Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:03:39.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Assessment of Personality Disorder

from Part III - Assessment and Diagnosis of Specific Mental Disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2019

By
Leonard J. Simms ,
Trevor F. Williams  and
Chloe M. Evans
Edited by
Martin Sellbom  and
Julie A. Suhr
Martin Sellbom
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Julie A. Suhr
Affiliation:
Ohio University
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we review the current state of personality disorder (PD) assessment practices. The review includes both traditional measures that are rooted in categorical conceptualizations of PD and dimensional measures that have emerged in response to mounting evidence that has called into question the validity of traditional PD classification approaches. The scope of this chapter includes prominent and promising models and measures of PD. Moreover, our review is focused on omnibus measures that present a relatively “complete” picture of personality pathology rather than measures that focus on the features of only one or a limited set of PDs. Finally, we address two important topics relevant to PD assessment. First, we discuss the cross-cultural PD assessment literature, which is characterized by a relative lack of strong cross-cultural research on the manifestation and measurement of PD. Second, we address the disconnect between research and applied practice of PD assessment.

Keywords

personality disorderAlternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD)personality functioningassessmentinterview methodsself-report methodscross-cultural assessmentclinical translation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Clinical Assessment and Diagnosis , pp. 398 - 415
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdin, E., Koh, K. G., Subramaniam, M., Guo, M. E., Leo, T., Teo, C., Tan, E. E., & Chong, S. A. (2011). Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4+) among Mentally Ill Prison Inmates in Singapore. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 834–841.Google Scholar
Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62–81.Google Scholar
Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 521–536.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (rev. 4th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Bach, B., & Hutsebaut, J. (2018). Level of Personality Functioning Scale – Brief Form 2.0: Utility in capturing personality problems in psychiatric outpatients and incarcerated addicts. Journal of Personality Assessment. doi:10.1080/00223891.2018.1428984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagby, R. M., Costa, P. T., Widiger, T. A., Ryder, A. G., & Marshall, M. (2005). DSM‐IV personality disorders and the Five‐Factor Model of personality: A multi‐method examination of domain‐ and facet‐level predictions. European Journal of Personality, 19, 307–324.Google Scholar
Bagby, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2018). The validity and clinical utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 Response Inconsistency Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagby, R. M., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Five Factor Model personality disorder scales: An introduction to a special section on assessment of maladaptive variants of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Bagge, C. L., & Trull, T. J. (2003). DAPP-BQ: Factor structure and relations to personality disorder symptoms in a non-clinical sample. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, L. S. (1996). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF: Manual for Administration, Scoring, and Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Berghuis, H., Kamphuis, J. H., & Verheul., R. (2014). Specific personality traits and general personality dysfunction as predictors of the presence and severity of personality disorders in a clinical sample. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(4), 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, A. J., Morey, L. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2017). Exploring the assessment of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders with the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(2), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Calabrese, W. R., Rudick, M. M., Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2012). Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality-2nd Edition (SNAP-2). Psychological Assessment, 24, 751–763.Christensen, T. B., Paap, M. C. S, Arnesen, M., Koritzinsky, K., Nysaeter, T., Eikenaes, I., et al. (in press). Interrater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM–5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders Module I: Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, L. A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 58, 227–257.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (2002). Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (2nd ed.): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Unpublished test manual.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., Watson, D., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Diagnosis and classification of psychopathology: Challenges to the current system and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 121–153.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F. L., & Merwin, M. M. (1992). Reliability and validity of the Coolidge Axis Two Inventory: A new inventory for the assessment of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 59, 223–238.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Davidson, K. M., Obonsawin, M. C., Seils, M., Patience, L. (2003). Patient and clinician agreement on personality using the SWAP-200. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 208–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dreessen, L., & Arntz, A. (1998). Short-interval test-retest interrater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Personality Disorders (SCID-II) in outpatients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 138–148.Google Scholar
Evans, C., & Simms, L. J. (2018). Assessing inter-model continuity between the Section II and Section III conceptualization of borderline personality disorder in DSM-5.Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 290–296.Google Scholar
First, M. B., & Gibbon, M. (2004). The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Disorders (SCID-II). In Hilsenroth, M. J. & Segal, D. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Vol. 2: Personality assessment (pp. 134–143). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
First, M. B., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., & Oldham, J. M. (2018). Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-AMPD). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
First., M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Benjamin, L. S., Spitzer, R. L. (2015). User’s Guide for the SCID-5-PD (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorder). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
First, M. B., Williams, J. B. W., Benjamin, L. S., Spitzer, R. L. (2016). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Screening Personality Questionnaire (SCID-5-SPQ). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Fossati, A., Somma, A., Borroni, S., & Miller, J. D. (2017). Assessing dimensions of pathological narcissism: Psychometric properties of the Short Form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory in a sample of Italian university students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The personality psychopathology five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In Strack, S. & Lorr, M. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 Scales. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 104–114.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., Finn, J. A., Reynolds, S. M., Shields, S. M., & Arbisi, P. (2013). The MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5-RF) Scales: Development and validity research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 140–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hentschel, A. G., & Livesley, W. J. (2013). The General Assessment of Personality Disorder (GAPD): Factor structure, incremental validity of self-pathology, and relations to DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(5), 479–485.Google Scholar
Hentschel, A. G., & Pukrop, R. (2014). The essential features of personality disorder in DSM-5: The relationship between Criteria A and B. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202(5), 412–418.Google Scholar
Hopwood, C. J., Good, E. W., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Validity of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 650–659.Google Scholar
Huprich, S. K., Nelson, S. M., Meehan., K. B., Siefert, C. J., Haggerty, G., Sexton, J., Baade, L. (2017). Introduction of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9, 553–563.Google Scholar
Hutsebaut, J. Feenstra, D. J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2016). Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a brief self-report questionnaire for the assessment of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF). Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7(2), 192–197.Google Scholar
Hyler, S. E. (1994). Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute.Google Scholar
Klein, M. H., Benjamin, L. S., Rosenfeld, R., Treece, C., Hsted, J., & Greist, J. H. (1993). The Wisconsin Personality Dis- orders Inventory. I: Development, Reliability, and Validity. Journal of Personality Disorders, Supplement, 18–33.Google Scholar
Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., … & Zimmerman, M. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 4, 454–477.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F. (2013). Personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livesley, W. K. (2006). The Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology (DAPP) approach to personality disorder. In Strack, S. (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 401–429). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. K., & Jackson, D. N. (2009). Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology-Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., & Jang, K. L. (2000). Toward an empirically based classification of personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 137–151.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., Jang, K. L., & Vernon, P. A. (1998). The phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 941–948.Google Scholar
Livesley, W. J., Schroeder, M. L., Jackson, D. N., & Jang, K. L. (1994). Categorical distinctions in the study of personality disorder: Implications for classification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 6–17.Google Scholar
Loranger, A. W. (1999). International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Loranger, A. W. (2002). OMNI Personality Inventory and OMNI-IV Personality Disorder Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Lynam, D. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maples, J. L., Carter, N. T., Few, L. R., Crego, C., Gore, W., Samuel, D. B., … & Miller, J. D. (2015). Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: An item response theory investigation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Assessment, 27, 1–16.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & Martin, T. A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 261–270.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 407–425.Google Scholar
McDermutt, W., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Assessment instruments and standardized evaluation. In Oldham, J. M., Skodol, A. E., & Bender, D. S. (Eds.), Textbook of personality disorders (pp. 89–101). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Press.Google Scholar
Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). MCMI-III manual (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Millon, T., Grossman, S., & Millon, C. (2015). MCMI-IV: Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory manual (1st ed.). Bloomington, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Morey, L. C. (1991). Professional manual for the Personality Assessment Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Morey, L. C. (2017). Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale. Psychological Assessment, 29, 1302–1308.Google Scholar
Okada, M., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Comparison of three self-report measures of personality pathology. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31, 358–367.Google Scholar
Oltmanns, J. R., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: The Personality Inventory for ICD-11. Psychological Assessment, 30, 154–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2006). Perceptions of self and others regarding pathological personality traits. In Krueger, R. F. & Tackett, J. L. (Eds.), Personality and psychopathology (pp. 71–111). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Parker, G., Both, L., Olley, A., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Irvine, P., & Jacobs, G. (2002). Defining disordered personality functioning. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16(6), 503–522.Google Scholar
Parker, G., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Both, L., Kumar, S., Wilhelm, K., & Olley, A. (2004). Measuring disordered personality functioning: To love and to work reprised. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110(3), 230–239.Google Scholar
Pfohl, B., Blum, N., & Zimmerman, M. (1997). Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, C. (1999). Assessment practices in the era of managed care: Current status and future directions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(7), 787–796.Google Scholar
Quilty, L. C., & Bagby, R. M. (2007). Psychometric and Structural Analysis of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) Facet Subscales. Assessment, 14, 375–384.Google Scholar
Retzlaff, P. (1996). MCMI-III diagnostic validity: Bad test or bad validity study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(2), 431–437.Google Scholar
Ro, E., & Clark., L. A. (2009). Psychosocial functioning in the context of diagnosis: Assessment and theoretical issues. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 313–324.Google Scholar
Rojas, S. L. (2017). Dismantling the Five Factor Form. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Rojas, S. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2014). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Five Factor Form. Assessment, 21(2), 143–157.Google Scholar
Rojas, S. L., & Widiger, T. A. (2018). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Five Factor Form and the Sliderbar Inventory. Assessment, 25(2), 222–234.Google Scholar
Schotte, C. K. W, De Doncker, D. A. M., Dmitruk, D., Mulders, I. V ., D’Haenen, H., & Cosyns, P. (2004). The ADP-IV Questionnaire: Differential validity and concordance with the semi-structured Interview. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 405–419.Google Scholar
Schotte, C. K. W., De Doncker, D., Vankerckhoven, C., Vertommen, H., & Cosyns, P. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1179–1188.Google Scholar
Segal, D. L., & Coolidge, F. L. (2007). Structured and semi-structured interviews for differential diagnosis: Issues and application. In Hersen, M., Turner, S. M., & Beidel, D. C. (Eds.), Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (5th ed., pp. 72–103). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Dhillon, S., & Bagby, R. M. (2018). Development and validation of an Overreporting Scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM–5 (PID-5). Psychological Assessment, 30, 582–593.Google Scholar
Sellbom, M., Waugh, M. H., & Hopwood, C. J. (2018) Development and validation of personality disorder spectra scales for the MMPI–2–RF. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100, 406–420.Google Scholar
Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2007). The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simms, L. J., & Clark, L. A. (2006). The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP): A dimensional measure of traits relevant to personality and personality pathology. In Strack, S. (Ed.), Differentiating Normal and Abnormal Personality (2nd ed., pp. 431–450). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Simms, L. J., Goldberg, L. R., Roberts, J. E., Watson, D., Welte, J., & Rotterman, J. H. (2011). Computerized Adaptive Assessment of Personality Disorder: Introducing the CAT-PD Project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380–389.Google Scholar
Smith, S. W., Hilsenroth, M. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (2009). Convergent validity of the SWAP-200 Dependency Scales. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197, 613–618.Google Scholar
Smith, T. L., Klein, M. H., Alonson, C., Salazar-Fraile, J., Felipe-Castano, E., Moreno, C. L. et al. (2011). The Spanish Version of the Wisconsin personality Disorders Inventory-IV (WISPI-IV): Tests of Validity and Reliability. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 813–833.Google Scholar
Somwaru, D. P., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1995). Development and reliability of MMPI-2 based personality disorder scales. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Workshop and Symposium on Recent Developments in Use of the MMPI-2 & MMPI-A. St. Petersburg Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
Suzuki, T., Samuel, D. B., Pahlen, S., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as maladaptive extreme variants of the five-factor model: An item-response theory analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 343–354.Google Scholar
Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). The MMPI-2-RF Restructured Clinical Scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Turkheimer, E., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2003). Factorial structure of pathological personality traits as evaluated by peers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 1–12.Google Scholar
Trull, T. J., & Widiger, T. A. (1997). Structured Interview for the Five-Factor Model of Personality (SIFFM): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
van Kampen, D. (2002). The DAPP-BQ in the Netherlands: Factor structure and relationship with basic personality dimensions. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16(3), 235–254.Google Scholar
Verheul, R., Andrea, H., Berghout, C. C., Dolan, C., Busschbach, J. J. V., van der Kroft, P. J. A. et al. (2008). Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP-118): Development, factor structure, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 23–34.Google Scholar
Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999a). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 1: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 258–272.Google Scholar
Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999b). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part 2: Toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 273–285.Google Scholar
Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (2007). Personality diagnosis with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): Integrating clinical and statistical measurement and prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 810–822.Google Scholar
Westen, D., Shedler, J., Bradley, B., & DeFife, J. (2012). An empirically derived taxonomy for personality diagnosis: Bridging science and practice in conceptualizing personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 273–284.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A. (1993). The DSM-III-R categorical personality disorder diagnoses: A critique and an alternative. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 75–90.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Bach, B., Chmielewski, M. S., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C. G., Hopwood, C. J., et al. (in press). Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP. Journal of Personality Assessment.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Boyd, S. (2009). Personality disorders assessment instruments. In Butcher, J. N. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 336–363). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., & Clark, L. A. (2000). Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 946–963.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Sellbom, M., Chmielewski, M., Clark, L. A., DeYoung, C. G., Kotov, R. et al. (2019). Personality in a Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 77–92.Widiger, T. A., & Trull, T. J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62(2), 71–83.Google Scholar
Wright, A. G. C., & Simms, L. J. (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5, 43–54.Google Scholar
Yalch, M. M., & Hopwood, C. J. (2016). Convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity of DSM-5 traits. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 394–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yam, W. H. (2017). Examination of personality pathology across cultures: Comparisons among White, Chinese, and Indian Individuals in the United States. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Yam, W. H., & Simms, L. J. (2014). Comparing criterion- and trait-based personality disorder diagnoses in DSM-5. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 123, 802–808.Google Scholar
Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Sickel, A. E., & Yong, L. (1996). The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV). Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital.Google Scholar
Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E. et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Reliability of Axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 291–299.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J., Bohnke, J. R., Eschstruth, R., Mathews, A., Wenzel, K., & Leising, D. (2015). The latent structure of personality functioning: Investigating Criterion A from the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders in DSM-5.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 532–548.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×