Comparative Perspectives on Contemporary Western Europe, Latin America, and the United States. The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society Policy Brief.Google Scholar
Landau, D. (2018). Populist Constitutions. University of Chicago Law Review, 85 (2), 521–543.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. (2018). Populism and Constitutionalism. In Kaltwasser, C. R. et al., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 590–606.Google Scholar
Nash, K. (2016). Politicising Human Rights in Europe: Challenges to Legal Constitutionalism From the Left and the Right. International Journal of Human Rights, 20 (8), 1295–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oklopcic, Z. (2019). Imagined ideologies: Populist figures, liberalist projections, and the horizons of constitutionalism. German Law Journal, 20 (2), 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2019). The opportunism of populists and the defense of constitutional liberalism. German Law Journal, 20 (3), 314–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thio, L.-A. (2012). Constitutionalism in Illiberal Polities. In Rosenfeld, M. & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 133–152.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C. (2020). Constitutionalism and populism: national political integration and global legal integration. International Theory, 12 (1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N. (2019). Populism and constitutional tension. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2), 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recommended Reading
Affolder, N. (2021). Transnational Climate Law. In Peer, Z., ed., Oxford Handbook of Transnational Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. (2006a). The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, S. ed. (2010). Human Rights and Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC (2018). Summary for Policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O. et al, eds., Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Available from: www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jaria-Manzano, J. I. & Borras, S. eds. (2019). Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Edgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzé, L., ed. (2017). Environmental Law and Governance for the Anthropocene, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Levy, R., et al, eds. (2018). The Cambridge Handbook on Deliberative Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loevy, K. (2016). Emergencies in Public Law: The Legal Politics of Containment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setzer, J. & Vanhala, L. (2019). Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10 (3), e580.Google Scholar
Stacey, J. (2018). The Constitution of the Environmental Emergency, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Recommended Reading
Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory, 36 (1), 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, M. (2013). Immigration, Jurisdiction, and Exclusion. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 41 (2), 103–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, G. & Wellman, C. H. (2011). Debating the Ethics of Immigration: Is There a Right to Exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carens, J. (1987). Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders. Review of Politics, 49 (2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, S. (2013). The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass, 8 (3), 254–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2016). Strangers in Our Midst: The Political Philosophy of Immigration, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberman, K. (2016). Immigration as a Human Right. In Fine, Sarah and Ypi, Lea, eds., Migration in Political Theory: The Ethics of Movement and Membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevnick, R. (2011). Immigration and the Constraints of Justice: Between Open Borders and Absolute Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shachar, A. (2009). The Birthright Lottery: Citizenship and Global Inequality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Song, S. (2017). Why Does the State Have the Right to Control Immigration? In: Knight, J., ed., NOMOS LVII: Migration, Emigration, and Immigration. New York: New York University Press, pp. 3–50.Google Scholar
Song, S. (2018). Immigration and the Limits of Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souter, J. (2014). Towards a Theory of Asylum as Reparation for Past Injustice. Political Studies, 62 (2), 326–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. H. (2008). Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics, 119(1), 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recommended Reading
Balkin, J. (2020). The Cycles of Constitutional Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafetz, J. & Pozen, P. (2018). How Constitutional Norms Break Down. UCLA Law Review, 65 (4), 1430–1459.Google Scholar
Fishkin, J. & Pozen, D. E. (2018). Asymmetrical Constitutional Hardball. Columbia Law Review, 118 (3), 915–982Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. & Huq, A. (2018). How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pozen, D. E. (2019). Hardball and/as Anti-Hardball. New York University Journal of Legislation & Public Policy, 21 (4), 949–955.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. (2004). Constitutional Hardball. John Marshall Law Review, 37 (2), 523–553.Google Scholar